Once tvs with HDMI 2.1 is mainstream, 40fps will be the new 30fps. 40fps on a 120hz display is totally fine.
Once tvs with HDMI 2.1 is mainstream, 40fps will be the new 30fps. 40fps on a 120hz display is totally fine.
Why if 30fps is just fine?anytime someone posts about how shitty 30fps is, UPVOTE it. not even reading the content, just upvote it in the hopes to get the message across to devs, etc. no 30fps!
The version with 48GB/sec bandwidth.What version of HDMI 2.1? Since all TV's from the last decade have now essentially been retroactively declared to hit HDMI 2.1 standard's.
Any HDMI connection can now be labelled as HDMI 2.1, and that's not okay
The HDMI Licensing Administrator has decreed that all HDMI sockets are now 2.1, even if they're notwww.whathifi.com
It's the other way around.You have to have brain damage to not be able to tolerate 30 fps. Is as simple as that.
So you've never enjoyed a single game that was 30FPS? Lol. StopIt's the other way around.
It takes a special breed of sperg to enjoy that choppy, chunky slow-paced framerate, where you can basically count the individual imagines in a scene.
"I'm totally fine with it". Well, congrats for having the reflexes of an octogenarian?
Well, surely NOT *because* they were 30 fps games, so trying to hold on that type of argument is beyond idiotic.So you've never enjoyed a single game that was 30FPS? Lol.
Maybe in your little walled console garden.The vast majority of AAA games have been 30. You hated them all?
Well you literally said "It takes a special breed of sperg to enjoy that choppy, chunky slow-paced framerate", so I assume you've hated every single 30FPS game ever made.Well, surely NOT *because* they were 30 fps games, so trying to hold on that type of argument is beyond idiotic.
Maybe in your little walled console garden.
Are you one of those people that leaves the motion smoothing setting on?How so
Are you one of those people that leaves the motion smoothing setting on?
It's the other way around.
It takes a special breed of sperg to enjoy that choppy, chunky slow-paced framerate, where you can basically count the individual images in a scene.
"I'm totally fine with it"/"Can't even tell the difference!". Well, congrats for having the reflexes and poor eyesight of an octogenarian?
As it's often the case: you started with a stupid assumption, so you reached a stupid conclusion.Well you literally said "It takes a special breed of sperg to enjoy that choppy, chunky slow-paced framerate", so I assume you've hated every single 30FPS game ever made.
Which is absolutely ridiculous of course
I just like to see things when the camera pans in a movie, man.Are you one of those people that leaves the motion smoothing setting on?
Holy christ the hyprbole.
Hmm.That visual leap we saw in the Matrix demo is 1000x more important/impressive than 60fps.
Then give us a choice. 60 fos 1440p or 30fps4k30fps isn't going anywhere on console because some devs like to push gfx and the sacrifice is to go 30fps.
You need a psyciatrist, not more frames.I'm playing The Last of Us Part 2 these days and my eyes are killing me! I'm trying to avoid camera movements at all costs.
I think that games i played all those years which run at 30 fps and below caused my myopia(especially, playing TES:Oblivion with 15-20 fps for more than 100 hours ). You don't believe it? Here is a literature review about screen time(use of digital devices) and myopia relation: link to scielo.br. They reviewed 9 studies with more than 100.000 participants in total. In conclusion, they can't say it's related for sure but they suspect it may has some effect on it. Maybe someone will do a study about 30 fps vs 60 fps games and their effects on eye problems in future. I think 30 fps does more damage than screen time or resolution.
I think devs should leave this old crap behind. I can handle some low resolution textures here and there. But i can't take this 30 fps bs anymore! It's not healthy at all.
PS: Great game so far btw.
Edit for necromancers: After a suggestion made on this thread 1 year ago, i learned that playing a ps4 game at 30 fps on a 75 hz monitor increases the awfulness of 30 fps. I continued to play The Last of Us 2 (which you can't play on a pc yet) on TV and it was a little more bearable. My thoughts on 30fps haven't really changed, but my frustration eased a bit.
Don't buy games that are under 60fps.
If everyone stops buying games sub 60fps, devs will eventually set that as a standard.
Then again, one is cutting down a lot of library that way.
I truly cannot play 30fps anymore. I won't. I fear some devs are going to still make it a target however. I simply won't be able to play those games if they don't offer a 60 fps option.
that was back in the day tech has grown exponentially since the days of doom quake and unreal.If we follow this reasoning PS2 and PS3 must have killed you
You'll get 30fps @ 1440p and you will like it.Then give us a choice. 60 fos 1440p or 30fps4k
Yes cause we should all think that 30 frames is smooth like what digital foundry says it is.30fps rarely bothers me that much even after a decade with 120hz+ monitors. I just spent a few hours in Rift Apart at 4k30 (having finished it in the 60fps mode last night) and it only took me a few minutes to adjust.
It still sucks by comparison but I don't find it too hard to adapt. The loss of resolution at 60fps is also very noticeable in my opinion.
Normal people enjoy the games while tolerating 30fps locks. They don't actually enjoy 30fps. It would take a special breed of sperg for that, yeah.Well you literally said "It takes a special breed of sperg to enjoy that choppy, chunky slow-paced framerate", so I assume you've hated every single 30FPS game ever made.
That means they accept mediocrity then not knowing that there are better alternatives out there we're in the 2020s not in the 2000s no more.Normal people enjoy the games while tolerating 30fps locks. They don't actually enjoy 30fps. It would take a special breed of sperg for that, yeah.
Make 120 FPS the standard in film, also.
Yeah.30fps rarely bothers me that much even after a decade with 120hz+ monitors. I just spent a few hours in Rift Apart at 4k30 (having finished it in the 60fps mode last night) and it only took me a few minutes to adjust.
It still sucks by comparison but I don't find it too hard to adapt. The loss of resolution at 60fps is also very noticeable in my opinion.
PS2 have a bigger ratio of 60fps games than PS3. Especially in racing games. PS3/360 generation had the worst frame rates after the PS1/SAT/N64 generation.If we follow this reasoning PS2 and PS3 must have killed you
Tolerating doesn't mean accepting.That means they accept mediocrity then not knowing that there are better alternatives out there we're in the 2020s not in the 2000s no more.
30fps rarely bothers me that much even after a decade with 120hz+ monitors. I just spent a few hours in Rift Apart at 4k30 (having finished it in the 60fps mode last night) and it only took me a few minutes to adjust.
It still sucks by comparison but I don't find it too hard to adapt. The loss of resolution at 60fps is also very noticeable in my opinion.
I have this issue and I would like to know if anyone else has this or if there is somebody who can explain this to me.
I'm playing demon souls on ps5 using the 60fps performance mode, but when I see video clips for the game either on the ps5 or YouTube they seem more "60fps" than when I'm playing.
Why is it?
Or they don't care. Of course if people could get higher frames they would but they can enjoy 30fps games and not care at all that it's 30fps.Normal people enjoy the games while tolerating 30fps locks. They don't actually enjoy 30fps. It would take a special breed of sperg for that, yeah.