1. October 1 - Sinister (DVR) - Worth watching
2. October 2 - Shadow of the Vampire (DVR) - Worth watching
3. October 3 - The Exorcism of Emily Rose (DVR) - Worth Watching
4. October 4 - Would You Rather (DVR) - Worth watching
5. October 5 - Excision (DVR) - Worth watching
6. October 6 - Evil Dead (2013) (DVR) - Meh
7. October 7 - Angel Heart (DVR) - Worth watching
8. October 8 - The Lords of Salem (DVR) - Meh
9. October 9 - Near Dark (DVR) - Worth watching
10. October 10 - Warm Bodies (DVR) - Worth watching
11. October 11 - Byzantium (DVR) - Meh
12. October 12 - Rare Exports: A Christmas Tale (DVR) - Meh
13.
Eraserhead (1977) (DVR)
Ive loved James Camerons
Aliens from the first time I saw it. It was scary (but not too scary for my prepubescent self). It had action. It had immensely quotable dialogue. Time passed, and at the bare minimum Id get at least the joy of watching a good film whenever I find it showing randomly on a cable television channel.
The image that impressed itself onto my young brain was the Alien Queens assault on Bishop on the Sulaco. The tail run through his chest, the milk white blood pouring from his mouth, the Queen tearing Bishop in two with its claws: that part of that scene stayed with me from the start. When I was younger, the more visceral horror of Aliens was particularly effective. As Ive gotten older, its the conceptual horror of the Xenomorph, in particular the invasive body horror that targets our unconscious fears about our own reproductive processes, that haunts me. In parenthood, theres no one to hear you scream.
Even if Jack Nance, the protagonist of David Lynchs
Eraserhead, wanted to scream out his anger, fear, frustration, confusion, Im not sure anyone would be able to hear him over the pervasive sound, the industrial groaning and nervous background white noise that seeps from every corner of his world. The hissing, crashing, and groaning should be a sign, much like a babys cry, that something is wrong. But Nance cant figure it; hes barely motivated enough to take care of his baby, much less solve the worlds problems.
As critics and David Lynch historians have discussed,
Eraserhead explored Lynchs own fears about becoming a parent, specifically a parent of a child who was born with special needs. Eraserhead brought back the sense of panic about figuring out what this screaming bag of meat that left the womb biologically nine months too early wants even though its incapable of communicating its needs, much less its desires, the frustration born from sleep deprivation, the irrational anger at the partner who can be so easily blamed for bringing the troubles of parenthood to your life, and the confusion about the choice to be bound sexually and emotionally to another person for the rest of your life when other sexual partners look so inviting and free of trouble.
Lynchs ambivalence about the United States and escapism that are embedded in his later works have their foundation in
Eraserhead as well, and you can see the beginnings of images from his later works here. The Velvet room and the opera scene from
Mulholland Drive can trace their lineage to the Woman in the Radiators performance in
Eraserhead. Mary X is the first of Lynchs blondes. Nance tries to find escape from the world with his neighbor, the Beautiful Girl Across the Hall, and by watching the Lady in the Radiators performance while lying on his bed in his one bedroom apartment, much like Diane tried to escape the ugly truth in fantasy in
Mulholland Drive, but the only way he can find peace is by murdering his child, which brings an end to his world.
Id argue that this is Lynchs masterpiece, a masterfully crafted and profoundly personal film. Lynchs surrealist tendencies hadnt overwhelmed his storytelling yet, and it has a passion that his other films, other than
The Straight Story, lack.
14.
Dark Skies (2013) (DVR)
Last year, I watched
Fire in the Sky as a part of the marathon, and it made a great alien abduction panic combo with the Slumber Party Alien Abduction segment of
V/H/S 2. After watching
Dark Skies, I wish that I had stuck to the original plan to watch
Alien Abduction: Incident in Lake County instead.
Dark Skies is a serviceable alien abduction horror film, but it lacks any remarkably scary moments. It felt tame, and it felt like a wasted opportunity.
I appreciate that
Dark Skies plays closer to a supernatural ghost haunting film, using some of the same faerie tricks (taking food from the refrigerator, stacking things in the kitchen, mysteriously triggered perimeter alarms, distortion of electronic surveillance equipment) that films like
Paranormal Activity used to build the tension and show that things are amiss in the household of Daniel (Josh Hamilton) and Lacy (Keri Russell) Barrett, than an alien abduction film like
Fire in the Sky. It borrowed a scare from The Birds. It even featured Daniel examining the surveillance footage frame by frame in order to find the invaders of his home, much like the protagonist in
Paranormal Activity. The film felt like it had very little new to say.
It also features a huge info dump from J.K. Simmons conspiracy theorist/alien abductee about 2/3 of the way through the film in order to set up the final siege scene. Then, the director decides to skip showing most of that siege scene, which seemed like a curious decision. The film had built to this confrontation between the family and the invaders. Instead, the film switches focus from the Daniel and Lacy to their sons to try to arrive at an emotional conclusion that seemed wrong for the film that director/writer Scott Stewart had created.
Throughout the film, Daniels unemployment creates tension with Lacy, which then seeps into his interactions with his sons and neighbors. Hes clearly ashamed by his inability to find a job. This had great emotional potential, and Keri Russell plays Lacys frustration about Daniel lying to her about getting a job and her joy when Daniel actually does get a job in an overall strong, committed performance. Similarly, Simmons makes the most of his limited role as an exposition machine. But the films conclusion hinges on a deep feeling of estrangement between Daniel and his eldest son, Jesse, that isnt explained by the inciting incident of their relationships rupture that we see in the film.
Besides providing an exposition dump, Simmonss character also blatantly spells out Stewarts theme of family unity in the face of hard times to Daniel and the audience. I can see how Stewart tried to use the alien abduction and home invasion as the crucible by which the family can gain strength, but the film then puts that idea down with Simmonss fatigue and fatalism and its own ending. The family put aside its differences, which werent very well explored, to come together against the unknowable threat from the outside. The ultimately fail to keep the family together against that threat, which seemed an unearned twist.
The more I think about
Dark Skies, the more I feel a sense of regret about how it wasted its potential.
15.
The Purge (2013) (DVR)
The Purge writes a check for suspension of disbelief that it cant cash. It takes cinematic shortcuts to posit the idea that humans are naturally aggressive, almost as though were tainted with an Original Sin, and that we must purge ourselves of this sin by acting out against our fellow man. The film tries to detach crime from poverty, from mental illness, from desperation born from chemical addiction, which is nonsense. It points to the characters who suppressed their animalistic urges to hurt and kill as survivors worthy of admiration to give the film a sense of moral grounding, but it doesnt actually make a case for why their morality is superior to the masked killers who hunt the homeless on Purge Night for thrills or their neighbors who want to kill the protagonists out of jealousy. It leaves us to project our morality onto the characters and their actions, which feels like an incomplete dialogue.
The world is drawn in just enough to inspire questions. How does the government treat citizens like the Sandin family who barricade themselves against the outside world and refuse to participate in Purge Night? The government clearly believes in the cathartic (or economic) effects of Purge Night, but the movie effectively divides American citizens between those who kill and those who wont. Do the people who refrain from killing (or committing other crimes) on Purge Night judge those who participated during the rest of the year? Do those who kill judge those who refrained and find them to be disloyal or weak? Killing is the shortcut, but the film makes a point that all crime is legal on Purge Night. One can assume that rapes are committed on Purge Night. What happens to children conceived from rape? If a citizen fires a bullet at one second before Purge Night ends and the bullet hits the intended victim after Purge Night has ended, is the shooter charged with a crime? How do religious authorities, particularly the Christian denominations, reconcile the governments directive of Purge Night with their doctrines and prohibitions against killing? The writer chose to set the film in the United States in a specific time (2022), which opens the film to scrutiny. Unfortunately, the dystopia the movie presents doesnt stand up to examination.
Jason Blum,
The Purges producer, claimed that his production company is in the business of making
scary movies, not political movies. But if theres a political message baked into [the film], I wont turn it down. Despite his claim,
The Purge is inherently a political film, from its premise to the flavor sprinkled throughout the film to provide context. Talk radio commentators wonder whether Purge Night is secretly designed to exterminate all non-contributing members of society. They discuss how the real victims are the poor who cant afford to protect themselves. The leader of the gang that laid siege on the Sandins home refers to his partners as the haves and their intended homeless victim as filthy swine and social parasite. They claim their right to kill based on what they think of as inherent superiority by din of their higher economic standing.
And we havent even touched on the fact that film positions these white, rich, young masked killers to be hunters of a black homeless man.
Politics and racial dynamics aside, the films creators tell their tale clumsily. The filmmakers mistake taking shortcuts for brevity. Were not given sufficient time or context to gain a sense of James Sandin, played by Ethan Hawke, or Jamess son, Charlie, played by Max Burkholder. When Charlie deactivates the security system to let the unnamed homeless stranger into his home, its unclear why other than the fact that the plot necessitated it. The story of Jamess daughters boyfriend, who tries to assert his right to date the Sandin girl, Zoey, played by Adelaide Kane, above her fathers objections by pointing a gun at him on Purge Night goes nowhere; Zoey doesnt seem particularly traumatized by the fact that her father killed her boyfriend. The unnamed homeless stranger who is provided refuge in the Sandins home goes missing for most of the film; were given no reason to root for his survival at the cost of the Sandins safety other than the biases that we bring to the film. When James decides to fight, his wife, Mary, played by Lena Headey, is not asked for her opinion even though shell have to take up arms against the masked killers who will invade their home. In fact, Mary could probably be extracted from the film altogether without dramatically changing the film; its a waste of Headey, who plays steely women so well. Furthermore, the film doesnt explore Jamess motivation to fight. He says to Mary that they have to fight to protect their home. But did he choose because he believed in the castle doctrine, or did he choose because he couldnt bring himself to give the unnamed homeless stranger, bound and subdued by the Sandins at this point, to the mob? Its a clumsy take on material explored by Peckinpah in
Straw Dogs.
The handheld cameras shakiness obscures our view of almost everything, which brings us to the inherent contradiction of the film. No one can deny that
The Purge is a genre film, slotted somewhere between
Assault on Precinct 13 and
Straw Dogs. The viewers are invited to root for the Sandins as they kill the masked invaders in spectacularly violent ways. Yet the film ends by asserting that the best thing for people is to repress their irrepressible violent tendencies, though releasing those tendencies has apparently brought the country safety and economic prosperity. So why should we repress those tendencies other than a sense of goodness, which means little when the film also asserts that people are inherently violent?
The Purge frustrated me. A tweak of the premise, perhaps by choosing not to set the film in the United States in the near future, could at least dampen questions about its world-building. The premise is still interesting; its the idea of boisterous celebration, overturning social conventions, and debauchery before periods of penance and confession writ large. As a film of plot and character motivations, it feels half-baked, and it relies on the audiences own biases and opinions to make itself work, rather than holding a conversation with the audience as
Funny Games, for example, does.
16.
Teeth (2007) (DVR)
I thought this was cleverly tongue-in-cheek, horrifying, and wince-inducing at the same time. The movie begins with a pair of atomic power plant silos rising above the town like a great, heaving, life-creating and life-destroying bosom. The camera then tilts down to see an all-American nuclear family, only its a blended family. The idea of the nuclear family and the specter of nuclear power haunt this film; every so often, the film reminds us of radiations power to mutate, which ties into the general teenage anxiety about the changes to our bodies and ourselves.
Nuclear power is tied to the town and to the family of Bill, his son Brad, Kim, and her daughter Dawn. Kims developed cancer, and no one in the film explicitly blames the nuclear plant. But the film makes the judgment for us by reminding us periodically of the plants presence.
Pheromones, like radiation, cant be detected by our naked senses; the town is equally covered by both. Dawn is committed to maintaining her purity, which she defines by chastity, in the face of hormone driven temptation. She characterizes her virginity as the most precious gift of all, but she discovers that its a target; the Promise Ring she wears just marks her as a prize or the subject of a bet.
Dawn eventually realizes the powers of her developing body despite the towns male hierarchys best attempts to keep her and everyone else in the dark about something as fundamental as female reproductive anatomy. The schools textbooks cover anatomical drawings of the vagina with a gold sticker; the biology teacher stumbles over even saying the words vagina or vulva and expresses approval of the towns initiative to keep its teenagers pure by withholding knowledge from them; Dawns first gynecologist is a man, who exploits his profession by sexually assaulting women.
Writer-director Mitchell Lichtenstein straddles the line between horror and satire skillfully, shifting and pivoting from one sensibility to the other and getting the balance mostly just right. It depicts the men who try to take advantage of Dawn as getting what they deserve; the films
Carrie mixed with
Reefer Madness with a touch of
I Spit on Your Grave. Its probably the smartest horror film next to
Eraserhead Ive seen so far this year.