• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Alan Wake - The First 12 Minutes (German)

Rat Salad said:
Are you mocking? Because your sympathy comes off as a lame troll man.
:lol

I think he's just summing up brain_stew's posts in the thread. :lol

bj00rn_ said:
Yeah, you're right. My apologies, I think I had daxter01 (Which for some reason won't post the source of the pics) in mind when I wrote that post.

:)
 
If the game looked that blurry you'd think at least one preview would have mentioned it. They all pretty much gushed over the graphics.
 
WickedLaharl said:
if not for the 4xAA it would look just about as bad as the battle sequences in SO4.

which is to say that it looks terrible. all those fancy lighting effects lost in a blurry mess.

what a shame :(
yeah it's a waste really. why bother putting all those details in the scene and then bury them all under a blurry mess. I don't know why they chose this but it's really surprising considering Remedy's long history with PC games. I would rather play a game on medium setting at higher resolution than maximum setting at very low resolution. what's the point of all the extra details when you can't see them? Resolution is the last thing you want to sacrifice in 3D graphics, high resolution has far more impact on image quality than say HDR or lighting or shadows since all the buzz about HD content and HDTVs etc when they first introduced. There is a reason why 720p is considered HD, because it can contain enough information to look sharp, detailed and impressive enough to human eyes. I will play the game anyway but I had higher expectations after all these years. I'm very disappointed that all they've showed so far were bullshots. I hope the game delivers, visually I've played far better games on 360. this is not very special to be honest.
 
JaseC said:
I think he's just summing up brain_stew's posts in the thread. :lol



:)


Whatever i guess. It just came off sounding like some weak taunt towards people looking forward to the game. Hopefully we get better screens as the game nears release. Abit too blury even for SD standards,no?
 
JaseC said:
I honestly have no idea how can you look at those blurry, detail-lacking screenshots above and say they look "amazing" for a big-budget Xbox 360 game releasing mid-2010 (well, close enough to it).
I don't know what that has to do with it, I just look at what I see and I think it looks amazing.
That shot of the lumberjack? "Blurry, detail-lacking". Really?

But whatever, I've never been able to understand this board when it comes to all the graphics nitpicking. I didn't even know Halo 3 was supposed to be a "jaggy mess" until I started reading Halo threads more closely.
 
I'm glad they finally gave us an answer. So the game is rendered subHD to facilitate all the various layers of postprocessing, which is fine by me. Light, darkness and mood play a key role in the gameplay so the game would fall into pieces if it didn't have all the postprocessing. An example of that would be this

No postprocessing

Watch-Alan-Wakes-Look-Evolve-.jpg


Various layers of PP included

Watch-Alan-Wakes-Look-Evolve-.jpg
 
WickedLaharl said:
if not for the 4xAA it would look just about as bad as the battle sequences in SO4.

which is to say that it looks terrible. all those fancy lighting effects lost in a blurry mess.

what a shame :(

SO4 battles were 490p or so, how was AW look that bad? :lol

And SO4 engine was a mess, sub-HD or not.
 
WickedLaharl said:
if not for the 4xAA it would look just about as bad as the battle sequences in SO4.

which is to say that it looks terrible. all those fancy lighting effects lost in a blurry mess.

what a shame :(

Well I recently played SO4 at a friend's house and yeah the battle sequences were really blurry with a lot of jaggies, on the other hand having played Conviction yesterday a game which also runs at sub-HD (1024x576 w/2xAA) looks really sharp upscaled at 1080p on my set with 1:1 pixel mapping - looks almost like a 720p game with no AA which was what I thought when I played the demo before the pixel-counts appeared.

My point is that after the latest videos of AW we've seen where it definitely look good and of course blim's very positive impressions there is a chance that AW will not look like a blurry mess...I'm sure the 4xAA and the excellent upscaling of the 360 will help a lot.
 
nilam01 said:
No postprocessing

http://cache.g4tv.com/ImageDb3/190071_S/Watch-Alan-Wakes-Look-Evolve-.jpg[IMG]

Various layers of PP included

[IMG]http://cache.g4tv.com/ImageDb3/190069_S/Watch-Alan-Wakes-Look-Evolve-.jpg[IMG][/QUOTE]

Ah, finally something interesting. Thanks for posting those.
 
pringles said:
I don't know what that has to do with it,

My point is they've had the resources to make this a fantastic-looking game, and have even talked about how it is so, but those screenshots would suggest otherwise. (As I implied in one of my earlier posts, however, the game does look better in the videos).

I just look at what I see and I think it looks amazing.

Fair enough. I wasn't trying to convince you otherwise, just emphatically disagreeing.

That shot of the lumberjack? "Blurry, detail-lacking". Really?

Absolutely.

But whatever, I've never been able to understand this board when it comes to all the graphics nitpicking. I didn't even know Halo 3 was supposed to be a "jaggy mess" until I started reading Halo threads more closely.

That shouldn't be surprising considering the game completely lacks AA.

Rat Salad said:
Whatever i guess. It just came off sounding like some weak taunt towards people looking forward to the game.

Despite the similarities, I was kidding :lol
 
Azerach said:
It's lacking some shadows, thats one of the reasons why it looks off. Most notably there should be shadows casting from the register and the small stand in front of the flashlight.

I brought this issue up earlier in the thread. It seems many large and rather obvious objects have no shadows which tends to become more glaring the more you see them in relation to the few objects that do have those dynamic shadows like the enemies
 
JaggedSac said:
So they combine a lot of separate renders into one 720p buffer. How is that subHD?

Some people decided it was sub-HD period, no matter how many times Remedy says it's not. Also, didn't you get the memo ? Game looks horrible now.
Can't wait for the reviews to confirm that it's indeed one of the best looking games on console. At least haters won't ruin the official thread if it's the case.
 
WickedLaharl said:
has there been any official videos or screenshots released that are not purposely misleading? i haven't been able to find any.

how can a video of the game play (not cutscene) be purposely misleading ?
 
LordPhoque said:
Some people decided it was sub-HD period, no matter how many times Remedy says it's not. Also, didn't you get the memo ? Game looks horrible now.
Can't wait for the reviews to confirm that it's indeed one of the best looking games on console. At least haters won't ruin the official thread if it's the case.

Because if a reviewer says it, it has to be true. I wonder if Alan Wake will have an "Oscar Caliber story" like Grand Theft Auto 4?

I find the differences between the cut scenes and the gameplay a little jarring. I feel like the more seamless a game is visually between the cutscenes and the gameplay, the more cinematic a game feels. In this regard, Alan Wake reminds me of Resident Evil 5 than it does some other games that are better at pulling this off.
 
Shurs said:
Because if a reviewer says it, it has to be true. I wonder if Alan Wake will have an "Oscar Caliber story" like Grand Theft Auto 4?

When it comes to the graphics, reviewers are generally right. Actually it's already possible to see that the game is one of the best looking ones to come out this year just by looking at the gameplay videos.
You were not complaining about reviews praising the graphics of UC2, right ?
 
LordPhoque said:
Some people decided it was sub-HD period, no matter how many times Remedy says it's not.

Ok, I thought there were people who actually had knowledge of the resolutions of all the various render targets that Remedy is using and combining into the 720p image.
 
LordPhoque said:
When it comes to the graphics, reviewers are generally right. Actually it's already possible to see that the game is one of the best looking ones to come out this year just by looking at the gameplay videos.
You were not complaining about reviews praising the graphics of UC2, right ?

Great review on other systems = bribes.

Great review on one's system of choice = Pulitzer-worthy game journalism / truth revealed to the masses. :lol
 
LordPhoque said:
When it comes to the graphics, reviewers are generally right. Actually it's already possible to see that the game is one of the best looking ones to come out this year just by looking at the gameplay videos.
You were not complaining about reviews praising the graphics of UC2, right ?

I wasn't one of the ones complaining about sub-perfect 10 scores for Uncharted 2's graphics. The game wasn't without its flaws. For example, the eye shine on some of the characters was distracting. Let's be clear though, I do feel Uncharted 2 is a visual step above Alan Wake. I think I'll leave it at that for now.
 
This is just sad. Remedy has achieved some other nice graphical features with this game and it now all goes by the board because it is lacking resolution. Let alone the gameplay and narrative, which seems great.
 
derFeef said:
This is just sad. Remedy has achieved some other nice graphical features with this game and it now all goes by the board because it is lacking resolution. Let alone the gameplay and narrative, which seems great.

What, if I may ask, seems "great" about it?
 
silenthill1979 said:
Poor Remedy, I'm sure they are reading these posts and are disappointed about the negative resonance. People should appreciate the work of 5 years...

You're right. If they are reading these comments across the different forums, some at Remedy will be dissapointed, while others will be mad because they anticipated the backslash generated by some of their tech decisions. Every sacrifice in resolution to gain some post-process effect would have been discussed among them.

If something is to be learned from the GAF reaction to Halo 3 is never, EVER, sacrifice resolution or anti-aliasing to better image/light effects. All the HDR, double buffer, lighting-engine generated little positive feedback compared to the sub-HD, no AA backslash.
 
daxter01 said:
there is noway game is this blury, something is wrong with these pics,i mean come on look at this one
4534391384_be739de565_o.jpg

Definitely upscaled. At 4xmsaa and 540p upscaling, in motion instead of blown up jagged edges, you get blown up smoother-ed edges. The msaa will end up a bit of a waste. msaa works better together with higher resolution.

Can try it with a PC game, let ATI/Nvidia driver upscale to 1080p a low resolution, you will see what i meant.
 
Shurs said:
What, if I may ask, seems "great" about it?
It just clicks on me watching those videos. Can not tell you exactly why but it looks like fun to play and has an interesting story. This is my personal opinion of course.
 
Shurs said:
I wasn't one of the ones complaining about sub-perfect 10 scores for Uncharted 2's graphics. The game wasn't without its flaws. For example, the eye shine on some of the characters was distracting. Let's be clear though, I do feel Uncharted 2 is a visual step above Alan Wake. I think I'll leave it at that for now.
But of course you would. Do you reallty think anybody on this forum would take your opinion of an Xbox 360 exclusive seriously? I know I sure wouldn't.
 
Qwerty710710 said:
too bad it's the truth no other game on any console comes close.
stop trolling man. Why do you want to get banned? Just put an IMO, dont come out as if you're speaking a fact, its subjective and it will be better if you say so, so that you dont seem trolling.
 
EagleEyes said:
But of course you would. Do you reallty think anybody on this forum would take your opinion of an Xbox 360 exclusive seriously? I know I sure wouldn't.

I think Mass Effect 2 looks like a fantastic game. I assume the Left 4 Dead series is fantastic. I think Banjo N&B is a great looking game. XBLA has a better 2009 than PSN and that has continued into 2010.
 
Dabanton said:
Shurs man you're really concerned for this game. :lol

You have the second most posts in this thread and you don't even have an 360?!

I just thought we could, you know, discuss the game in more than single sentences. Alan Wake was a title that I have interest in, which is rare for a 360 title. You won't notice me in many 360 exclusive threads.
 
I find it a little sad that all the previous AW thread with trailers and stuff got like 100-300 posts but then someone mentions the magic word sub-HD and bam, 1300 replies.
 
Umm why does that salsa member have that avatar?? It looks like goatse or something :(

By the way, WickedLaharl, you really sound like a broken record. We got it the first time, you are disappointed and think it's a travesty the devs lied.
 
Shurs said:
I just thought we could, you know, discuss the game in more than single sentences. Alan Wake was a title that I have interest in, which is rare for a 360 title. You won't notice me in many 360 exclusive threads.

You have a weird way of showing your 'interest' ... if you can't even answer the question 'What's seems so great about it' yourself.
 
Dabanton said:
Shurs man you're really concerned for this game. :lol

You have the second most posts in this thread and you don't even have an 360?!

Trolls can't be bargained with. Trolls can't be reasoned with. Trolls don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear. And they absolutely will not stop, ever, until you admit Allan Wake is shit.
 
Shurs said:
I think Mass Effect 2 looks like a fantastic game. I assume the Left 4 Dead series is fantastic. I think Banjo N&B is a great looking game. XBLA has a better 2009 than PSN and that has continued into 2010.
So what. I'm more of an Xbox fan but I love Uncharted, Resistance and Ratchet. The bottom line is you seem desperate to try and make Alan Wake look as bad as possible and it started with last weeks trailer. It just looks silly.
 
Top Bottom