That's dumb and for poor people.
6800XT begs to differ.
I have a 6800XT and it runs most games at 4K and 60 fps at ultra settings. Saying it is a shit card is false and a bad take.
Ray Tracing still isn't even in a state where it matters all that much. Rasterization is still king(which the 6800xt and 6900xt are beasts at). So if anything, AMD is good where it counts the most.
Me too, but they're all doing it at jacked-up prices.
There are gazillions of games releasing on pc only. If you care about only AAA, your loss.
Bill O'Rights
Including RT on? Metro, Watch Dogs, Control, etc???
Let's not.Is GPU warring ok?
No there are many many more games than those. Right now I ran Tales of Arise buttery smooth in 4K @ 60fps at highest settings. Not being able to run RT doesnt mean it is shit. Get some perspective.
It is just people fanboying for team green. They have no real perspective or actual understanding of how the whole thing works. Most of the time people won't even know what rasterization is. For example:
Consumer always loses in this market. It is a hit for AMD cause you can literally throw a turd out and it will sell out. This is why Nvidia is in the process of rereleasing the 2060 super with more RAM.... because they can and they know it will sell out. Everyone is making huge dough and Intel is coming out really late on this train cause if Ethereums plans eventually come into play. The market will certainly drop.
My perspective is if not ALSO good for RT/RTX (and DLSS or equivalent) in 2021/almost 2022, the card does not even exist, so even less than "shit".
As someone who owned a 3060 Ti and upgraded to a 6800 XT I respectfully say, you's a damn lie.
This is actually not a bad idea, still plenty of time to mine with it during downtime to get >50% of its cost back. The weird thing about it though is there's actually very few 3090s out there, at least in Europe.
The RDNA 2.0 cards are actually on par if not better at standard rasterization compared to their Nvidia counterparts. yes the 6600xt sucks but 6700xt is actually not half bad.Why would you even buy Radeon GPU, it's beyond me. You get so much more with team green.
Is GPU warring ok?
I think the problem is that Radeon cards are just good at one thing. Rasterizing shit in games, meanwhile when you buy nVidia, you can easily mined back the price of the card, it will help you with productive work, you have CUDA, you have DLSS, etc.
Yep you nailed it. Also you forgot to mention the FSR(AMD's answer to DLSS) exists and in a grander sense it is better for the gaming community. Especially since it is not hardware locked to create exclusivity. Nvidia cards including "legacy" 900 series also get the benefit of FSR. DLSS 2.0 as a whole is a more polished software since it performs great in all of it's settings. Where FSR is only really good in Ultra Quality and is acceptable in Quality. The problem with this upscaling tech is that there is still shimmering that occurs from the inherent nature but Nvidia's DLAA is the real game changer that is people aren't talking about as much. AMD is on par with Nvidia and sometimes even better when it comes to rasterization. I just think most people are just so bought into the years of AMD failing to catch up.
In my post above AMD does offer an answer to DLSS. They were just late to the plate but it exists in games and is getting more releases just as DLSS has. Deathloop and Back 4 Blood have FSR and it isn't locked to AMD only GPUs.
FSR isn't in any shape or form substitute for DLSS...
I suppose that is your opinion. Been watching a ton of content comparing the two technologies. Fanboying for either team is just eyerolling. Especially when they clearly are taking advantage of the current market as much as they can.
