AbsoluteZero
Banned
aparisi2274 said:You know, with the amount of real stunt work being performed on this movie, I can't believe there hasn't been a serious accident.
How's that broadway show coming along, by the way?
aparisi2274 said:You know, with the amount of real stunt work being performed on this movie, I can't believe there hasn't been a serious accident.
AbsoluteZero said:How's that broadway show coming along, by the way?
aparisi2274 said:You know, with the amount of real stunt work being performed on this movie, I can't believe there hasn't been a serious accident.
Expendable, real professionals!Extollere said:Unlike Spider-Man Turn Off The Dark, they probably actually have real professionals working their rigs![]()
Blader5489 said:No, Sony still owns Spider-Man and Ghost Rider, and Fox still owns X-Men, Daredevil, and Fantastic Four. Everything else is now back under Marvel's umbrella and so they can start producing their own movies in-house (outside of the five I just mentioned).
Marvel sold the movie rights to all their properties to other studios back in the 90s, but most of those projects stalled in development hell, so the contracts expired and properties like Iron Man, Thor, Nick Fury, etc. reverted back to Marvel. Sony and Fox are the only exceptions because they keep putting new films out, which renews their contracts and allows them to hold onto their franchises.
Anth0ny said:So basically, Marvel will never get the rights back until Sony/Fox stops making those movies?
Which is never?
Damn it, I love the crossovers Marvel does with their properties. I'm hyped for Avengers. If they can get Spidey and X-Men back, shit would be god like. Civil War film? Hell yes.
Stunt work happens all the time, there is a reason people make careers out of them. The difference here is everything is getting leaked so you are getting a view you're not supposed to, or are designed to be seen...aparisi2274 said:You know, with the amount of real stunt work being performed on this movie, I can't believe there hasn't been a serious accident.
Anastacio said:From the filming yesterday. It's thescene."death of uncle Ben"
Peter sitting under a bridge:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rVWnv81bPs
The hell mayne? You didn't say which movie and I highlighted the spoiler. I HATE YOU.SolKane said:Movie spoiler:
Peter Parker is Spider-Man.
Norton is also working on "The Amazing Spider-Man," stating that the film has a $220 million budget.
Anth0ny said:So basically, Marvel will never get the rights back until Sony/Fox stops making those movies?
Which is never?
Damn it, I love the crossovers Marvel does with their properties. I'm hyped for Avengers. If they can get Spidey and X-Men back, shit would be god like. Civil War film? Hell yes.
Because then they'll have to share the spoils 50/50? Sony/Fox will never agree to share their cash cow with anyone. Warner right now trying to wiggle themselves out of 50/50 contract with Legendary Pictures.neorej said:I'm not ENTIRELY sure, but it's not impossible for the three studios to come to a mutual beneficial agreement which will result in a X-Men, Spider-Man, Avengers, Fantastic Four crossover-movie. The HALO-movie had two studios working together to cough up the dough, why wouldn't Sony, Fox and Disney come a similar agreement?
Dead said:Uhh
http://www.worstpreviews.com/headline.php?id=21675&count=0
The wording is kind of wierd, considering the article's subject, but...
_dementia said:$220 million is ridiculous.
Agreed, $220 million is like what Batman 3 will cost.Salvor.Hardin said:That's odd. Last year it was said that the budget would be in the $80 million range. And from the filming that's what it looks like. I seriously doubt the $220 mn figure.
I'd love to see someone write a screenplay for all those characters for a 3 hour movie that didn't cost 400 million dollars. Logistically impossible unless you loaded the cast with nobodies and/or centered it on one team.neorej said:I'm not ENTIRELY sure, but it's not impossible for the three studios to come to a mutual beneficial agreement which will result in a X-Men, Spider-Man, Avengers, Fantastic Four crossover-movie. The HALO-movie had two studios working together to cough up the dough, why wouldn't Sony, Fox and Disney come a similar agreement?
50 mil for that? I'd do it with my mouth.DoctorWho said:$50 mill to the guy who has to clean his crotch in post.
_dementia said:$220 million is ridiculous.
M.D said:I'm sure at one point I read that Avatar had the highest movie budget of all time so that must have been a mistake or wiki figures are wrong..
But that was one of the reasons not to do a direct sequel to SM3. New director, new lead actor, lower costs.jett said:Sounds like your average summer blockbuster to me. People really thought it was gonna cost 80? lolz.
brotkasten said:But that was one of the reasons not to do a direct sequel to SM3. New director, new lead actor, lower costs.
And we got great stunt people there who do parkour, who do skateboarding, and they were teaching Andrew Garfield certain elements of that. And certain elements you wouldnt miss him doing. You know, $200 million is resting on his shoulders, so it would be totally impractical to put him in every situation but hes in as many situations as well allow him to be.
Messypandas said:not surprising. this is shooting on location in New York right? That shit cost clams, yo
_dementia said:$220 million is ridiculous.
M.D said:Official Logo and Poster
![]()
![]()
Blader5489 said:Those are fake.
How can it be official? This isn't a Marvel Studios movie...PhoncipleBone said:Official, sadly.
PhoncipleBone said:Official, sadly. Well, the Marvel Studios thing is pretty suspect. As is the "in July" part.