• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

"Anonymous" Vs Scientology : FIGHT

Status
Not open for further replies.

deadhorse32

Bad Art ™
"Anonymous" releases statements outlining "War on Scientology"

January 23, 2008


The Internet-based group "Anonymous" has released statements on YouTube and via a press release, outlining what they call a "War on Scientology". Church of Scientology related websites, such as religiousfreedomwatch.org have been removed due to a suspected distributed denial-of-service-attack (DDoS) by a group calling themselves "Anonymous". On Friday, the same group allegedly brought down Scientology's main website, scientology.org, which was available sporadically throughout the weekend.

Several websites relating to the Church of Scientology have been slowed down, brought to a complete halt or seemingly removed from the Internet completely in an attack which seems to be continuous. The scientology.org site was back online briefly on Monday, and is currently loading slowly.

On Monday, the group released a video titled: "Message to Scientology" on YouTube concerning their intentions to attack the Church of Scientology. A robotic voice on the video begins with "Hello leaders of Scientology. We are Anonymous," and continues by explaining their motivations: "Over the years we have been watching you, your campaigns of misinformation, your suppression of dissent and your litigious nature. All of these things have caught our eye. With the leakage of your latest propaganda video into mainstream circulation the extent of your malign influence over those who have come to trust you as leaders has been made clear to us. Anonymous has therefore decided that your organisation should be destroyed." The message goes on to state that the group intends to "expel Scientology from the Internet". As of Wednesday, the video had been viewed 370,347 times, favorited 2,473 times, and is currently YouTube's top third video of the day.

The "Message to Scientology" video was highlighted as the "YouTube Video of the Week" by The Michigan Daily. Commenting on the video, the piece states "if this video is any indication, it seems like the assailants mean business". In a blog post on USA Today's website, Jess Zielinski wrote that it was "not a shock that hackers hold a grudge against Scientology," and in a followup post on another USA Today blog, Angela Gunn wrote that "those of us who remember ... the adventures of Operation Clambake are fascinated to see this kind of thing flare up again". Blogging for Wired magazine, Ryan Singel wrote about the incident in a piece on Wednesay titled "War Breaks Out Between Hackers and Scientology -- There Can Be Only One". Singel wrote that the Project Chanology wiki page "directs Anonymous members to download and use denial of service software, make prank calls, host Scientology documents the Church considers proprietary, and fax endless loops of black pages to the Church's fax machines to waste ink". According to Wired, "The Church of Scientology did not immediately respond to a call for comment".

The viewpoints expressed in the video are echoed on the "Project Chanology" website, an open source of information and direction for those within Anonymous, which talks of tactics such as blackfaxing and prank calling alongside other "real-life" methods of attack. The satirical website Encyclopedia Dramatica also has a similar page devoted to "Project Chanology".

"Anonymous" released a statement on Monday in the form of a press release, "Internet Group Anonymous Declares "War on Scientology": "Anonymous" are fighting the Church of Scientology and the Religious Technology Center". In the statement, the group explained their goal as safeguarding the right to freedom of speech "A spokesperson said that the group's goals include bringing an end to the financial exploitation of Church members and protecting the right to free speech, a right which they claim was consistently violated by the Church of Scientology in pursuit of its opponents." The press release also claimed that the Church of Scientology misused copyright and trademark law in order to remove criticism from websites including Digg and YouTube. The statement goes on to assert that the attacks from the group "will continue until the Church of Scientology reacts, at which point they will change strategy".

The attack was reportedly motivated by the Church of Scientology's attempts to remove a promotional video featuring Scientologist Tom Cruise from YouTube. After the Church of Scientology lodged a copyright infringement complaint with YouTube, the site took down the video. The Tom Cruise video is still available on Gawker.com, which has stated it will not remove the video "It's newsworthy, and we will not be removing it."

Gawker.com discussed the actions of the "Anonymous" group, in a post on Monday titled "Scientology vs. the Internet: Why Kids On The Internet Are Scientology's Most Powerful Enemy". Gawker.com briefly outlined actions of other anonymous users critical of Scientology, including actions taken in the past by users of YouTube, Digg, and YTMND "This isn't the only group of Internet users unafraid of the intimidating cult; a whole range of sites has turned the Church into a mockery by doing what mainstream celebrity-coverage outlets wouldn't dare."

A poster on the newsgroup alt.religion.scientology (a.r.s.) was critical of the actions by the "Anonymous" group. In a post titled "Open Letter to Anonymous" Jeff Jacobsen, webmaster of lisamcpherson.org, posting as "cultxpt" wrote that "It's understandable that people get upset over the things the Church of Scientology has done online and off", pointing out that the Church of Scientology had "tried to shut down a.r.s.", and "spam our newsgroup to this day". In 1999 "sporgery", a form of nonsensical spam tactic, was used as an attempt to disrupt discussion on the newsgroup. Previously in 1995 Helena Kobrin, an attorney for the Church of Scientology, attempted to remove the a.r.s. group from Usenet. Kobrin sent a rmgroup message which stated: "We have requested that the alt.religion.scientology newsgroup be removed from all sites". This later led to a declaration of war by the hacker group Cult of the Dead Cow, and an increase in popularity of the a.r.s site. This initial conflict came to be known as "Scientology versus the Internet".

The post from Jacobsen went on to criticize the actions of the "Anonymous" group, stating: "We're supposed to be the good people," and stated that contrary to the Anonymous group's tactics, "Our weapons as critics are reason, evidence, argument, and free speech".

On Tuesday, the founder of Operation Clambake, a non-profit organization and website critical of Scientology based in Stavanger, Norway, released a statement about the attacks by "Anonymous". Andreas Heldal-Lund was critical of the "Anonymous" groups actions, stating: "The author of Operation Clambake does not condone such activity. Attacking Scientology like that will just make them play the religious persecution card. They will use it to defend their own counter actions when they try to shatter criticism and crush critics without mercy." Heldal-Lund went on to emphasize the right of all people and organizations to freedom of speech - including the Church of Scientology: "Freedom of speech means we need to allow all to speak - including those we strongly disagree with. I am of the opinion that the Church of Scientology is a criminal organisation and a cult which is designed by its delusional founder to abuse people. I am still committed to fight for their right to speak their opinion."

http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/"Anonymous"_releases_statements_outlining_"War_on_Scientology"

The video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCbKv9yiLiQ
 

deadhorse32

Bad Art ™
Instigator said:
Is Scientology illegal yet in your country of adoption, Milhouse?

Belgium, France, Ireland, Luxembourg and the United Kingdom have not recognized Scientology as a religion. Scientology has also not been recognized as a religion in Israel or Mexico. A recent judicial investigation in Belgium is now in the process of prosecuting Scientology.

working on it
 

FiRez

Member
if someone is stupid enough to join scientology, they deserve to be there. even if that cost their life and/or money.

c'mon /b/ there are more noble cause to fight out there, even if you do it just for the lulz
 

alr1ght

bish gets all the credit :)
"BRING IT ANONYMOUS"
7wj0a6g.gif
 

Fireblend

Banned
That video sucks. And I was there when they were trying to get scientology.org's servers down about a week ago, they barely made the page load slower for me... at least flooding their fax machines with entirely black pages (+ rickroll, etc..) should piss off some secretaries...
 

whytemyke

Honorary Canadian.
i wonder if scientology did something to provoke them. because they started with just the DOS shit, iirc, and now it's all out anon war?





the end of that video reminds me of some Borg type shit. "We are Anonymous. We are Legion." if i had one of those dedicated to me i'd be calling the FBI ASAP :lol
 

Wes

venison crêpe
This has been brewing for a couple of days now. It's been fun to watch.

There's a planned "masked demo raid" for outside a Scientology Centre in London for sometime soon :lol
 

Fuzzery

Member
whytemyke said:
the end of that video reminds me of some Borg type shit. "We are Anonymous. We are Legion." if i had one of those dedicated to me i'd be calling the FBI ASAP :lol
lolol, I don't think the FBI could do anything. Yeah, having anon after you would suck almost as much as having the mafia after you or something haha
 

Jenga

Banned
Zeed said:
Scientology has no idea what they're up against.
Oh quit acting like 4chan is a serious threat. Seriously, it's rare for anything to keep their interest longer than a month. Half the website community is actually tired of all the "invading" stuff, so I say it's more like "Scientology vs. parts of /b/".
 

Xapati

Member
Jenga said:
Oh quit acting like 4chan is a serious threat. Seriously, it's rare for anything to keep their interest longer than a month. Half the website community is actually tired of all the "invading" stuff, so I say it's more like "Scientology vs. parts of /b/".

Unfortunately this is true. It's a minor nuisence to the CoS.
 

Olivier

Member
Xapati said:
Unfortunately this is true. It's a minor nuisence to the CoS.

Nah, I'm fairly sure the CoS will be shattered into pieces when they'll learn Anon hacked their WoW accounts.
 

AVclub

Junior Member
This war was mentioned in the Tom Cruise thread yesterday. Apparently the press is picking up on it but every mainstream media source seems to be afraid to make any sort of comment on it for fear of litigation or hypnotized celebrity scorn.
 

laserbeam

Banned
quadriplegicjon said:
wow. hardcore raid.

Thats enough actually for the Scientologists to start using their contacts in Government etc to track those Guys down to stage pickets and protests outside their house etc.


But either way its about time people gave Scientology more shit for their crimes.

As they like to throw at Their Protesters "What are your crimes?"

They have committed acts of aggression Against Governments, Committed Murder etc
 

DECK'ARD

The Amiga Brotherhood
laserbeam said:
Thats enough actually for the Scientologists to start using their contacts in Government etc to track those Guys down to stage pickets and protests outside their house etc.


But either way its about time people gave Scientology more shit for their crimes.

As they like to throw at Their Protesters "What are your crimes?"

They have committed acts of aggression Against Governments, Committed Murder etc

I like how the Scientologist casually tried to get their second name, what city they are from etc. out of them.

The Scientology Character Assassination Department is probably drawing up the documents as we speak.
 

Karakand

Member
I'd post an opinion but frankly I'm terrified of both groups even though I'm a member of one.

Sooooooooo I'll go nuke some popcorn and pour some drinks, y'all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom