There is more capability for the tablet.Hari Seldon said:Yeah I'm waiting for a Windows 7 tablet. A cell phone OS is fine for a cell phone, but I want more capability for a tablet.
There is more capability for the tablet.Hari Seldon said:Yeah I'm waiting for a Windows 7 tablet. A cell phone OS is fine for a cell phone, but I want more capability for a tablet.
Sriffat said:GAF always has a dedicated browser window for me![]()
D4Danger said:I think this might be the case for some people.
Personally I would like to see more developers use web technologies instead of being locked down to Apple app store.
Here's a recent article about why developers might be moving away from Apple's lock-in
http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2010/01/27/7-reasons-developers-desert-iphone-apps/
Now I'm not saying the App store is going to crumble overnight, of course not, but as more products come onto the market it makes sense for developers to leverage skills they already have with a product that is platform agnostic.
SuperPac said:Even though I was disappointed overall by the presentation, there's one thing to consider. The App Store and the huge amount of potential that brings with it. No one's going to say "oh, it's just a big iPod Touch I'm not going to develop for it" unless they want to leave a pile of money on the table.
IMO, it's not about the lack of a camera, or Flash (really the only thing that would matter is Flash Video, but YouTube's covered and if more sites move to HTML5 it stops being an issue), or multitasking. Those are nitpicks that the hardcore has. The iPhone doesn't multitask and to be honest I've never been in a situation where I wished it did. What does matter are apps, and I'm positive we're going to see some great stuff for the iPad at/after launch.
I am using Windows 7 on a tablet. It's shit to use just the screen so I use it as a regular laptop. I can't imagine the usability nightmare it would be have this without have kb/m *shudders*Hari Seldon said:Yeah I'm waiting for a Windows 7 tablet. A cell phone OS is fine for a cell phone, but I want more capability for a tablet.
which1spink said::lol @ at all of you guys who makes it look like adobe is a slave of apple - actually it's they other way around. Imagine adobe would stop supporting osx... How many professional users would stay?
Starchasing said:but that is not miltitasking...
multitasking is listening to pandora stream, while connected to msn, while typing...
Mr. Dobalina said:Until (if) Android ever can overtake iPhone in total units, then there is no reason for developers to ignore the iPhone. If some cool app comes out that is Android only and the developer refuses to make an iPhone version, some other deverloper will make an equivalent unless there is some technical reason they can't.
Of course, this isn't even taking into account that it's not just an Adroid/iPhone market thing. Apple probably sells at least 3X as many iPod Touches as iPhones (just guessing on that number). So if you're a developer, you choices are developing for the Android market or the iPhone/iPod/iPad market - which will likely be 10-20X the size. Where do you think you are going to focus?
jts said:I am using Windows 7 on a tablet. It's shit to use just the screen so I use it as a regular laptop. I can't imagine the usability nightmare it would be have this without have kb/m *shudders*
iPhone OS is more than simply a cell phone OS. It's Apple's mobile OS for touch devices powered by ARM processors. Apple can take it anywhere and still call it iPhone OS.
It's clear that they should change its name for marketing's sake though.
Sure... but if you get a device with a real OS my advice is to at least get one with the interface it was primarily designed for, as well as 99% of its applications (keyboard and mouse).Hari Seldon said:Personally, I'd give up some usability and UI features for the power of having a real OS. I was hoping that the UI would just blow me away, but it didn't, so I'd rather have a real OS.
Ignatz Mouse said:How is not having flash a nitpick of the hardcore? Joe User goes to a website, it doesn't work right. That happens a lot on phones/iPods, and they live with it, but why would they accept that in large device where the web browsing isn't so much a bonus as a major reason to own the it in the first place?
But when you have a YouTube application on the device by default, Flash suddenly becomes very unimportant.NinjaFridge said:We all know Flash is pretty shit but it is a huge part of the internet
jts said:Sure... but if you get a device with a real OS my advice is to at least get one with the interface it was primarily designed for, as well as 99% of its applications (keyboard and mouse).
D4Danger said:Here's a recent article about why developers might be moving away from Apple's lock-in
http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2010/01/27/7-reasons-developers-desert-iphone-apps/
Now I'm not saying the App store is going to crumble overnight, of course not, but as more products come onto the market it makes sense for developers to leverage skills they already have with a product that is platform agnostic.
Is it possible for me to store and view PDF documents on the iPad itself? If it can do that, I think I will be there day one.
Sure.ElyrionX said:Is it possible for me to store and view PDF documents on the iPad itself? If it can do that, I think I will be there day one.
ElyrionX said:Is it possible for me to store and view PDF documents on the iPad itself? If it can do that, I think I will be there day one.
D4Danger said:I think this might be the case for some people.
Personally I would like to see more developers use web technologies instead of being locked down to Apple app store.
Here's a recent article about why developers might be moving away from Apple's lock-in
http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2010/01/27/7-reasons-developers-desert-iphone-apps/
Now I'm not saying the App store is going to crumble overnight, of course not, but as more products come onto the market it makes sense for developers to leverage skills they already have with a product that is platform agnostic.
longdi said:this is like macbook air again, good to look, no good to eat.
i believe tablets/e-readers of books and webs, are going to be the next big thing. i hope other companies like Google, Sony, Dell, Microsoft will not miss the boat like iPhone. surfing porn in bed on 10" high res e-ink is the digital life!
That might be correct in some way, i.e. the tech community was expecting a lot more from the iPad. But do you honestly think the iPad will sell in as limited quantities as the MB Air did? If not, you can't say it's "like [it] again."longdi said:this is like macbook air again, good to look, no good to eat.
what I think is most bizarre is the thing is fast, it has decent specs its should be able to do far more...its like its purposely crippled.
sedaku said:I think it would be cool as a expensive e-book reader. And for taking note and stuff I guess.
Other than that I don't know, seem more like a toy than a tool.
NinjaFridge said:The faithful are trying to justify bad decisions. We all know Flash is pretty shit but it is a huge part of the internet and ignoring that is retarded.
longdi said:this is like macbook air again, good to look, no good to eat.
i believe tablets/e-readers of books and interwebs, are going to be the next big thing. i hope other companies like Google, Sony, Dell, Microsoft will not miss the boat like iPhone. surfing porn in bed on 10" high res e-ink is the digital life!
So there's no convincing argument for netbooks to sell to the mass public, despite the sales figures showing them selling in the tens of millions to the mass public, yet the convincing argument for the iPad to sell to the mass public is exactly the same as the netbook argument, just with a dash of elegance thrown in?SnakeXs said:I just haven't heard any convincing arguments for netbooks for the mass public. It does what many people spend most of their time doing, and it does it in a more elegant (to stay away from the term "better") manner. That's what it wants to do, nothing more.
Like I alluded to, the whole sector is going lateral. This year is going to see an explosion of options in terms of formfactor, UI configurations, etc. Netbooks, tablets, hybrids, e-readers - this whole arena of supplementary computing device is diversifying dramatically this year.I'm not disagreeing, but I also see this is not going after netbooks so much as being a lateral move.
But that's nothing special for the sector the iPad moves into. It WAS for the smartphone market when the app store appeared for the iPhone.It's an App delivery platform, period, and the sky's the limit for what can be done on it.
Because it established a major headstart in the areas I outlined.iPhone tech in barely 3 years old, and is still a leader in ease of use and consumer happiness.
Who was expecting that?!?. I think most were expecting that Apple would build more strongly on it than they have.Expecting Apple to throw it all away was kind of hoping for a bit much.
NO. The iPhone didn't simply do the things I listed more elegantly, it clearly did them better. It put other smartphone web browsing capabilities to shame and made real 2.0 web apps a reality on smartphones for the first time. It single-handedly redefined how to build and distribute native apps for smartphones. It introduced sensible UI innovations that hadn't existed on smartphones previously.The iPad does things more elegantly than netbooks, just like the iPhone with smartphones
Since when is the netbook market "tiny, tiny" or even just tiny?It CAN replace netbooks for some, but Apple didn't release this thing to target a tiny, tiny market like netbooks.
Hari Seldon said:I agree, but the only problem with that plan is the tablet market is much more crowded than the cool hand-held market was when the Touch and iPhone launched. Especially with all of the coolness seen at CES, and also netbooks thrown into the mix. And even possibly a MS Courier announcement before the iPad ships (they would be smart to).
Starchasing said:yeah.. ipad has a filesharing system and there are many many pdf readers for iphone
Mr. Dobalina said:Legit question (even as an iPad supporter):
If using iWork - how do I import/export those documents to my desktop?
Great! Thanks!
Now I just need to decide whether it's 32 or 64 and 3G or no 3G though the 3G option may be taken out of my hands since I doubt the local providers have the micro sim card.
I think this size is good for reading pages at default size, without resizing. I know for manga, I'd want to go page to page while only scrolling a little up or down, not having to pinch each page to fit. PEACE.longdi said:i suddenly got this feeling that it still looks dorky reading from a 10" lcd in public. no?
i think the perfect e-reader is like a 4-5" smart phone from iphone 4g or nexus 2, something that easily slot in/out of pockets and control in one hand. tablets are still for indoors use, ether personal time in bed or work/school/projects...imo. :lol
I think it's down to the software.Pimpwerx said:Just curious, but does anyone interested in the iPad currently have a tablet? Maybe some of my disillusionment comes from owning a tablet, and not seeing this as a huge step up. This has multitouch, which mine doesn't, but having used an HP tablet with multitouch recently, I think that's one less advantage this device has. It's really down to the form factor IMO. 1.5lbs is the best thing here. PEACE.
Hari Seldon said:I wonder if Apple will release some type of special stylus that will work with the screen to make it a good note-taker device. If they do that would be huge for me.
Liu Kang Baking A Pie said:But when you have a YouTube application on the device by default, Flash suddenly becomes very unimportant.
Add in that Vimeo, Dailymotion, and YouTube all have native video support, what are we missing? Hulu and Netflix, both of which are better suited to other devices, and both can make applications to run on this. After all, Pandora is a Flash website, but they've nailed their iPhone app.
DSN2K said:I think the lack of multi-tasking is the major killer for me at least, its the one thing that's keeping it a giant Itouch and not a tablet PC.
what I think is most bizarre is the thing is fast, it has decent specs its should be able to do far more...its like its purposely crippled.
White House has an iPhone app where you can watch it. It even let you stream it last night.Zaraki_Kenpachi said:But have news sites switched over? I know I can't watch the state of the Union on whitehouse.gov due to it being flash.