:lol yeah right. :lolcaptive said:Yea pretty much. A lot of these quotes were when the iphone was what 599?
It wasn't till a price drop + app store that the iphone really took off.
The quotes from MS people aren't really surprising though.
"If things were different we'd think differently about things."border said:All those quotes are from when the iPhone was $600, only ran on 2G networks, and had zero support for 3rd party applications. If those factors had stayed the same, I don't think those would have been unreasonable things to say.
LRB1983 said:I want something bigger than an ipod for things like this:
![]()
(put any book/comic instead of one piece XD)
Marty Chinn said:Whoa, let's not immediately dismiss stuff like Wacom capabilities. Just because the public doesn't know about it or doesn't know they want it yet doesn't mean they don't want it. It's often that until they see it, hear about it, or even try it out that realize they want it. In fact, I dare say Wacom capabilities with Apple's touch of interaction would go a long way given that the most natural input to these common consumers that all you defenders are pointing out is the ability to write with a pen. It is by far more intuitive to do than using a virtual keyboard. There's just so many things that Apple could have done had they included a stylus. Note taking, writing e-mails by hand that transcribed to text, etc. A whole world of possibilities that would have made computers more intuitive and useful that we'll still have to wait for.
It's not really trying to replace anything. It's just another device that has a different design philosophy for reaching mostly the same end. People are NOT getting tired of having more options to accomplish their computing needs.GodfatherX said:except it has all the faults the iphone/touch get a pass for being handheld devices, this isn't an alternative to students or workers, or 90% of other end users that might get by with handhelds between trips to their laptops, because they still need a full featured os, this doesn't bridge the gap in any way
h1nch said:I was really hoping for more of a multi-touch snow leopard rather than a large iphone OS. Why not finder app at least?
I'll have to wait to see the quality of the apps that come out (not interested in jailbreaking it either)
Anth0ny said:All five hundred and seventy something chapters of One Piece in the palm of my hand? DAY ONE!![]()
mrklaw said:could have, but was tried with PDAs years ago and never worked out. Yes, modern computing power could help with that but I'm not sure if companies want to bring that back just yet. Fingering is where its at.
iPad is a logical progression from iphone. Perhaps thats why we aren't blown away by it. But 'uninspired design'? Its a giant screen, what did you want?
The interaction model is proven and the larger screen opens up new possibilities compared to the smaller iphone.
actually, so will I. It instantly becomes far more attractive at sub 499 prices.Ignatz Mouse said:If, in a few months, they knock 1/3rd off the price, I will be singing a different tune.
border said:All those quotes are from when the iPhone was $600, only ran on 2G networks, and had zero support for 3rd party applications. If those factors had stayed the same, I don't think those would have been unreasonable things to say.
D4Danger said:From the first second it was shown everyone could see it's potential. Yes, some things were missing but people got it and they knew, in time, that stuff would come.
Opus Angelorum said:In hindsight it's easy look at historical opinion and highlight how wrong it was, this does not however mean that many of the genuine criticisms of the iPad are null and void. To suggest that the iPad will be successful because critics in the past have been wrong about other Apple products is rather disingenuous.
border said:It doesn't mean criticisms are wrong; it just means that critics are notoriously short-sighted. In a few weeks or months the iPad could have multitasking and Flash support and those are the only serious dealbreakers here. In a few weeks or months it could be cheaper due to a subsidy worked out with AT&T or just a flat price cut.
Opus Angelorum said:In hindsight it's easy look at historical opinion and highlight how wrong it was, this does not however mean that many of the genuine criticisms of the iPad are null and void. To suggest that the iPad will be successful because critics in the past have been wrong about other Apple products is rather disingenuous.
Pristine_Condition said:Nobody is suggesting that valid criticisms are null and void. Nobody.
Marty Chinn said:Well for the record, I have a 100% track record with these types of Apple productsI knew the iPod would be big, I instantly knew the iPhone would be huge, and I knew the Apple TV would be a flop. I also so far have called the iPad even before it was unveiled. I really don't think this thing will be big in its current form. It's going to need to go through some massive changes in order for it to have a chance for any type of success. I think it'll sell better than the Apple TV, but I think it will be extremely mediocre in success at best compared to the iPod and iPhone.
Pristine_Condition said:Are you WickedAngel's alt account or something? Because he tried this same, lame rhetoric and failed as well.
Nobody is suggesting that valid criticisms are null and void. Nobody.
Marty Chinn said:I think it'll sell better than the Apple TV, but I think it will be extremely mediocre in success at best compared to the iPod and iPhone.
Mr. Dobalina said::lol
Well, if that's you're comparison, of course it's not going to be "successful."
Projections are 4M in 2010, while the iPhone goal was 10M the first year.
border said:That's not exactly going out on a limb -- how could any computer be as successful as the iPod or iPhone? Music players and phones are essential lifestyle accessories, whereas a laptop/netbook/tablet never really can be.
Marty Chinn said:Well for the record, I have a 100% track record with these types of Apple productsI knew the iPod would be big, I instantly knew the iPhone would be huge, and I knew the Apple TV would be a flop. I also so far have called the iPad even before it was unveiled. I really don't think this thing will be big in its current form. It's going to need to go through some massive changes in order for it to have a chance for any type of success. I think it'll sell better than the Apple TV, but I think it will be extremely mediocre in success at best compared to the iPod and iPhone.
I think lack of USB is the 3rd major ciritical fault (hell, I'm willing to discount Flash although I think it's pretty big). USB would have allowed the iPad to act as a real midpoint between an ipod/iphone and a desktop, with a user being able to easily move data onto the iPad and then directing it towards either an iPhone/iPod or desktop. The desktop could have been completely removed from the equation for the computer-terrified, particularly with the vastly improved iTunes interface on the iPad.border said:It doesn't mean criticisms are wrong; it just means that critics are notoriously short-sighted. In a few weeks or months the iPad could have multitasking and Flash support and those are the only serious dealbreakers here. In a few weeks or months it could be cheaper due to a subsidy worked out with AT&T or just a flat price cut.
Zachack said:I think lack of USB is the 3rd major ciritical fault (hell, I'm willing to discount Flash although I think it's pretty big). USB would have allowed the iPad to act as a real midpoint between an ipod/iphone and a desktop, with a user being able to easily move data onto the iPad and then directing it towards either an iPhone/iPod or desktop. The desktop could have been completely removed from the equation for the computer-terrified, particularly with the vastly improved iTunes interface on the iPad.
Opus Angelorum said:@ border
So do we really just highlight the potential of a device, rather than its current flaws. Are we really saying that everything will be fine in six months, so lets not be too harsh?
I understand that history has shown (sometimes) that Apple can improve a product beyond original inception, but to give every new release a free pass is bordering on insanity.
Opus Angelorum said:So why does it seem anyone voicing a negative opinion is being castrated?
Marty Chinn said:I'm just saying I don't think it's going to be the next best thing as Apple has implied and how the defenders are pushing it. I think it's going to be more like a MacBook Air or an Apple TV. Its price point and functionality will help it sell better than those but it will definitely be more in that class than the game changing class the other two devices are.
WickedAngel said:Actually, that's exactly what you're doing when you pull quotes from 9 years ago and throw in a "lol, familiar".
Pristine_Condition said:But take a deep breath first. Don't want you to get too upset and feel castrated like Opus.
SnakeXs said:The iPhone revolutionized a stagnant market, and opened it, and the mobile internet, to millions. Phones are something that everyone has.
This is creating a new market, not aimed, quite yet, at everyone.
I'm not seeing why you would expect this to match the iPhone, initial response wise.
Opus Angelorum said:So why does it seem anyone voicing a negative opinion is being castrated?
Pristine_Condition said:2007-2008 is not nine years ago, dood. Try again.
But take a deep breath first. Don't want you to get too upset and feel castrated like Opus.
Serious. Business.
:lol
Opus Angelorum said:@ border
So do we really just highlight the potential of a device, rather than its current flaws. Are we really saying that everything will be fine in six months, so lets not be too harsh?
I understand that history has shown (sometimes) that Apple can improve a product beyond original inception, but to give every new release a free pass is bordering on insanity.
Marty Chinn said:So I think it's wrong to say that a laptop/netbook never can be when in fact that is where things are shifting.
SnakeXs said:The amount of wildly shortsighted points of view are astonishing.
VGChampion said:By the way has this article been mentioned here? My dad just sent me it and it's pretty much how I feel about the iPad.
http://thechasbah.blogspot.com/2010/01/at-this-writing-i-havent-had-chance-to.html
As Steve said (and I fully concur) ... beats the crap out of a netbook for most things. Amen.
SnakeXs said:Didn't you hear? Flash is half of everything people do on computers.
Marty Chinn said:Whoa, let's not immediately dismiss stuff like Wacom capabilities. Just because the public doesn't know about it or doesn't know they want it yet doesn't mean they don't want it. It's often that until they see it, hear about it, or even try it out that realize they want it. In fact, I dare say Wacom capabilities with Apple's touch of interaction would go a long way given that the most natural input to these common consumers that all you defenders are pointing out is the ability to write with a pen. It is by far more intuitive to do than using a virtual keyboard. There's just so many things that Apple could have done had they included a stylus. Note taking, writing e-mails by hand that transcribed to text, etc. A whole world of possibilities that would have made computers more intuitive and useful that we'll still have to wait for.
Karma said:It didn`t create this market. CES had tons of Android tablets and full OS tablets.
The quotes I'm talking about were about the iPod.
Past that, you're going to find similar quotes about every product Apple has delivered in the past decade because that's what they do; they imitate. They're an American embodiment of classic Japanese business philosophy; their most successful products already have established markets and their product is typically seen as an evolutionary movement past every else. The problem here? Tablets aren't a household establishment; the market is flimsy and questionable in contrast to, say, the netbook market.
Flying_Phoenix said:I'm going to be honest here. I can't really think of any sites I regularly go to that even use flash. Let alone have it as a mandatory.
Karma said:It didn`t create this market. CES had tons of Android tablets and full OS tablets.
Where was all the revolutionary talk when the Android tablets were shown at CES? They do the exact same things the iPad does.
Reginald P. Linux said:I don't know where people are getting this ridiculous idea from.
You mean the ads.mrkgoo said:Neogaf uses flash.
Obviously not for something that you necessarily want, however![]()