S
SLoWMoTIoN
Unconfirmed Member
FTFYMan, Bloodborne is the best game this generation. By a long way, on anything imo.
FTFYMan, Bloodborne is the best game this generation. By a long way, on anything imo.
Fuck, really? I've been so indifferent since the Y6 release fell on the same week as its did.
I know right , Dreams, WilD, GT Sport, Gravity Rush, all like The Last Of Us and the same / sYes, this is my biggest gripe with them. Really wished they had a battle royal from guerilla or something like that this e3. The uber serious scripted single player action games with a static protagonist are getting old.
Give me something like sea of thieves, state of decay, or at least something unique. Not that those two games are awesome, or sold well, but they are at least different.
Wtf happened to WilD, btw?I know right , Dreams, WilD, GT Sport, Gravity Rush, all like The Last Of Us and the same / s
Tbh, Socom was one of Sony's best franchises back in the days and M.A.G. was awesome and deserves a sequel..Well if you want battle royal games and MP focus games then buy games like Fortnite or Overwatch. Why should sony bother makes those type of game when 3rd party already making for them. I rather see Sony focus on making SP games and base on how much games like God Of War sold I'm not only one.
What rock have you been living under? Tons of people list The Last of Us as the best game ever made. Even more lift it in top five or ten.
Well if you want battle royal games and MP focus games then buy games like Fortnite or Overwatch. Why should sony bother makes those type of game when 3rd party already making for them. I rather see Sony focus on making SP games and base on how much games like God Of War sold I'm not only one.
The rest of the world pretty much hates the US, and that is more of a factor than anything for why the xbox doesnt sell well in other countries. Even at the height of the 360's popularity, game sales in other countries weren't exactly great, and that was not for a lack of diverse games on the 360 at the time. So your argument is not necessarily fail proof.LMAO You think im a fanboy ok Enjoy youre opinion Buddy
The question is here why is ms not successful in Europe ?
Whats the reason that ms is losing in europe every generation
It has to do with the direction they choose with their games
Sony has different games in different genres
Thats right that their games are cinematic and action the reason is that todays gamers like cinematic experiences that is why sony makes cinematic games
"Days Gone is a single player cinematic story driven exclusive like all of Sony's other games"
No, they're vastly diverse
You're not getting the point of this picture, this is the primary output of Sony's first party. Their games mostly share the same design philosophy spun off of each other and thus they lose their identities. A lot of people will say that Sony themselves is providing a ton of variety but when you break things down to their core they're actually the least diverse first party of everyone. They have strong output, they are good games, but they are not risks, they are safe bet third person cinematic experiences which are aesthetically and operationally comparable.So if you cherry pick scenes with trees the games are suddenly the same? Can you find pics with trees from Witcher 3, State of Decay 2, Monster Hunter World, Jurassic World Evolution and Breath of the Wild to show they are also in that group?
Mario Kart, Mario Party, Mario Golf, Mario Tennis.... rinse and repeat for 20 years
Sony is doing exceptionally well comparitively to its competitors
LMAO You think im a fanboy ok Enjoy youre opinion Buddy
The question is here why is ms not successful in Europe ?
WOW! So this is the "new" thing to say now huh? System wars will never end.
SMH.
This is what matters. Your words are golden. Sony lets creativity thrive and this is their secret.I’ve gained a great deal of respect for Sony’s gaming division(s) over the years. In addition to the cinematic (stupid term) games they takes chances constantly on new IP’s and are willing to fund and release niche titles (Gravity Rush) that they know won’t sell gangbusters (Last Guardian, etc).
They give their studios lots of creative leeway and they results show.
Loved that they released WipeOut and looking forward to MediEvil.
They also have a back catalogue of games that they can resurrect at any time - Syphon Filter, G-Police, Warhawk, damn list can go on forever. So yeah, hope they keep doing what they are doing.
No, they're vastly diverse
No they fucked up from the beginning of the XBOXBecause they fucked up the Xbox One E3 reveal.
No they fucked up from the beginning of the XBOX
They lost every generation and their losing has nothing to do with the e3 reveal
No, they're vastly diverse
Shit! Looks how beautiful those games are! With visuals like these I don't even care how, " Samey" they are. The crazy thing is these games play as good as they look.No, they're vastly diverse
I said this before but I would say let 3rd party handle MP focus games. They much more popular and more people play those games because the multipaltform games. I personally like Sony focusing on SP games and they also have 3rd party console exclusive Japanese games like Persona, Dragon Quest and Yakuza.They probably are going to start to feel very samey once they all release, because there are only so many 3rd person games you can play before they start to overlap on game play elements. In my opinion a much more concerning issue is the gloomy and draining nature of all these games, every game is trying to tell heavy stories, that start to feel less like games in which you have fun, but more so a trail which you follow to the finish line to conclude the story.
Sony clearly standardized the formula for their big AAA games that are meant to have global appeal, which isn't bad, but is not something that will be able to go on for much longer if they don't include some game chancing elements to fresh up the 3rd person experience, after all these are 30 to 40 hour experiences, that have a rather limited replayability compared to games with heavy online components. As much as people love to trash Xbox for Halo and GoW it is something PS should have heavy invested in creating, because those game concentrate on a decent story, but a premium online experience that players can spend 100's and even 1000's of hours playing due to great gameplay mechanics, something that is non existent on the PS right now.
Maybe because that is a dumb thing to say and the people saying it are probably attempting to troll. Poorly. BotW plays nothing like Skyrim.Its funny how people keep bringing up the western first party games and call it samey even when they are still different from each other. When BOTW came out everybody called it the best game ever and that Nintendo games were always different, yet if you called it Zelda Skyrim you'd get buried in hateful replies or outright banned in certain websites. Funny.
A camera angle is not a genre though. It's only a camera angle. How many angles are there to makes games in? which one has the most games currently. A racer can assume many camera angles during play. A platformer can be first person, tpp or 2.5D, yet some people say most of Sony's games are TPS. Then VR is a whole other perspective in terms of feel and immersion.....I'd say they're a bit samey in terms of art style and genre's seem to overlap a bit but each game definitely has a unique personality. Also, I kind of like that Sony has a distinctive "polish" to their games, almost acts like a Sony seal of quality. Nintendo games have their "look" too.
However, I would like for Sony to make an RPG or something completely different in tone, art style, and genre.
Don't forget about Puppeteer I personally really liked that game.For an entire console generation output, their games are more than diverse. Just look at LittleBigPlanet, Knack, Dreams, Tearaway, Gravity Rush as straying away from the "over the shoulder" template.
But because they want to set the benchmark/sell third party games, their major AAA games get more attention.
Maybe because that is a dumb thing to say and the people saying it are probably attempting to troll. Poorly. BotW plays nothing like Skyrim.
That's about right, great graphics, great polish, great animation, nice sound design, great gameplay, solid framerates....In such respects, they're the same allright.No. The criticism is absurd to me. The thing they most share in common is exceptional quality.
Tbh, Socom was one of Sony's best franchises back in the days and M.A.G. was awesome and deserves a sequel..
Then again, Zipper got closed, so I don't think there is a Sony-studio up for the job.
You mean it sold better on the handheld platforms that have triple the install base of the GameCube and WiiU?It outsold Zelda on both, DS and 3DS. Animal Crossing on DS and 3DS sold more than any Zelda game ever made, even if you count TP on Wii and GCN as one game and BotW on Switch and Wii U as one game.
They are all like watching a movie. Still don’t get the appeal. If I want to watch a movie I turn on the TV or go to the movies.
"Break things down to their core."You're not getting the point of this picture, this is the primary output of Sony's first party. Their games mostly share the same design philosophy spun off of each other and thus they lose their identities. A lot of people will say that Sony themselves is providing a ton of variety but when you break things down to their core they're actually the least diverse first party of everyone. They have strong output, they are good games, but they are not risks, they are safe bet third person cinematic experiences which are aesthetically and operationally comparable.