• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Ashley Madison infidelity site's customer data stolen

Status
Not open for further replies.
This. How many people in this thread would support the user database of a closeted homosexual online community being released?

I get you, but I don't feel it's the same. I've seen people get hardcore fucked over from cheating, one day, the other shoe is going to drop
 

coleco

Member
Interesting to see how ethical disagreements make it okay for people to have their private information stolen. It's none of our business what people do in their private lives, especially since it's not criminal.

Keep in mind I hate cheating.

Completely agreed. Some disgusting answers in this thread.
 

Morts

Member
Wasn't there a lawsuit involving some woman who worked for Ashley Madison whose job included creating fake profiles? I wonder how many of those 37 million are real.
 

Moff

Member
This. How many people in this thread would support the user database of a closeted homosexual online community being released?

0 would be my guess. I have no idea how you come to that conclusion. do you seriously think being gay is as morally wrong as hurting your partner by cheating?
 

riotous

Banned
Account breakdown:
5 actual married women
999,995 thirsty single guys
500,000 troll female accounts made by teenagers
35.5 million spam accounts that send cam site links
 

Alavard

Member
0 would be my guess. I have no idea how you come to that conclusion. do you seriously think being gay is as morally wrong as hurting your partner by cheating?

He's comparing this to the recent Gawker article in which a CEO was allegedly soliciting a gay escort and was outed as a result. He had a wife and kids. The overwhelming GAF response was that Gawker was a monster for publishing it and it was no business of anyone's but the family if he was cheating on his wife.

Very different reaction to the situation in this thread.
 

Cybrwzrd

Banned
0 would be my guess. I have no idea how you come to that conclusion. do you seriously think being gay is as morally wrong as hurting your partner by cheating?

You are missing the point. It isn't your place to be the moral police.
 

KidJr

Member
GAF is ridiculous at times, I'm not saying cheating is right at all but the way people are always so quick to pass judgement never astounds me.
 

Diablos

Member
Oh well. I have nothing to worry about. I was always frank and earnest with women.

In Chicago, I'm Frank. In New York, I'm Earnest.
 

Cybrwzrd

Banned
He's comparing this to the recent Gawker article in which a CEO was allegedly soliciting a gay escort and was outed as a result. He had a wife and kids. The overwhelming GAF response was that Gawker was a monster for publishing it and it was no business of anyone's but the family if he was cheating on his wife.

Very different reaction to the situation in this thread.

Yes. That was another example of what I am referring to.
 
Jesus, the replies in this thread...you are ok with people being victims of identity theft just because they are in stale, boring relationships and want a bit of excitement in their lives?

They don't know what identity theft entails. I mean, how many on gaf know someone who had their credit information stolen, used, or kept for blackmailing purposes? They know what cheating is, have perhaps partaken in it or been victims of it so they have strong opinions about. Plus, it's more "important" to say that you're not ok with cheating than it is to say that you're not ok with identity theft. Don't take it the wrong way. I doubt they have actually considered their words.

Is there a source for this number? Not trying to give you a hard time, just wondering. Thank you.

Wikipedia has a nice bit on that iirc. I don't believe the number ever goes above 40%, which iirc was related to unmarried couples.
 

JC Lately

Member
(Reposting as it proably got lost at the bottom of the last page)

Lot of assumptions being made in this thread.

Site 'specializes' in helping people cheat on their spouses. Specializes. Not requires. Which means as there are an unknown amount of people who use this site who are a) single, b) married but have the ok form their spouse to be there, or c) signed up once fully intending to cheat, sent a few messages out, came to their damn senses before meeting anyone and deleted their account ( except not really apparently) and never looked back. Lets say 70% of the site were actually scum sucking cheaters. What's 30% of 37 million? Hell lets say 90% were cheaters and the other ten fell into the exceptions I gave. Did they 'deserve' to have their personal details stolen? Or are they just acceptable losses to the GAF High Horse Calvary?
 
(Reposting as it proably got lost at the bottom of the last page)

Lot of assumptions being made in this thread.

Site 'specializes' in helping people cheat on their spouses. Specializes. Not requires. Which means as there are an unknown amount of people who use this site who are a) single, b) married but have the ok form their spouse to be there, or c) signed up once fully intending to cheat, sent a few messages out, came to their damn senses before meeting anyone and deleted their account ( except not really apparently) and never looked back. Lets say 70% of the site were actually scum sucking cheaters. What's 30% of 37 million? Hell lets say 90% were cheaters and the other ten fell into the exceptions I gave. Did they 'deserve' to have their personal details stolen? Or are they just acceptable losses to the GAF High Horse Calvary?
I would only feel bad for the people in example B. Acceptable losses like you said.
 

RDreamer

Member
(Reposting as it proably got lost at the bottom of the last page)

Lot of assumptions being made in this thread.

Site 'specializes' in helping people cheat on their spouses. Specializes. Not requires. Which means as there are an unknown amount of people who use this site who are a) single, b) married but have the ok form their spouse to be there, or c) signed up once fully intending to cheat, sent a few messages out, came to their damn senses before meeting anyone and deleted their account ( except not really apparently) and never looked back. Lets say 70% of the site were actually scum sucking cheaters. What's 30% of 37 million? Hell lets say 90% were cheaters and the other ten fell into the exceptions I gave. Did they 'deserve' to have their personal details stolen? Or are they just acceptable losses to the GAF High Horse Calvary?

Then there's the fact that the identity theft will affect the spouse that was cheated on, too.
 

kinggroin

Banned
If you're married, legally and recognized as such by your government, then it is no different than a contract.

It should be illegal to breach contract by cheating. Not jail time mind you, but stiff monetary penalties.

The spiritual ramifications will depend on your own brand of faith, but at the very least universally, you should feel icky for doing it.
 
If you're married, legally and recognized as such by your government, then it is no different than a contract.

It should be illegal to breach contract by cheating. Not jail time mind you, but stiff monetary penalties.

Doesn't this sort of already exist, in divorce?
 

Diablos

Member
Pay to have your data removed? Is that even legal?
Not sure, but paying for something you actually aren't getting sure sounds illegal to me.

Cheaters never win, as the old saying goes. I do feel bad for the unexpected turmoil this hack is going to bring to a lot of families and long-term relationships.

The Internet has done so many good and bad things for humanity. This is the latest example of the bad. I kind of hate the Internet sometimes.
 

mjontrix

Member
What's stopping them from leaving that stale, boring relationship instead of cheating?

Nothing, they're just scum.

The idea of wanting to out cheaters, even to the point of committing criminal activity, is shit.

The consequences of their actions will manifest in their own lives. But cheating isn't a criminal activity, and hacking into a website to use private information as blackmail most certainly is.

But What If This Is The Consequences?
 

SyNapSe

Member
Why would you give your real personal details to a site like this? I mean you'd have to give location and age I suppose but I'd make up everything else.

I guess we don't know what the hackers are going to do with the data.
 

hbkdx12

Member
Why would you give your real personal details to a site like this? I mean you'd have to give location and age I suppose but I'd make up everything else.

I guess we don't know what the hackers are going to do with the data.

Why wouldn't you? Possible hacking aside, surely people who are genuinely making accounts on this site probably aren't expecting anyone, their partner of all people, to recognize/identify them.
 

KingSnake

The Birthday Skeleton
So many people that are insecure about their relationships to the point that hey hate some people who never did anything to them personally.

I wonder what other crimes can be committed against cheaters and get approval around here.
 

magnetic

Member
(Reposting as it proably got lost at the bottom of the last page)

Lot of assumptions being made in this thread.

I love how you think that your opinion is so unique and deserving of attention that you chose to post it twice just in case some people missed it.
 

Ozigizo

Member
Why would you give your real personal details to a site like this? I mean you'd have to give location and age I suppose but I'd make up everything else.

I guess we don't know what the hackers are going to do with the data.

I think you have to pay to actually use it.
 

AlphaDump

Gold Member
Scary to think about the OPM breach and this breach. It would be like open season for extortion or blackmail if one were to draw links between the two databases..
 
The fuck? 37 MILLION people registered on that site?

Considering there are probably tons of people who have affairs without the use of that site, are there any married couples left who aren't cheating?

Well marriage can be quite depressing. Usually when its forced.
 
You are missing the point. It isn't your place to be the moral police.

This. I don't cheat. I hate the idea of infidelity. I can think what I want about cheating and people that cheat.

But none of that should be relevant when someone's personal information has been compromised like this.

Doesn't make it "OK" because they're terrible cheaters.
 

manfestival

Member
thieves stealing from scumbags

Not claiming moral superiority but I dont blame someone for praising the police if I get caught doing something illegal and really stupid
 

JC Lately

Member
I would only feel bad for the people in example B. Acceptable losses like you said.

You head it here first, folks. Identity theft is okay if you happen to post on a site the thrives have a moral objection too! Didn't partake in the action they dislike on said site? too bad. Colltaeral damage happens, yo.
 

SyNapSe

Member
Credit card validation.

Yeah, I thought about that but then figured I'd be willing to go buy a $100 visa prepaid card and fill that info in.

To me signing up for this site would be the same as signing up for the silk road site where you can buy drugs. I wouldn't want anything tying back to my real life if possible.
 

Moff

Member
You are missing the point. It isn't your place to be the moral police.

I know perfectly well what kind of point you were trying to make, I did not miss it. it was just a terrible example because there is nothing morally wrong with being a homosexual, that's no place for a "moral police" either way.
so why would the same people who play the "moral police" here have anything against homosexuals? obviously an identity theft against gays would be the exact same thing as an identify theft against heterosexuals.
 

robotrock

Banned
I didn't know this was a real website

I saw it mentioned in that really bad Jason Reitman movie and thought it was made up.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom