bonchooski
Member
Origins+fix the remasters and I will support this release.
same here, how they aren't including origins makes no sense.
Origins+fix the remasters and I will support this release.
Porting the game to a Unreal Engine 4 probably had a lot to do with it.
It probably would of been way easier to port the UE3 PC version with all settings maxed out to consoles.
But WHY change engines if it's going to look WORSE? It looks really bad, man. I would have rather just had 1080p60 straight ports of the PS360 version with anti-aliasing. Insane.
Probably some WB exec thought that "The first Arkham games on UE4" would be a good selling point for the game.But WHY change engines if it's going to look WORSE? It looks really bad, man. I would have rather just had 1080p60 straight ports of the PS360 version with anti-aliasing. Insane.
That said, I highly doubt they're adding Origins because of the state they left that game in (they gave up on patching it at a certain point).
How does that even happen? *sigh*
They should just continue whatever they're doing with this remaster and give Origins to Bluepoint since that's the only Batman game that truly deserves a remaster/rerelease.
Wow, WB actually taking the initiative and making sure the product isn't a total train wreck like it seemed. Another reminder of how bad this port was looking:
That said, I highly doubt they're adding Origins because of the state they left that game in (they gave up on patching it at a certain point).
Still shocked at the level of praise that Origins gets around here. Other then the boss fights, everything else about it was just a low quality carbon copy of Arkham City.
Still shocked at the level of praise that Origins gets around here. Other then the boss fights, everything else about it was just a low quality carbon copy of Arkham City.
Despite my strong dislike for that game, I think it's lame to not include it. $50 is pretty damn pricey for two old games.
I don't thin I've ever played Arkham Origins. Is it as bad as people claim it is?
I don't think I've ever played Arkham Origins. Is it as bad as people claim it is?
I don't think I've ever played Arkham Origins. Is it as bad as people claim it is?
I don't think I've ever played Arkham Origins. Is it as bad as people claim it is?
I wouldn't say so. I think it's roughly on par with City, maybe just a tad beneath it, and I liked it a lot more than Knight (Asylum is still my fave).I don't think I've ever played Arkham Origins. Is it as bad as people claim it is?
Wow, WB actually taking the initiative and making sure the product isn't a total train wreck like it seemed. Another reminder of how bad this port was looking:
That said, I highly doubt they're adding Origins because of the state they left that game in (they gave up on patching it at a certain point).
Can they release a Arkham Knight Definitive Edition in the meantime?
Wow, WB actually taking the initiative and making sure the product isn't a total train wreck like it seemed. Another reminder of how bad this port was looking:
That said, I highly doubt they're adding Origins because of the state they left that game in (they gave up on patching it at a certain point).
That's my guess as well. The 360 version had a bug that erased your save file, and they never fixed it. If they didn't address such a huge problem at the time, I can't imagine they'd spend the time to address all the issues now.That said, I highly doubt they're adding Origins because of the state they left that game in (they gave up on patching it at a certain point).
Really hoping they add Origins as doing so would guarantee a buy from me.
It's an awful gameI don't think I've ever played Arkham Origins. Is it as bad as people claim it is?
It's an awful game
They should just continue whatever they're doing with this remaster and give Origins to Bluepoint since that's the only Batman game that truly deserves a remaster/rerelease.
It's an awful game
I don't think I've ever played Arkham Origins. Is it as bad as people claim it is?
No, it's a reasonably solid game.
It lacks the density, smarts and polish of Rocksteady's titles. It's rough around the edges, there's far fewer puzzles, it's buggy, and is by and large more repetitive then Asylum, City and Knight. But it does build on City's crime scene analysis mechanic significantly, and as is often mentioned, the story is very compelling, with novel twists on classic characters. The DLC is very good, although the Wii U version (the most polished version ironically) doesn't have it. Thing is, Rocksteady made such a good formula that even when someone else comes in without the experience or talent, a good game still comes out of it.
Yeah, it's decent. A fair 8 compared to the effortless 9s (and I'd even give Knight a 10) in the rest of the franchise.
They're unfortunately backed up with other titles.
Some people hate the tweaks to the combat, but as a vet of the first 2 the added challenge was very welcome in Origins. You had to relearn some of the timings and perform better in the base game, whereas the other two you could sort of sleep walk through them and only got tested in the challenge levels mostly.