The Smoking Bun
Banned
Ok so let me give a fair warning that the discussion topic is fairly horrific and not for the faint of heart. This is something I have been thinking off ever since Batman: Arkham Origins was announced with it's younger and meaner take on Batman. I can't say how successful WB Montreal has been in this aspect but I wonder one thing.
He does NOT and cannot kill, so why doesn't Batman cripple, severely injure or perhaps even torture his foes as a punishment? Reserve it for the really dangerous psycho's like Joker. Has he ever done such a thing in the comics? The closest I can imagine is Batman throwing Maroni from a balcony breaking his leg in TDK.
Doesn't have to be a regular thing, exceptional case. Say the Penguin blows up a bus full of children and Batman in his rage blinds him. Would that make the Penguin less dangerous? Say he pulls and eye for an eye on Joker and paralyses him from the neck down. Helpless but Alive. Doesn't break the one rule but makes them almost beg for death. Joker has his minions but would they really care to work for a helpless cripple?
Has there been any character in fiction who does this? Doesn't kill but mutilates or severely injures his enemies practically rendering them inert? How would the villains react? Joker would probably become more insane and Penguin would be ballistic, starting a crime war for the head of the dark knight. What about lesser criminals? Forget going to prison, you'd lose a finger or your entire arm if you ever came face to face with the Bat.
How would Gotham react? How is deliberately mutilating them worse than beating them to a pulp and leaving them groaning in pain from a broken arm as we do in the Arkham series.
Thoughts?
He does NOT and cannot kill, so why doesn't Batman cripple, severely injure or perhaps even torture his foes as a punishment? Reserve it for the really dangerous psycho's like Joker. Has he ever done such a thing in the comics? The closest I can imagine is Batman throwing Maroni from a balcony breaking his leg in TDK.
Doesn't have to be a regular thing, exceptional case. Say the Penguin blows up a bus full of children and Batman in his rage blinds him. Would that make the Penguin less dangerous? Say he pulls and eye for an eye on Joker and paralyses him from the neck down. Helpless but Alive. Doesn't break the one rule but makes them almost beg for death. Joker has his minions but would they really care to work for a helpless cripple?
Has there been any character in fiction who does this? Doesn't kill but mutilates or severely injures his enemies practically rendering them inert? How would the villains react? Joker would probably become more insane and Penguin would be ballistic, starting a crime war for the head of the dark knight. What about lesser criminals? Forget going to prison, you'd lose a finger or your entire arm if you ever came face to face with the Bat.
How would Gotham react? How is deliberately mutilating them worse than beating them to a pulp and leaving them groaning in pain from a broken arm as we do in the Arkham series.
Thoughts?