Mihael Mello Keehl
Banned
Damn you and your edit! It is next Hen!But GAF told me Wii U is next gen !
Damn you and your edit! It is next Hen!But GAF told me Wii U is next gen !
But GAF told me Wii U is next gen !
For the average consumer Activision wasn't upfront about the fact that Blops2 was coming to Wii U at all.
So you don't think the Wii U is performing badly globally?
I've just made that up in "narrative creation"?
However, I'm going to bed, so enjoy your own little world you've created.
I haven't read the posts you've responded to but the Wii U is doing terrible compared to every other console worldwide. While it's not confirmed (it was heavily rumored and a few people who were "in the know" said it but we probably will never know the full story) it seems as though the reason EA went sour on supporting Nintendo is because they wanted Wii U to run on Origin (and were slowly making progress) but Nintendo was all "hell no" when they read their deal over. In that context it makes complete sense why they'd support them with barebone games (in terms of quantity). The fact the Wii U is doing poorly probably isn't making them want to change their minds either.Actually, it is a narrative. It is performing badly compared to what exactly? And, to be more on topic, how does that relate to EA? And then, to actually relate that to my actual request for some journalism on the relationship between EA and Nintendo, how did EA's CEO go from promising unprecedented support E3 2012 to releasing only extremely late and expensive ports? Does this make business sense? How does one narrative interact with the other? Why was Nintendo working with EA so closely with its online strategy only for EA to not use the eshop when the Wii U launched? Did this make business sense? Does it explain why the Wii U is performing badly?
The fact is that you and I have a limited perception of reality. The idea that you're determined to represent your narrative as definitive is hilarious to say the least. However, I'm going to bed, so enjoy your own little world you've created.
Actually, it is a narrative. It is performing badly compared to what exactly? And, to be more on topic, how does that relate to EA? And then, to actually relate that to my actual request for some journalism on the relationship between EA and Nintendo, how did EA's CEO go from promising unprecedented support E3 2012 to releasing only extremely late and expensive ports? Does this make business sense? How does one narrative interact with the other? Why was Nintendo working with EA so closely with its online strategy only for EA to not use the eshop when the Wii U launched? Did this make business sense? Does it explain why the Wii U is performing badly?
The fact is that you and I have a limited perception of reality. The idea that you're determined to represent your narrative as definitive is hilarious to say the least. However, I'm going to bed, so enjoy your own little world you've created.
Talking about dire third party software sales isn't necessarily something which has to start and end with the Wii U.
Haha, good lord..
You're right. The fact that the Wii U is selling sub 100k monthly in the NPD's, less than 10k a week in Japan and god knows what in Europe, presumably pitiful amounts if chart estimations are anything to go by, is definitely a fabrication in my own little world. As is the assertion that this might, just might, be having an impact on support.
I hope you can find some enjoyment from the Wii U's third party offerings, because these release date delays and lack of ports entirely are clearly upsetting you quite a lot.
I haven't read the posts you've responded to but the Wii U is doing terrible compared to every other console worldwide. While it's not confirmed (it was heavily rumored and a few people who were "in the know" said it but we probably will never know the full story) it seems as though the reason EA went sour on supporting Nintendo is because they wanted Wii U to run on Origin (and were slowly making progress) but Nintendo was all "hell no" when they read their deal over. In that context it makes complete sense why they'd support them with barebone games (in terms of quantity). The fact the Wii U is doing poorly probably isn't making them want to change their minds either.
bf was never about sp, this is just dice chasing the cod console crowd. the multiplayer is where bf shinesI can only speak for myself: Seen the gameplay video - honestly, it looks boring. If EA skips it for Wii U, fine. For the ones who care, it would be cool to have it, but whatever EA thinks is right won't bother me.
Much more interesting games are coming to the Wii U anyway.
EA and Ninty could be tighter than spandex and it still wouldn't make financial sense to port BF4 to the Wii U.Actually, it is a narrative. It is performing badly compared to what exactly? And, to be more on topic, how does that relate to EA? And then, to actually relate that to my actual request for some journalism on the relationship between EA and Nintendo, how did EA's CEO go from promising unprecedented support E3 2012 to releasing only extremely late and expensive ports? Does this make business sense? How does one narrative interact with the other? Why was Nintendo working with EA so closely with its online strategy only for EA to not use the eshop when the Wii U launched? Did this make business sense? Does it explain why the Wii U is performing badly?
The fact is that you and I have a limited perception of reality. The idea that you're determined to represent your narrative as definitive is hilarious to say the least. However, I'm going to bed, so enjoy your own little world you've created.
Stop lying.
Only the extremely poisoned fanboy mind thinks that a game NOT coming to a console is a good thing.
At least it got Rayman Legends. Anyone know what the sales are like on that one?
You, however, clearly think you do. I find that funny. I get more serious in my writing when I'm laughing.
i'm personally more inclined to believe insiders than people analyzing from the outside, and i guess that comes from seeing conclusions made on certain things i can't talk about at the time that can be waaaaaay off.
All of a sudden, the relationship between EA and Nintendo would take a more positive turn. The Wii, which launched with EA titles like Madden 07 and Need for speed Carbon, would receive more upcoming EA titles. For the first half of 2007, Wii would receive SSX Blur, The Godfather: Blackhand Edition, Tiger Woods 07, and Medal of Honor Vanguard.
Larry Probst declared that EA already had 15 titles in development for Wii at this point.
By July 17, 2009, Electronic Arts was dominating the Wii charts.
Kotakus Owen Good wrote an article noticing the lack of people playing Madden (Wii U) online on a Sunday. He questioned whether Wii U was much of a sports console.
Good writes, Here was the picture on the Xbox 360 at midafternoon: 31,080 Madden players connected to the EA Sports servers; 2,978 were in a game. On the Wii U: 42 were online. One was in a game. It may be an off-peak time, and it may be a version releasing three months after the games main launch. The numbers still arent good. Thats forty-two people in North America playing Madden NFL 13 on a Sunday on the Wii U.
EA announced Madden NFL 25 would launch for Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3, but for some odd reason, no Wii U version would be announced. Some gamers brought up the theory that EA would wait to announce the Wii U version once the PS4/Next Xbox versions were announced.
Fully agreed. Im not sure anyone knows how Nintendo will react to this but lets hope its good. Iwata and co want to meet goals by the end of the year for the company and Wii U not getting 3rd party games is definantely something that needs to be addressed in one way or another. Not through money hatting and hoping but through something more long term and constructive that even their next console and handheld can benefit from.It was pretty clear when EA decided to promote smart glass as the second screen experience at E3 (over Wii U) that their support would be abysmal going forward.
Still...it's good that Nintendo will finally realise that despite what some 3rd parties said during the Wii generation...they won't port to Nintendo platforms no matter how capable the machine is and no matter how much they tailor a controller to suit their needs. A valuable lesson.[
Can you pm me the secret list of these guys?i love how some nintendo fans hated COD series but when black ops 2 got the wiiu version it was incredible and the off tv play was awesome xD
now battlefield 4 is shit..yeah..sure
It was pretty clear when EA decided to promote smart glass as the second screen experience at E3 (over Wii U) that their support would be abysmal going forward.
Still...it's good that Nintendo will finally realise that despite what some 3rd parties said during the Wii generation...they won't port to Nintendo platforms no matter how capable the machine is and no matter how much they tailor a controller to suit their needs. A valuable lesson.
i love how some nintendo fans hated COD series but when black ops 2 got the wiiu version it was incredible and the off tv play was awesome xD
now battlefield 4 is shit..yeah..sure
But Wii U is next gen?
Neither series will be suspected of harbouring a classic game, but I don't see why CoD would've received hatred from even the most virulent of fanboys; after all, Wii received respectable - relative to the console's ability - ports of everything from CoD 3 to MW3, bar only Modern Warfare 2. I think you are mistaking your fantastical perception for reality.
I am an infrequent COD player, by the way. I did enjoy the Wii U version of Black Ops 2 & hope the next edition makes it across. Activision have an open goal now.
Yep, thats a bingo. Dead console.
Fair enough. I'm not going to contest something with someone who has inside information when I don't.
Maybe Wii U just aint for madden online games. Most people playing madden online are either doing online franchise or playing ranked/unranked games which are dedicated madden players. That crowd will certaintley not buy a Wii U for that. As a big NFL fan madden player Ive been on sites such as operation sports where the commuinity mocks the Nintendo version of anything madden. Its not surprising the online community is like that. Buying a Wii U for that would be a real mistake. I have a Wii U but I would never buy madden for it never bought it on Wii either only 360.Damn *cringes* If EA goes as far as to not even port Madden...wow.
It was pretty clear when EA decided to promote smart glass as the second screen experience at E3 (over Wii U) that their support would be abysmal going forward.
Still...it's good that Nintendo will finally realise that despite what some 3rd parties said during the Wii generation...they won't port to Nintendo platforms no matter how capable the machine is and no matter how much they tailor a controller to suit their needs. A valuable lesson.
![]()
The Wii U certainly feels like it's getting Dreamcasted at this point, the only difference being the Dreamcast had games.
Not sure if this is stealth sarcasm, but I'll bite
Umm...
I've got bad news for you >.>;
Shit is done and put on the shelf, will release when the PS3/360 ports are finished, release simultaneously, I think it was September
(Wii U will have a bigger install base by then, hopefully!)
i just want to clarify- i don't have inside information regarding this incident, just others. however regarding this, there have been other semi-confirmations from others along the way that led me to believe it's true.
i love how some nintendo fans hated COD series but when black ops 2 got the wiiu version it was incredible and the off tv play was awesome xD
now battlefield 4 is shit..yeah..sure
The Wii U certainly feels like it's getting Dreamcasted at this point, the only difference being the Dreamcast had games.
I look forward to a two-console future.
I look forward to a two-console future.