• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Battlefield 5 physical sales down more than half on Battlefield 1

Will be interesting to see how Origin Access Premiere plays into this as well considering BF has a very large install base on PC. Wonder how many will pay $15 for a month or two and skip spending $60 for the full game.
 
It was the backlash from the first trailer, which in all honesty was not deserved. If you care so much about women and prothestics arms in your videogames you are in the wrong hobby.

Also BF1 was actually not as well received either. There was backlash against it, and lots of complaints against the gameplay and the content of the game especially upgrades and customization. Then you add in the long wait for the premium drops and there was negativity around BF 1 as well. LOL its funny but its the BF cycle. Game comes out everyone complains its the worse BF yet, and then when the next BF launches everyone fondly remembers the old one as the greatest. Happend with BFBC2, BF3, BF4, BF1 and now BFV.

And one last point but not having BR day 1 probably cost them a lot of sales. NO ONE CARES ABOUT YOUR SINGLE PLAYER DICE. You aren't Rockstar of Naughtydog or Nintendo. Cut the SP and put in a BR mode day 1 that would of moved units.

This.

I like SP games, but lets be honest folks, most are not buying BF for single player. I wouldn't be that upset to see it go. Spend the funds on different MP modes.
 
What's wrong with wolfenstein 2?

My guess is the "Make America Nazi free again" marketing, which had the plausible deniability of just re-purposing a famous slogan, until the game's producer directly referenced the continual conflation of Trump supporters with Nazis.

I don't even like Trump, but I ended up playing a used copy of that game too. No reason to not play a game you want to play, simply because the game's developer is a tool.
 
So many have stated that this is the best Battlefield game, yet it still didn't break sales record.

So what is going on?

Can't be advertisement as every BF fan would know this game coming out. There are articles written everywhere too.

Was it that exclusive 11 days advantage for premiun Origin subscribers that ticked off a lot of regular BF fans who prefer to just buy the game at normal price?

Or was it EA/DICE shoving their political correctness agenda that left a very long lasting negative impression since the very first teaser?

Could simply be being put up against COD and Red Dead 2. As a BF fan, I can very much say this is one of the best BF titles yet. I can also say any concept of "political correctness" is irrelevant to my purchase of this game or any other game. I just don't know how many are really buying games for those reasons let alone not buying a game solely for that reason. Great games can still move less units. Many have.

The Last Of Us beat GTAV in GOTY awards the year it released, did not outsell GTAV.
 
This.

I like SP games, but lets be honest folks, most are not buying BF for single player. I wouldn't be that upset to see it go. Spend the funds on different MP modes.

I have owned all BF's since BFBC2 and probably put like 3 hours total into all the SP combined. No DICE SP has ever been praised.

Should of been like COD, dropped the SP and made sure BR was out day 1.

BR is the hottest thing right now, if BF had a BR mode there would be more hype for the game. No twitch streamers are streaming War Stories LOL.
 
My guess is the "Make America Nazi free again" marketing, which had the plausible deniability of just re-purposing a famous slogan, until the game's producer directly referenced the continual conflation of Trump supporters with Nazis.

I don't even like Trump, but I ended up playing a used copy of that game too. No reason to not play a game you want to play, simply because the game's developer is a tool.


Agreed. I never get how or why folks get triggered by junk like that. Even if its a political concept I'm against or a religion I"m not etc, its not relevant to me having fun with the game. Literally hundreds of people work on a AAA title to get it released, if someone doesn't play a game based on the beliefs of the developer, I'm not even sure how they can really game at all considering almost any team can have a member that doesn't share their same belief. Its childish and just doesn't make much sense.

Its always this ultra secret tinfoil hat agenda, be like "today Far Cry 5, tomorrow THE WORLD" /s lol
 
It's a joke of a game, I'll stick to bf1.

I droped BF1 after just a few hours due to the terribly amount of snipers on open maps, but this game is tons of fun so far and Snipers are much less of a nuisance. I think BFV is def. superior to BF1 in many ways.
 
The gameplay is better than bf4. I am taking bf3 levels here maybe even better than bfbc2. What a shame, they finally nailed the gunplay and ttk only to have the game fail due to dumb marketing.

All the people calling it a reskin are completely wrong. The gunplay is completely changed, it only has similar visuals to bf1 due to the setting.
I agree. The mechanics of the game are the smoothest I've played in a battlefield game. The physics can be wonky at times but that's just frostbite. For the first time I like BF more than cod this year. The game feels decently balanced between game play and unlocks while adding character customization.
 
EA Access subscribers. You know the drill. Expect BF5 to be a EA Access freebie I'd say somewhere around summer 2019.

If you must play it now. Go buy for cheap. If you can wait, play it next summer.
 
Agreed. I never get how or why folks get triggered by junk like that. Even if its a political concept I'm against or a religion I"m not etc, its not relevant to me having fun with the game. Literally hundreds of people work on a AAA title to get it released, if someone doesn't play a game based on the beliefs of the developer, I'm not even sure how they can really game at all considering almost any team can have a member that doesn't share their same belief. Its childish and just doesn't make much sense.

Its always this ultra secret tinfoil hat agenda, be like "today Far Cry 5, tomorrow THE WORLD" /s lol

That's not a belief, it is using games for political indoctrination. They can do whatever they want, but nobody is forced to buy it. Stop trying to shame people for choosing how to use their own money.
 
its a shame since its faaaaaaaaar better than BF1 but if this makes them go back to modern/future then i dont mind lol
 
What's wrong with wolfenstein 2? That's any different than wolfenstein 1

I'd be interested to hear...
In a time where anyone with a conservative view was/is considered a Nazi by extremist leftists, they were clearly trying to fuel a political fire in a bad political climate. I have no problem shooting nazis in a videogame, I grew up playing W3D but don't appreciate them pushing an agenda with their marketing.

If a woman appearing on the cover of a video game is threatening to you, that's a 'you' problem.
Doesn't bother me at all. I play games like the Atelier series, Horizon Zero Dawn, Tomb Raider, Heavenly Sword, etc. Again it's just the idea that they were pushing a political agenda that bothers me. If you want to create a storyline entirely based on women or a LGBT character then all I care about is the quality of the story. If you decide to rewrite history to push an agenda then no thanks. Yes there were women in WW2 but you're literally talking about a droplet in the bucket. For example, Bioware has bisexual characters in their games and I love them. Now if they made Geralt bisexual to cave into social pressure then I would drop the Witcher games. If they make Witcher 4 about Ciri then awesome. If they made Geralt into a female character for a reboot just because "it's 2018" then I'd be annoyed. Make sense?
 
But I thought making the game more """inclusive""" and having it portray badass PoC women was going to massively increase sales with all the badass grrls who can't wait to get into video games but have been waiting in the wings all this time because toxic game companies only made games with white males as main characters? 🤔🤔🤔🤔
 
5 years ago Bioshock Infinite just had to put a generic "guy with a gun" cover on the game.

Now a game just has to put a generic "tough chick" on the cover even when it's a WW2 game and it sticks out like a sore thumb, because what's the first image that springs to mind when you think "WW2"? Why, women of course!
 
But I thought making the game more """inclusive""" and having it portray badass PoC women was going to massively increase sales with all the badass grrls who can't wait to get into video games but have been waiting in the wings all this time because toxic game companies only made games with white males as main characters? 🤔🤔🤔🤔

Who stated it would definitely lead to more sales?

And yeah I mean show me a battlefield game that didn't feature a white dude front and center

One game features women as an available character choice in MP and part of war stories, and partially in some advertising and

REEEEEEEEEEEEE SJW culture and politics correctness run amok! Not in my ww2 games!

Like poor White guys just can't catch a break and find any representation in video games

*Sigh*
 
It's a fantasy game, not a documentary. They are trying to appeal to a growing demographic of girl gamers, it's no harm. Nothing about the game is realistic, so stop projecting your politics onto everything. They did it for sales, the same thing that drives every decision.
 
Two steps forward with gameplay and design (fort building, gun feedback & selection) and one step backwards with story and political hiccups.
 
I was a huge fan of BF BC2, BF3 (and BF4, when it allowed me to connect online on PC) but BF"1" felt like a downgrade to me.

I've played too many WW2 games since the 2000's, I don't want to go back to that period again.
And the naming/numbering doesn't make sense either.
 
Makes sense, they've been putting these out way too frequently like they're trying to be COD, rather than try to make each game last a long time and keep selling for ages without self-competition.

Keep it to one game a generation and make it the very best it can possibly be guys. A spin off or two might be fine but focus on the main game and meaty DLC for it like back in the days of glory.
 
Last edited:
its a shame since its faaaaaaaaar better than BF1 but if this makes them go back to modern/future then i dont mind lol

Bite your tongue on that futuristic crap🙉.
But yes next game needs to modern!!
Can't wait to play that on my PS5 !!
 
It's a fantasy game, not a documentary. They are trying to appeal to a growing demographic of girl gamers, it's no harm. Nothing about the game is realistic, so stop projecting your politics onto everything. They did it for sales, the same thing that drives every decision.

Authenticity is not the same as Realism. The games have never been realistic, but they have strived for some level of authenticity.

Who stated it would definitely lead to more sales?

And yeah I mean show me a battlefield game that didn't feature a white dude front and center

One game features women as an available character choice in MP and part of war stories, and partially in some advertising and

REEEEEEEEEEEEE SJW culture and politics correctness run amok! Not in my ww2 games!

Like poor White guys just can't catch a break and find any representation in video games

*Sigh*

The issue has never been that a women is front and center on the cover. Why is it that you almost always use the same disingenuous bullshit in your posts? You purposefully misconstrue the issues at hand.
 
Authenticity is not the same as Realism. The games have never been realistic, but they have strived for some level of authenticity.



The issue has never been that a women is front and center on the cover. Why is it that you almost always use the same disingenuous bullshit in your posts? You purposefully misconstrue the issues at hand.

Guess what? There are no "issues" to speak of in all this

Developers wanted to create more options for player characters to be inclusive. That's never an issue unless you're a bigot
 
That's not a belief, it is using games for political indoctrination. They can do whatever they want, but nobody is forced to buy it. Stop trying to shame people for choosing how to use their own money.

No one is saying anyone is forced to buy anything (not sure where you got that idea)

" using games for political indoctrination " Yea, except you don't know that as you'd never know what any developer is 100% going to believe and that would be for the most part irrelevant to the overall game in the first place.

So you can use your money how you see fit, simply that I MYSELF do not buy games based on what a developer believes, by that logic you would be able to buy no games at all as any developer could be um " using games for political indoctrination ".


STAND BACK BRO, DMC5 has a guy with 1 arm, smh look at Capcom trying to force a agenda for disabled folks, out here using games for political indoctrination!!! Guess I'm not buying that game, don't get me started on tetris either, you mean Russian political indoctrination? (proceeds to put tinfoil around head) /s

Sorry man but theses are just situations that have to do with feelings and emotions, have nothing to actually do with gaming. By that logic you'd be unable to play most games or watch films, shows etc. I just don't game for those reasons and I'd argue most don't. Otherwise Far Cry 5 should have failed =)
 
Who stated it would definitely lead to more sales?

And yeah I mean show me a battlefield game that didn't feature a white dude front and center

One game features women as an available character choice in MP and part of war stories, and partially in some advertising and

REEEEEEEEEEEEE SJW culture and politics correctness run amok! Not in my ww2 games!

Like poor White guys just can't catch a break and find any representation in video games

*Sigh*

You're arguing in bad faith.
 
In a time where anyone with a conservative view was/is considered a Nazi by extremist leftists, they were clearly trying to fuel a political fire in a bad political climate. I have no problem shooting nazis in a videogame, I grew up playing W3D but don't appreciate them pushing an agenda with their marketing.


Doesn't bother me at all. I play games like the Atelier series, Horizon Zero Dawn, Tomb Raider, Heavenly Sword, etc. Again it's just the idea that they were pushing a political agenda that bothers me. If you want to create a storyline entirely based on women or a LGBT character then all I care about is the quality of the story. If you decide to rewrite history to push an agenda then no thanks. Yes there were women in WW2 but you're literally talking about a droplet in the bucket. For example, Bioware has bisexual characters in their games and I love them. Now if they made Geralt bisexual to cave into social pressure then I would drop the Witcher games. If they make Witcher 4 about Ciri then awesome. If they made Geralt into a female character for a reboot just because "it's 2018" then I'd be annoyed. Make sense?

Any game about killing Nazis is inherently going to be political

It's not hard to see the correlation from the rise of Donald trump to the rise of the alt right. Is Donald trump an actual nazi? No i don't believe that, but he's absolutely a bigot, Xenophobe and created an entire platform that resonates with nationalist viewpoints the alt right believe, and it's absolutely enabled people and the behaviors you are seeing

If you're not an alt right racist douche than that advertising wasn't making a point about you
 
Guess what? There are no "issues" to speak of in all this

Developers wanted to create more options for player characters to be inclusive. That's never an issue unless you're a bigot

Continued generalizations and arguing in bad faith. The fact that you think the only way you can have an issue is by being a bigot shows how weak your arguments truly are.
 
Any game about killing Nazis is inherently going to be political

It's not hard to see the correlation from the rise of Donald trump to the rise of the alt right. Is Donald trump an actual nazi? No i don't believe that, but he's absolutely a bigot, Xenophobe and created an entire platform that resonates with nationalist viewpoints the alt right believe, and it's absolutely enabled people and the behaviors you are seeing

If you're not an alt right racist douche than that advertising wasn't making a point about you
My point is it has a political agenda whether it's about me or not which it's clearly not about me. Alt-right wouldn't like me one bit, doesn't mean I want crap about them spewed in my games. I game to get away from the real world.
 
They are trying to appeal to a growing demographic of girl gamers

Then they should create a game in which female characters make sense instead of forcing them where they don't fit.

Imagine a game about Zulu warriors with white people in the tribe just so they can appeal to everyone. That would be silly, right?
 
Then they should create a game in which female characters make sense instead of forcing them where they don't fit.

Imagine a game about Zulu warriors with white people in the tribe just so they can appeal to everyone. That would be silly, right?
Lol perfect analogy.
 
Am I on ResetEra?

Neither conservatives nor liberals own the concept of misrepresenting arguments and assigning inferred motivations. The issue isn't when people recognize that is being done to them, the issue is when people don't recognize when they are doing that to others.

I've been aware of the concept of bad faith long before Era was a thing.
 
Its just kinda proves again if you listen or even hire the typical twitter sjw you better dont care about money because sjw dont actually buy the games, comics or movies they loudly scream about and demand to change to suit their opinions, they simple do that to spread their ideology and subvert everything they can get their hands on.
Companies that still dont get that they are just a loud twitter minority and think they maybe a bigger audience and are ready to lose a part of their own established fan base in some cases even literally insulting them before the first sales numbers are even in... are just lol at this point (looking at you cali sony).
This particular example isnt even that bad besides"muh authenticity/actual history" it is even refreshing that you can shoot guys and gals and not just the typical hordes of men like it usually is especially in single player campaigns.
Just dont force it in games that it doesn't make sense and with it rewrite history/glorify the past into something better that it never was, stop trying to do this crap for the wrong idiotic reasons and then have the audacity to expect your customers to be blind idiots that dont call you out on it or you may lose money lol
This is like the BBC getting angry when people point out its bullshit that they change literal European history, not some dumb Hollywood movie but BBC literally looking at history through rose tinted glasses and changing ANYTHING they didnt like about history for the sake of today's ideas of inclusion. Its fucking idiotic and everyone can see what you are doing.
 
Last edited:
It's 50% off already in some stores. Can be had for $30. wtf, that was quick. Seems the retailers front loaded their stock too much, and it ain't flying off the shelves. I've said it before and I'll say it again; that cover does not lend itself to the primary demographic that plays this series on console/controller, i.e casual dude bros.

They are trying to appeal to a growing demographic of girl gamers

The female demographic for Call of duty and Battlefield is most assuredly not growing in relative terms. Absolutely, sure. But the most dominant bulk of the buyers of this series will continue being males so the demographic focus should not awkwardly change with shoehorned bullshit, or sales will suffer. The tiny minority of girl gamers playing competitive online shooters cannot carry this series, or even keep it alive.
 
Last edited:
Then they should create a game in which female characters make sense instead of forcing them where they don't fit.

Imagine a game about Zulu warriors with white people in the tribe just so they can appeal to everyone. That would be silly, right?

By your own admission then, no ww2 game can have women in Major roles and make sense, so tough luck to all female gamers that enjoy war shooters and would like to be able to pick someone to represent themselves?

Pick a white dude and like it? Is that really the line we are drawing here?
 
The only BF game I really liked was Vietnam. I can't stand another WW1/WW2 game anymore, they've just been done enough. Give me the jungles of Vietnam with some badass music to go with it any time!

One of my all time favorite game startups has to be when BF Vietnam hits Jefferson Airplane's White Rabbit
 
By your own admission then, no ww2 game can have women in Major roles and make sense, so tough luck to all female gamers that enjoy war shooters and would like to be able to pick someone to represent themselves?

Pick a white dude and like it? Is that really the line we are drawing here?

You need a lot of history to brush up on, like Lyudmila Pavlichenko as an example.
 
Will be interesting to see how Origin Access Premiere plays into this as well considering BF has a very large install base on PC. Wonder how many will pay $15 for a month or two and skip spending $60 for the full game.

My group of 3 bought premiere for it, otherwise we woulda just paid for it normally.

I'm sure lots of people went that route.
 
I don't think it has anything to do with SWJ anything.

Just that the market is finally moving passed the yearly shooter iteration.
 
I had a discussion with a friend about this. He said "I'm glad, I hope EA dies". It doesn't make sense to me when someone is happy when a product tanks. If you like it, buy it. If you don't, don't. Why do people care about stuff that they won't consume anyway? There is people that like it and if it fails people will probably lose their jobs. EA will continue and whenever it becomes a bad business someone else will buy them (say Tencent or whatever).

Nobody wins.

They did things better than with Battlefront (which I didn't buy mostly because I don't care about SW) and still people grill them over some stupid comments that were in response to some other stupid complaints. The only thing that having women characters in the game changed is that you sometimes listen to women screaming and dying in the background. I don't see how that is an issue and historical accuracy has never been a part of the series. I mean, there have been giant sharks in the sea and people jumping from planes and shooting other planes with rockets while they fall. If I wanted realism I'd play ARMA or Squad (which I do, but not all the time).

A lot of people are missing out on a good game and most likely the franchise will go to the freezer.

My group of 3 bought premiere for it, otherwise we woulda just paid for it normally.

I'm sure lots of people went that route.

My brother and I did as well. As soon as it expires I will buy the full version. Well worth it. (Plus I got to play FIFA 19's The Journey)
 
Last edited:
honestly I just didn't buy it because I spent that cash on other games. it looks good but since the delay it went from maybe day 1 to eh ill buy it later.
 
Top Bottom