• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Bionic Lens could give you vision 3x better than 20/20

Status
Not open for further replies.
So......in the future our eyes won't be real?

My God! Jaden Smith is a prophet!


YCE2SwD.jpg

Goddamn at just realizing in 100 years from now Jaden Smith will be considered a prophet of his time.

The hero we deserved but not the one we needed right now.

Well, it is good to see gaffers catch up to me.
 
I... did ask for this.

I would definitely do this. My eyesight is complete shit and will only get worse with age.
 
I'm absolutely down for this, but my vision is good enough for everything but driving, so I would definitely wait and see how the early adopters take to the surgery before trying it myself.
 
So we can run games in 480p again and get an instant framerate boost!
 
What I am worried though is by seeing "too well" we will notice how shitty the world actually looks like. We might even be able to see some of the biggest germs and dust mites with the naked bionic eye. Kind of eerie, but I'm totally getting upgraded.

Back in the day, there was an episode of Married With Children where Al Bundy finally got glasses to correct his horrible vision. At first he was excited, but his new enhanced eyesight soon caused depression as details of the squalor around him became clear, the "girl" he flirted with at the mall was actually 40 and his own reflection in the mirror showed how old he was getting. He smashed the glasses.

 
If this works as advertised, there isn't a single doubt in my mind that this will be 100% mandatory for fighter pilots.

One of the catches is that the eye has to be fully developed first. So like you couldn't do it until you're 25+.

I mean, I'm guessing most fighter pilots are younger than that. Certainly most servicemen probably couldn't get it done.


I'd totally do something like this, but I wouldn't be in any sort of rush about it. Certainly I wouldn't want to be part of "gen 1". But once my vision starts detireorating I'd get it.
 
Isn't there a thing where you can only take so much visual stimulation (in this case scene detail) at once and too much would overload you, so headaches, nausea, eventually making you go crazy?
 
I could see occasional zoom, but do you really want to see everything around you in super high definition?
How is this even a question?!

I've had laser surgery, but would also be up for this if it's actually successful. I'm still wondering how this Garth Webb came up with the tech to do it while others have spent tens of millions and come up with nothing as close.
 
As someone with vision bad enough that it can't really be corrected to 20/20 (I get headaches if I go that far) ... I'm ok with this

Technically I can and possibly will get PRK, but this sounds like it would be better.

(if you want to see how I see without glasses, try looking at your TV through a macroscopic lens)
 
I would wait to see how it works (and the cost). However, I wouldn't mind upgrading my body. I'm tired of being hearing impaired, vision impaired, and having sore limbs that get very sensitive in the cold.
 
I'm sure it will cost like $30,000.

On the local news, they were saying (after interviewing the guy) that the procedure would cost around $3200 Canadian (or about $2600 USD).

And the inventor wants to set up a charity foundation to help poor people who can't afford $3200.
 
I would get the procedure and continue to wear frames, because megane will never die.

Although I would be kinda worried about seeing every detail and every crater-like pore in someone's face, for instance.
 
I wonder if this would work with people who have Keratoconus, like me. I would gladly spend my life savings for the surgery.
 
This is obviously some kind of Monkey Paw trick. You get your new lenses and everything looks hideous close up like one of those extreme detail shots from Ren & Stimpy. I'm pretty sure it was an Outer Limits episode.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom