HK-47 said:Bioware fanbase is forever alone. They are desperate.
I love if there was a really popular character that pretended to like the PC but rejects you right at the end. So satisfying.
ultron87 said:There's plenty of people who get really really into the shipping (ie caring about character x getting with character y) aspects of fandom when it comes to any kind of fiction.
The bisexuals of the world agree with you.The_Technomancer said:Seriously though, I feel that out of all the ways they could have handled romance with different sexualities that was the least realistic and most insulting.
You need to talk to Samara moreHK-47 said:Bioware fanbase is forever alone. They are desperate.
I love if there was a really popular character that pretended to like the PC but rejects you right at the end. So satisfying.
TheSeks said:Yes, but the point is: Bioware excludes options for some demographics (see gays) for... six-seven games, suddenly includes them and there's an uproar?
So it's totally okay to have straight romance options and exclude gay gamers, but not the other way around?
shidoshi said:My absolute top request if I could add anything to Persona 3? The ability to hook Mitsuru up with that girl in the school hallway. I wanted nothing more than to help love bloom between those two!
(And, really, I find that to be a very interesting potential aspect - not just the ability for the player to work on their own relationships with others, but help foster relationships between NPC characters.)
dionysus said:Romancing HK-47, the dialogue would be hilarious.
...It's got Mordin. He's pretty cool guyK.Sabot said:Considering the game really has nothing going for it, I guess I can't blame people for obsessing.
WanderingWind said:...Morrigan?
Kind of forgot about KOTOR. Looking back I'd say that the Bastila romance thread is probably the most successful in gaming for me. It evolved naturally, had some layers (you couldn't just click the 'heart' option to win), and there were real and unexpected endgame consequences depending on how things turned out. Felt like much more than a side quest.dionysus said:I just prefer how KOTOR handled it. Because you could only romance 1 character (I think?), that allowed your romance on that character to have large plot implications later in the game. For a romance to affect the plot, you necessarily have to limit the options on the player unless you want to bust your budget on a ton of branching path plots.
HK-47 said:Does she? Never bothered doing that whole song and dance with her.
TheSeks said:Not an attack on you, but let's open a dialog on this:
So it's totally okay for straight romance options to be forced on gay gamers, but not the other way around?
Like in Mass Effect, Male Shepard has no gay romance options (like oh say... WREX), but can get it on with a space redneck (Ashley), or a blue alien (Liara). Those of us that are gay and play male Shepard because... well... we're MALE, are SOL. How do you think we feel about that?
TheSeks said:Excluding gay romance options for people that "roleplay as themselves" (IE: me) is totally okay, then?
What I'm trying to say is: Straight/heteronormative romance options in numerous games is totally okay, but not giving gay options isn't?
This was the only good thing about DA2.WanderingWind said:I agree. I severely dislike DA2, but this is silly. Was it incredibly silly for every character to be bi-sexual? Yes. Is it worth getting worked up about? Probably not.
shidoshi said:My absolute top request if I could add anything to Persona 3? The ability to hook Mitsuru up with that girl in the school hallway. I wanted nothing more than to help love bloom between those two!
(And, really, I find that to be a very interesting potential aspect - not just the ability for the player to work on their own relationships with others, but help foster relationships between NPC characters.)
dude said:The only part about Dragon Age I liked is reading somewhere that many people didn't realize they were romancing with some male character until far into it.
It's awesome, and Bioware should get like a medal for that (along with a kick to the balls for the game itself though.)
I always thought all characters should have a romance option - Whether you're playing as male or female, though the difficulity of the romance will change significantly depntding on the NPC's... Openness to new ideas
dude said:(along with a kick to the balls for the game itself though.)
Chihori totally had a thing for Mitsuru.shidoshi said:My absolute top request if I could add anything to Persona 3? The ability to hook Mitsuru up with that girl in the school hallway. I wanted nothing more than to help love bloom between those two!
(And, really, I find that to be a very interesting potential aspect - not just the ability for the player to work on their own relationships with others, but help foster relationships between NPC characters.)
Patryn said:A situation like that is more reflective of the real world, where some people just don't swing the way you wish they did no matter how hard you try.
ninj4junpei said:Chihori totally had a thing for Mitsuru.
I wonder if Persona 5 will be more progressive. :3
Hehe you said "empty vessels"fernoca said:That too.
I mean, imagine all the "drama" in Gears of War with Dom and Maria during the first 2 games, but instead of Maria it was his boyfriend or husband Luis or whatever; something more evocative than the usual "I'm gay because I have sex with men".
But in games, gay characters are usually either the flamboyant characters that has crushes with the main character or this empty vessels that are gay, because you have sex with other male characters.
And I can understand that they do it precisely because of the "straight male gamer" demographic, and the shock it may cause if characters don't go around announcing that they're gay.
Haha..that's worst than I thought actually.
Then again, seeing the whole debacle that caused the "sexual acts" of the first game too, I don't blame the team for it.
At least they still put some "gay options" for their games, which is more that can be said of other developers.
Alucrid said:Fuck that, Mitsuru and subsequently her vast fortune and empire were the protagonists.
Not possible. Shinjiro x Akihiko is the real truth.ultron87 said:Mitsuru x Akihiko for life!
FINALBOSS said:...As a straight male gamer, getting ROMANCES in a fucking video game is the absolute least of my concerns.
FINALBOSS said:...As a straight male gamer, getting ROMANCES in a fucking video game is the absolute least of my concerns.
I'd like to think my character is such a sexy god of beauty he can convert anyone if he tried hard enough. Sure, it's not as realistic, for various reasons, but it's a fantasy game, brah. If I can kill demons and conquer the land of Generic-Fantasy-Ville, I don't see what's so unrealistic about me seducing some macho man...Patryn said:This is the one thing I disagree with: I don't think everyone should be an option for everybody. Frankly, I think Dragon Age got the closest: Some people were bisexual, and some were just straight. All they were missing was a purely gay male and a purely lesbian female.
A situation like that is more reflective of the real world, where some people just don't swing the way you wish they did no matter how hard you try.
Of course, this reasoning flies out the window if you view the whole thing as simple wish fulfillment, at which point everyone should be bisexual in order to fulfill everyone's desires.
Oh god that looks awkward.Snuggler said:I'm always down for some man elf on man elf sex, the faux-Enya music is just the icing on the cake
mxgt said:+1
Problem is the people on the Bioware forums are absolutely insane. Some of the stuff there about characters like Tali is downright creepy.
What the hell, man. You're always taking shots at everyone, man. That's not cool, man. What have weeaboos done to you, man? That's not cool, man, that's not cool. Man.Ickman3400 said:Agreed, and the Bioware forums are beyond fucking creepy always flooding the boards of each new game with romance requests and questions. They're pretty much on par with anime weeaboos.
I dunno, Garrus fangirls are hilariously awkward. It's like going to the zoo.FINALBOSS said:Dude before you said the same thing. I'm so very glad I've never gone there.
branny said:I like Mr. Gaider's response, however I'm sad that it's complete and utter BS in the face of how BioWare has handled Mass Effect.
Brobzoid said:Can we have a show of hands for who plays these games for the combat mechanics versus the story and it's related mechanics (dialog, romancing, etc)?
The thing that is most egregious about Dragon Age 2 being stream-lined or dumbed down or whatever, to me, is that Bioware seems* to be taking the focus off of the combat mechanics and the things associated with that and in it's place pushing for more story, more character interactions, more romances, internal conflicts in your party, etc.
Not to say older Bioware titles didn't have that stuff, but I feel they're pushing it much more to the foreground at the expense of the combat. This is especially bothersome because Dragon Age was their "old school Bioware game" as opposed to Mass Effect with it's newness.
* I ain't played Dragon age 2 yet, so I might be pissing myself in the face here.
Heh. A poor dating sim dev.Ickman3400 said:Same thing with DA2. Too focused on who you can bang and didn't have a real centralized story (each Act has a different main focus). Bioware is slowly turning into a dating sim dev.
HK-47 said:What do you mean?
tomegatherion77 said:Besides Im married I know how real relationships work, and no amount of fantasy can spice that up lol.
Kinspiracy said:I did enjoy having Isabella and Aveline in my party and hearing Isabella suggest to Aveline that she stick her thumb up her new husbands ass as a way of spicing things up.
I never cared about combat mechanics.Brobzoid said:Can we have a show of hands for who plays these games for the combat mechanics versus the story and it's related mechanics (dialog, romancing, etc)?
The thing that is most egregious about Dragon Age 2 being stream-lined or dumbed down or whatever, to me, is that Bioware seems* to be taking the focus off of the combat mechanics and the things associated with that and in it's place pushing for more story, more character interactions, more romances, internal conflicts in your party, etc.
Not to say older Bioware titles didn't have that stuff, but I feel they're pushing it much more to the foreground at the expense of the combat. This is especially bothersome because Dragon Age was their "old school Bioware game" as opposed to Mass Effect with it's newness.
* I ain't played Dragon age 2 yet, so I might be pissing myself in the face here.
this is actually what i think. it's kind of nauseating.poppabk said:This reads less like the guy takes issue with homosexuality and more like he is upset because he didn't find a new 'girlfriend' that he really hit it off with in the new game.
I was the opposite, but then again I played Baldur's gate when I was a lot younger than I am now and didn't have a particular interest in reading large blocks of text in English. So maybe they've always had their priorities like this, but that's not how I remember them damn it. :cdude said:I never cared about combat mechanics.
Old school BioWare games never focused on combat. BG2 for example didn't have the best combat, it could be pretty slow and cumbersome at times. It was good, but definitley not the game's high point - The writing was. Each character felt real, I almost felt like I bonded with them through the game, I felt bad for Nalia when I dumped her from my party. I felt bad for an imaginary character.
BioWare's recent effort lack any of this, despite being better at most other things than their previous games. And that's how I felt with the DA series, the writing was so boring, I couldn't master any interest in any of the caracters. Sure, the interactions were much better than in BG, as the technology is much better, but the script itself is just terrible.