How is Nintendo "very reactionary"? If anything competitors react to them. Nintendo has always been content to march to the beat of a different drummer. I think there's a better argument to be made that they don't react fast enough to certain industry changes (storage medium, online, HD, etc.). Also, while Wii 2 may not be ready for the market just yet, I have little doubt Nintendo has been working on it since before the Wii was released, and their planning for next gen is already in the advanced stages. I also think it's erroneous to assume that Nintendo's approach to a single generation is always a strong indicator of how they'll approach the next. They've spoken before about a revolutionary approach vs. evolutionary, and although I'm sure there will be some defining feature to the Wii successor to help differentiate it from the competition they could just as easily focus on refining and building upon what they've already innovated this generation. I wouldn't be surprised if they were first out of the gate with a mainstream approach to haptics, for example. I think their trump card in this situation is that even if they play it conservative on the hardware front again they're still in the best position to wow fans by sheer virtue of contrast between the visual fidelity of their titles from this gen to the next.