walking fiend
Member
I don't believe stricter gun control will be solving all the tensions that lead to use of violence, and that focusing on gun control is simply turning a blind eye to the real issue(s) here.
One of such issues is that a large portion of the population in the US are racist or at least are not willing to take a firm stand against it [otherwise they would avoid voting for racist nominees].
Not that it is simply the average American's fault*, or that every white person is Racist and every person who is minority is not racist, but the deeply rooted racism is the reality which the American need to accept responsibility for and come up with a plan to systematically address it. Just encouraging people to be less racist in your speeches after each time that there is an incident has not and is not going to suffice.
*I was at a lecture recently by a distinguished anthropologist from university of Chicago or Washington, can't remember which, who was trying to argue that it is OK to be poor (and many other things), because some people are actually happy to be poor (and many other things). Ironically enough though, in the end he showed some graphs to prove that the gap between the rich and poor is not as large as people claim... and I was wondering, if he believes that gap is not important, why is he so adamant to prove that the gap is decreasing?
Edit: I am not against strict gun control; however, I don't see it possible to focus on it without losing focus on the more important matter at hand here. Specially because even with strict gun control, it doesn't mean police will be disarmed.
One of such issues is that a large portion of the population in the US are racist or at least are not willing to take a firm stand against it [otherwise they would avoid voting for racist nominees].
Not that it is simply the average American's fault*, or that every white person is Racist and every person who is minority is not racist, but the deeply rooted racism is the reality which the American need to accept responsibility for and come up with a plan to systematically address it. Just encouraging people to be less racist in your speeches after each time that there is an incident has not and is not going to suffice.
*I was at a lecture recently by a distinguished anthropologist from university of Chicago or Washington, can't remember which, who was trying to argue that it is OK to be poor (and many other things), because some people are actually happy to be poor (and many other things). Ironically enough though, in the end he showed some graphs to prove that the gap between the rich and poor is not as large as people claim... and I was wondering, if he believes that gap is not important, why is he so adamant to prove that the gap is decreasing?
Edit: I am not against strict gun control; however, I don't see it possible to focus on it without losing focus on the more important matter at hand here. Specially because even with strict gun control, it doesn't mean police will be disarmed.