-
Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!
Bloodborne release date moves to March 2015
- Thread starter Nibel
- Start date
yeah...
It was a tiny miny bit excessive to release these two games so close.The Witcher 3 is also a game to look out for that month.
sublimit
Banned
The only thing that i don't like is that it's too close with the release of Type-0.Obviously Bloodborne is a priority so i guess i'll just play the FFXV demo and put Type-0 in my backlog for as long as i have enough with Bloodborne.
Although i could also see a delay for Type-0 happening lol.
Although i could also see a delay for Type-0 happening lol.
ConradCervantes
Banned
Good enough for me. Hopefully it won't be yet another launch date shitshow now, plus I hate it when games are released right after the semester begins. I'll pick it up after midterms conclude.
And i'm more shocked if they were speaking about their own game. Dark Souls 1 and 2 are much better with 60 FPS so color me surprised about that.
ekka4shiki
Member
I'm fine with this. Witcher 3 will keep my busy for that month after all.
Oh you will still get Blighttown
Triggerhappytel
Member
Demon's Souls HD, coming free packaged in with Bloodborne!!
There are a few current-gen games I'm interested in, but Bloodborne seems like the first game I'll be sad to miss out on, so that's going to be my catalyst for getting a PS4.
FalsettoVibe
Member
I'm ok with this.
MatrixMan.EXE
Member
Disappointing. But then I guess this also gives us a full month to dedicate to The Witcher 3 which is good.
A bad news day special
A game releases the day before and performs horribly.
Bloodbourne gets put back a month and a half the next day.
People don't care because they want game to be good and stable
Everybody leaves internet happy.
Ubisoft gets a few more digs for not delaying and fixing horribly performing game.
The Order gets a bit of breathing room.
A game releases the day before and performs horribly.
Bloodbourne gets put back a month and a half the next day.
People don't care because they want game to be good and stable
Everybody leaves internet happy.
Ubisoft gets a few more digs for not delaying and fixing horribly performing game.
The Order gets a bit of breathing room.
StrongBlackVine
Banned
The Order 1886 and The Witcher 3 is enough for February.
Just play Witcher 3 for a month
Assuming that game will actually be good.
Hopefully they use the extra time to improve image quality a bit. It was looking kind of rough.
Just play Witcher 3 for a month
Or Evil Within.
Or Bayonetta 2.
Or GTAV PC.
Or Captain Toad.
Or Assassin's Creed Unity.
Or Far Cry 4.
Yeah i think i'll survive.
MMaRsu
Member
Or Evil Within.
Or Bayonetta 2.
Or GTAV PC.
Or Captain Toad.
Or Assassin's Creed Unity.
Or Far Cry 4.
Yeah i think i'll survive.
Unity? You actually bought that piece of shit and supported Ubisoft. Urgh.
AmaterasuOni
Banned
Meh! Well, I'll survive. There's some other titles coming around that time.
Seems the best compromise to optimize the game furtherly and let The Order 1886 and Witcher 3 have some room to breathe in February.
Wasn't there a thread here not long ago asking Sony to reconsider releasing both Bloodborne and The Order 1886 during the same month? Those people should be happy now
Wasn't there a thread here not long ago asking Sony to reconsider releasing both Bloodborne and The Order 1886 during the same month? Those people should be happy now
Unfortunate, but it makes sense. Releasing two major new first party 'AAA' IPs a couple of weeks apart was a dumb ass move, and it's not like they can risk another delay for The Order at this point I'm guessing.
I don't want to say I'm fine with this, but the reasons do make a lot of sense.
I don't want to say I'm fine with this, but the reasons do make a lot of sense.
Jawbreaker
Member
I'm cool with this. February is packed and more time spent optimizing Bloodborne is never a bad thing.
Triggerhappytel
Member
If she loves you she'll understand.
Canis lupus
Member
I didn't notice massive fluctuations in the alpha, not even during the boss fight, I'd say the fps was better than last gen Souls games. The game just briefly freezed/hanged a few times.
Poimandres
Member
Delayed to improve performance.
immortal-joe
Member
Didn't even flinch. There's just too much to play and my backlog is hilariously huge.
Depends how much time you get to play every day, but I highly doubt The Order will be a long game. Probably your typical 10-15 Hour (Tops) Story based Shooter. Shouldn't be too hard to finish that in 4 days, unless you can't play that much per day.
You can do better, buy some money via Microtransaction to show how low, people can go.
Benzychenz
Member
Gives me another month to finish Dark Souls and start Dark Souls II.
RedAssedApe
Banned
smart move. order no longer sent to die
Stone Ocean
Member
Fucking hell. Oh well, more time for The Witcher then
I'm starting to like delays more and more. I'd rather wait than play a game with poor performance faster. It's like someone telling me they're going to slow cook a turkey instead of microwaving it. We have EA and Ubi to give us half assed soggy disappointment already, and I don't like my games chewy.