No, since the Wii, they go: "Which is the cheapest mass producable hardware supporting our next console's gimmick that we can get away with?"
As for being slightly above, below, right on or in between the XBone and PS4 - It doesn't matter at all. Those are
three year old systems, soon to be updated to the "Neo" and "Scorpio". Systems that, at least in theory, support rendering games in 4k rather than 1080p, which was far too often not even possible ont he XBone, so being on par with that wouldn't exactly be a flattering feature of the NX. Those 2013 systems do not represent state of the art hardware anymore, and any minor difference in computational capabilities between the NX and those in either direction and in any of the relevant parameters won't change a thing about that. If the NX was on par with the Scorpio or Neo, then we'd be talking.
Not that I complain about it, because I can get my high end fix anytime on the PC. If the new Zelda delivers and renders in 1080p on the NX, it'll be the reason for me to own a NX and to play it above all the graphic whoring miracles available on any other platform. But one has to keep this in mind when it comes to the last ten years of Nintendo hardware: They're at least one generation behind. At the very least the game design in BotW is catching up a bit on the last decade of western game development.