• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Can men and women be "just friends"?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I guess the question here is ' can one be just friends with someone you are emotionally/physically attracted to?'

It's possible, and the attraction can make friendship fun if you don't let things get out of hand.
 
It's just not a bet I'd make.
I've already mentioned what me and my lady friends do, compared to my male friends. They are both two completely different types of entertainment and I enjoy both of them for what they are. I'm not trying to make anything else out of my female friends. I've never tried.

edit: aaaaand with this post, we're back to "Why should I trust you" so it's gonna repeat itself. So boring.
 
This thread is making me very uncomfortable. I know my particularly dysfunctional form of sexuality probably rules me out here somewhat, but I can honestly say that when I make friends from either gender it's because I enjoy the company of the other person as a person, not a prospective sexual object. I feel like this weirdly dick-led approach to interpersonal relationships is in large part why I've never been very good at befriending males and most of my most rewarding and emotionally intimate friendships have been with the opposite sex. Women aren't horrible monsters who all hate each other and look to exploit and humiliate vulnerable males. They're just people too: ones mercifully free of the idealisation of douchebaggery and the 'bro' mentality.
 
no offense but this does sound kind of stalkerish

texting can be a "slippery slope" .. dont hinge too much on that shit

I didn't have too much of a choice. She hardly ever answered her phone when I would call (which was about... once a week, give or take). When she wanted to talk, she would literally text me "Call me". I think it was because she lived in a crowded house - I could always hear the noise when we talked.

When we were out together, things were fine. Have fun, flirt, dance, drink, whatever seemed fun at the moment. Kissing in public was fun and she liked it too. One time we even walked the rock jetty's at Balboa Peninsula (quite dangerous actually, but very fun). Then sat at the end of it and watched the sunset and people playing in the water. This was our first date, and when I kissed her. Things typically got heavier in the car or at my place.

What I think did me in, and when she started responding less to my texts, was our date at House of Blues/Downtown Disney. I made the mistake of letting her get into my head, let her know how I think. At the time things seemed fine. We danced after, and played with Legos at the lego store. Had a caricature done.

But something definitely changed after that date. And talking too much I think was it. You live, you learn. I learned that I have to talk less, create more mystery. And NEVER let a girl know how I think.

The next weekend after the HoB was Thanksgiving weekend. Four day weekend, and I wanted to do something on Saturday or Sunday. So I texted her once and called her once (she didn't pick up) on Friday asking if she was available on those days. She didn't respond. I texted her on Sunday asking how her Thanksgiving weekend was. She responded "It was great!! Urs?" We then texted back and forth for a bit. But I could tell from her replies that something was wrong.

I then texted her on Monday saying I could tell there was something wrong, and asking when could we talk it over. I sent a text on Wednesday saying "I miss you :)". No response to either this or Monday's text.

Then she sent me that four word text on Thursday ending things. I didn't reply to it.

To put the timeline in perspective, the HoB date was on November 21st I believe. Her text ending it was on December 1st. So, a 10 day span.

Oh, and I think if it took a girl three hours minimum to respond to every one of your reaches to her, I think it would get to you after a while too. I didn't notice it at first, but it started bugging me after a while. I never brought it up with her.
 
I keep returning back to this thread because just the thought of some responses blows me away. Here's a (super well-edited) picture of me sitting with 5 attractive women.

http://i.imgur.com/mSHMb.jpg

Again, I find every single one of them attractive. Loe and behold, they are all my friends. Impossible, right? I should also note that I'd never, EVER have sex with any of them. "BUT THEY'RE ATTRACTIVE AND THEREFORE YOU'RE NOT REALLY FRIENDS IF THE OPPORTUNITY WAS GIVEN!", right? Again, you're wrong.
WTF. Here's one mine: http://img33.imageshack.us/img33/6928/12922419.jpg
And I would fuck all of them. In fact, I did. Only one, but I felt attracted to all of them. Jezz man, serious, I cannot understand your post. Anyway, guess I have to respect that.
 
I didn't have too much of a choice. She hardly ever answered her phone when I would call (which was about... once a week, give or take). When she wanted to talk, she would literally text me "Call me". I think it was because she lived in a crowded house - I could always hear the noise when we talked.

When we were out together, things were fine. Have fun, flirt, dance, drink, whatever seemed fun at the moment. Kissing in public was fun and she liked it too. One time we even walked the rock jetty's at Balboa Peninsula (quite dangerous actually, but very fun). Then sat at the end of it and watched the sunset and people playing in the water. This was our first date, and when I kissed her. Things typically got heavier in the car or at my place.

What I think did me in, and when she started responding less to my texts, was our date at House of Blues/Downtown Disney. I made the mistake of letting her get into my head, let her know how I think. At the time things seemed fine. We danced after, and played with Legos at the lego store. Had a caricature done.

But something definitely changed after that date. And talking too much I think was it. You live, you learn. I learned that I have to talk less, create more mystery. And NEVER let a girl know how I think.

The next weekend after the HoB was Thanksgiving weekend. Four day weekend, and I wanted to do something on Saturday or Sunday. So I texted her once and called her once (she didn't pick up) on Friday asking if she was available on those days. She didn't respond. I texted her on Sunday asking how her Thanksgiving weekend was. She responded "It was great!! Urs?" We then texted back and forth for a bit. But I could tell from her replies that something was wrong.

I then texted her on Monday saying I could tell there was something wrong, and asking when could we talk it over. I sent a text on Wednesday saying "I miss you :)". No response to either this or Monday's text.

Then she sent me that four word text on Thursday ending things. I didn't reply to it.

To put the timeline in perspective, the HoB date was on November 21st I believe. Her text ending it was on December 1st. So, a 10 day span.

Oh, and I think if it took a girl three hours minimum to respond to every one of your reaches to her, I think it would get to you after a while too. I didn't notice it at first, but it started bugging me after a while. I never brought it up with her.

but how many minutes was that? come on man, you should have included that in your analysis as well
 
If you don't mind me asking, what do you get out of those friendships with those five women? I have a policy of not being friends with women unless they're gonna set me up with their hot friends (women make the best wingmen). Here you you have five attractive women who are all mutual friends with you and yet none of them have slept with you. I don't see what you get out of this deal.

What about, you know, friendship? Companionship, good conversation, shared experiences, somebody to look to for help or advice if need be. The things we'd hope we'd normally get from friendship regardless of gender. I don't see how this is hard to understand. Claiming that women are, basically, only good for sex has some deeply misogynist undertones I wouldn't think I'd need to point out.

I'm honestly finding this rather bewildering and frustrating. You're all making out my gender to be more shallow and simplistic than I'd ever feared.
 
GRONk.jpg
 
but how many minutes was that? come on man, you should have included that in your analysis as well

Oh come on. What's wrong with analyzing a relationship to see where things went wrong? I listed where I think I went wrong.

It's good to learn what you did wrong so you don't repeat them.
 
What about, you know, friendship? Companionship, good conversation, shared experiences, somebody to look to for help or advice if need be. The things we'd hope we'd normally get from friendship regardless of gender. I don't see how this is hard to understand. Claiming that women are, basically, only good for sex has some deeply misogynist undertones I wouldn't think I'd need to point out.

I'm honestly finding this rather bewildering and frustrating. You're all making out my gender to be more shallow and simplistic than I'd ever feared.

Yeah, it's insulting towards men too, a lot of the shit being said or implied here.
 
Yeah, it's insulting towards men too, a lot of the shit being said or implied here.

It's not insulting if there is a valid biological underpinning. I'd say the insult would be from people positioning some sort of deluded ideological vision of how 'things should or ought to be' while ignoring what is.

Take for instance the following survey from Match.com referenced in Psychology Today below. Although the article states that such relationships can and do occur, the survey shows the following:

1. Most people believe it can happen.
2. From the same population, most people secretly wish for more intimate relationships from their friends.
3. Again from the same population, most people have experienced a failure in the belief of male-female friendships.
4. There is a clear difference between the positions of men and women on this issue.

"Do you believe men and women can be platonic friends?

Yes: 83%

No: 11%

Unsure: 6%
Have you had a platonic friendship that crossed the line and became romantic or sexual?

Yes: 62%

No: 36%

Unsure: 2%
Who is more likely to misinterpret the intimacy of friendship for sexual desire?

Men: 64%

Women: 25%

Unsure: 11%
Is it possible to fall in love with someone who first enters your life as a friend?

Yes: 94%

No: 4%

Unsure: 2%
Do you hope that when you do fall in love, your partner will have started out as your friend?

Yes: 71%

No: 9%

Unsure: 20%
Who is better at keeping sex out of a platonic relationship?

Men: 13%

Women: 67%

Unsure: 20%"
 
I've had sex with a lot of my female friends now that I think about it. However, I do have a lot that I'm just friends with and nothing more. One or two I'm very good mates with, probably more so than guy mates.

I think being brought up by a single mother makes it easier for me to relate to women, or at least get along with them better.

But yes, you can be 'just friends' with women.
 
Meh I want to say yes, but all the female friends I have where all MIA when they got boyfriends. Except for 1 girl, who didn't magically disappear. It might be because I introduced the guy to her though. You can be friends with girls, but imo it's better to keep it superficial with them. So technically you can, but why bother really? It's easier to have a good friendship with guys.

Speaking as a male.

edit:
Obviously there are exceptions here and there: situations where there are huge age differences, girls who you get to know because they are dating your other friends, people you meet through your family, and work relationships that turn into friendships. If I get to know a woman who I find unattractive, I can potentially become friends with her, but that just doesn't happen very often.
Yeah forgot about this category. I somehow don't consider these friends, but more like family.
 
It's not insulting if there is a valid biological underpinning.

I'm not sure there is a valid biological underpinning. I am gay and have gay (and straight) male friends who I am just friends with. I don't see a biological explanation why it is impossible that a hypothetical man and a hypothetical woman who share similar interests couldn't just be friends in the same way that shouldn't apply to my own situation even more strongly (since with two men the issue ought to be worse, if they are the reason it doesn't work).
 
I have found that I almost never bother to put forth the effort required to become acquainted with a girl unless I find her somewhat attractive. So even though I may have a girl who's just a friend, we probably wouldn't ever have become friends in the first place if I didn't find her attractive.

And I don't just mean physically attractive. She could be amazing looking, but if she's stupid or annoying in some way, we're probably not going to be friends either. So it's not like I'm pretending to be friends, its just that there is usually another dimension on my end. I think that is probably the case in most guy-girl relationships.

Obviously there are exceptions here and there: situations where there are huge age differences, girls who you get to know because they are dating your other friends, people you meet through your family, and work relationships that turn into friendships. If I get to know a woman who I find unattractive, I can potentially become friends with her, but that just doesn't happen very often.

Pretty much this.

Yeah, I can be friends with a woman, got a lot of female friends ... but "just friends" is not likely. If I'm friends with a woman there's gonna be some level of attraction in someway, be it physical or mental, that I find sexually attractive.

I guess it depends on what you feel being "just friends" means. Sure, I can be friends with both genders ... but there's never a level of sexual attraction with my male friends.
 
I can't see why we can't reconcile the hypothetical desire to fuck someone attractive with treating members of the opposite sex like human beings.
 
I'm not sure there is a valid biological underpinning. I am gay and have gay (and straight) male friends who I am just friends with. I don't see a biological explanation why it is impossible that a hypothetical man and a hypothetical woman who share similar interests couldn't just be friends in the same way that shouldn't apply to my own situation even more strongly (since with two men the issue ought to be worse, if they are the reason it doesn't work).

I think us gay men are here to debunk why this doesn't apply to everyone. Perhaps we're better because of it!

;)
 
I can't see why we can't reconcile the hypothetical desire to fuck someone attractive with treating members of the opposite sex like human beings.

Well put.

It's not even the idea that many friendships develop some romantic element that is so objectionable, it's the repeated assertion that the only reason to associate with 50% of the population is to fuck them.
 
2RS7u.jpg


I'm also still going to promote the case of FemBros - girls who, while not physically unattractive, are so tomboyish that you treat them like a guy.
 
I'm not sure there is a valid biological underpinning. I am gay and have gay (and straight) male friends who I am just friends with. I don't see a biological explanation why it is impossible that a hypothetical man and a hypothetical woman who share similar interests couldn't just be friends in the same way that shouldn't apply to my own situation even more strongly (since with two men the issue ought to be worse, if they are the reason it doesn't work).

There's a range of variation between impossible and possible. Such relationships are possible, and as indicated may even be very positive, but the application of such relationships would not be representative of the majority, and then you have to also put culture into perspective when talking about human beings as a whole.

Same-sex relationships may also provide for different experiences than heterosexual ones due to the fact that children grow up in the same environments regardless of sexual preference. In that way I don't think they would be exactly the same. Being stuck around boys due to "voluntary gender segregation" and growing to like boys is likely going to provide a different experience than being stuck around boys and then growing to girls.
 
Haven't read all this thread, but I think they can be. I've got loads of guy pals who I would never sleep with and I can't imagine they'd want to sleep with me (I'm basically a bro). I think I've only ever slept with one of my pals before, though we're not really friends anymore (but I think that's independent of the shagging). I used to totally fancy my current flatmate, and I told him how I felt, but we're even better friends than we used to be. He has a g/f now, but if he didn't and he made a pass at me, I'd probably go for it, but that's more to do with the fact that I'm an eternal singleton rather than that I like him in that way. Basically I think he's a good looking guy so wouldn't turn it down, but I don't like him enough to make a move\I need a shag.

Edit: This thread is making me think that all my male friends are only pals with me because they think I'm totally repulsive...
 
There's a range of variation between impossible and possible. Such relationships are possible, and as indicated may even be very positive, but the application of such relationships would not be representative of the majority, and then you have to also put culture into perspective when talking about human beings as a whole.

Same-sex relationships may also provide for different experiences than heterosexual ones due to the fact that children grow up in the same environments regardless of sexual preference. In that way I don't think they would be exactly the same. Being stuck around boys due to "voluntary gender segregation" and growing to like boys is likely going to provide a different experience than being stuck around boys and then growing to girls.

Those sound like sociological (or maybe psychosocial is the better word?) reasons, though, which again says to me that there isn't some biological reason it doesn't happen.

If you are saying that an explanation for the attitude of some men that men and women cannot be friends are because of some internalized culturally-derived values, then I would agree with you. I think that you can see that at work in this topic. What I disagreed with was that there was some biological basis to it, and the examples you gave weren't biological explanations.
 
Yes... duh?

If you're not attracted to them, yes. Even if you were, it's not like you have to date/fuck/etc a friend just because you're somewhat attracted to them.

I find it completely weird that some people have to be attracted to the person in order to even want to become friends in the first place. Wtf.

What about, you know, friendship? Companionship, good conversation, shared experiences, somebody to look to for help or advice if need be. The things we'd hope we'd normally get from friendship regardless of gender. I don't see how this is hard to understand. Claiming that women are, basically, only good for sex has some deeply misogynist undertones I wouldn't think I'd need to point out.

I'm honestly finding this rather bewildering and frustrating. You're all making out my gender to be more shallow and simplistic than I'd ever feared.
Agreed.
 
Those sound like sociological (or maybe psychosocial is the better word?) reasons, though, which again says to me that there isn't some biological reason it doesn't happen.

If you are saying that an explanation for the attitude of some men that men and women cannot be friends are because of some internalized culturally-derived values, then I would agree with you. I think that you can see that at work in this topic. What I disagreed with was that there was some biological basis to it, and the examples you gave weren't biological explanations.

I'd say that it also involves biology as a motivating factor and that genetic sexual attraction always exists. Brothers and sisters for instance tend not to develop sexual attraction if they are raised together, but if separated and connected in later years, they may actually develop an increased interest in each other leading to incest. I believe that was the case of separated siblings that had inadvertently married each other unknowingly.

May be this one but I could have sworn it was an older (as in years older) news topic:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-couple-discovered-twins-separated-birth.html

The analysis of how such relationships occur despite the genetic taboo of incest and the sheer odds of coupling led to the implication that genes played the key element in attraction and that people with similar genes but separate ties found each other exceptionally attractive. While sociology is a factor, there is also an underlying genetic one that exists and plays a part in attraction and there is no element of choice over it, only control.

I always like the metaphor of the beating drum of biology. It's always there but gets louder or softer depending on the circumstances and in the case of attraction, genes are a significant motivating factor.

Again, I'm not saying they 'cannot' be friends but that it is challenging to do so and while the belief that this scenario could be optimal is fine, I'm skeptical of belief over practice. That survey from the article I linked to earlier shows that practice and desire don't appear to match said beliefs to the same extent and that such successes in practice would represent the minority.
 
Ridiculous premise and video. Why would having any sort of attraction limit your ability to be friends with the opposite sex? I have female friends who range from unattractive to drop dead gorgeous but that doesn't limit my friendship with them at all.

The guys in the video seemed like they were in college but their minds are stuck in high school.
 
No.

The long answer is "yes", but the whole time you'd be resisting your impulses. The penis is very strong, that's just how men are wired.

Edit: See Atrus' post above.
 
I feel bad for straight men thanks to this topic.
I'm convinced many of them just didn't have many (or any?) really good female friends. Once you get past that stage and start looking at things other than how hot a person and rather at their many other qualities, it just doesn't matter.

I can think a female friend of mine is gorgeous and still have little to no attraction to them, just like any other friend.
 
Can a man and a woman just be friends? Can a man a fleshlight just be "friends"? both answers are NO.


This post brought to you buy our sponsor Fleshlight.
 
To everyone saying "no" in here, can you not be around hot female co-workers and not be attempting to fuck them either?

'Attempting', or 'wanting'? A very important distinction.

The other mitigating factor is whether she has a wedding ring; that little gold line is one that plenty of guys wouldn't cross.
 
'Attempting', or 'wanting'? A very important distinction.

The other mitigating factor is whether she has a wedding ring; that little gold line is one that plenty of guys wouldn't cross.

Seeing how the argument against being friends with women is "You can't be friends without wanting to fuck her." then I don't think the distinction between "attempting" and "wanting" makes a difference at all in this case.
 
Sigh, it's so sad and fucked up that this thread can essentially be boiled down to: women are only good for providing sex.
 
It takes two mature person to achieve a real, balanced friendship. It is possible, but very hard to do. Especially when a romance was in the past (which is my whole life story, lol :P)
 
Sigh, it's so sad and fucked up that this thread can essentially be boiled down to: women are only good for providing sex.
A lot (that is: not all) of men are quite misogynistic, even if they dont know it themselves. The complete disrespect they show women is shocking at times. Or the whole idea that, just because they are 'nice' (read: creepy as fuck) to women they deserve sex, is also quite often there. A lot of the replies in this topic shows that perfectly: women are useful for sex, and anything else (i.e. friendship) is only a game you have to play to get them to have sex with you. It's almost like they think women aren't real persons.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom