• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Capcom: Buy our latest test game - Biohazard ~Dark Side Chronicles

Status
Not open for further replies.
TheKingsCrown said:
Your statements are true, but they don't have to be is what I'm saying.

It is absurd that companies will not create a fully 3D non-rails game for the Wii, when they have done much better for far lesser consoles (GameCube). Still, I expect Resident Evil 6 will start on Wii and be ported to the other consoles.

The gamecube was one of the most powerful consoles last gen.

I'm not understanding something...in every sales threads Wii lovers love to throw up Casual Gamers, and this expanded Wii audience, and how hardcore games are "not for the console." Then god forbid someone doesn't make a game that makes use of the Wii controls in mind....another bitch thread. Yet when something casual is announced, and makes use of the controls you guys go up in arms.

Resident Evil: UC sold to the *gasp* casual gamers, and you know what? They'll probably buy this one too. So when you guys parade around with these casual sales numbers, and get casual games why moan?
 
EmCeeGramr said:
MySims instead of Sims.

MySims and Sims.

TheKingsCrown said:
Still, I expect Resident Evil 6 will start on Wii and be ported to the other consoles.

Da, da, daaaa.

Christopher said:
in every sales threads Wii lovers love to throw up Casual Gamers, and this expanded Wii audience, and how hardcore games are "not for the console."

What sales threads have you been reading? D:
 
Christopher said:
The gamecube was one of the most powerful consoles last gen.

I'm not understanding something...in every sales threads Wii lovers love to throw up Casual Gamers, and this expanded Wii audience, and how hardcore games are "not for the console." Then god forbid someone doesn't make a game that makes use of the Wii controls in mind....another bitch thread. Yet when something casual is announced, and makes use of the controls you guys go up in arms.

Resident Evil: UC sold to the *gasp* casual gamers, and you know what? They'll probably buy this one too. So when you guys parade around with these casual sales numbers, and get casual games why moan?

so you really think the million+ buyers of UC are casuals? :lol
 
Christopher said:
The gamecube was one of the most powerful consoles last gen.

I think he meant that more in the "it was third place in a three-way console race, yet got better support than the current winner" way.
 
David H Wong said:
And I love how GAF thinks everyone owns every console. "You don't like the Wii games, just buy 360 games instead!"

Yeah, probably less than 10% of gamers have more than one new-gen console.

If I want to play MadWorld, I have to buy a Wii and everyone in this very thread will tell me so. So, if you want to play RE5 or whatever, buy that console.
 
Kintaro said:
If I want to play MadWorld, I have to buy a Wii and everyone in this very thread will tell me so. So, if you want to play RE5 or whatever, buy that console.
Problem with that analogy is that the 360 already has lots of action games.
 
morningbus said:
I think he meant that more in the "it was third place in a three-way console race, yet got better support than the current winner" way.
Maybe because Capcom could port their titles to as many as 3 additional equivilant platforms at that time. The 1.5M worldwide sales for RE4Wii was great for a $30 title with no competition that had already been released on previous consoles. 1.5M worldwide for a new RE4-level game (meaning tens of millions in development) would be a failure.
Problem with that analogy is that the 360 already has lots of action games.
But there are threads full of List Warz about how the Wii already has lots of games for the non-grandmas, so what's the problem?
 
EmCeeGramr said:
Problem with that analogy is that the 360 already has lots of action games.

All the more reason to get one isn't it? If that need isn't getting filled on your system of choice but there's a widely available and cheaper option to fill such a need, why not fill it?
 
morningbus said:
Technically all that's confirmed is a Leon dressed in his Resident Evil 2 outfit, I think. It could be CV/RE4 with flashbacks to Raccoon City.
Yeah, I've seen the scan. I extrapolated from the games missing from UC1 and Dahlgren's quotes. :p


morningbus said:
Spin-offs aren't necessarily bad things, either. A RE4-like game would undoubtedly have been some kind of off-shoot from the main storyline. The real problem here is that we're being given low-budget games with terrible or unwanted gameplay styles.
EmCeeGramr said:
Well that, and the fact that Wii owners are getting upset at the very idea of spinoffs.

We've had two Resident Evil on-rails shooters, a Dead Space on-rails shooter, a Dragon Quest on-rails slasher, a Samurai Warriors on-rails slasher, a Final Fantasy dungeon crawler, a Castlevania fighting game, a Soul Calibur hack-and-slash, Rayman party games, and on-rail Sonic storybook games with RPG elements and swords. We get SSX Blur and Skate It instead of SSX5 and Skate, MySims instead of Sims. And while some of these games are fine, a lot of them are 3rd rate attempts at being different for the heck of it.
Very true.

Spin-off = smaller team, not A-string, lower budget (even proportionally) - it's understandable if people are unhappy with the very concept of spin-offs, even though some of them have turned out to be good games.
 
Kintaro said:
If I want to play MadWorld, I have to buy a Wii and everyone in this very thread will tell me so. So, if you want to play RE5 or whatever, buy that console.

Yet this still doesn't stop people saying "I wish they'd port this to the 360, I'm not buying a Wii" in Madworld threads.

For some reason "I refuse to ever buy a Wii" is a perfectly reasonable position to take, yet refusing to buy either a PS3 or 360 is something beyond belief.

For the record, as a current PCii'er, I think both positions are equally as stupid.
 
Vdragoon said:
this post makes too much sense
Seriously, STOP WITH THE SIDE GAMES...

What good are side games, even if they fit the platform, without the mainline games?

The fact that gun-games fit the Wii controller doesn't mean every major franchise should get one, and most are probably gonna end up bombing by crowding the market so much so quick.

Side games (aka 3rd rate efforts most of the time) are OK when taken in context with mainline games, but alone they are crap to Wii-only owners. Example: Soul Calibur Legends would have been a bit more accepted (despite not being very good) if we had gotten Soul Calibur 4 as well.

Umbrella Chronicles as an accompaniment to RE4 was fine, but now we are getting another light-gun game with no major title along with it. It's going to run into the same problem Dead Space Extraction will because Dead Space isn't on Wii. Sure, the very tiny percentage of people owning multiple platforms are ok with it, but companies need to take into account the larger hardcore gaming audience on Wii and not limited themselves to fans of certain franchises that own multiple systems.

If these games were released at $20 then I could see some casuals jumping in, but at $50 there is no way these light-gun games are gonna reach critical mass. For example, would World at War have sold almost 500k in the US alone if it had been a $50 rail game? Probably not. I expect this next Chronicles game isn't gonna reach nearly the heights Umbrella Chronicles did partly because there is not major, meaty game on the system it could complement well.
 
Last-gen direct ports are not making Wii owners happy.
Low budget games developed by 3rd Tier studios are not making Wii owners happy.
Half-assed attempts at milking a franchise is not making Wii owners happy.
Showing a recently started development for shit and giggles (and also for trying to cover a huge fiasco) is not making Wii owners happy.
And for a legitimate attempt at a good game, you managed to move all possible strings to make it miserabily fail so you could have your excuse not to do it anymore.

Guess what? You can go choke on a putrid zombie dick, shove this shit back to your asses and then fuck yourselves, in any order. I'll give my money to the talented people that you kicked in the ass instead.
 
beje said:
Last-gen direct ports are not making Wii owners happy.

Huh? The whole reason this thread is so large is due to a last-gen port that made Wii owners too happy (apparently, so now Capcom's gotta tone down that happiness to more reasonable levels).

Personally, I am also greatly anticipating Pikmin, Pikmin 2, and Metroid Prime on the Wii.
 
donny2112 said:
Huh? The whole reason this thread is so large is due to a last-gen port that made Wii owners too happy (apparently, so now Capcom's gotta tone down that happiness to more reasonable levels).

Personally, I am also greatly anticipating Pikmin, Pikmin 2, and Metroid Prime on the Wii.

I was talking about RE0 and RE1 (that you could already play on Wii if you had them for GC) with 0% new content added, Okami to some extent too, but whatever.

The point is, I want somebody at Capcom (because I know they're reading this) to know that, by default, any future game by them will be considered utter shitty cash-ins until they prove me wrong, which won't happen soon as MotoGP is some half-assed PS2 port, Spyborgs always sounded like a really bad idea and MH3 is not likely coming to the west soon.

And I'm absolutely not the only one that thinks like this
 
It's just a little disappointing that, out of the two RE games that sold well, RE4 Wii Edition is the one NOT to be taken a step further.

Instead, Capcom decided to build on what they did with Umbrella Chronicles. It's not necessarily a bad thing, since the Wii is the premiere platform for rail-shooters, and Umbrella Chronicles is a solid game (and is excellent fanservice), but RE4: Wii Edition is one of the most brilliant ports ever, and that has a lot to do with the controls. People felt that RE4's brilliance on Wii was proof enough that another game should be made with similar gameplay, even if it's not as high-tier as Resident Evil 5.

Of course, UC originated and RE4-like experience, but just happened to make the transition to rail-shooter territory. It worked out in the end, but there are a lot of us who would've liked to see the result of UC had it been shaped more around RE4-like gameplay.
 
morningbus said:
Yet this still doesn't stop people saying "I wish they'd port this to the 360, I'm not buying a Wii" in Madworld threads.

For some reason "I refuse to ever buy a Wii" is a perfectly reasonable position to take, yet refusing to buy either a PS3 or 360 is something beyond belief.

For the record, as a current PCii'er, I think both positions are equally as stupid.

I don't care either way. But like you said, both sides do it. For the record, I'll just borrow a Wii and rent MadWorld so like always, I end up the winner. :lol

Last-gen direct ports are not making Wii owners happy.
Low budget games developed by 3rd Tier studios are not making Wii owners happy.
Half-assed attempts at milking a franchise is not making Wii owners happy.

Perhaps you should direct your hate at Wii owners. RE4 Wii sold well which told Capcom it makes Wii owners happy. Umbrella Chronicles sold well, which tells Capcom that it makes Wii owners happy. to them, they're just making Wii owners happy. Perhaps you should spit that hate to the userbase who bought these titles. Whatever good that will do ya.
 
it's kind-of frustrating to be annoyed about a game that i'll probably buy at full price.

i suspect this fits into the games-as-art argument somehow...
 
Warren Ellis said:
The Wii Circle

FIST INFO ON A NEW GAME

-Announcement of a new third party game
-hopes are raised
-fans say that this time is an original game
-fans say the game will have the best controls ever
-tests are over
-HD fans fear that maybe this time their favorite game will be on wii

FIRST SCREENS OF THE NEW GAME

-it is the same old on-rails game/porting

-first cutscenes screens and people say "it is good for a wii"
-fans say the wiimote is perfect for this game
-this is the final test
-HD fans laughing

THE GAME GETS RELEASED
-the game gets 7 on ign/gamespot/edge
-ign/edge/gamespot sucks
-the fans still say it is the best game ever because of the controls
-graphics are bad even for a wii
-HD fans still laughing
:lol

The on-rails genre is worth as much as a port now. How desperate.
 
Relaxed Muscle said:
I don't think is that hard, not watered down ports but either a niche genre, which until some time ago was almost dead on consoles but seems to have appealed somehow to a part of casual gamers on Wii, so developers found a easy and cheap way to do spin off of some of their series.

How many people will put on rails shooters on their favorites genres? and the other part who don't really care about the genre, how many of them will prefer an action game, a proper survival horror game, an outbreak sequel, a proper remake instead another half assed on rails shooter?

I'm pretty sure if this was a proper and totally new spin off based on RE4 gameplay and power up engine, none to little people would have complained. If we don't count those who will complain because it's not on their console of choice.

I've pretty much given up for Capcom to make a traditional RE game on ANY console.
And I prefer to have another RE Chronicles than an Outbreak sequel. The loading time left a very horrible taste to me.
 
Zachack said:
The 1.5M worldwide sales for RE4Wii was great for a $30 title with no competition that had already been released on previous consoles. 1.5M worldwide for a new RE4-level game (meaning tens of millions in development) would be a failure.

So basically, Lost Planet and Dead Rising (360) were failures?
 
Rash said:
People felt that RE4's brilliance on Wii was proof enough that another game should be made with similar gameplay, even if it's not as high-tier as Resident Evil 5.
They did make another game with RE4 gameplay. It was called Dead Rising: Chop Till You Drop, and it was farmed out and had absolutely no legitimate effort put into it.
 
Kintaro said:
Perhaps you should direct your hate at Wii owners. RE4 Wii sold well which told Capcom it makes Wii owners happy. Umbrella Chronicles sold well, which tells Capcom that it makes Wii owners happy. to them, they're just making Wii owners happy. Perhaps you should spit that hate to the userbase who bought these titles. Whatever good that will do ya.

I supported Capcom buying UC to show them they have a good userbase to work on. But hey, after all that has happened in 2 years, I won't be the one opening the mouth when they decide to piss their next outsourced cheap-ass excuse for a game. They managed to insult Wii userbase in every conceivable way after all the support shown being Dead Rising the icing on the cake, so it's natural and expected to get the middle finger from most users, more or less like Sony with PS3 after all those unfortunate Kutaragi pieces of fine bullshit and the 5 months delay for no reason other than giggles in Europe.
 
Zachack said:
1.5M worldwide for a new RE4-level game (meaning tens of millions in development) would be a failure.

Someone is confusing the developer-budgets with PS360 projects.

How many Wii games have had a developer budget that high?
 
Mithos said:
Someone is confusing the developer-budgets with PS360 projects.

How many Wii games have had a developer budget that high?
This. This. This. This. This. Are you listening Capcom? You can pay newly hired employees less to work on this architecture. Pay less, make more, sell more. Do you get it yet? Okay?
 
beje said:
I supported Capcom buying UC to show them they have a good userbase to work on. But hey, after all that has happened in 2 years, I won't be the one opening the mouth when they decide to piss their next outsourced cheap-ass excuse for a game. They managed to insult Wii userbase in every conceivable way after all the support shown being Dead Rising the icing on the cake, so it's natural and expected to get the middle finger from most users, more or less like Sony with PS3 after all those unfortunate Kutaragi pieces of fine bullshit and the 5 months delay for no reason other than giggles in Europe.

So, you bought UC. What other message did you think you would get from buying UC other than "Hey, they liked UC! Lets make another one!"

Play some MadWorld. It'll make ya feel better. :D

This. This. This. This. This. Are you listening Capcom? You can pay newly hired employees less to work on this architecture. Pay less, make more, sell more. Do you get it yet? Okay?

Isn't that what they're doing here? Ope!
 
Mithos said:
Someone is confusing the developer-budgets with PS360 projects.

How many Wii games have had a developer budget that high?

"Tens"? None. I think Red Steel was purported to be 8-10 million in development budget, though. I think that's the highest of any game I've heard of on the Wii.

Eteric Rice said:
So basically, Lost Planet and Dead Rising (360) were failures?

:lol Nice.
 
Kintaro said:
So, you bought UC. What other message did you think you would get from buying UC other than "Hey, they liked UC! Lets make another one!"

The very least I was expecting would be something like "Hey, they liked UC! Let's assign a new one to an internal team with an interesting budget to make a more fleshed out experience", not "lololol give a couple yens to Cavia janitors so they can work on their lunch break and deliver Wii users more shit". There's a huge difference, you know.
 
Last year when confronted on their weak Wii efforts a Capcom exec replied something to the extent of "be patient great games take time to make". So this was the great game support they were telling us to be patient for. This and Chop till u drop.

As much as I love UC and we already knew a sequel was coming at some point to act like UC2 is major support is beyond disingenuous on their part. This game will be outsourced just like the first one was and will cost them very minimal development resources. Big game announcement this is not lol. They should have kept the hype to a minimal.
 
Eteric Rice said:
I'm browsing around the Capcom boards right now and the Capcom employees are absolutely silent. :lol

That's because they know really well that they're going to be eaten alive if they give the slightiest hint of being reading the forums.
 
Eteric Rice said:
I'm browsing around the Capcom boards right now and the Capcom employees are absolutely silent. :lol
They're lucky they don't flatten all the tires in their parking lot. "Wii RE fans will be very happy" my ass lol.

I'm on my way to buy Madworld a game made by former Capcom devs who know how to support the lead console with games to actually be impressed over.
 
Eteric Rice said:
I'm browsing around the Capcom boards right now and the Capcom employees are absolutely silent. :lol

I would assume they can't realy say anything until the official announcement on Friday?
 
Capcom brought this upon themselves. Had they just said we have a new Wii announcement coming soon, no one would have blown it up to what it did. Fuck you, Capcom.
 
This thread is massive.

Any real info on Dark Chronicles yet? The OP hasn't been updated and I can't tell if posters are genuinely complaining or speculating over the title.
 
Kintaro said:
So, you bought UC. What other message did you think you would get from buying UC other than "Hey, they liked UC! Lets make another one!"
The problem is that Capcom saying these games are "tests" to see how much the Wii audience want "mature" games based on high profile franchises.

If Wii owners don't buy the spinoffs, the publishers assume they don't want the big budget franchise.
If Wii owners do buy the spinoffs, the publishers assume that they want more spinoffs.
 
Brandon F said:
This thread is massive.

Any real info on Dark Chronicles yet? The OP hasn't been updated and I can't tell if posters are genuinely complaining or speculating over the title.
It will contain RE 2 and RE CV locations. It will have Leon and Claire. There is a scan going around.
 
I think it could be good. I enjoyed UC afterall and it's basically a perfect title for the Wii.

I'm on my way to buy Madworld a game made by former Capcom devs who know how to support the lead console with games to actually be impressed over.
You sound like me...in reverse.

(Though I am buying Madworld).
 
~Kinggi~ said:
It will contain RE 2 and RE CV locations. It will have Leon and Claire. There is a scan going around.
It actually doesn't mention CV. People are just guessing from that Capcom employee's comments earlier.

Maybe when the game is officially announced (isn't it supposed to be at the RE5 launch party tomorrow?) we'll get more solid information.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom