• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Capcom share holders do not approve stock take over defense

In case Nintendo really buys them they should let make Platinum a new Viewtiful Joe, that's all I ask them to do.
And FullHD-REmakes of RE0-3.

jack-nicholson-nodding.gif
.
 
Considering the direction Nintendo has taken, acquiring/publishing exclusive games in different non-typical Nintendo genre's (Bayo, Devil's Third, X, new Fatal Frame for Wii U) Capcom's IP's definitely seem like a good fit. Would be interesting to see Nintendo passing on former Clover IP's to Platinum who they know built a relationship with.
But how will buying Capcom shares + huge development costs for major titles stack up against sales on a Nintendo system? I think it's a very risky investment.
 
Considering the direction Nintendo has taken, acquiring/publishing exclusive games in different non-typical Nintendo genre's (Bayo, Devil's Third, X, new Fatal Frame for Wii U) Capcom's IP's definitely seem like a good fit. Would be interesting to see Nintendo passing on former Clover IP's to Platinum who they know built a relationship with.
But how will buying Capcom shares + huge development costs for major titles stack up against sales on a Nintendo system? I think it's a very risky investment.

Dead Rising is a pretty huge IP for Xbone and Steet Fighter and Smash on the same console make Nintendo the tournament standard. Capcom develops games that fill a lot of holes in Nintendo's library

So much wishful thinking in this thread.

Oh totally. I have no qualms admitting that I want Nintendo to buy an interest in Capcom for many reasons. However it just makes sense for everyone if they did do it.
 
In terms of Resident Evil, isn't that one of the few i guess 3rd party core IPs that do well on Nintendo platforms. RE4 if i remember correctly did very well on the GCN and on the Wii as well. The GCN version selling 1.6 million compared to the PS2's 2 million with a significantly larger userbase.

I assume RE4 did well on Gamecube, and it did better on Wii. But that was also almost a decade ago. It didn't stick around on Gamecube for all that long either, and I personally have no idea how Capcom viewed that initial launch. Did they NEED the PS2 version to help make up the dev cost?

A better comparison would perhaps be Revelations. Revelations did well on 3DS according to Capcom, didn't it? Could they continue to make games like that without the possibility of porting to 5 other platforms? Now what about games on an HD platform which would cost a lot more...?
 
I assume RE4 did well on Gamecube, and it did better on Wii. But that was also almost a decade ago. It didn't stick around on Gamecube for all that long either, and I personally have no idea how Capcom viewed that initial launch. Did they NEED the PS2 version to help make up the dev cost?

A better comparison would perhaps be Revelations. Revelations did well on 3DS according to Capcom, didn't it? Could they continue to make games like that without the possibility of porting to 5 other platforms? Now what about games on an HD platform which would cost a lot more...?

Revelations did really well on 3DS and above expectations on Wii U. It's totally within the realm of possibility.
 
You are seriously the only guy I've ever heard claim they liked Lost Planet.

1 was neat, but 2 and 3 were pretty terrible.

I loved Colonies and 2. If Nintendo buying Capcom meant that the franchise will return to it's gameplay roots (EC, Colonies, 2) especially on the Wii U. I'm down for it.
 
It would be sad... but:

Mega Man->Nintendo
Ghost & Goblins->Nintendo
Ace Attorney->Nintendo
Monster Hunter->Nintendo
DMC->Platinum
Viewtiful Joe->Platinum
Okami->Platinum
Resident Evil->Sony
Onimusha->Sony
Dino Crisis->Sony
Street Fighter->Sony
Final Fight->Sony
Dragon's Dogma->MS
Dead Rising->MS
Bionic Commando->MS
Lost Planet->MS
Breath of Fire->Atlus
Ducktales->Disney
Chip & Dale->Disney
Phone ports and stuff->Gung Ho

Devs are split into new studios for these companies, Sony buys Dimps and Nintendo buys Platinum.
 
Let's say Sony buys Capcom tomorrow.

What happens to Monster Hunter 4 Ultimate?
 
It would be sad... but:

Mega Man->Nintendo
Ghost & Goblins->Nintendo
Ace Attorney->Nintendo
Monster Hunter->Nintendo
DMC->Platinum
Viewtiful Joe->Platinum
Okami->Platinum
Resident Evil->Sony
Onimusha->Sony
Dino Crisis->Sony
Street Fighter->Sony
Final Fight->Sony
Dragon's Dogma->MS
Dead Rising->MS
Bionic Commando->MS
Lost Planet->MS
Breath of Fire->Atlus
Ducktales->Disney
Chip & Dale->Disney
Phone ports and stuff->Gung Ho

I more or less like what i see there. I doubt they will sell the company IP by IP though.

Canceled, please understand

All those go with different contracts. Do you think that Deep Down would be canceled if Nintendo bought them? No way.
Games on the pipeline and that close to release will go as planned.
 
If Nintendo do buy Capcom some of the Nerd-Rage would be hilarious, would pale the Bayonetta 2 Nerd-Rage into insignificance lmfao. I'd love it to happen just to see that lololol
 
Let's say Sony buys Capcom tomorrow.

What happens to Monster Hunter 4 Ultimate?
Moved to Vita and PS3. Bur remade to include MH3, MH3U, MH4 and MH4U content in something like a HD collection.
Another team works in RE7 with From Software and Team Siren helping them.
Bluepoint ports RE1 Remake in HD for PS3, Vita and PS4 (crossbuy).
Some guy out there ports all Ace Attorney games to Vita.
Ono leads SFV development, working again with Dimps.
Yoshida calls Kamiya and offers Platinum to do DMC, Okami and Viewtiful Joe sequels or remakes with full creative freedom and a good budget paid by Sony.
 
If Nintendo do buy Capcom some of the Nerd-Rage would be hilarious, would pale the Bayonetta 2 Nerd-Rage into insignificance lmfao. I'd love it to happen just to see that lololol

I mean, I'd like to see Nintendo buy Capcom too, but I'd like it because I think it'd make Nintendo as a platform holder a lot more relevant, but why do some people want to watch the world burn? Seriously.
 
If Nintendo do buy Capcom some of the Nerd-Rage would be hilarious, would pale the Bayonetta 2 Nerd-Rage into insignificance lmfao. I'd love it to happen just to see that lololol

The Bayonetta 2 backlash would be nothing. We'd be talking about Street Fighter, Devil May Cry (which already got a ton of hate for DMC4 being on both PS3 AND 360 from some people), Resident Evil, and a ton of other franchises.

On the other hand, a huge chunk of the characters people would want in Smash Bros. suddenly become possible.
 
The Bayonetta 2 backlash would be nothing. We'd be talking about Street Fighter, Devil May Cry (which already got a ton of hate for DMC4 being on both PS3 AND 360 from some people), Resident Evil, and a ton of other franchises.

Well, to be frank, the only two must have RE games both released exclusively on Nintendo consoles, one of them is still exclusive.
 
I think Nintendo buying Capcom would be great, as long as they keep certain key game development folks.

Replace all the businessmen. You now have a happy ending.
 
The Bayonetta 2 backlash would be nothing. We'd be talking about Street Fighter, Devil May Cry (which already got a ton of hate for DMC4 being on both PS3 AND 360 from some people), Resident Evil, and a ton of other franchises.

It would be the apocalypse. Bigger than Sega leaving hardware.

Then again, we're living in a world where Ben Affleck nearly directed a Star Wars film and Billy Elliot is playing Fantastic Four's Thing, so anything's possible.
 
The Bayonetta 2 backlash would be nothing. We'd be talking about Street Fighter, Devil May Cry (which already got a ton of hate for DMC4 being on both PS3 AND 360 from some people), Resident Evil, and a ton of other franchises.

On the other hand, a huge chunk of the characters people would want in Smash Bros. suddenly become possible.

Maximum irony. "Hey console warrors don't worry DMC isn't multiplatform any more."

It'd be like the game industry as presented by the twilight zone.
 
I don't know. I think a lot of the hate stemming from Bayo 2 being WiiU exclusive was because the WiiU had a wasteland of a library at the time if you didn't care for Nintendo games, and people simply didn't want to purchase a new console for a single game... if Nintendo really bought Capcom, Capcom's library alone would sustain a lot of people who aren't head over heels over Nintendo properties.
 
Let's be honest, there will be a meltdown whatever happens anyway.

Yeah, we're at a stage where everything is hypothetical, but the likely options seem to be a console manufacturer, meaning exclusivity, or a person predominately interested in mobile, meaning even fewer non-mobile games.

Whoever wins, gaf loses.
 
Revelations did really well on 3DS and above expectations on Wii U. It's totally within the realm of possibility.

Hm. Resident Evil does have enough of a draw as a franchise that it perhaps could make up its cost on a single platform, assuming Nintendo could whip them into shape and get those projects to stop being so stupidly overinflated.
 
I'd love for Nintendo to buy Capcom. Sony would be okay, but I'd rather they didn't. They do well with WWS but I don't think they'd too well with capcom. MS will hopefully stay very far away, they have no idea what they're doing and they'd run it into the ground (see: Rare).

If it is sold it'll likely be to a third party company though.
 
If there's any place Nintendo actually checks for fan feedback, it's the Miiverse.

I know they do check it, but again, they aren't going to buy a company on the suggestion of a few fans.

People commenting on a "post MS-Rare" are forgetting that Rare was bleeding talent/capability before they were sold... Star Fox Adventures wasn't good, and it wasn't just a change of protag that caused it (collect-a-thons were already way on their way out by the time it came out).

Nintendo was just the first to realize this, which is why they were okay with selling them to Microsoft.

But they were very well respected by gamers and the industry at that time, regardless of what was going on within the company. Passionate devs were attracted to them, and gamers snapped up their offerings on Nintendo platforms. Nintendo knew this, and still didn't think they were worth the effort?

Why couldn't the company be fixed up? Look at Retro. They were given structure and a focus, and the guidance they needed. I still think it was a bad move, long-term.

Water well under the bridge now though.
 
Yeah, we're at a stage where everything is hypothetical, but the likely options seem to be a console manufacturer, meaning exclusivity, or a person predominately interested in mobile, meaning even fewer non-mobile games.

Whoever wins, gaf loses.

I'm going to say the likely option is no one buys them (or their IP in a bankruptcy fashion), until proven otherwise.

I don't think people are proposing hypotheticals so much as airing fantasies about various IP being worked on, either by a company (or all the major companies at once) dropping support for their own IPs or by a purchased Capcom diverting man-power away from their more profitable IPs by decree by the company that bought them to make profit. Or in the case of Nintendo, the fantasy of having third party support on consoles.
 
Top Bottom