I just don't see anything like RE in this new game
You see what you want to see. The same could be argued about Outbreak.
, it still feels like a RE game
How do you know this new RE online title doesn't? You saw 2 minutes of this yet...I played HUNDREDS of hours of Outbreak 1 and 2 and I'm telling you, you haven't seen enough of this new title to really say that, I'd argue we've seen enough to support its the base concept of Outbreak. Anything else you are arguing is way too subjective like "feel" or your emotions regarding it.
I'd even go as far as to say that I'll be more willing to play true and next gen Outbreak game
What about this title isn't outbreak besides obviously it having a different name? If you go on about "feel", you need to excuse your point, its too bias and emotional for anyone to take into any consideration. It would be like me saying the new DMC5 isn't like the last ones and I'd pay f or a "REAL" DMC titles. (Oh, whats not DMC about it) "OK bro, well I FEEL, it FEELS, THE FEELS" once you go down that road, you are not arguing about any objective feature, you are actually asking for an emotional attachment to the title like you had with another title...something no damn company can even properly convey or even understand, that is just too vague and based on personal want that just can't be measured. Its why you only see me telling you about actual factual features, not my feelings on the title. That is subject to change person by person ie subjective. Thus it has no place in talking about this and the other title. To be on the same page, ignore your feelings about it as there is no point to bringing it up. Stay on objective facts and features that can be measured to make the point.
VS
"feel"
I just don't think RE brand will benifit much (or at all) from the most of the stuff they've showed in gameplay trailer, if anything it'll make it worse, again, just like after Operation Racoon City or Umbrella Corps.
Funny, could someone not saying this about the Outbreak 3 trailer showing 4 people fighting zombies with different abilities? So you are more obsessed over the name "Outbreak" then you are the actual concept of the game....
I care about this brand and I don't want it to be damaged or get bad rep
?? Gamers are not that dumb though bud, they understand this isn't a main RE title, everything you are arguing can be argued even about OUTBREAK! They have had so many bad RE side games its not even funny, but fans still clearly understand the main RE titles and remakes are go tos, no one is dying over this. So you can't ask for Outbreak and then complain about a online Resident Evil title and then worry about brand, then complain about OTHER MP titles......soooo none of that would apply to Outbreak 3? So as someone that played 1 and 2, you are worrying about lots of dumb things. This is pretty much Outbreak, I didn't just like those games cause the name was "OUTBREAK" I liked it based on what I did.
I liked having many characters that were just civilians and new.
I liked having many puzzles to solve as a team
I liked having online players stop a zombie from biting me
I liked having different abilities
I liked being able to turn into a zombie after I hit 100%.
Those things still exist in this title, so its a day 1 buy for me. Stop getting so hung up on "feel" of something you didn't even play, heck as someone that put so many hours in those 2 games, don't you think its odd I'M not arguing over this existing but supporting it?
So you can't really be this upset over 2 minutes of a trailer of a sequel to a series you never played arguing about something you've never even felt or played. It makes no sense.
if you trully believe in online RE experience, do it right
??? My friend, you never played Outbreak 1 or 2 to know if this is doing it wrong so.... This pretty much is Outbreaks concept in a nutshell. It even has the feature of finding a map to update the team, at 2.12min you can see it on the top right.
sometimes doing nothing is better
Yet...you are asking for something CALLED Outbreak 3? smh. So they need to make money to fund the company, this isn't the first RE online title and this won't be the first time they've had a title flop if it does. They still need to compete in the market and I"m all for this. I've seen enough from that trailer to see its most of Outbreaks features to support a buy.
they didn't even cared about this new game that much and the fact that they've outsourced it and handed over their tech to do it kinda proves my point.
Nope. The tech already exist and Outbreak is simply a different RE concept, everything in RE2 remake that you do can work to make a outbreak title, Outbreak one more time is a CONCEPT, you don't need anyone from the original staff to do it right because if they just have the main core features, they are fine. WHAT you do in Outbreak is the difference, not how it feels or moves or anything like that. So if you can shoot a gun, have zombies, unlock doors etc, you can make a outbreak title. Its why this of all titles makes sense to outsource in the first place. Capcom likely gave them several things that it needed, random characters, turning into zombies, puzzles, finding maps, collecting items etc. All that already exist.
4v1 BS, stupid camera and mastermind shit etc
Oh, having nothing like that would make it better? So just having NPCs spawn randomly like in all other RE titles would be better? So this is something that makes no sense bud, its an option that only adds to the title. It means you are playing against a very, very hard enemy that you can't just trick or game, but must actually work together to beat, but that is the concept of Outbreak, you did that already simply not against a human, but even in outbreak YOU TURNED INTO A ZOMBIE! So the concept of a player attacking another player is not "stupid" its part of the concept.
I can't see anything that reminds me of RE in this game and from what I've seen in this trailer.
Can argue the same about Outbreak 1 and 2 then, make a real argument that doesn't just say "my feelings etc" So this whole "I can't see" stuff has way too much to do with your feelings then anything factual or objective.
I do have problems with mediocre games which hurt the brand and your reputation.
You never played this game to know if it is mediocre, you just saw 2 minutes of trailer... You never even played the original outbreaks to even know if that even applies to those titles.... They've had many flops from the Survivor series or Umbrella Corps to ironically Outbreak....yet they still exist. Folks that know the brand, know it has some misses, but RE2 and RE7 sales very much show the fan base is not so dumb that they don't know what a side game is. Will you not buy RE3 cause this? RE8? Soooooo why did you think everyone else was so slow that they'd apply this game flopping to all RE titles to ever release in the future?
And why on earth must you follow stupid trends
I don't see 4 vs 1 as a stupid trend, it makes 100% sense for a RE title as its rooted in the concept. Its not something brand new to have a bad guy throwing enemies at you. I'd argue this is one of the few IPs that makes complete sense for this.
Again, look at how you did before - Operation Racoon City and Umbrella Corps - miserable POS which flopped hard
But hey, you are asking for Outbreak 3? Could you not just argue not to make it as its online and would be a "miserable POS"? Outbreak 1 and 2 sold poorly as to why you didn't get a sequel for so long, to argue against this is to argue against Outbreak 3 as this is Outbreak all but the actual name itself.
look at original Outbreak and just make this game today with modern tech, nothing less, nothing more
Nothing more? Just no dude, at this point you are arguing for less features of a game you never even played. This is Outbreak with MORE features. I'm ok with a player being the bad guy, all that does is make it harder and more random. I have no clue why that would be unwanted and for all you know, you can simply have a playlist that has that as a NPC. So I don't know why you would argue so hard and claim a game will flop based on a feature that might be turned off as a option.
The saddest part of this whole thing is, you ignored its a co-op RE title, online, team play, puzzle solving, you must find the map, can turn into a zombie and each person has different abilities all just to complain that you are getting a new feature.
I much rather play original Outbreak game just with modern tech
Sure dude, you want to play a game CALLED Outbreak more then you actually want to play a game for its actual features ie the thing you actually do in the game. Might as well slap "Outbreak" a sticker and put it on the box to change your mind as you seem to be in love with that name vs the game itself.
Oh yes, more expanded, like if they expand the player being an enemy like when you turn into a zombie, but like maybe Mr.X or someone else? Ohhhh but I forget you don't want anything more, but you want....what more? So you are in love with a name at this point.
Never played Outbreak because it was called Outbreak, I played it cause the features and this game has those features.