• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Captain America: Civil War SPOILER Thread - #TeamThanos

Status
Not open for further replies.
These are fairly easy to follow movies, you just have to put attention for 2 fucking hours. Is that really too hard to do?
I pay attention, and I generally remember the plots of most movies, and yet I didn't realize the connection. Human beings are imperfect. And that's about it. No need to get huffy about it.
 
are you talking about the bucky starks debate? cause that seems more like a common sense battle than a marvel elitist battle

tumblr_o67gm4BLbU1r057rfo8_r1_400.gif
 
He realized the Starks were killed by Hydra. Not that Bucky was the assassin.

Instead of reiterating this point, I'll just re-post my comment.

Another thing, so we know Cap knew Hydra did it, so why would he have an issue telling Tony this? In the letter at the end of the movie, he tells Tony he admits he didn't tell Tony to protect himself because of what might happen. Why would he need to protect himself if he didn't know Bucky did it?

If he just thought it was Hydra then there's no reasons not to tell Tony. If he really only thought Hydra had done it then I could maybe buy him not telling Tony so this tragic event in his life isn't made even more tragic. However, he admits that he didn't tell him for selfish reasons and those reasons are that he didn't want to get Bucky in more hotshit since he's Cap's friend.

Tony asks if Cap knew, Cap says he knew Hydra did it. Tony asks again if he knew, Cap admits that he did and then he sends a letter explaining why he never told Tony about Bucky. Why would he explain that he only did it for himself if what he "knew" was just that Hydra had Tony's parents killed? This wouldn't negatively impact Cap.

[edit]

Tony: Did you know?
Cap: I didn't know it was him
Tony: Don't bullshit me, Rogers. Did you know?
Cap. [long pause. Eyes darting left and right]...yes

Letter at the end of the movie.

Cap: I know I hurt you, Tony. I guess I thought by not telling you about your parents I was sparring you, but I can see I was really sparring myself and I'm sorry. Hopefully one day you can understand.

Cap was bullshitting Tony when he said he didn't know it was Bucky and then admits to knowing a line later. Then he sends a letter apologize for knowing and not telling him.

They couldn't have made all of this anymore clearer.
 
People were shocked when Bucky was revealed as the WS.

But also remember that the other Super Soldiers were a red herring for Zemo's true endgame. It's not surprising that you wouldn't draw the connection between Stark's parents and Bucky being responsible.
 
lPEKKiq.jpg


Only saw the movie once but I thought Cap said he didn't tell Tony to protect Tony from mental anguish.

I posted the transcript above your post.

That's what he told himself but once Tony found out, he realized he only did it to protect himself.
 
These are fairly easy to follow movies, you just have to put attention for 2 fucking hours. Is that really too hard to do?
Human memory is incredibly imperfect, so you're going to have to forgive people who saw TWS once a year or two ago and don't perfectly retain every single little piece of information.
 
remember when everyone was arguing about the "he's my friend tony" "so was I" line in the trailer, with some saying that tony absolutely was hurt by the betrayal and thought rogers was a close friend.


...and then the directors put in a take that makes way more sense that has stark angry/dismissive moreso than hurt. yeah. smart move. #teamcoworkers
 
The plot doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me. Why did Zemo keep asking about 1991? He obviously already knew about Bucky and the death of the Starks. He had no need for the Augments... So why the obsession with the mission report?
 
remember when everyone was arguing about the "he's my friend tony" "so was I" line in the trailer, with some saying that tony absolutely was hurt by the betrayal and thought rogers was a close friend.


...and then the directors put in a take that makes way more sense that has stark angry/dismissive moreso than hurt. yeah. smart move. #teamcoworkers
Similarly, the 'punch you in your perfect teeth' line is said more jokingly in the take used in the movie compared to the trailer.
 
The plot doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me. Why did Zemo keep asking about 1991? He obviously already knew about Bucky and the death of the Starks. He had no need for the Augments... So why the obsession with the mission report?
He was looking at the encrypted Hydra data, and found some dates lining up. He probably already knew what it meant - just wanted the find the proof.
 
The 'sad' take makes a lot more sense for the tone of the first trailer.

In the movie he's still hurt by Tony's betrayal and he did consider him a close friend, but at that point he's more mad than sad about Cap's betrayal.
 
But why? A lot of effort expended for absolutely no reason.
Why what? Why look for proof? To get Tony to unrelentingly hunt Cap's best friend. Why was he looking at Hydra data? He wanted to find something to destroy the Avengers. Why did he want to destroy the Avengers? To get revenge for his family.

I mean Zemo was obviously trying to make Bucky a target, so he knew something was up.
 
But he already knew what he was looking for. He knew where to find the information (the bunker) and it's not like the general and Bucky had the tape on them.
Apparently he didn't know where the bunker was though... He found who was presumably one of Bucky's handlers. Found Bucky. Found out about the bunker from there.
 
Why what? Why look for proof? To get Tony to unrelentingly hunt Cap's best friend. Why was he looking at Hydra data? He wanted to find something to destroy the Avengers. Why did he want to destroy the Avengers? To get revenge for his family.

I mean Zemo was obviously trying to make Bucky a target, so he knew something was up.

Stick with me here.. So Zemo digs through the released Hydra data and finds both the generals location and something on a mission from 1991. On a hunch, he hunts down the general and questions him on the mission. The general says suck it, but Zemo finds the book that fills him in on Bucky and the bunker. Zemo then bombs the accords to flush out Bucky so he can brainwash him and ask him about some mission he performed in 1991. He then travels to the bunker mentioned in the star book and finds a box labeled 1991 with a video of Bucky doing the deed.

Why question Bucky at all? Why not just frame him and leave it at that?
 
He knew about 1991 from looking at Black Widow's files, we're not told what exactly he found there but we know it peaked his interest and knew he could use that information to destroy the Avengers. His investigation into the date lead him to finding the Bunker and the tape that most likely confirmed his suspicions.

Zemo needed solid proof that Bucky killed Tony's parents to set off Tony. Without it, Tony might brush off the allegations and nothing could happen. The proof was one of the surefire ways of pitting Tony and Cap against each other.

Stick with me here.. So Zemo digs through the released Hydra data and finds both the generals location and something on a mission from 1991. On a hunch, he hunts down the general and questions him on the mission. The general says suck it, but Zemo finds the book that fills him in on Bucky and the bunker. Zemo then bombs the accords to flush out Bucky so he can brainwash him and ask him about some mission he performed in 1991. He then travels to the bunker mentioned in the star book and finds a box labeled 1991 with a video of Bucky doing the deed.

Why question Bucky at all? Why not just frame him and leave it at that?

We don't know what all in the notebook, all we know for sure is that it had Bucky's activation code. Once he had that, he questioned Bucky and Bucky told him all he needed to know about 1991. Once he knew whatever Bucky told him, he went to the Bunker.

He wouldn't have known to go there without questioning Bucky.
 
He knew about 1991 from looking at Black Widow's files, we're not told what exactly he found there but we know it peaked his interest and knew he could use that information to destroy the Avengers. His investigation into the date lead him to finding the Bunker and the tape that most likely confirmed his suspicions.

Zemo needed solid proof that Bucky killed Tony's parents to set off Tony. Without it, Tony might brush off the allegations and nothing could happen. The proof was one of the surefire ways of pitting Tony and Cap against each other.

But he didn't need Bucky for that proof. He had everything in the star book. The book mentions the bunker and how to enter.
 
But he didn't need Bucky for that proof. He had everything in the star book. The book mentions the bunker and how to enter.

See my edit.

The book didn't have the location to the bunker but it did have the code to open the door. He needed to question Bucky to find the location and to hear more about what happened in 1991.

If he knew the location of the bunker, he would've gone there straight away without putting himself in danger but he couldn't do that without first questioning Bucky.

That's why it was so important to frame him, if he gets framed then the world will go after him and eventually catch him. Once he got captured, Zemo would go there to interrogate him and get the relevant information about 1991. Getting to the bunker doesn't happen without Bucky getting interrogated and that doesn't happen without him getting arrested.
 
See my edit.

The book didn't have the location to the bunker but it did have the code to open the door. He needed to question Bucky to find the location and to hear more about what happened in 1991.

If he knew the location of the bunker, he would've gone there straight away without putting himself in danger but he couldn't do that without first questioning Bucky.

Well, I wish they had shown that. I thought it was safe to assume that a book that contained "how" to access a top secret bunker would also outline the "where."
 
See my edit.

The book didn't have the location to the bunker but it did have the code to open the door. He needed to question Bucky to find the location and to hear more about what happened in 1991.

If he knew the location of the bunker, he would've gone there straight away without putting himself in danger but he couldn't do that without first questioning Bucky.

That's why it was so important to frame him, if he gets framed then the world will go after him and eventually catch him. Once he got captured, Zemo would go there to interrogate him and get the relevant information about 1991. Getting to the bunker doesn't happen without Bucky getting interrogated and that doesn't happen without him getting arrested.

Maybe it has the location, but it is written in codes, and he couldn't decrypt it.
 
Well, I wish they had shown that. I thought it was safe to assume that a book that contained "how" to access a top secret bunker would also outline the "where."

Bucky telling Cap what Zemo was after:
He wanted to know about Siberia. Where I was kept. He wanted to know exactly where.

Made it clear that Zemo needed to question Bucky to find the bunker. Since we know he started out questioning about the specific mission, he probably also found out from Bucky that the mission report would be at the bunker.
 
He'll talk about the wonderful coffee and German cuisine they had at the airport while fucking Giant-Man was throwing planes at people.
 
I swear to god, Thor 3 better open with a shot of every returning character and state their name and a summary of what they did in past movies.
"Thor; alien, not the God, brother by adoption of Loki, the villain in Thor 1 and Avengers, son of Odin, who is dead and replaced by Loki doing illusions making Thor think Odin is still alive. His weapon of choice is witty banter and a smashing hammer called Mjölnir, or Mjeuh-meu for the less initiated. Only he is deemed worthy can hold and lift the hammer, and those who can shall be imbued with the powers of Thor, basically calling up lighting and swinging that hammer REALLY hard."
"Hulk, or Bruce Banner, got his condition through a blast of gamma radiation. Has mastered his rage by the end of Incredible Hulk and demonstrates this in Avengers, as a result he can now turn into Hulk at will. Still needs Black Widow to calm him down to return to human form. He has apparantly forgotten about the love of his life; Betty."
"Hulk and Thor have a history together, they fought on the Helicarrier (that's a flying aircraftcarrier) in Avengers, and Hulk suckerpunched Thor after taking down a Leviathan alien worm thingy."
"Stan Lee. Creator of the Marvel comics you are now witnessing in filmform. Has a cameo in just about every Marvel-movie, look out for him in this movie too."

"At the end of Age of Ultron, Thor went off to follow up on a vision he got and he needs to investigate. Hulk took a Quinjet (that's a sort of plane) and dropped off the radar soon after."


Okay, so now we're an half hour into the movie, shall we take a small break to let it all sink in and then we come back here in like 10 minutes so we can see where it goes from here?

And hand everyone cheatsheets at the entrance so they can look up who the big guy with blonde hairs and billowing red cape is again.
 
Stick with me here.. So Zemo digs through the released Hydra data and finds both the generals location and something on a mission from 1991. On a hunch, he hunts down the general and questions him on the mission. The general says suck it, but Zemo finds the book that fills him in on Bucky and the bunker. Zemo then bombs the accords to flush out Bucky so he can brainwash him and ask him about some mission he performed in 1991. He then travels to the bunker mentioned in the star book and finds a box labeled 1991 with a video of Bucky doing the deed.

Why question Bucky at all? Why not just frame him and leave it at that?

To make it not obvious that you're setting a trap? You're forgetting that at that point, everyone is convinced this dude wants the remaining Winter Soldiers. And the team doesn't chase after him to Siberia unless he makes it clear his interest is in Siberia.
 
I just saw this movie! Spider-Man was by far the high point for me, I had skipped pretty much every Marvel movie until I heard that they were introducing Spider-Man so I went back and watched them all in the last couple of months. Totally worth it.

Also Team Iron Man, Cap was a coward who was right about things but for all the wrong reasons.
 
So, after watching Civil War again the soundtrack actually grew on me a bit. I actually liked how the big superhero vs superhero fight scenes in the movie actually had more somber tones to them instead of huge bombastic stuff like in an Avengers movie. It helped kind of sell that superheroes shouldn't be fighting

I hope he recaps all the events at the start of Ant Man 2

I need a recap of the airport scene with Pena voicing all the characters

Ant-Man 2 is a failure if this doesn't happen.
 
TeamCap would've won easily if ant-man threw his "Make things big" disk at the members

I think that'd kill anyone who isn't in the suit. In Ant-Man, the main bad guy kept shrinking unprotected sheep who would subsequently explode. You'd think something similar would happen for growth as well.

Come to think of it, those disks are pretty deadly.
 
Organic material has a risk of going splat without a suit.

Now that you mention it, the giant ant at the end of Ant-Man is a bit of a plot hole

I mean, only Darren Cross's faulty Yellowjacket formula made organic matter go splat, and that was before he made it work.

The Pym Particle in general shouldn't be used too much without the suit insulating you from its harmful side effects (like "altering your brain chemistry," a turn of phrase that they kept using >_>), but it looks like once or twice isn't too bad to get you in and out of its effects.
 
I think that'd kill anyone who isn't in the suit. In Ant-Man, the main bad guy kept shrinking unprotected sheep who would subsequently explode. You'd think something similar would happen for growth as well.

Come to think of it, those disks are pretty deadly.

You need the Ant Man suit for it to work.

Organic material has a risk of going splat without a suit.

Now that you mention it, the giant ant at the end of Ant-Man is a bit of a plot hole

In ant-man movie an ant was made big, it wasn't dead :)

edit : missed guek's last line :)
 
I love Ant-Man, fun movie, isn't there a part in there where they say that he has to have the suit (particularly his helmet) on before changing size?

Spoilering just in case
when he's cuffed in car he doesn't shrink to get out of it till after he maneuvers his way into helmet
.
 
I've been working 100-hour weeks since this came out so I just now had a chance to see it.

Tony's specific justification was incredibly weak. That guy would have been dead even if the Avengers were never there, along with countless others who ended up living.
Rhodey's justification was 100% based on fear. He tries to pretty it up at the end but I think it was just because his cowardice had cost him so much.
Wakanda was at the conference to support the Sokovia Accords, but... Black Panther ended up being the first character to go vigilante in the movie. (with no repercussions, not even a scolding)
And wow, they really went full mustache-twirling with Tony. He knew that everything Zemo did until the blackout and escape was to get alone in a room with Bucky. And he must have known why Zemo went to all of that trouble to get in a room with him. But then he goes psycho-killer when he finds out that Bucky killed his parents. (which couldn't have been that much of a surprise to him) Then after Tony gets his ass beaten he has a quiet moment and I was thinking "Ok, here's where he realizes that it doesn't make sense to blame Bucky.". But no, he doubles down on his stupid.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom