-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Castlevania: Lords of Shadow 2 Review Thread
- Thread starter ViewtifulJC
- Start date
BruceLeeRoy
Banned
Oh man Andy my sincere apologies. I misunderstood.
Sorry man.
Yeah gaf convinced me to because of the story, I had already sold it so I played it with my brother and I have to say I agree that it's pretty good
GoWs aren't trash games in this or any alternative universe that exists. They aren't comparable to Bayonetta or DMC or Ninja Gaiden, sure, but it's pathetic over-negative hyperbole that overly negative people like you like to shit out of your mouths for some reason, as if you are some gods of games who know better than anyone else.
And please, most of the enemies are far from dumb and it's not like other action games don't suffer from them too. DMC & Bayonetta especially suffer from some sand-baggy enemies as well.
I found the gameplay shallow and repetitive after about 2 hours and I even like GoW, is it really worth finishing just for the story? I was really not having any fun playing the game.
I do appreciate a good story, as rare as they are in games.
And apparently it didn't work for this game. Spending the whole first game getting powers, becoming badass Dracula and then losing it all does not sound fun.
It's what Arkham City did well, keeping all the gadgets gained from Arkham Asylum from the start instead of arbitrarily making you lose it all.
MagicWithEarvin
Member
Oh man, what a shame. Guess I'll just wait for it to go on a Steam sale.
gametrailers gave it an 8.3
gamespot have it an 7
gamereactor gave it an 8.
whats your point? there are big magazines/sites that gave it great scores aswell.
SlasherJPC
Banned
Knowing your preference for story, I still don't think LoS has a good enough one that you would find interesing and worth going through the game for. Just being honest, and I love LoS and Mirrors of Fate so yeahhhhhh.
BruceLeeRoy
Banned
For Castlevania I thought it was well handled but I had nothing to play so we just flew through it. I don't know if it's worth a play all by itself though.
kunonabi
Member
not really, the story is told very poorly despite some decent ideas.
The game somehow makes you hate Patrick Stewart, so no.
Gintoki313
Banned
That GT video review is really bad. They spend the whole time saying bad thing about the game, yet give it an 8.3. That makes no sense. Yet in their Thief reveiew they spent the whole time praising the game, but gave it a 7.5. GT video reviews are weird.
I'm interested in the game. Except for the stealth segments, it seems like it'll be fun. I finished Lords of Shadows a few days ago, so I wouldn't mind seeing more of Gabriel again.
I'm interested in the game. Except for the stealth segments, it seems like it'll be fun. I finished Lords of Shadows a few days ago, so I wouldn't mind seeing more of Gabriel again.
Brerlappin
Member
The story in it is crap and told as hammily as humanly possible. People say its a good story because of the shocking twist at the end that LoS2 has already spoiled for you omg
and then belmont was a vampire
Seriously LoS is one of the worst games ive ever played. Its absolutely awful and features some of the genuinely worst sections in any game ive ever played. The music box, those stupid electricity bits..not surprised LoS2 is getting reamed in reviews.
puffyshirt
Banned
Lots of reviews commenting on how the back half is a huge step up from a boring first half. Looks like I need to slog through, should I ever play it.
LoS1 is a pretty long game. If I recall, at 2 hours in, I don't think you've gotten both light and dark powers, which really add to the depth of the combat. The game improves significantly as you move forward. I think the first 5 or 6 chapters are pretty weak, but it's a 30 chapter game (i think, it's long, either way). It's definitely no GoW or DMC, but the combat is fun. And yeah, the ending is very well done, and why people were so stoked for this one.
I'll pick up LoS2 later, as march is all inFAMOUS for me.
Reviews haven't be relevant to me in over a decade, but it is often interesting to see what journalists think of games every once in a while.
Sounds like you are obsessed about the score. Why can't you just listen to what they have to say and kind of just ignore the score? Is it so important?
SargerusBR
I love Pokken!
Sounds like this is a "love it or hate it" type of game. Will play it soon to draw my own conclusions.
nelsonroyale
Member
Now this is disappointing. What happened? The first game had some good foundations to build on.
I don't think it's a problem if a game does it like LoS1 -> LoS2, it's just all in the execution and it just seems like they didn't execute it all that well, at least when it comes to gameplay.
Cyber Caesar
Member
Glad to hear you went ahead and finished it. You have to approach this game with a speed run mentality to get all it has to offer. The Titans I hate, they kill the pacing. I never used half of Gabriel's arsenal till second playthrough, it can be effective and stylish.
SNES SC4 I speed run, I can play it in my sleep and stylishly I might add. I know every thing smells of rose tinted nostalgia.
Astral Dog
Member
I thought the first los was just ok, this game looked a lot better.
still im going to try it.
still im going to try it.
Odd, I absolutely hated the first few hours of the first LoS, but enjoyed the rest. This one has been pretty fun, albeit definitely hammy, from the start. I'm only 3-4 hours in, so it might change, but I'm enjoying it.
It's a game filled with absurd stuff, definitely a change of tone from the first game. It tries to be straight faced even when tasking Dracula, who has just awaken from centuries of sleep, to sneak into a pharmaceutical company as his first mission. It's dumb, but highly entertaining IMO.
Edit: Although, I wouldn't be surprised if the overall game was poorer than the first. Kojima did oversee that one, and Mirror of Fate, their second Castlevania game, was pretty terrible.
It's a game filled with absurd stuff, definitely a change of tone from the first game. It tries to be straight faced even when tasking Dracula, who has just awaken from centuries of sleep, to sneak into a pharmaceutical company as his first mission. It's dumb, but highly entertaining IMO.
Edit: Although, I wouldn't be surprised if the overall game was poorer than the first. Kojima did oversee that one, and Mirror of Fate, their second Castlevania game, was pretty terrible.
Gintoki313
Banned
I usually could care less about the score, but what they were saying doesn't lead up to the score they gave it. This is bad, this is bad, this is too much... we give it an 8. What? You just spent the whole time saying how bad it is, yet give it an 8? Then say something good instead of bad during the review. The negatives they said in the review was that they didn't like the stealth segments, the weapons felt similar, they didn't like the lightings effect on the camera, and the first few hours of the game was a lot of tutorials. The only thing positive they said was the combat is enjoyable, the creatures and bosses look great, and its a beautiful game. That's about it.
All in all, what they said didn't match up to the score they gave it. Like I said, I could care less about the score they give it. I'm more mad that I jumped into the review expecting a lot of praise from them since they gave it an 8, yet I watch it and it's a bunch of negativity.
Uncle Rupee
Banned
Judging by the Giant Bomb quick look, they've taken what was essentially one of the finest 2D action games and turned it into another generic God of War wannabe. Vinny even says, it's like God of War mixed with the new Devil May Cry game. :/ Can't wait for this series to return to someone who cares about it.
brandonh83
Banned
I know this is nuts but maybe you'll like it as did those reviewers that liked it?
Why are people treating this as being so conclusive? The first game didn't exactly get great scores either and IIRC most reviews seemed to think it was okay yet bashed it for being like God of War and ripping off Shadow of the Colossus and complaining about it not being a Castlevania game. So I ask, why on earth is this so damn devastating to people? All the reviews aren't bad, and the first game was definitely up to individual experience.
The game may be shit for all I know, hell I haven't played it yet, I just think the overreactions to scores are a tad loony.
I had no idea that an opinion could be objectively held as a universal truth. they are not games that I like because I value fluid, flexible mechanics in character action games over anything else. if you are into the narrative (i think it's repugnant) or can get past the lower-level combat mechanics for the "whole package", more power to you.
Uncle Rupee
Banned
Yes, the only possible reason it is getting poor reviews is because they didn't bribe them. :/
SargerusBR
I love Pokken!
I still don't get how LoS 2 got a 4/10 from EDGE and yet they gave Rambo a 5/10.
There is no way in hell that LoS 2 is worse than Rambo.
There is no way in hell that LoS 2 is worse than Rambo.
I know every review is the individual reviewer's opinion and they all have their own ideas of how to use the scale, but there should really be a reviews editor to enforce some standards and consistency.
You're right, there's no way in hell that LoS 2 is worse than Rambo, and I don't have to play either one to know that.
batman2million
Member
Still excited to play this regardless. I loved the 1st one and remember how the reviews bashed it as well.
The first game reviews pretty well, I don't recall it getting several 4/10. I really think this is really bad for a game being made by a fairly good studio.
I don't usually care that much for reviews, but when a game like this starts getting so many scores below average it's a really big red warning sign for me.
The worst for me is how many of the reviews are saying the environments look dull.
What I liked the most about Lords of Shadow 1 was the journey itself through all those amazing environments while the amazing soundtrack played in the background...from what many reviewers are saying this doesn't seem to be the case here.
I'll probably still pick it up when it's 5 on steam or so..but overall i'm just really disappointed.
swazzyswess
Member
I feel like I've said this like three times about LoS2 already, but screw it, I'm bored. This is the number-one thing that worried me about LoS2 and almost every review confirms that it's a problem. Whoever decided they should swap out the seemingly dozens of great locations from LoS1, which were sometimes beautiful, sometimes gothic and basically everything in between, for generic industrial crap should be firmly slapped. Maybe it just came down to budget and time, but it was still a bad decision. No way am I trudging through a Castlevania game set in a bunch of factories and sewers. Ugh.
Homunculus
Banned
It was already the last Lords of Shadow game. Mercury Steam already said that LOS2 will complete the Gabriel Belmont story. There was never any intention to continue the series after this.
Picked up the original a few weeks ago on the cheap to see if I liked it.
I liked the story and some of the enviroments (loved the Music Box level), but as an overall game, meh. Too many parts I was irritated.
Seeing this review the way it is, well, makes my decision to pass extremely easy.
I liked the story and some of the enviroments (loved the Music Box level), but as an overall game, meh. Too many parts I was irritated.
Seeing this review the way it is, well, makes my decision to pass extremely easy.
Cave Johnson
Member
The problem is that this kind of argument only works if every game is free. When money is involved, it makes sense that the consumer wants the best use for their purchase especially when you start comparing value with other games. Suggesting that every game should be "tested" just to affirm an opinion is too risky in both time and money.
This is why the generalized overview (in this case, reviews) pretty much determines how one actually purchase a product.