This is similar to Activision with all of the IPs they had. They could make whatever video game they felt like but it's limited to games since say for example Sony owns the movie rights for spiderman
Wrong. Before development on TW1 even began, CD Projekt bought the IP completely from Metropolis Software (And then later bought Metropolis), who themselves had bought the IP from Sapkowski back in the 90's.
Can someone explain to me how hostile takeovers are legal? It seems like all it does is screw over smaller (but still big) companies.
To be honest, I don't see CD Projekt being that valuable to a large company. They are profitable, but they are currently targeting console/PC AAA, which is a market set to stagnate over the next decade. They also don't have any huge mobile properties or any massive competitive PC cash cows that target western markets as well as Asain markets.
This may be overblown to be honest, I don't see CD Projekt being that valuable to a large company.
They are profitable, but they are currently targeting console/PC AAA, which is a market set to stagnate over the next decade. They also don't have any huge mobile properties or any massive competitive PC cash cows that target western markets as well as Asain markets.
God no. I thought they were owned by an outside PC hardware and publishing company that was relatively powerful in its region
How many shares can I purchase with 10 US DOLLARS
In b4 we find out who it is, today at BlizzCon
Yeah, its name is CD Projekt, and it's a publicly traded company.
See, this is why Valve stays private. You don't have to answer to idiotic short-term-thinking shareholders and you don't face the risk of being forcibly bought out if you don't go public. Fuckin' stock market.
I'm not arguing whether such a venture would be profitable for a large company, nor am I arguing that those methods aren't monetarily effective. Throwing the widest net possible and streamlining content, narrative, and mechanics are extremely effective. I'm arguing from CD Projects perspective and from their current target market's perspective, which includes GOG.
The changes brought on by EA caused the founders of Bioware to leave the industry entirely along with at least of plurality of talent at Bioware. Along with any chance of Bioware crafting a game that will stand the test of time going forward. The latter is somewhat subjective, but I highly doubt we will be seeing a "LTTP: Dragon Age Inquisition" in a decade.
If Bioware was having money issues at the time, then hats off to them for getting the most money out of the deal before exiting the industry, but CD Project is solvent and largely independent currently.
AAA gaming is doing the exact opposite of stagnating. It's a bigger game than it has been in the entire history of the industry
See, this is why Valve stays private. You don't have to answer to idiotic short-term-thinking shareholders and you don't face the risk of being forcibly bought out if you don't go public. Fuckin' stock market.
1 share at the current rate. Keep saving money, because there's another 95 819 999 shares to buy.
Perhaps I'm naive, but jumping from semi-vague board meeting talking points to "CD Projekt's corpse is already moldering in Vivendi/Konami/EA's basement" seems a bit alarmist.
Didn't CDProjekt have most of its stocks tied to its current founders? Wouldn't that make hostile takeovers really difficult?
Perhaps I'm naive, but jumping from semi-vague board meeting talking points to "CD Projekt's corpse is already moldering in Vivendi/Konami/EA's basement" seems a bit alarmist.
EA finally realized Bioware wasn't the biggest cinematic RPG maker around.
Perhaps I'm naive, but jumping from semi-vague board meeting talking points to "CD Projekt's corpse is already moldering in Vivendi/Konami/EA's basement" seems a bit alarmist.
The moment you go public and put shares on the market, you are selling (a part of) your company. In a hostile takeover another company is just buying enough shares off the market to get the majority.Can someone explain to me how hostile takeovers are legal? It seems like all it does is screw over smaller (but still big) companies.
Sounds like CDPR will soon have a fight on their hands... which is terrible news for them considering how bad they are at combat.
God no. I thought they were owned by an outside PC hardware and publishing company that was relatively powerful in its region
The thing is, they're not idiotic most of the time, they just completely don't care about your future, they want their cash now. Which is not that different, but explains basically everything about the stock market.
MGS GWENT