• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

CMV: Doom Eternal is better than 2016 in every way besides the plot

xrnzaaas

Member
It's worse than 2016 Doom. You constantly have to remember what types of actions to perform to receive specific things (almost like a chess game), the platforming sections are awful (they shouldn't be mandatory) and the music is nowhere near as memorable.
 
Last edited:
It's worse than 2016 Doom. You constantly have to remember what type of actions to perform to receive specific things (almost like a chess game), the platforming sections are awful (they shouldn't be mandatory) and the music is nowhere near as memorable.
>You constantly have to remember what type of actions to perform to receive specific things (almost like a chess game)

That's what makes the combat better

>the platforming sections are awful

I disagree it's better than just walking in a straight line to the objective. I found it to be pretty fun and speeds up the pace of combat.

>the music is nowhere near as memorable.

I'd say their about tied imo. Both are really fucking good.
 
Last edited:

Ulysses 31

Member
If anything it's 2016 that strayed from its roots by focusing on realism.
It did but not that far to be annoying and I wasn't a fan of the battle arena structure in that game either, but Doom Eternal took all those things and made it worse.
No you didn't have monkey bars and fire rings before but just because a game adds something remotely new doesn't mean it's automatically straying from it's roots.
But those things made me think the level designers didn't care anymore about (carefully) crafting a believable world overrun by demons and just wanted to make an obstacle course that has no in-universe reason to be there.

To me, the (somewhat) believable level design(in 3 up to 2016) made it more enjoyable to fight through, in Eternal this seems to have taken too much of a backseat and it's making the levels less memorable and exposes the hallway, battle arena, hallway, battle arena level structure too much.


You're talking out of your ass way too much in this thread.

Part of a level in Doom 2 has very narrow walkways so that is evidence people wanted to swing around in majority of the levels of Doom 1/2/3/64/2016?

Or is that evidence of Doom 2 having odd level design choices here and there?
 
Last edited:

EverydayBeast

thinks Halo Infinite is a new graphical benchmark
Doom 2016 was my first doom, eternal felt almost too good for its own good the slick guns, weapon wheels, better demon hell arenas and eternal is reflected with an 80+ metacritic score.
 
It did but not that far to be annoying and I wasn't a fan of the battle arena structure in that game either, but Doom Eternal took all those things and made it worse.

But those things made me think the level designers didn't care anymore about (carefully) crafting a believable world overrun by demons and just wanted to make an obstacle course that has no in-universe reason to be there.

To me, the (somewhat) believable level design(in 3 up to 2016) made it more enjoyable to fight through, in Eternal this seems to have taken too much of a backseat and it's making the levels less memorable and exposes the hallway, battle arena, hallway, battle arena level structure too much.

Part of a level in Doom 2 has very narrow walkways so that is evidence people wanted to swing around in majority of the levels of Doom 1/2/3/64/2016?

Or is that evidence of Doom 2 having odd level design choices here and there?
But those things made me think the level designers didn't care anymore about (carefully) crafting a believable world overrun by demons and just wanted to make an obstacle course that has no in-universe reason to be there.

To me, the (somewhat) believable level design(in 3 up to 2016) made it more enjoyable to fight through, in Eternal this seems to have taken too much of a backseat and it's making the levels less memorable and exposes the hallway, battle arena, hallway, battle arena level structure too much.


It's not a big deal. Doom was never meant to be "immersive" if you want that play Resident Evil. I don't know why you're so fixated on it. Games always have those weird immersion breakers and there's plenty in 2016. I mean why would people just litter stuff all over the laboratory floors? But I digress, this "belivable level design" criticism isn't as big as you're making it seem.
 
Last edited:

Imtjnotu

Member
Eternal is better than 2016 in pretty much every way besides it's plot. Then again, that should be the last thing on your mind when playing a Doom game.

Edit: The bio isn't meant to have content, it's a CMV post.
Billy Madison Shut Up GIF
 
Doom 2016 was my first doom, eternal felt almost too good for its own good the slick guns, weapon wheels, better demon hell arenas and eternal is reflected with an 80+ metacritic score.

I didn't think Doom 2016s gunplay could be topped in how intense it was.

Then Eternal came out and made it look like a water pistol fight between 5 year olds.
 

Ulysses 31

Member
It's not a big deal. Doom was never meant to be "immersive" if you want that play Resident Evil. I don't know why you're so fixated on it. Games always have those weird immersion breakers and there's plenty in 2016. I mean why would people just litter stuff all over the ground. But I digress, this "belivable level design" criticism isn't as big as you're making it seem.
I played through the main campaign and the first DLC on nightmare and I'm telling why I didn't enjoy Eternal as much as the previous Doom entries. Too much of the "Doom soul" was missing for me in Eternal. If I hadn't played any of the other Dooms I likely would've had a different opinion.

But if people like Eternal the most then good for them. :messenger_ok:
 
Last edited:

Killer8

Member
Eternal was worse in almost every way. Technically I guess the engine is superior to 2016 but the art direction was a major step back. The enemy designs ended up looking incredibly goofy and over-animated. I know some of the designs were meant to be a callback to the original games, but it just came across as silly looking. 2016 was a dark game with a lot of contrast while Eternal is almost cartoonishly colorful and bright. For a game based around a Hell setting, the former is going to be the way to go (and a lot more metal).

In terms of the gameplay, Eternal felt like id watched a lot of those super sweaty 'pro' videos of Doom 2016 on Youtube, and thought that the key to interesting gameplay was having the player constantly be switching up their weapon and using every single one of their abilities. Basically, if you want to play the game in the way you want for more than 2 seconds, id steps in and says "that's not interesting enough", and then makes the ammo run out. It feels like a tiresome juggling act of all the mechanics, like a very specific play style that you're railroaded into doing. Which is kind of ironic considering the whole point was to make it feel more varied.
 

Bragr

Banned
I like Doom Eternal, but if it didn't have enemies that constantly rush you, it would be better. It makes you feel like you are playing a platforming-pinball shooter or something like that.

It feels like one of those 2D platforming games where you are chased by something and always have to move forward as a black screen is trying to swallow you.

It's not as drastic as that, but I get that feeling during the combat, that you are chased by something. It feels arcade-ish and annoying. Like playing 3 hours of that Uncharted 4 segment where the car is chasing you.

I understand it's the catalyst for the resource systems and many other things, but it creates so many odd parts of the game that I don't enjoy, even if I love how they tried to do something different.
 

Rubicaant

Member
I think overall i prefer 2016, but i still really enjoyed Doom Eternal. Glad they both exist, i wouldn't want a direct sequel to 2016 without any changes, that would've been worse than Eternal.
 

THE DUCK

voted poster of the decade by bots
doom no ammo edition
great fun

This post just proves that you were too clueless to play the game properly if you think doom eternal has no ammo.
Just wondering, do you complain about every game where you ignore when they tell you how to succeed?
 

Patrick S.

Banned
Whoever or whatever a "CMV" is, he/she/it/they is/are wrong.

Edit: Oh, I see, already answered. Well, the answer is still: wrong.
 
Last edited:

Spukc

always chasing the next thrill
Exactly, this guy gets it.
Resource management is not doom

doom is an constant orgy of violence putting pauses in this loop because no ammo is fucking dumb and not what doom is
This post just proves that you were too clueless to play the game properly if you think doom eternal has no ammo.
Just wondering, do you complain about every game where you ignore when they tell you how to succeed?
no it's not OG doom
the game is ok
it's just not doom
 
I thought the le epic plot capeshit direction they took eternal was kind of dumb. 2016 was better IMHO

But doom 2 is still the best, particularly with good wads like eviternity.

Here is a psa YouTube link for anyone interested in peak doom:

 
Resource management is not doom

doom is an constant orgy of violence putting pauses in this loop because no ammo is fucking dumb and not what doom is

no it's not OG doom
the game is ok
it's just not doom
Resource managing in modern doom games doesn't pause the violence loop, it continues it. You chainsaw to extract ammo, you glory kill to extract health you set demons on fire to extract armor.
 
I thought the le epic plot capeshit direction they took eternal was kind of dumb. 2016 was better IMHO

But doom 2 is still the best, particularly with good wads like eviternity.

Here is a psa YouTube link for anyone interested in peak doom:


I agree that's the only way in which 2016 does it better but Doom was never about the plot and 2016s plot wasn't great or anything just serviceable.
 


You're talking out of your ass way too much in this thread.

I'll agree, doom 2 had lots of circle strafing.

That being said, It had very little platforming and the platofrming it did have was more like sprinting across gaps. There was no jumping in doom 2.

Mario neon hoop jumping was never part of the equation.

There is nothing I would call eternal style platforming in doom, doom 2 or Plutonia.
 
Doom 2016 was like a total shock, nobody expected it to be good but it ended up being exactly what it needed to be as a soft "reboot".
Eternal is definitely more of an "arena shooter" in its design. I love both for different reasons.

There's no loss for me here, both games exist and do what I enjoy. My one big critique about Eternal though is that is is a little too self aware, so it can feel a bit "meme"y.
 

SkylineRKR

Member
Its absolutely better, but its not without its shortcomings. First I didn't enjoy Eternal much and thought 2016 was better but this changed when I gave it another go way later.

There is a lot to manage, too much perhaps, and I am still not a fan of its ammo management, but I think Eternal is better structured. I could do without some stupid environmental gimmicks but Eternal has better encounter design. Nearly the whole of 2016 is arena battle after arena battle starting with low level goons, and then the tiers go up each time. Eternal has less boring encounters, and they are less drawn out. Its just that in Eternal you get bum rushed and you have to constantly manage your ammo on top of other meters. But once it clicked I enjoyed it a ton, ended up liking Eternal more than 2016.

And yes you pretty much have to use all weapons and play sweaty in Eternal to be most effective, personally I like it if there is an incentive to this. I am also a big fan of DMC games, which might explain some.
 
Last edited:
Its absolutely better, but its not without its shortcomings. First I didn't enjoy Eternal much and thought 2016 was better but this changed when I gave it another go way later.

There is a lot to manage, too much perhaps, and I am still not a fan of its ammo management, but I think Eternal is better structured. I could do without some stupid environmental gimmicks but Eternal has better encounter design. Nearly the whole of 2016 is arena battle after arena battle starting with low level goons, and then the tiers go up each time. Eternal has less boring encounters, and they are less drawn out. Its just that in Eternal you get bum rushed and you have to constantly manage your ammo on top of other meters. But once it clicked I enjoyed it a ton, ended up liking Eternal more than 2016.
Eternal definitely benefits from a replay due to the high learning curve.
 
Eternal was worse in almost every way. Technically I guess the engine is superior to 2016 but the art direction was a major step back. The enemy designs ended up looking incredibly goofy and over-animated. I know some of the designs were meant to be a callback to the original games, but it just came across as silly looking. 2016 was a dark game with a lot of contrast while Eternal is almost cartoonishly colorful and bright. For a game based around a Hell setting, the former is going to be the way to go (and a lot more metal).

In terms of the gameplay, Eternal felt like id watched a lot of those super sweaty 'pro' videos of Doom 2016 on Youtube, and thought that the key to interesting gameplay was having the player constantly be switching up their weapon and using every single one of their abilities. Basically, if you want to play the game in the way you want for more than 2 seconds, id steps in and says "that's not interesting enough", and then makes the ammo run out. It feels like a tiresome juggling act of all the mechanics, like a very specific play style that you're railroaded into doing. Which is kind of ironic considering the whole point was to make it feel more varied.

Eternal is brighter/more colourful because it's going for a more retro arcade style vibe that is in the spirit of the first few games. I can see where you're coming from though.

>In terms of the gameplay, Eternal felt like id watched a lot of those super sweaty 'pro' videos of Doom 2016 on Youtube, and thought that the key to interesting gameplay was having the player constantly be switching up their weapon and using every single one of their abilities.

And they were right to do so. The combat feels more dynamic as a result.

>Basically, if you want to play the game in the way you want for more than 2 seconds, id steps in and says "that's not interesting enough", and then makes the ammo run out.

You chainsaw for more ammo or you switch weapons. That's exactly how it worked in 2016. I don't see the problem.
 
Last edited:

Killer8

Member
Eternal is brighter/more colourful because it's going for a more retro arcade style vibe that is in the spirit of the first few games. I can see where you're coming from though.

>In terms of the gameplay, Eternal felt like id watched a lot of those super sweaty 'pro' videos of Doom 2016 on Youtube, and thought that the key to interesting gameplay was having the player constantly be switching up their weapon and using every single one of their abilities.

And they were right to do so. The combat feels more dynamic as a result.

>Basically, if you want to play the game in the way you want for more than 2 seconds, id steps in and says "that's not interesting enough", and then makes the ammo run out.

You chainsaw for more ammo or you switch weapons. That's exactly how it worked in 2016. I don't see the problem.

The chainsaw in Eternal is not exactly the same as 2016.

In 2016 it had limited fuel that you can only find in the level. In Eternal, there is always one fuel unit that will recharge on its own.

In 2016, because of the limited fuel, it was used as more of a power weapon that can instantly kill most enemies. The ammo being dropped from them was really just a bonus, like some victory confetti.

In Eternal, since you always have some fuel recharging, being able to use it is just a matter of time. It stops being this infrequently used power weapon, where you save its fuel for a special occasion, and starts being just the way to get ammo back.

And why did this change happen? Because the designers decided to make ammo extremely scarce, not only in the capacity of each gun but by placing less pickups in the level. The chainsaw now becomes pretty much "ammo restock tool". It's why the chainsaw has to recharge now because the game will be unplayable without it.

My issue with this design, as i've said, is that between the chainsaw, the glory kills for health, and the flamethrower for shields, you end up juggling all of this shit constantly because by design you now have to. You can't get as comfy with your favorite gun as 2016 and blast away to your hearts content, because it will run dry in no time. Of course you'd still have to change weapons in 2016 too, it wasn't like there was infinite ammo in that game. But it felt like there was enough to at least let you get your kicks a lot more with the tools you wanted to use. Eternal takes them away far too early to enforce muh gameplay variety.

The whole design of the game is just solutions looking for problems. Playing Eternal left me feeling like a clown trying to keep all of id's balls in the air.
 

JonSnowball

Member
Doom 2016 and Doom Eternal are both arena shooters and aren't representative of the original Doom games. I prefer 2016 over Eternal, though I can see why people would enjoy Eternal - especially if they're under the age of 25.
 

Thaedolus

Gold Member
I didn’t like how it seemed to force you to use certain weapons or strats on specific enemies rather than just ripping and tearing until it’s done. But it was still fun, just not as fun as 2016

Edit:

The chainsaw in Eternal is not exactly the same as 2016.

In 2016 it had limited fuel that you can only find in the level. In Eternal, there is always one fuel unit that will recharge on its own.

In 2016, because of the limited fuel, it was used as more of a power weapon that can instantly kill most enemies. The ammo being dropped from them was really just a bonus, like some victory confetti.

In Eternal, since you always have some fuel recharging, being able to use it is just a matter of time. It stops being this infrequently used power weapon, where you save its fuel for a special occasion, and starts being just the way to get ammo back.

And why did this change happen? Because the designers decided to make ammo extremely scarce, not only in the capacity of each gun but by placing less pickups in the level. The chainsaw now becomes pretty much "ammo restock tool". It's why the chainsaw has to recharge now because the game will be unplayable without it.

My issue with this design, as i've said, is that between the chainsaw, the glory kills for health, and the flamethrower for shields, you end up juggling all of this shit constantly because by design you now have to. You can't get as comfy with your favorite gun as 2016 and blast away to your hearts content, because it will run dry in no time. Of course you'd still have to change weapons in 2016 too, it wasn't like there was infinite ammo in that game. But it felt like there was enough to at least let you get your kicks a lot more with the tools you wanted to use. Eternal takes them away far too early to enforce muh gameplay variety.

The whole design of the game is just solutions looking for problems. Playing Eternal left me feeling like a clown trying to keep all of id's balls in the air.
This
 
Last edited:

bender

What time is it?
Resource management is not doom

doom is an constant orgy of violence putting pauses in this loop because no ammo is fucking dumb and not what doom is

Breaking flow is one of my bigger gripes about 2016. I liked the moment to moment action with guns even if I wasn't found of the ammo/health/chainsaw/glory kill loop, but what sapped my joy more than anything else is that the upgrade system made finding all the secrets and challenge rooms feel necessary which led to large lulls between the most enjoyable parts of the game and worse yet, level resets due to missing a secret after a point-of-no-return.
 
I didn’t like how it seemed to force you to use certain weapons or strats on specific enemies rather than just ripping and tearing until it’s done. But it was still fun, just not as fun as 2016

Edit:


This
The only ones that really required you to do that is the cacodemon from what I recall.
 

JonSnowball

Member
Here's a take no one has mentioned: Mick Gordon's score is overrated. It's nothing special, it's effectively 90s industrial metal instrumentals looping constantly. In Eternal specifically it got really old.
 
Top Bottom