Glass Shark
Banned
Nothing wrong with being a furry. The rape part is obviously bad news.
That's cussed up.
PLEASE, take this article with a barrel of salt. This is an issue with SoFurry's tag system.
Firstly, this guy has the most vanilla stories and comics I've ever seen.
https://gray-muzzle.sofurry.com/stories
https://www.furaffinity.net/user/Mx5Madness
This article breaks down how the SoFurry tag system works. In context, you can filter content with "loves", "likes", "tolerates", and "hates". The filters you use are available publicly, which leads to situations like these. I can almost guarantee he meant it in context of fictional art.
More info on SoFurry's GUI design here: https://www.flayrah.com/7083/furry-...urry-profile-mishap-how-site-design-flaws-are
For the new page:
PLEASE, take this article with a barrel of salt. This is an issue with SoFurry's tag system.
Firstly, this guy has the most vanilla stories and comics I've ever seen.
https://gray-muzzle.sofurry.com/stories
https://www.furaffinity.net/user/Mx5Madness
This article breaks down how the SoFurry tag system works. In context, you can filter content with "loves", "likes", "tolerates", and "hates". The filters you use are available publicly, which leads to situations like these. I can almost guarantee he meant it in context of fictional art.
More info on SoFurry's GUI design here: https://www.flayrah.com/7083/furry-...urry-profile-mishap-how-site-design-flaws-are
Pretty much my thoughts as well.I'm supposed to think that liking fictional rape is a-ok. Got it.
hope you all realize that rape is in the context of consenting RP or simply in the context of written/drawn erotica and the dude isnt randomly saying "i like rape"
but fair enough if thats still a big deal to you, i get it
I'm supposed to think that liking fictional rape is a-ok. Got it.
So it's just his interests and not that he condones rape or anything. What I figured. The OP should probably be updated.
I instantly read it as he tolerates 'rape' - ie the fantasy, and not you know actually raping someone. If people who basically live on the internet (ie respondents in this thread) don't grasp that then I see why he resigned; because how do you explain any of this to the public at large if internet citizens don't even get it.
For the new page:
PLEASE, take this article with a barrel of salt. This is an issue with SoFurry's tag system.
Firstly, this guy has the most vanilla stories and comics I've ever seen.
https://gray-muzzle.sofurry.com/stories
https://www.furaffinity.net/user/Mx5Madness
This article breaks down how the SoFurry tag system works. In context, you can filter content with "loves", "likes", "tolerates", and "hates". The filters you use are available publicly, which leads to situations like these. I can almost guarantee he meant it in context of fictional art.
More info on SoFurry's GUI design here: https://www.flayrah.com/7083/furry-...urry-profile-mishap-how-site-design-flaws-are
aside: why are so many furrry avi's on twitter/etc white supremacists?
i dunno if there is a real trend, but i would imagine its the same reason as anime avatars: because internet subcultures attract the marginalized and the marginalized are susceptible to recruitment by hateful communitiesthat's....something
aside: why are so many furrry avi's on twitter/etc white supremacists?
Social isolation that organize under banners like 8chan that have historically been home to fringe right wing groups since the 90's.that's....something
aside: why are so many furrry avi's on twitter/etc white supremacists?
I completely get it. But does that make it better? Not a rhetorical question. I'm actually genuinely curious how people feel about someone in an election position who is fine with that kind of content? I know it means you're not supportive of actual rape, but the thought process around it is still troubling, no?
Yes? I would personally tolerate rape as it pertains to drawings/stories depending on context. Doesn't mean I seek such things out or want to acquire such material. But saying you tolerate something isn't the same as promoting it or wanting to make it a reality outside of the confines of the internet.I completely get it. But does that make it better? Not a rhetorical question. I'm actually genuinely curious how people feel about someone in an election position who is fine with that kind of content? I know it means you're not supportive of actual rape, but the thought process around it is still troubling, no?
Id have a Shark Girl mayor tbhAs long as there aren't any scalies holding office I'm good.
i'm not gonna try to change any of you but man, if in all your sexual thoughts and explorations through pornography of various forms written, drawn and acted, you have decided that tolerating any sort of fake rape or fake NC encounter is a mark of an irredeemable person then....i just dont know what to think about that
Zero fucks given.Chamberlains profile showed he liked to be called Gray Muzzle the fox and was happy to divulge his sexual likes and dislikes even saying he tolerated rape.
if i could have a final fight furry version with a shark girl as mike haggar i would buy it on all platformsId have a Shark Girl mayor tbh
How about no.Id have a Shark Girl mayor tbh
that's....something
aside: why are so many furrry avi's on twitter/etc white supremacists?
I completely get it. But does that make it better? Not a rhetorical question. I'm actually genuinely curious how people feel about someone in an election position who is fine with that kind of content? I know it means you're not supportive of actual rape, but the thought process around it is still troubling, no?
Problem I'm running into is what is a rape fantasy. Is it bondage? Submission? Is it actually pretending it is a rape? Everyone has their own definition. The studies I quickly read make it sound like when you get more specific and use the word rape or rape fantasy and separate it from bondage or submission or rough sex, the number drops by quite a bit.
Probably the same pool of social isolation which leads people who really like anime to sometimes fall hard right and other times hard left
Edit: more like the people who already feel different or outcasted gravitate to those things to begin with. I don't want to sound like a dick.
i dunno if there is a real trend, but i would imagine its the same reason as anime avatars: because internet subcultures attract the marginalized and the marginalized are susceptible to recruitment by hateful communities
what the person above said
Social isolation that organize under banners like 8chan that have historically been home to fringe right wing groups since the 90's.
The enemy of my enemy is my friend basically. Everyone wants to be a part of something and oftentimes organizations like that is all they have.
Nazi furries are a thing https://www.google.com/amp/www.news...ch-truth-about-nazi-furries-and-alt-right?amp
Nazi furries are a thing https://www.google.com/amp/www.news...ch-truth-about-nazi-furries-and-alt-right?amp
There is a summary on reddit so you don't have to read it.......it sure is um somethingFurred Reich...
Furred Reich...Nazi furries are a thing https://www.google.com/amp/www.news...ch-truth-about-nazi-furries-and-alt-right?amp
What did he do wrong?
Different for each person. For my ex it was faking a rape situation. Being a rape victim, twice at the time me and her were dating, I wasn't comfortable with it, but being submissive, I went through with it to satisfy her.
Nothing. But public perception is everything. Like I posted, we don't live in a sex positive society. No one talks about their sexual desires in public without being shamed.What did he do wrong?
I completely get it. But does that make it better? Not a rhetorical question. I'm actually genuinely curious how people feel about someone in an election position who is fine with that kind of content? I know it means you're not supportive of actual rape, but the thought process around it is still troubling, no?
Its 2017, you should know you can't!
This I will agree with
UPDATE: SoFurry has fixed their tag system so this doesn't happen again.
From the above article:
This is simply a bad UI. "Tolerates" was on the negative side of the preferences. It could have easily gone into the tag filter if wasn't so oddly placed.
I'm not sure to be honest. If you're in any sort of public role, things get dicey. Fantasies/kinks can get weird really fast. It doesn't mean you want to endulge in watersports/etc in real life.
I feel like the "tolerated rape" part should be included in the thread title.
Anyone who is considers it acceptable to watch Game of Thrones "tolerates" rape in that they're okay with a piece of fictional media representing it.
Obviously resigning was the right choice, but this is not a difficult thing to understand in my opinion. It's something that some people accept seeing occasionally in fiction, whether it's portrayed as an evil thing or a fantasy. To make this even easier to understand, imagine someone indicated that they "tolerate" murder in their fiction filters, requesting that they "see little of" fiction with murder in it.
Murder is in a vast amount of fiction, is obviously wrong, and yet is widely "tolerated" in this sense.
Nothing. But public perception is everything. Like I posted, we don't live in a sex positive society. No one talks about their sexual desires in public without being shamed.
I instantly read it as he tolerates 'rape' - ie the fantasy, and not you know actually raping someone. If people who basically live on the internet (ie respondents in this thread) don't grasp that then I see why he resigned; because how do you explain any of this to the public at large if internet citizens don't even get it.
In GoT maybe, in other fiction no.What? That's a completely different context. Tolerating Rape Fantasies and Tolerating Rape as a Narrative is not the least bit similar. Rape is used as a narrative device in GoT to show how vile people are and make you hate them, not for you to get off on.