greycolumbus
The success of others absolutely infuriates me.
April Fools'?
I refused to believe that Conservapedia was real, but I was unfortunately mistaken.I refuse to believe it. I'm actively checking The Onion in hope of finding this there!
Blue eye's, blonde hair, strong facial features...
They already had that show in the 80s.
I mean, no. But he was a piece of shit.
The "many people believe that sex outside of marriage is immoral" part cracked me up in particular.
Curious as to what's funny
100:1
You're alright, ROBOGAF.
But it is.
GAF servers couldn't handle this and imploded.
It's actually a magazine created by The Onion.
Why would this be a joke? It's a pretty standard conservative message and the obsession with the "liberal media bias" is nothing new.
History of the universe is probably going to far. Post-Civil Rights? Now that I would believe.
This is way too close to April Fools' Day to be real.
...right?
I refuse to believe this is real. That cover is way too perfect.
I refused to believe that Conservapedia was real, but I was unfortunately mistaken.
Coservapedia said:The eminent pathologist Dr. William Eckert wrote concerning homosexual homicides: "Equally high is the number of homicides, many probably related to transient attachments, which often lead to suspicion, jealousy, and murder. When murder does occur it is exceptionally brutal with an overkill appearance... Overkill, as it is seen in homosexual and lesbian murders, is certainly a form of sadistic crime." see: Homosexuality and Homosexuality and murders
lol wtf is this.
Next time a social con tries to argue the "if everyone were homosexual, we couldn't reproduce" slippery slope, ask him to extend that same genius line of thinking towards abstinence as well.
Devo, the libruls have tricked you into believing their lies!!! This magazine will teach you wonderful life lessons!
![]()
What the fuck.
Woah, slow down there, rodent.
Hetero-sex is perfectly fine and natural as long as it happens between a husband and a wife. It's an expression of their love for each other, and it strengthens their lifelong bond!
Duhhhhh
Needs more recipes honestly.
It's just the whole tone of it, going from the criticism of conservatives straight to the bible.
Conservatives can be pretty good at doublespeak.The name of the column is MAKING SENSE.
I feel like I'm taking crazy pills.
1. Please be ready to offer proof and evidence that atheism is true.[3]
2. Please be ready to answer the "15 questions that evolutionists cannot answer" which are featured in Creation Ministries International's Question evolution! campaign.
3. Consider reading Conservapedia's atheism article and the Conservepedia Christian apologetics article to better prepare you for the debate. You may find you want to change sides and debate on the Christian side of the aisle given the abundant evidence for Christianity and the lack of proof and evidence for atheism. In addition, please consider reading Creation Ministries International's atheism article which can be found here which is written by Mariano Grinbank as it offers quite a bit of information concerning atheism which you may be asked to address.
4. Please consider losing some weight. I certainly don't want you to claim you could have done better in the debate if your body and mental acumen had been operating at "full atheist power". I am giving you 150 days to shed your flabby physique and replace it with a "mean, lean, atheism debating machine". Given the "superior atheist intellect" which you no doubt possess, I am sure if you put your mind to it that you will be able to lose the weight. However, if you need more time, I can certainly accommodate you. I have put some helpful resources below which offers some of the best information from medical science, exercise science and nutritional science as I know that many atheists purport to love science. Plus, according to medical science, there are a number of health risks associated with being overweight which are cited in Conservapedia's Atheism and Mental and Physical Health article.
5. Although you might want Richard Dawkins to be a debate partner, please consider this information:
In a letter to fellow atheist and evolutionist Richard Dawkins which was subsequently quoted by The Daily Telegraph, fellow atheist Dr. Daniel Came wrote concerning Dawkins' refusal to debate the Christian apologist Dr. William Lane Craig:
"The absence of a debate with the foremost apologist for Christian theism is a glaring omission on your CV and is of course apt to be interpreted as cowardice on your part."[4]
I would encourage you to ask Richard Dawkins to be a debate partner, but please do not be disappointed if he declines as he often is reluctant to leave his "intellectual bunny hole".
Sincerely,
User:Conservative
Isn't Mississippi simultaneously the most religious and the most obese state in the union?