• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Conservative Teen Magazine

Status
Not open for further replies.
So ironic that regardless whether it is a parody or isn't, it's so close to what we could expect from conservative right-wing anyway that we can't rule out the possibility of it actually being real.

Need to read, though. Want me to gain some 'opposition'-sources; to know what 'they' are up to. In the case this isn't a parody, that is.
 
I refused to believe that Conservapedia was real, but I was unfortunately mistaken.

john_stewart_facepalm.jpg
 
Why would this be a joke? It's a pretty standard conservative message and the obsession with the "liberal media bias" is nothing new. The people that create, fund and promote this kind of stuff know how important it is to capture the narrative.
 
lol wtf is this.

Next time a social con tries to argue the "if everyone were homosexual, we couldn't reproduce" slippery slope, ask him to extend that same genius line of thinking towards abstinence as well.
 
I refused to believe that Conservapedia was real, but I was unfortunately mistaken.

Coservapedia said:
The eminent pathologist Dr. William Eckert wrote concerning homosexual homicides: "Equally high is the number of homicides, many probably related to transient attachments, which often lead to suspicion, jealousy, and murder. When murder does occur it is exceptionally brutal with an overkill appearance... Overkill, as it is seen in homosexual and lesbian murders, is certainly a form of sadistic crime." see: Homosexuality and Homosexuality and murders

1210679522332.jpg
 
lol wtf is this.

Next time a social con tries to argue the "if everyone were homosexual, we couldn't reproduce" slippery slope, ask him to extend that same genius line of thinking towards abstinence as well.

Woah, slow down there, rodent.

Hetero-sex is perfectly fine and natural as long as it happens between a husband and a wife. It's an expression of their love for each other, and it strengthens their lifelong bond!

Duhhhhh
 
librul academics
librul media
librul families having librul kids eating librul hamburgers and librul kebabs
librul girls on librul streets librully libruting liberians.

Liberal.

That's about as much sense as I am capable of making after reading this tripe.

Librul.

Edit: The kebabs aren't so much librul as they are islamofacist.
 
BxwO5.jpg


What the fuck.

I particularly enjoy the "red white and blue" theme of the cover. It reinforces the concept that white people are central to america, they are the white, in amidst the red and blue sweaters, that make america what it is. Minorities are not actually important and can only detract from the strength of america.

So to reiterate, White people are core to america, minorities need to stay off camera.




libruls
 
Woah, slow down there, rodent.

Hetero-sex is perfectly fine and natural as long as it happens between a husband and a wife. It's an expression of their love for each other, and it strengthens their lifelong bond!

Duhhhhh

Now I know why sex with myself improves my self esteem! I need to email my Linkin Park mailing list quick...
 
Hey, people have the right to live as they wish, but that doesn't mean they should be legally allowed to do so.
 
It's just the whole tone of it, going from the criticism of conservatives straight to the bible.

You have to acknowledge that GAF demographic and attitudes are not representative of society in general. It seems like an apparent thing to say, but your comment suggests its a point worth reiterating; many people believe in a deity and many of those take it seriously. Social conservatism is part of their beliefs and the defence of those social beliefs in the context of abstinence seems more poignant now after the reaction to that screenshot than it was before it

When I first saw the "lol" posts, I wasn't sure whether the reaction was based on the fact that God was invoked it, not unusual here, or the defence of abstinence - neither of which, if looked at from a fair mind, worthy of ridicule especially when you consider the point used in support of the Bible was the obvious statement that human reproduction was important. All it was doing, presumably, was saying the immorality isn't sex itself but the context it is done. A reasonable (although debatable) point, even if you disagree with the nature of that context (marriage). So I don't think the reaction to it was justified at all

/rantover
 

http://www.conservapedia.com/Essay:...nn_Jillette#Five_suggestions_to_Penn_Jillette
1. Please be ready to offer proof and evidence that atheism is true.[3]

2. Please be ready to answer the "15 questions that evolutionists cannot answer" which are featured in Creation Ministries International's Question evolution! campaign.

3. Consider reading Conservapedia's atheism article and the Conservepedia Christian apologetics article to better prepare you for the debate. You may find you want to change sides and debate on the Christian side of the aisle given the abundant evidence for Christianity and the lack of proof and evidence for atheism. In addition, please consider reading Creation Ministries International's atheism article which can be found here which is written by Mariano Grinbank as it offers quite a bit of information concerning atheism which you may be asked to address.

4. Please consider losing some weight. I certainly don't want you to claim you could have done better in the debate if your body and mental acumen had been operating at "full atheist power". I am giving you 150 days to shed your flabby physique and replace it with a "mean, lean, atheism debating machine". Given the "superior atheist intellect" which you no doubt possess, I am sure if you put your mind to it that you will be able to lose the weight. However, if you need more time, I can certainly accommodate you. I have put some helpful resources below which offers some of the best information from medical science, exercise science and nutritional science as I know that many atheists purport to love science. Plus, according to medical science, there are a number of health risks associated with being overweight which are cited in Conservapedia's Atheism and Mental and Physical Health article.

5. Although you might want Richard Dawkins to be a debate partner, please consider this information:

In a letter to fellow atheist and evolutionist Richard Dawkins which was subsequently quoted by The Daily Telegraph, fellow atheist Dr. Daniel Came wrote concerning Dawkins' refusal to debate the Christian apologist Dr. William Lane Craig:

"The absence of a debate with the foremost apologist for Christian theism is a glaring omission on your CV and is of course apt to be interpreted as cowardice on your part."[4]

I would encourage you to ask Richard Dawkins to be a debate partner, but please do not be disappointed if he declines as he often is reluctant to leave his "intellectual bunny hole".

Sincerely,

User:Conservative

TXmOI.gif
 
This is the most perfect distillation of every Republican talking point I've ever seen. Something this mindless must have required some sort of evil genius.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom