Finally great moment from campaign Thanks for upload.x3sphere said:Uploaded a gameplay vid here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2SDR0c4mo8&feature=channel_video_title
markao said:Not mine, but that new Bokeh (distance) looks even better than the old one.
Pimpbaa said:
BlackDove said:Not to be a dick, but I found your problem right there.
The issue is when you combine Cryengine with TVs over HDMI IIRC. Insanely fucking retarded how they refuse to fix it.bloodforge said:Not really, I have my PC hooked up to a 60inch plasma. TV's are more or less monitors now anyway.
It's an issue with the game, not whatever TV he has hooked up, I'm sure.
BlackDove said:Not to be a dick, but I found your problem right there.
Stallion Free said:Cryengine with TVs
Insanely fucking retarded
Stallion Free said:
Pimpbaa said:Stupid game keeps wanting to run at 24Hz mode on my tv. Apparently some people had the same issue with Crysis and Crysis Warhead.
BlackDove said:Yep and yep.
I'd rather play on my 32 inch that I use for a monitor while sitting about a yard away from it. My eyes hate me, but I'm well entertained.Pimpbaa said:Wrong and wrong. Stop being stupid, I'd rather play on my 40 inch tv while in my recliner.
Pimpbaa said:Wrong and wrong. Stop being stupid, I'd rather play on my 40 inch tv while in my recliner.
What don't you understand? The engine has a bug that forces 24 hz when played over HDMI on HDTVs. It isn't a preferential thing and fixing it isn't a guarantee.Pimpbaa said:Wrong and wrong. Stop being stupid, I'd rather play on my 40 inch tv while in my recliner.
Pimpbaa said:Stupid game keeps wanting to run at 24Hz mode on my tv. Apparently some people had the same issue with Crysis and Crysis Warhead.
It didn't work for me this time on the Nvidia control panel, it just tells me that it is already in the list.TheExodu5 said:Solution: create a custom resolution in your video card control panel. Just create a resolution with 1920*1080 and 60Hz. Use that resolution instead of the default 1080p. Crysis should run at 60Hz then.
Luckily I don't use HDMI! VGA for life. Actually works a shitload better than HDMI with this TV.Stallion Free said:What don't you understand? The engine has a bug that forces 24 hz when played over HDMI on HDTVs. It isn't a preferential thing and fixing it isn't a guarantee.
BlackDove said:Yes, I play on my 100" Full HD projector.
What's your point?
Stallion Free said:What don't you understand? The engine has a bug that forces 24 hz when played over HDMI on HDTVs. It isn't a preferential thing and fixing it isn't a guarantee.
It didn't work for me this time on the Nvidia control panel, it just tells me that it is already in the list.
Stallion Free said:It didn't work for me this time on the Nvidia control panel, it just tells me that it is already in the list.
Except he isn't?Pimpbaa said:I know it has a bug. He is saying there is something inherently wrong about pc gaming on a HDTV.
Stallion Free said:Except he isn't?
...But then I thought about it and read some other posts and it became exceedingly clear that that isn't what he meant.TheExodu5 said:When he started his post with "Not to be a dick", that was the impression I got.
RedSwirl said:So, which feature in the advanced graphics menus controls the tessellation?
TheExodu5 said:Works for me. =\
NVidia Control Panel
Display -> Change Resolution
Customize
Create Custom Resolution...
When he started his post with "Not to be a dick", that was the impression I got.
n0n44m said:yeah same here, I just spent an hour editing Nvidia drivers and monitor .inf's but the control panel just automatically adds a bunch of HDTV resolutions
I guess it gets them from the monitor/TV's EDID or something?
anyway posted a Crysis2 "fix" (workaround) a few posts back that works for me
TheExodu5 said:Works for me. =\
NVidia Control Panel
Display -> Change Resolution
Customize
Create Custom Resolution...
High five. I know what to expect with a budget build and the people claiming that AMD or i5 CPUs have better value must not browse the official PC hardware thread. It looks like C2 improves graphics for anyone with a DX11 card and I'll find some combination that will perform well.Horsemama1956 said:The game doesn't care if it's a "hardware" thread. While 2 HT threads aren't as good as 2 real threads, they provide about 60% of the performance. There is no reason not to get an i3 if you don't want to spend a lot of money just to play games(nothing wrong with that).
I've been PC gaming for close to 20 years and have never bought a high-end rig and never had trouble playing 98% of the games out at the time I've had on each system maxed out.
My current system is an i3 540@4.4, 4GB DDR3 1600Mhz and on overclocked 6870 and couldn't be happier with it. This CPU shits all over anything AMD has out right now for games, and at worst matching it. An i3 2100 is about equal to a Phenom II x4 at 3.5-3.7, so plenty for playing games. In stuff like Starcraft 2 or ports, there is no comparison.
People overestimate what kind of hardware you need,especially since you CAN'T futureproof a rig. It's impossible. People that spend 2k on their system typically upgrade at the same rate someone that spent 700 and at best only enjoyed a few more games running at higher settings at a higher resolution.
I had a Phenom II x4(some Athlon IIs as well) system and it's a joke people(myself included) recommended AMD for budget gaming when the i3s were cheaper and far better suited for gaming.
Well i play on my personal Imax screen, with my custom made quantum computer, while hanging from a Denel AH-2 (piloted by one of Sikorsky's grandsons) with cables Mission Imposible style.BlackDove said:Yes, I play on my 100" Full HD projector, in my recliner, with a custom made support for the PC in wood, retractable monitor on the side, and full 5.1 surround sound.
What's your point?
How well will my 5770 do lol?
ChoklitReign said:High five. I know what to expect with a budget build and the people claiming that AMD or i5 CPUs have better value must not browse the official PC hardware thread. It looks like C2 improves graphics for anyone with a DX11 card and I'll find some combination that will perform well.
It really depends on how often you upgrade. Quad core optimized titles like GTAIV and World in Conflict are the exceptions right now but they could eventually be the rule, and I wouldn't count on cpu prices going down when a socket becomes obsolete. If titles ever become unplayable on a dual core you'd have no cost efficient choice other than to start all over with a new mobo. I got burned by going single core in a similar fashion.ChoklitReign said:High five. I know what to expect with a budget build and the people claiming that AMD or i5 CPUs have better value must not browse the official PC hardware thread. It looks like C2 improves graphics for anyone with a DX11 card and I'll find some combination that will perform well.
Adding 1920,1080,60 to shortcut properties always fixed the issue for me in C1.Stallion Free said:It didn't work for me this time on the Nvidia control panel, it just tells me that it is already in the list.
LovingSteam said:Huh? Where can you buy an OC'ed i5 2500k for the $50-60?
Smokey said:Alright finally finished. Gonna see what my FPS looks like on Ultra everything.
Core i7 2600k @ 4.5ghz
GTX 580 @ 900mhz
8GB RAM
Prepared for my machine to buckle for the first time.
Pimpbaa said:Damn, everything looks so goddamn nice on ultra but my geforce 460 screams out in pain. Am I getting any of the dx11 effects with everything set to extreme? I know I'm losing POM and tessellation.
-bakalhau- said:Objects