From their Siggraph 2013 talk: http://advances.realtimerendering.com/s2013/ppt_Sig2013_CDPR_Characters_v10.ppt
I wonder if it's like Fallout (toggle between) or Deus Ex (context sensitive).
I wonder if it's like Fallout (toggle between) or Deus Ex (context sensitive).
I wonder if it's like Fallout (toggle between) or Deus Ex (context sensitive).
Yeah. More games should allow you to choose, like racing games.I'd much prefer having control of what camera I want to use.
why is Cyberpunk still "next gen platforms"?
why is Cyberpunk still "next gen platforms"?
why is Cyberpunk still "next gen platforms"?
Sooo...as in Elder Scrolls choose-your-camera or Deus Ex free-form first person-third person-in cover?
I want to see my character customizations on my character damn it. Probably one of my favorite aspects in TPS RPG games. I can't do that in first person...
I wonder if it's like Fallout (toggle between) or Deus Ex (context sensitive).
The return of the kingSega haven't announced yet.
I wonder if it's like Fallout (toggle between) or Deus Ex (context sensitive).
I wonder if it's like Fallout (toggle between) or Deus Ex (context sensitive).
From their Siggraph 2013 talk: http://advances.realtimerendering.com/s2013/ppt_Sig2013_CDPR_Characters_v10.ppt
The tons of customization line makes me think it's a toggle.
why is Cyberpunk still "next gen platforms"?
Uhh...
And there i had hopes for proper party based game like they said earlier. Dat Skyrim chasing money.
well if its true that its not coming out before 2016 or something they might not have any platforms locked down for that
Every open world RPG with a single character is chasing TES now huh?Uhh...
And there i had hopes for proper party based game like they said earlier. Dat Skyrim chasing money.
I think that refers to the player character editor given the context is a presentation on their character creation pipeline.
Toggling between first and third person means they need to both model the player character well and model the first person arm view (and account for the fact you will be looking at other characters a bit more closely than in third person).
Uhh...
And there i had hopes for proper party based game like they said earlier. Dat Skyrim chasing money.
why is Cyberpunk still "next gen platforms"?
Every open world RPG with a single character is chasing TES now huh?
CDPR implement a lot of visual customizations to your player character in their games, I'd be pretty surprised if it's a FPS game where you don't visually see your customizations.
In that sense, I'm thinking they're going for a toggle, but that worries me as well. The Elder Scrolls games control terribly in third person, and designers have to do a lot of polish to get both camera perspectives just right. I hope they can pull it off...
It hope it's like Deus Ex. That way developers only have to focus on one animation set at a time.I wonder if it's like Fallout (toggle between) or Deus Ex (context sensitive).
Yeah, like it would make sense to do that for an FPS.Unfortunately most FPS developers are incredibly lazy. Most of them don't even model anything but a gun and a pair of hands. Let alone animating all the movements.
They really should have set this game in 2177. 2077 is just way too early (considering what they've shown of the tech available in the game).
CD Projekt RED already state the weakness on Skyrim design. I don't actually think they will repeat the same mistake. Hell, their game might show us how bad Skyrim design actually is.Uhh...
And there i had hopes for proper party based game like they said earlier. Dat Skyrim chasing money.
Yeah. When they announced Cyberpunk they said they want real Cyberpunk game not some "cyberpunk" in the name only. They promised party based game with cyberpunk gameplay. They said some changes will be needed since it is computer game but they wanted stay true to the core of cyberpunk.
Now it is TPP/FPP open world game. I don't know any TPP or FPP game that did well party based combat and i am not talking about some shitty combos. I am talking about real party based combat as in JA2.
Open world isn't wrong but creating it with FPP/TPP in mind will mean it won't be what they promised.
I don't remember them promising party based game play at all, but I'll take your word for it. Regardless you can't say the game is chasing Skyrim money for following the same style of game CDPR has been making since they've came onto the scene. Only difference now is a FP viewpoint.Yeah. When they announced Cyberpunk they said they want real Cyberpunk game not some "cyberpunk" in the name only. They promised party based game with cyberpunk gameplay. They said some changes will be needed since it is computer game but they wanted stay true to the core of cyberpunk.
Now it is TPP/FPP open world game. I don't know any TPP or FPP game that did well party based combat and i am not talking about some shitty combos. I am talking about real party based combat as in JA2.
Open world isn't wrong but creating it with FPP/TPP in mind will mean it won't be what they promised.
I thought the exact same thing. Sounds like Elder Scrolls/Fallout style to me.