• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

David Jaffe: Iwata "Has Earned The Right to Fail"

I came in expecting another person bashing Iwata and instead it turned into a decent read. Sometimes you fall but you have to pick yourself back and up learn why you fell in the first place. Wii U needs a 180. The consoles hardware is fine the way it is but making the changes customers want will help them in the long run even if the console stays third tier all gen long showing improvement should help them in the long run. Unified accounts where your games follow your account and purchases that are cross platform compatible would be a great step forward. Still waiting for the day to transfer my Wii data to Wii U without having to bother with $1 - $1.50 upgrade and can just use the new features. I'll always be rooting for Nintendo they can fix this mess they just have to keep at it.
 
Bullshit. No CEO has earned the right to fail.

He needs to get on with reforms to make the company more global or fuck off and let someone else do it. Iwata is just another Nintendo employee at the end of it all and he needs to perform well for the good of the company. No one has the right to fail.

if Steve Jobs was still alive he had earnt it imo
 
TBH, I'd actually argue that this has been a thing since even before the Wii. The Wii just replaced the brick walls with walls of cash that told them they were in the right until Wii U came along.
N64 showed they at least understood the appeal of western game development and GC showed that they at least had to move on from cartridges, but both efforts weren't quite enough. Wii and beyond have just been an outright rejection of what the industry pushes and believes in for better or worse. Wii U has clearly turned out for the worst. The brick wall turned into some sort of six inch thick steel.
 
Not exactly. They had people like Cerny who knew what went wrong with the PS3.

WTF? What's Cerny got to do with anything? He's never even been a Sony employee (he's a contractor), let alone upper management or CEO. Kutaragi is the equivalent to Iwata in this situation, not Cerny of all people.

Anyway, I disagree with Jaffe. Some failures are fine to overlook, like the 3DS (which is doing well but nowhere close to GBA or DS numbers) but major failures like the Wii U (or PS3) really show that things need to change. It's not like the Wii U came completely out of the blue either, Iwata let them fall so far behind Sony and Microsoft on the console front to chase casuals that they'll never catch up.
 
I kind of agree. Wanting Iwata to resign, just because of one console being a failure, it is a really selfish point of view. He was the one behind the Wii, an amazing console, so IMO he deserves another chance. Yamauchi failed a lot before resigning from his position as the president, I don't see why it should be different to Iwata.

No, he really wasn't

Mr. Asada is most famous for being at the helm of Nintendo when Mr. Yamauchi decided to retire. Asada was the head of a 6 person "Executive Committee" that ran the Company for a few years while Yamauchi carefully oversaw how everything ran without him.

That 6-person committee included Iwata, BTW. However:

September 2001 - Purchased Wii technology from Tom Quinn after Microsoft and Sony laughed at it...it's thanks to Mr. Asada that Nintendo was able to develop the Wii and revive its fortunes

Iwata's only hand in that was saying "okay" to it as the "executive director" of the board. It was Asada that saw the potential in using that in Nintendo's consoles and made/developed it with R&D for Iwata to okay.
 
The folks who were responsible for much of the failure of PS3 are still there, responsible for making PS4 what it is. They learned lots of hard lessons from the failures of PS3 to make PS4 a much stronger product (and even to make PS3's latter years much better than its first years).

except Kutaragi who was the father of playstation.

So there are parallels here.
 
Kaz is the guy behind the PS3 slim and rebranding away from the Spider-Man font back to the traditional PlayStation font. Kaz made the PS3 what it is today.

Iwata is in the same position as Kutaragi, two successes and one gigantic failure. Kutaragi was summarily replaced.

There is no room for sentiment in business. Whatever his past successes, Iwata has overseen the biggest failure Nintendo has ever been through and he needs to be moved on.

Kaz is the guy behind the PSVita failure, and somehow nobody demands his head...
 
Jaffe one of the people that just lays the Wii success at Iwata's feet, huh.

What Nintendo needs is a bold CEO with an eye for global opportunity in the same way Yamauchi totally did. When you realise DS and Wii were still Yamauchi influenced, and 3DS and WiiU were Iwata's first rodeos with no influence, the bigger picture becomes pretty clear.

Sure, Iwata's failed 3DS launch we could all just brush under the carper and go "whoops, lessons learned." But to then repeat the exact same mistakes on an even grander scale with the WiiU is when the "ah, this guy is no good is he?" sentiment should set in.
 
I agree with this and I fear Nintendo is going to learn the wrong lesson from it, what with Iwata's statement about rethinking Nintendo's business structure. A major part of the problem plaguing Nintendo is that they haven't been able to match the feature set that people take for granted on rival systems such as online services and they've completely neglected the importance of third parties.

Many people don't even consider them contenders with the other two consoles anymore, more likely than not, Wii and Wii U are viewed as a companion console to play Nintendo stuff. When the public fails to buy their hardware on their strengths and unique feature set alone, they've got nothing to fall back on.
 
Why HE is using RANDOM caps words all over his PAPER?

I understand his point but I'm not sure in the position of Iwata, he had the "choice" to fail. He had everything to succeed and managed to waste time.
 
He makes some good points.

I'm just wary that whatever Iwata's takeaway from the Wii U is, it will not be the kind that benefits a core audience.
 
The folks who were responsible for much of the failure of PS3 are still there, responsible for making PS4 what it is. They learned lots of hard lessons from the failures of PS3 to make PS4 a much stronger product (and even to make PS3's latter years much better than its first years).

No they aren't. Kutargi is gone, Phil Harrison is gone, David Reeves is gone. Andy, Shu and Jim are new additions to the SCE BoD since that era.

if Steve Jobs was still alive he had earnt it imo

Possibly, but I don't think he had it within him to fail, and would have fallen on his sword if he did.

Kaz is the guy behind the PSVita failure, and somehow nobody demands his head...

Vita is a fringe product for Sony as a company, additionally, it is still a profitable product and the ecosystem has been profitable from the outset. Portable gaming is a sideline for Sony.
 
The folks who were responsible for much of the failure of PS3 are still there, responsible for making PS4 what it is. They learned lots of hard lessons from the failures of PS3 to make PS4 a much stronger product (and even to make PS3's latter years much better than its first years).

Some of the folks responsible for the PS3 are still there. Ken Kutaragi (SCE CEO), David Reeves (SCEE CEO) and Phil Harrison (SCEWWS president), to name a few of the most influential figures, are long gone. Jack Tretton, Andrew House and Shu Yoshida in particular were lower down the ladder at that point.

Why people are bringing this up, I have no idea. No-one's saying that they should fire the entire company, they're saying fire Iwata. He'd then be replaced by someone who has worked their way up the corporate ladder at Nintendo and hopefully understands why the Wii U was such a major failure.
 
Harsh words but Nintendo really needs to wake the fuck up. They are sitting on a goldmine and they don't even want to acknowledge it.
 
The folks who were responsible for much of the failure of PS3 are still there, responsible for making PS4 what it is. They learned lots of hard lessons from the failures of PS3 to make PS4 a much stronger product (and even to make PS3's latter years much better than its first years).

No they aren't. Completely different management and corporate philosophy at SCE now.

Regarding the topic, I don't think they should fire Iwata unless they know they can bring in someone who can make some real changes. If he's just replaced with Iwata #2, then it's pointless.
 
Unusually considered for a Jaffe statement.

Jesus Dave, you used to be so hip and cool, you're sounding more and more like Geoff Keighley by the second.

:P
 
Some of the folks responsible for the PS3 are still there. Ken Kutaragi (SCE CEO), David Reeves (SCEE CEO) and Phil Harrison (SCEWWS president), to name a few of the most influential figures, are long gone. Jack Tretton, Andrew House and Shu Yoshida in particular were lower down the ladder at that point.

Why people are bringing this up, I have no idea. No-one's saying that they should fire the entire company, they're saying fire Iwata. He'd then be replaced by someone who has worked their way up the corporate ladder at Nintendo and hopefully understands why the Wii U was such a major failure.

But at this point doesn't the Nintendo board pretty much entirely consist of Iwata picks? They're all part of the culture that resulted in the Wii U in the first place.
 
I didn't know Nintendo was a private company owned by Iwata. /s

That's the only logic for a CEO of a public-listed company to have earned a 'right to fail.'

A million successes don't absolve a major failing. At most, Iwata has earned the right to ask for time to right his failures, but he has no right to fail.
 
.



Possibly, but I don't think he had it within him to fail, and would have fallen on his sword if he did.
.

Whilst i agree to say he hadn't earnt it is nuts. He flipped the ENTIRE cell phone market on its head.

Apple has almost single handedly destroyed RIM and ten years ago if people said that blackberry would be in dire straights just a decade from then you would have laughed at them
 
if Steve Jobs was still alive he had earnt it imo

Well......Jobs was fired from Apple and it wasn't until they couldn't recover that he came back.

We do have a tendency to get rid of the person in charge the minute there is a downturn but such is the fate of a public company.
 
The dude is behind Nintendos two greatest successes of all time, and saved them from irrelevancy last gen. People saying he should be fired because of Wii Us abysmal first year are trigger happy, shortsighted armchair analydts. Its really ridiculous. Literally absurd to be calling for him to step down.

Yep, I've said this before but Iwata as CEO made more money overall for Nintendo comparatively to what he's lost.

I just figure I put that angle to consider as it's the normal knee jerk reaction to usually focus on ones failures to represent their character in whole.
 
But has he earned the right to design a new console? Because it won't be long until they are balls deep in a new console design.
I agree he has the right to be at the helm of the Wii u, but there is an inherent risk allowing him to design the next console when a new change in leadership could be necessary.
 
The right to a second chance, sure. As a leader, you do not have the right to fail, regardless of how successful you have been. That success is in the past. What you can do today or tomorrow, is what matters.
 
Jaffe one of the people that just lays the Wii success at Iwata's feet, huh.

What Nintendo needs is a bold CEO with an eye for global opportunity in the same way Yamauchi totally did. When you realise DS and Wii were still Yamauchi influenced, and 3DS and WiiU were Iwata's first rodeos with no influence, the bigger picture becomes pretty clear.

Sure, Iwata's failed 3DS launch we could all just brush under the carper and go "whoops, lessons learned." But to then repeat the exact same mistakes on an even grander scale with the WiiU is when the "ah, this guy is no good is he?" sentiment should set in.

Good answer.

I just looked at Aquamarine's Nintendo Board Of Directors thread.

Where's Hiroshi Yamauchi? He was back in Kyoto, uninvolved in this deal. That's right---Nintendo of America signed a game development contract with Rare Ltd. without the oversight of the Kyoto office.

Can you imagine the modern Nintendo of America going to Warner Bros. to commission an exclusive Batman game for the Wii U? Or what about even for a simple GTA V port?

It's unthinkable to imagine today's Nintendo of America making game-development-related business deals without Iwata / NCL involved---Iwata becoming NOA's President / Chairman solidifies that. Iwata has buried himself within every facet of Nintendo that getting rid of him would be harder than you might expect.

Good lord!! This company is s******.
 
The only 'problem' I have with this, and with Iwata in general, is not the fact that he failed but how he failed. A mistake like putting 3D in the 3DS, thus driving up the cost for a mostly unwanted gimmick that did nothing to help sales, is a mistake I can live with. But the whole clulessness associated with the conception, launch and life to date of the Wii U is pretty inexcusable.

That said, he sure said a lot of right things yesterday, something I didn't see coming from him. Whether or not that translates into actions going forward is something yet to be seen.
 
Yep, I've said this before but Iwata as CEO made more money overall for Nintendo comparatively to what he's lost.

I just figure I put that angle to consider as it's the normal knee jerk reaction to usually focus on ones failures to represent their character in whole.

If someone told you that there is a Magical CEO X that will be able to do better than Iwata and Steve Job at their best/most profitable points to their respective companies, would you fire those CEOs who had, before that, contributed so much to the compay?

Or would you keep those CEOs around out of some sentimentality and appreciation of past deeds/contributions? And forfeit the opportunity to push the business to new heights with Magical CEO X?

Asking Iwata to resign, is imo, a knee-jerk reaction at this point. But he cannot be absolved solely because he previously made so much money for the company that it's 'acceptable' for him to lose some.
 
Nobody has "the right to fail". What does that even mean? I don't believe that past success automatically and preemptively absolve you against future failures. I mean, the Wii was a pretty huge hit. How many failed consoles does that buy him protection against?

What Iwata does have however, is an obligation to fix the Wii U. Or at least look like he's putting some degree of effort into the task.
 
From a gamer point of view? Yeah ok. By not delivering on games year after year and constantly apologizing for it?

He said the Wii wouldn't have a drought problem like the GC.
He said the 3DS wouldn't have a drought problem like the Wii.
He said the Wii U wouldn't have a drought problem like the Wii and 3DS.

When we do get games, it's a bunch of rehashes or mediocre ones. I don't see why we should give him a pass for failure when he isn't taking any risks for us. Where's that AAA new IP from one of the main teams nintendo? From a gamer point of view we can criticize all we want.
 
Speaking of Disney buying Nintendo, that would be a great partnership for sure. I'd like to see their games on other platforms as I don't purchase their hardware. I understand their fanbase and those that are worried about them losing their magic if they didn't have their own hardware to work off of, but for me that would be great to have the chance to play some of their titles.
 
Yep, I've said this before but Iwata as CEO made more money overall for Nintendo comparatively to what he's lost.

I just figure I put that angle to consider as it's the normal knee jerk reaction to usually focus on ones failures to represent their character in whole.

You could have said the same about Kutaragi. Was it a mistake to let him go?
 
Kaz is the guy behind the PS3 slim and rebranding away from the Spider-Man font back to the traditional PlayStation font. Kaz made the PS3 what it is today.

Iwata is in the same position as Kutaragi, two successes and one gigantic failure. Kutaragi was summarily replaced.

There is no room for sentiment in business. Whatever his past successes, Iwata has overseen the biggest failure Nintendo has ever been through and he needs to be moved on.

Kutaragi's failure could be salvaged. Iwata's are a total face plant.
 
I agree with what he is saying but the WiiU is failing in a way that EVERY observer predicted it would because EVERYONE could see how much of a screw up everything about it is. That is what would concern me as a Nintendo shareholder (which I'm not by the way).
 
He kinda fallowed the global trends right with the wiiu and 3ds. Just he released the product s when the trends were going out and onto something else.

The board will probably give him a chance to correct this. But if it stays the same by the end of the year probably forced resignation.

But what do I know. Japan is wierd with its buisness practices ie: SE.
 
Kutaragi's failure could be salvaged. Iwata's are a total face plant.

Kutaragi screwed up but in the end he still made a great console. He didn't screw that up, the important thing. WiiU is a flawed product that they are stuck with now for years to come.
 
The type of faiure Jaffe is referencing in not the type of failure Iwata and Nintendo are eexperiening.

Nintendo is facing failure due to lack of clear vision, lack of clear message, and lack of clear direction.

Nintendo is not failing becaue their idea is different, they are failing because they no idea.
 
I agree to an extent but if a number of failings could have been easily solved by picking up any device from 2011 it just makes him seem out of touch.
 
Kutaragi's failure could be salvaged. Iwata's are a total face plant.

Agreed. The PS3 was still a viable product despite the cost and it's shortcomings. Wii U is not. The new management who came in had something to work with, that wouldn't be the case for anyone who comes into salvage the Wii U.
 
I think Disney should buy the rights to Nintendo's characters for use in theme parks and movies, but not to control the company. Nintendo would shrivel up and be on a shelf like the muppets.

That sounds reasonable. I don't know how much the new Pixar-run Disney has changed since the 2000-era sequelitis, but they showed an ability to milk their franchises dry. Not exactly what Nintendo needs right now.

Get FRESH young blood in, Nintendo!!!

I'm pretty sure they just retired a significant chunk of their board and brought in "new" faces.
 
Agreed. The PS3 was still a viable product despite the cost and it's shortcomings. Wii U is not. The new management who came in had something to work with, that wouldn't be the case for anyone who comes into salvage the Wii U.

When Steve Jobs came back to Apple, the first thing he did was cut every program that wasn't working, and redesign and reintroduce the ones that were working.

That's what's needed at Nintendo. You dump the Wii U now and take the hit. They can coast on the 3DS until the new successor hybrid console/tablet is ready.
 
Top Bottom