WrikaWrek said:WOuld be awesome.
Let MS handle the software side of the system, Sony the hardware side, Nintendo the Input Side of the system.
Pie in the sky dream, but nonetheless....
Oh AND DENIS DYACK SAID IT FIRST AND HE WAS CALLED A FOOL, I GUESS SOMETIMES FOOLS ARE JUST THINKING AHEAD
MS is decent at software and no windows vs the pc industry is proof they shouldn't have a blank check in this group to do it if. Once MS has an idea in software it can be great at other times no as it's self serving.
Sony should not deal with hardware at all not once have they demonstrated the ability to make a machine that really balances the aspects of the consumer. Go ahead and bring whatever argument you got. PSX only won because nintendo screwed up. PS2 was an issue of timing but tech wise a nightmare initially that only lasted because ms and nintendo launched late with no clear vision. PS3 does it even need to be said. These three companies and their engineers alone would ensure a sku or two that would fit the needs.
Nintendo gets too much credit for input yes they have a history but their competition forces it out of them. The problem with nintendo is they go to fast without consideration for the legacy they may destory you can easily look at Wii and n64 as proof of how their new interfaces can kill off established styles of gaming.
The idea works but you need two skus. Somehow convince nintendo they would earn more money in that industry than they do now. MS has to give API control. Publishers need to be eliminated or marginalized because they have various reasons themselves for not wanting this future IE the nintendo tiered devs in this environment getting a lot of the glory.