• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Deadline: Analysts project that movie studio profits are in for a rough 2017

Status
Not open for further replies.
Fewer movies. Less Money.

n03lr3J.jpg
 

kswiston

Member
It's hilarious that Disney has the smallest slate of all the studios for this year but is guaranteed to make the most money.

I should point out that I also didn't include any releases from Jan-Mar 10th. Universal has released 5 films already, Lionsgate has released 5, Warner Bros has released 3, Fox has released 2, Paramount has released 3, and Sony has released 4.

Beauty and the Beast this weekend is the first Disney film of the year.

EDIT: I added that info to the OP
 

DeathoftheEndless

Crashing this plane... with no survivors!
Like, besides the fact that the books are, well, weird; where is any marketing for this thing? The length of more or less all subsequent books after the first means any sequels would either have to be long-ass films or entirely TV-based makes it a weird proposition already. If they know in advance that it's all contingent on the success of this first film, why isn't it called The Dark Tower: The Gunslinger"?

I'd love for it to do well, but BOY does it not seem likely right now.

tl;dr make a Wizard and Glass adaptation.

There was a leaked trailer back in December or so. I'm not sure why it hasn't been officially released. I remember the first trailer for Ghostbusters coming out only a few months from the premiere date last year and that was also a Sony production.

I think a Wizard and Glass miniseries is in the cards, but I don't see it happening when the first movie fails.
 

BumRush

Member
It's an interesting question: Do studios try to copy Disney's home-run derby model of distribution (less films on a slate, slate specifically designed so that each entry holds super-blockbuster potential), or do they go the other way and maybe try to resurrect the mid-budget tier of motion picture that's been slowly asphyxiating the past couple decades?

It looks like they're going to try and join the home run derby, which will be hard considering Disney owns most of the sluggers outright already. And for whatever reason, releasing a lot of 30-50mil movies that could make 80-100 mil if successful doesn't seem to be an avenue any of these studios really wants to pursue strongly.

You nailed it with the bolded...outside of Fast, Transformers and a few others, the Home Runs are all Disney (marvel, star wars, Pixar, classics redone, etc)
 

4Tran

Member
It's an interesting question: Do studios try to copy Disney's home-run derby model of distribution (less films on a slate, slate specifically designed so that each entry holds super-blockbuster potential), or do they go the other way and maybe try to resurrect the mid-budget tier of motion picture that's been slowly asphyxiating the past couple decades?

It looks like they're going to try and join the home run derby, which will be hard considering Disney owns most of the sluggers outright already. And for whatever reason, releasing a lot of 30-50mil movies that could make 80-100 mil if successful doesn't seem to be an avenue any of these studios really wants to pursue strongly.
Definitely home run derby. Disney's success can't be denied so everyone's going to want a piece of that pie. It's probably going to be a terrible idea for most of the studios, but putting money on bad ideas is an essential part of Hollywood!
 

Ridley327

Member
It's an interesting question: Do studios try to copy Disney's home-run derby model of distribution (less films on a slate, slate specifically designed so that each entry holds super-blockbuster potential), or do they go the other way and maybe try to resurrect the mid-budget tier of motion picture that's been slowly asphyxiating the past couple decades?

It looks like they're going to try and join the home run derby, which will be hard considering Disney owns most of the sluggers outright already. And for whatever reason, releasing a lot of 30-50mil movies that could make 80-100 mil if successful doesn't seem to be an avenue any of these studios really wants to pursue strongly.

It's weird, since that's a sector that Disney specifically gave up on with their current path. They sold off Miramax ages ago, Hollywood Pictures and Touchstone have been dead for quite some time now, and they let their distribution deal with DreamWorks go out on a whimper with the one-two punch of The BFG and The Light Between Oceans.
 
It's an interesting question: Do studios try to copy Disney's home-run derby model of distribution (less films on a slate, slate specifically designed so that each entry holds super-blockbuster potential), or do they go the other way and maybe try to resurrect the mid-budget tier of motion picture that's been slowly asphyxiating the past couple decades?

It looks like they're going to try and join the home run derby, which will be hard considering Disney owns most of the sluggers outright already. And for whatever reason, releasing a lot of 30-50mil movies that could make 80-100 mil if successful doesn't seem to be an avenue any of these studios really wants to pursue strongly.
One would hope studios would look at Split, Get Out, and Logan (which yes, cost far more than the other two, but still far less than other blockbusters) and realize that not all the money is in expensive tent poles, but I get the feeling trying to emulate Disney will be a thing, which is a fool's errand if there ever was one.

If Fox is smart they'll look at the successes of Logan and Deadpool, the disappointment of Appocalypse, and the failure of ID4-2 and realize that a lot of conventional Hollywood wisdom is garbage, but I could see a successful Avatar sequel (if it ever fucking releases, lol) wiping out any lessons they may have learned. Plus they still apparently want X-Men to be their own MCU. We'll see how that goes.

Universal should be looking hard at what the Blumhouse deal is doing for them but I think 2015 set unrealistic expectations for them which will hurt them going forwards. 50 Shades already dropped significantly and Fate and JW2 ain't matching their predecessors, regardless of quality.

Warner is going to go the hardest at emulating Disney, and to be fair they definitely will come close to succeeding, but hopefully they won't lose sight of their own strengths in the mad push to match Marvel and milk their relationship with JK Rowling.
 

Sulik2

Member
Hey movie studios, Sept - November normally only get one or two movies in terms of tent pole releases, maybe try releasing more big movies in that giant gap instead of cramming everything into the summer and chopping each other's legs off. You've already expanded to March and some into Feb. These are the big three months that still seem oddly empty most years. Although Disney did Strange and Moana in this window last year, they are smart.
 

Hari Seldon

Member
TV has killed movies completely. If you are not a comic book fan or a kid there is literally no reason to even rent movies anymore. I will see Star Wars and Dunkirk in 2017 and that is it. Won't even rent anything lol.
 

jmdajr

Member
I should point out that I also didn't include any releases from Jan-Mar 10th. Universal has released 5 films already, Lionsgate has released 5, Warner Bros has released 3, Fox has released 2, Paramount has released 3, and Sony has released 4.

Beauty and the Beast this weekend is the first Disney film of the year.

EDIT: I added that info to the OP

Release all your shit in Jan and Feb!

Well John Wick 2, Get Out, Split, Kong, Logan, Lego Batman have all done good.
 
TV has killed movies completely. If you are not a comic book fan or a kid there is literally no reason to even rent movies anymore. I will see Star Wars and Dunkirk in 2017 and that is it. Won't even rent anything lol.
I mean, even if the numbers are down, not everyone has as narrow tastes/views as you apparently do. There's still plenty out there beyond what you've described.
 
Neither of these are true. BFG's $183m on a $140m budget is a loss, as studios share the revenue with theatres. In the US the studio gets a little over half, less elsewhere, and only $55m of the revenue was domestic. Which saddens me because I liked the movie.

The story is similar for Alice 2, just with a larger budget and a larger gross.

Long term both may turn a profit, but theatrically they absolutely did not.

Those numbers most likely don't include marketing spend, either. So they're even more bomb-ish.
 

Joni

Member
There is an easy solution. Stop spending so much on anything not a guaranteed hit. Don't give 200 million for a movie that isn't the hit sequel to a 50 million movie. And don't give that sequel 200 million either because clearly it can be cheaper.
 

pestul

Member
It probably isn't a huge dent yet, but half of my work colleagues (even the less tech savvy ones) are just stealing all their shit with Android tv boxes. It seems they've made the entry barrier much easier than torrenting. They have the gall to say "Why do you even go to the theatres? Ha ha". My response is usually, "So I can support filmmakers. I also don't like shit quality with forced subtitles."
 
If William Goldman were still actively working in the industry I would love to read the book he could write about the last decade. It's like everything he described in The Big Picture and Which Lie Did I Tell? amplified a thousandfold.

(If you don't know who I'm talking about look him up and read those books, they're hilarious.)
 
It probably isn't a huge dent yet, but half of my work colleagues (even the less tech savvy ones) are just stealing all their shit with Android tv boxes. It seems they've made the entry barrier much easier than torrenting. They have the gall to say "Why do you even go to the theatres? Ha ha". My response is usually, "So I can support filmmakers. I also don't like shit quality with forced subtitles."

yeah people are really shameless about this.. watching cam quality and shit
 

Harp

Member
I used to love going to the movies at theater. But between people constantly looking at their phones. Coughing every 5 mins. And have to hold a conversation. It really sucks. And thats before you take into account for the movie, drink and popcorn it's now 20-25 bucks to watch the movie. I think I will just buy the UHD blueray and watch the movie on my 65 inch 4k tv with Atmos surround sound at home. Even if I only watch the movie once at least I own it.

And don't get me started about new VIP sections!!! How are you doing to ask people to silence there phone then give them a beer in a glass bottle and food with metal fork and knife.
 
The crazy thing about Disney is that they don't just dominate the box office. They're also the long reigning king of home video, merchandise, and theme parks. To the point that their ludicrously successful film business is functionally just marketing for their resorts, toys, and BluRays. The closest the competition has is Universal's theme parks, which are still being trounced by Disney, and DC merch. And correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't Star Wars merchandise alone bigger than all other non-Disney merchandise, or close to? And then there's the Disney Princess juggernaut getting it's latest booster shot with Beauty and the Beast.

I wonder if we'll see the others push harder to match Disney in these areas. Home video is a lost cause (not worth competing for a shrinking pie) but I feel like there's more effort to be made in merchandise, and WB could always turn the Wizarding World into a bigger theme park partnership with Universal.
 
It's an interesting question: Do studios try to copy Disney's home-run derby model of distribution (less films on a slate, slate specifically designed so that each entry holds super-blockbuster potential), or do they go the other way and maybe try to resurrect the mid-budget tier of motion picture that's been slowly asphyxiating the past couple decades?

It looks like they're going to try and join the home run derby, which will be hard considering Disney owns most of the sluggers outright already. And for whatever reason, releasing a lot of 30-50mil movies that could make 80-100 mil if successful doesn't seem to be an avenue any of these studios really wants to pursue strongly.

More studios should try to zag when the others are all zigging.

Big problem is hollywood is everyone wants to follow the leader rather than carve their own niche, as you point out.
 

mjc

Member
Strong US dollar = lower international returns relative to local currency. Russia and Latin America have taken huge hits, but Europe and Asia are down as well. On top of that, 2015 foreign currency was already much weaker than 2014. But yes, the international market expansion has started to slow down.

They announced that date last April

http://collider.com/disney-release-date/

UNTITLED DISNEY FAIRY TALE (Live Action) previously dated on 12/22/17 moves up to 7/28/17
UNTITLED DISNEY FAIRY TALE (Live Action) now dated on 4/6/18
UNTITLED DISNEY LIVE ACTION now dated on 8/3/18
UNTITLED DISNEY LIVE ACTION now dated on 12/25/18
UNTITLED DISNEY FAIRY TALE (Live Action) now dated on 12/20/19

So we don't know what the July 2017 one is, but it's safe to assume that Aladdin or Mulan are the two 2018 ones right?
 

a916

Member
Disney had an unreal run last year, but that's also partly due to every other studio not stepping up to the plate.

Let's not condemn the other studios already... Universal broke records 2 years ago.

WB has a pretty strong slate, though LEGO Batman deserved a higher gross.

JL/WW should be big and Blade Runner and Dunkirk should bring in respectable money as well.

I mean Universal has:

Girls Trip
American Made
The Snowman
Insidious: Chapter 4
Let It Snow
Pitch Perfect 3

Unless they are delusional they aren't expecting to compete with Rogue One/Thor/Coco
 
It's weird, since that's a sector that Disney specifically gave up on with their current path. They sold off Miramax ages ago, Hollywood Pictures and Touchstone have been dead for quite some time now, and they let their distribution deal with DreamWorks go out on a whimper with the one-two punch of The BFG and The Light Between Oceans.

This is a really good point. That market is one that Disney has no desire to pursue. Why not fill that void? It's not like the market really disappeared on its own. It basically got starved. Audiences will turn out for it. 2017 is making a pretty strong case for that already.
 

kswiston

Member
In light of the discussion on Bobby's post, I have decided to update a chart I made on Dec 28th last year, looking at Domestic gross vs budget for every 2016 film to release in at least 1500 venues.

The updated version includes 2016 limited releases that went wide in 2017. With a handful of exceptions, these are final or near final grosses.

Code:
					Distributor	Total		Production Budget (million USD)
1	Rogue One: A Star Wars Story	BV		$530,118,047 	200
2	Finding Dory			BV		$486,295,561 	200
3	Captain America: Civil War	BV		$408,084,349 	250
4	The Secret Life of Pets		Uni.		$368,341,700 	75
5	The Jungle Book (2016)		BV		$364,001,123 	175
6	Deadpool			Fox		$363,070,709 	58
7	Zootopia			BV		$341,268,248 	150
8	Batman v Superman		WB		$330,360,194 	250
9	Suicide Squad			WB		$325,100,054 	175
10	Sing				Uni.		$268,744,865 	75
11	Moana				BV		$247,486,833 	150
12	Fantastic Beasts 		WB		$233,818,593 	180
13	Doctor Strange			BV		$232,630,718 	165
14	Hidden Figures			Fox		$162,861,188 	25
15	Jason Bourne			Uni.		$162,192,920 	120
16	Star Trek Beyond		Par.		$158,848,340 	185
17	X-Men: Apocalypse		Fox		$155,442,489 	178
18	Trolls				Fox		$153,584,569 	125
19	La La Land			LG/S		$148,449,258 	30
20	Kung Fu Panda 3			Fox		$143,528,619 	145
21	Ghostbusters (2016)		Sony		$128,350,574 	144
22	Central Intelligence		WB (NL)		$127,440,871 	50
23	The Legend of Tarzan		WB		$126,643,061 	180
24	Sully				WB		$125,070,033 	60
25	Bad Moms			STX		$113,257,297 	20
26	The Angry Birds Movie		Sony		$107,509,366 	73
27	Independence Day: Resurgence	Fox		$103,144,286 	165
28	The Conjuring 2			WB (NL)		$102,470,008 	40
29	Arrival				Par.		$100,546,139 	47
30	Passengers (2016)		Sony		$99,350,745 	110
31	Sausage Party			Sony		$97,670,358 	19
32	The Magnificent Seven (2016)	Sony		$93,432,655 	90
33	Ride Along 2			Uni.		$90,862,685 	40
34	Don't Breathe			SGem		$89,217,875 	10
35	Miss Peregrine's Home for...	Fox		$87,242,834 	110
36	The Accountant			WB		$86,260,045 	44
37	TMNT: Out of the Shadows	Par.		$82,051,601 	135
38	The Purge: Election Year	Uni.		$79,042,440 	10
39	Alice Through the Looking Glass	BV		$77,041,381 	170
40	Pete's Dragon (2016)		BV		$76,233,151 	65
41	The Girl on the Train (2016)	Uni.		$75,395,035 	45
42	Boo! A Madea Halloween		LGF		$73,206,343 	20
43	Storks				WB		$72,679,278 	70
44	10 Cloverfield Lane		Par.		$72,082,998 	15
45	Lights Out			WB (NL)		$67,268,835 	5
46	Hacksaw Ridge			LGF		$67,209,615 	40
47	The Divergent Series: Allegiant	LG/S		$66,184,051 	110
48	Now You See Me 2		LG/S		$65,075,540 	90
49	Ice Age: Collision Course	Fox		$64,063,008 	105
50	The Boss			Uni.		$63,077,560 	29
51	London Has Fallen		Focus		$62,524,260 	60
52	Miracles from Heaven		TriS		$61,705,123 	13
53	Deepwater Horizon		LG/S		$61,433,527 	110
54	Why Him?			Fox		$60,191,438 	38
55	My Big Fat Greek Wedding 2	Uni.		$59,689,605 	18
56	Jack Reacher: Never Go Back	Par.		$58,697,076 	60
57	Fences				Par.		$57,393,468 	24
58	Me Before You			WB (NL)		$56,245,075 	20
59	The BFG				BV		$55,483,770 	140
60	Neighbors 2: Sorority Rising	Uni.		$55,340,730 	35
61	The Shallows			Sony		$55,124,043 	17
62	Office Christmas Party		Par.		$54,767,494 	45
63	Assassin's Creed		Fox		$54,647,948 	125
64	Barbershop: The Next Cut	WB (NL)		$54,030,051 	20
65	13 Hours			Par.		$52,853,219 	50
66	Lion				Wein.		$48,647,617 	12
67	Kubo and the Two Strings	Focus		$48,023,088 	60
68	The Huntsman: Winter's War	Uni.		$48,003,015 	115
69	Manchester by the Sea		RAtt.		$47,532,151 	9
70	Warcraft			Uni.		$47,225,655 	160
71	How to Be Single		WB (NL)		$46,843,513 	38
72	Mike and Dave Need Wed. Dates	Fox		$46,009,673 	33
73	War Dogs			WB		$43,034,523 	40
74	Almost Christmas		Uni.		$42,065,185 	17
75	Money Monster			TriS		$41,012,075 	27
76	Allied				Par.		$40,098,064 	85
77	Nerve				LGF		$38,583,626 	20
78	Risen				Sony		$36,880,033 	20
79	The Nice Guys			WB		$36,261,763 	50
80	The Boy (2016)			STX		$35,819,556 	10
81	Dirty Grandpa			LGF		$35,593,113 	12
82	Ouija: Origin of Evil		Uni.		$35,144,505 	9
83	The 5th Wave			Sony		$34,912,982 	38
84	Inferno				Sony		$34,343,574 	75
85	Mother's Day			ORF		$32,492,859 	25
86	Patriot's Day			LGF		$31,886,361 	45
87	Gods of Egypt			LG/S		$31,153,464 	140
88	Collateral Beauty		WB (NL)		$31,016,021 	36
89	Hail, Caesar!			Uni.		$30,080,225 	22
90	When the Bough Breaks		SGem		$29,747,603 	10
91	Zoolander 2			Par.		$28,848,693 	50
92	The Finest Hours		BV		$27,569,558 	80
93	Florence Foster Jenkins		Par.		$27,383,770 	29
94	Hell or High Water		LGF		$27,007,844 	12
95	Moonlight			A24		$26,895,353 	2
96	The Forest			Focus		$26,594,261 	10
97	Ben-Hur (2016)			Par.		$26,410,477 	100
98	The Witch			A24		$25,138,705 	3
99	Bridget Jones's Baby		Uni.		$24,139,805 	35
100	Kevin Hart: What Now?		Uni.		$23,574,605 	10
101	Whiskey Tango Foxtrot		Par.		$23,083,334 	35
102	Snowden				ORF		$21,587,519 	40
103	Mechanic: Resurrection		LG/S		$21,218,403 	40
104	Free State of Jones		STX		$20,810,036 	50
105	Blair Witch			LGF		$20,777,061 	5
106	God's Not Dead 2		PFR		$20,774,575 	5
107	Keanu				WB (NL)		$20,591,853 	15
108	Middle School: The Worst Years 	LGF		$20,007,149 	9
109	Nine Lives (2016)		EC		$19,700,032 	30
110	Race (2016)			Focus		$19,115,191 	5
111	The Choice			LGF		$18,730,891 	10
112	Bad Santa 2			BG		$17,678,142 	26
113	Masterminds (2016)		Rela.		$17,368,022 	25
114	Norm of the North		LGF		$17,062,499 	18
115	The Birth of a Nation		FoxS		$15,861,566 	9
116	Eddie the Eagle			Fox		$15,789,389 	23
117	The Infiltrator			BG		$15,436,808 	30
118	Keeping Up with the Joneses	Fox		$14,904,426 	40
119	Criminal (2016)			LG/S		$14,708,696 	32
120	The Edge of Seventeen		STX		$14,431,633 	9
121	Triple 9			ORF		$12,639,297 	20
122	The Light Between Oceans	BV		$12,545,979 	20
123	Fifty Shades of Black		ORF		$11,686,940 	5
124	Pride and Prejudice and Zombies	SGem		$10,907,291 	28
125	The Darkness			HTR		$10,753,574 	4
126	Live by Night			WB		$10,378,555 	65
127	Popstar: Never Stop Never Stop.	Uni.		$9,496,130 	20
128	Hardcore Henry			STX		$9,252,038 	3
129	Ratchet & Clank			Focus		$8,821,329 	20
130	The Wild Life (2016)		LG/S		$8,005,586 	13
131	Silence				Par.		$7,100,177 	40
132	Shut In				EC		$6,900,335 	10
133	The Brothers Grimsby		Sony		$6,874,837 	35
134	The Young Messiah		Focus		$6,469,813 	19
135	Bleed for This			ORF		$5,083,906 	6
136	Incarnate			HTR		$4,799,774 	5
137	Hands of Stone			Wein.		$4,712,792 	20
138	Morgan				Fox		$3,915,251 	8
139	Max Steel			ORF		$3,818,664 	10
140	A Monster Calls			Focus		$3,740,823 	43
141	Rules Don't Apply		Fox		$3,652,206 	25
142	Miss Sloane			EC		$3,454,831 	13
143	The Disappointments Room	Rela.		$2,423,468 	15
					TOTAL		$10.896B	$8.139B



And some summary statistics based on the numbers above

Code:
Budget Range	# of releases	Avg Gross in Range	Avg Budget in Range
$150M+		16		$260M			$183M
$100-149M	15		$84M			$122M
$75-99M		7		$128M			$81M
$50-74M		14		$85M			$59M
$25-49M		36		$45M			$35M
$10-24M		38		$37M			$16M
$0-9M		17		$21M			$6M

TOTAL		143		$76M			$57M


Keep in mind that the above is just looking at the domestic box office. Big budget films have a much larger international average than small budget films (which may not even get an international release in most territories).
 
Neither of these are true. BFG's $183m on a $140m budget is a loss, as studios share the revenue with theatres. In the US the studio gets a little over half, less elsewhere, and only $55m of the revenue was domestic. Which saddens me because I liked the movie.

The story is similar for Alice 2, just with a larger budget and a larger gross.

Long term both may turn a profit, but theatrically they absolutely did not.

Where did you get these numbers like the studio gets half of domestic?
 

Hari Seldon

Member
Sure thing.

I know in my house, every time my wife and I think about renting a movie the conversation is "We have 3 more episodes of Show XXXX waiting for us". Renting is no longer the casual weekly ritual it used to be, I might rent 6 movies a year anymore and see 1 in a theater. 10 years ago I would see 4-5 live and rent like 40-50 movies a year. TV being just so ridiculously better combined with Hollywood producing maybe 3-4 movies a year that I would even bother with means that I don't spend anything on Hollywood anymore.

It is a shame, film used to be a huge part of my life.
 
When was the last time Sony had a successful blockbuster movie?
TV has killed movies completely. If you are not a comic book fan or a kid there is literally no reason to even rent movies anymore. I will see Star Wars and Dunkirk in 2017 and that is it. Won't even rent anything lol.
Bruh, you at least need to rent Get Out.
 

SFenton

Member
Why, every year, do I feel like Fox puts out the most movies likely to lose money?

Why am I wrong about this every year goddamn
 
BFG broke even



Sequal made money

Unless you're factoring in DVD/BD sales and perhaps merchandise, I seriously doubt either film made a profit for Disney. According to Wikipedia at the box office The BFG cost $140 million and made $183 million while 2 Alice 2 Furious cost $170 million and only made $300 million, which is less than a third of its predecessor. Unlikely these budgets included marketing either, I would guess.
 

vinnygambini

Why are strippers at the U.N. bad when they're great at strip clubs???
BFG didn't break-even, far from it.

The only distributor (pre-sold to some international territories to cover the budget) that got a good deal out of BFG was E-One who distributed the pic in the UK and other territories.

Disney and Dreamworks only got red ink.
 

kswiston

Member
BFG didn't break-even, far from it.

The only distributor (pre-sold to some international territories to cover the budget) that got a good deal out of BFG was E-One who distributed the pic in the UK and other territories.

Disney and Dreamworks only got red ink.

Yep.

Disney's worldwide cut on Alice 2 was in the neighbourhood of $125M against a production budget of $170M, plus whatever they spent on marketing. Even with home media and other revenue streams, that one is probably still in the red. I wonder what gross percentage they gave to Johnny Depp.
 
Where did you get these numbers like the studio gets half of domestic?
Personally I've largely gotten the numbers from talking with people more in the know than myself, as well as reading posts from knowledgeable folks here on GAF.

If you want some sort of source, a quick search brings up this (admittedly older) iO9 article citing a ~55% domestic share for the studios, using a Cinemark quarterly filing as a primary source. I'm sure other folks here can provide better sources.

http://io9.gizmodo.com/5747305/how-much-money-does-a-movie-need-to-make-to-be-profitable
 
More studios should try to zag when the others are all zigging.

Big problem is hollywood is everyone wants to follow the leader rather than carve their own niche, as you point out.

The irony is that Deadpool was huge partly because it did its own thing and everyone appreciated that fact. Instead of learning a genuinely valuable lesson from that, other studios (and probably Fox themselves) will just queue up to copy it.
 

Sesha

Member
Not surprised. General consumer confidence will go down, and movie-going audiences increasingly know what's-what, and are convening on a few franchises or brands like Harry Potter, Fast and the Furious, and Disney and their subsidiaries. People won't go see any big movie or brand movie just because the advertising is everywhere or the brand is whatever that they've heard of, anymore.

In the future there will be only Disney and they will own everything.

 

Busty

Banned
Another fucking SAW movie?

It's a known brand and they can make them for peanuts. That's a win/win as far as Lionsgate are concerned.

They don't even need to hire name talent because the Saw audience all turn up on the opening night to see claret getting sloshed around the screen so Lionsgate can hire any former CSI cast member or former boy band member they want to 'star'.

The only down side for properties like this (and many 'quick fix' horrors like it) is that they have next to no secondary market. The hardcore fans will buy the box sets but who's going to go into Walmart and buy Saw 6 on Blu Ray?!

It's all about turning that fast, cash profit on the theatrical run.

In the future there will be only Disney and they will own everything.

190711.gif
 
You would think that studios would start getting the picture that making a $100 million dollar shitty movie with "brand recognition" is a way worse move than make 10-20 low budget films by directors who are passionate about what they're doing.

Get Out was made for $4 million bucks and has made 25 times it's budget last I checked.

Betting on execution is not a particularly safe bet either. Especially since said execution still needs a significant marketing budget or else it gets lost in the shuffle with the other movies coming out around it. Get Out (and Split) are anomalies, and not the norm, in terms of how movies that cheap tend to do at the box office.
 

vinnygambini

Why are strippers at the U.N. bad when they're great at strip clubs???
Yep.

Disney's worldwide cut on Alice 2 was in the neighbourhood of $125M against a production budget of $170M, plus whatever they spent on marketing. Even with home media and other revenue streams, that one is probably still in the red. I wonder what gross percentage they gave to Johnny Depp.

Disney most likely pushed for the same deal that happened a few years ago when Depp reduced his fee for Into The Woods in order for Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides to be greenlit - except now it was Alice 2 for Pirates 5.
 
I pretty much only see blockbusters now. Im not paying 30+ bucks to see a movie if the experience isnt enhanced by seeing it in the theater. If its a story driven smaller movie then ill wait till it hits something for home viewing. The only exceptions are if my wife wants to see something, then ill make the trip.
 
You would think that studios would start getting the picture that making a $100 million dollar shitty movie with "brand recognition" is a way worse move than make 10-20 low budget films by directors who are passionate about what they're doing.

Get Out was made for $4 million bucks and has made 25 times it's budget last I checked.
Still, for every Get Out you have a dozen horror flicks that pass through theaters making less than $10M in profit. With every weekend becoming a battleground of blockbusters, there's less wiggle room for unexpected hits.

That's why they've become the domain of smaller studios, and seem destined to skip the theater entirely as Netflix and Amazon boost their profiles.
 

riotous

Banned
Why do people act like you literally have to buy a 3D, large format, non-matinee ticket, XXXtra large popcorn bucket, XXXtra large soda, a soft pretzel, and a box of the most expensive candy to see a movie in theatres?

Non 3D non-IMAX ticket to see Logan tonight for me would be $13.64 a piece before tax; being that I pay for my wife it works out to $30 on a weeknight. That's before I pay for parking.

We could do a weekend matinee, which we do sometimes, but that's still easily $25 after tax before any concessions are bought. Again, non-3D, etc.

I think most people discuss movie prices in terms of 2 tickets.
 

Bigfoot

Member
Disney doesn't need them anymore with Marvel and Star Wars backing them. When they didn't have Marvel or Star Wars, they were trying to find more franchises like Pirates. Now, they don't even need Pirates with Star Wars and Marvel taking up 3 slots year. No need for Tron or PoP or other live action flops. Double it down with their live action takes on classics cleaning house, Disney Animation back on top. I don't think they have a single major release that isn't a Live Action Fairy Tale, Pixar/WGA, Star Wars, or Marvel in the next 3 to 4 years. They'll still dribble out their nature specials twice a year and the occasional true story live action film every year. But they have no need to develop anything new.
Short term thinking though. Disney still needs to make new stuff because Marvel and Star Wars can't last forever, even if it doesn't seem that way at the moment.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom