assurdum
Banned
I'm sorry, but 'What exactly I have editing to save money face?' is gibberish.
I'm sorry, but 'What exactly I have editing to save money face?' is gibberish.
You look after yourself, Money Face. Have a lie down.
Reported. I'm frankly tired to people like you. End of the discussion for meYou look after yourself, Money Face. Have a lie down.
I put a lot of effort into this entire exchange. Can you Paypal me some cash?Reported. I'm frankly tired to people like you. End of the discussion for me
I put a lot of effort into this entire exchange. Can you Paypal me some cash?
You're a feisty one, Money Face. I like the cut of your jib.
You're a feisty one, Money Face. I like the cut of your jib.
He's a SASSY Money Face! I like it! AND you called me 'tough guy'. I'm loving this new you!
He's a SASSY Money Face! I like it! AND you called me 'tough guy'. I'm loving this new you!
I get it. I really do. But, we should probably take this private. This thread has already been derailed into a shit show of mindless bickering, stupid arguing, and finally, blossoming love. That last one, I think, isn't for everyone. It's just for us. My inbox, and everything else, is yours, Money Face.
I get it. I really do. But, we should probably take this private. This thread has already been derailed into a shit show of mindless bickering, stupid arguing, and finally, blossoming love. That last one, I think, isn't for everyone. It's just for us. My inbox, and everything else, is yours, Money Face.
I propose to start a thread dedicated to those unfortunate $10 so that everyone who can't get over it doesn't have to derail every single thread about this game, it's getting annoying.
We heard you, we understand you, now move on ffs.
This sentence is literal gibberish.
You basically do for the expense of it anyway.Imagine buying a graphics card and having to pay a small "fee" for each game in order to use your graphics card.
Ah, I see. That gives them a free pass to say whatever they like to other forum members, does it?They're asking you what they have edited to "save face." I'm assuming English is not their second language and yeah you're being a bit of someone you wouldn't want to see until Tuesday.
This sentence is literal gibberish.
FINALLY someone with a sense of fucking humour. How could you possibly read through that entire, hilariously stupid exchange and not see the humour in two grown adults having a stupidly circular conversation which ends in romance?I swear you two's back and forth has been more entertaining than all the warring here today
FINALLY someone with a sense of fucking humour. How could you possibly read through that entire, hilariously stupid exchange and not see the humour in two grown adults having a stupidly circular conversation which ends in romance?
For a forum that prides itself on being a libertarian, free speech alternative to the crackpot wokeism and insipid sissiness of Resetera, this place sure is infested with a lot of soft cock, wussy crybabies. We were a couple of dudes having a stupid internet argument which was clearly extremely silly. About a stupid paid upgrade for a video game.Dude I was dying reading through the thread while finishing up in the gym. Its obvious there's a language barrier but it was fuckin hilarious . Thank you both for that lol.
interesting... Richard mentions an SDK roadmap. I wonder what else is in there.
So there is NO way for mem to upgrade from ps4 to ps5 version for $10? I MUST pay $30?
Yes, I know that. What I wasn't aware is that DF has/had access to the PS5 SDK Roadmap. I would like to know what else is in the roadmap they have: VRR, 1440p, etc.Why wouldn't there be an SDK roadmap? They're always improving these for consoles, for years even.
It sets a bad precedent for the future of the "director's cut" branding. It sets a bad precedent for the future of backwards compatibility. The direct competition, and multiple third parties do more than this for free - so people are pointing out they are upset at this one thing.
Death stranding do it better. IIRC $10 for the ps5 upgrade and new content?A really disappointing DC. I didn't realize there was no way to upgrade to the PS5 version without getting the expansion as well which makes the paltry upgrades look even worse. The post content support for the original is commendable which in turn makes this seem worse. Save us Kojima.
I mean, we CAN't upgrade to ps5 version without paying $30. That's pretty slimy.I feel like the bad precedent was already set at the start of the last gaming generation when we were forced to pay full price for remakes/remastered version of games for the PS4/X1X era.
Seriously, how many games were priced at full price for PS4/X1X ports during the transition to the gaming generation?
I recall a large number of games being ported, slapped on a remastered title, and called it a day while charging $60 for it.
This is an extra $10 - $20 for an expansion. An expansion, my dude. Not just a "hey, this is now on PS5, imma charge you full price."
This isnt the same, nor can it be said this is a "precedent" as we have accepted far shittier practices (lootboxes, anyone?) than this.
It's hard for me to call this a terrible move when you've seen NG ports being done with less, but charged money anyway is what I'm saying.
Do I think it's great being charged for money? Of course not.
But I feel Sony/SP isn't making a bad choice here at all. Or at least one worth hating them for.
Looks the same
Ya but you have a 60fps patch for free whereas you were forced to pay full price for remastered at the start of the PS4/X1X era.I mean, we CAN't upgrade to ps5 version without paying $30. That's pretty slimy.
Again, ITS AN EXPANSION. Not just a NG patch
How about give us the ps5 upgrade for $10?Ya but you have a 60fps patch for free whereas you were forced to pay full price for remastered at the start of the PS4/X1X era.
Are some of you just young to remember actually really shitty practices from the past? Did Skyrim SE not exist with all its bugs galore never being fixed? Did TLOUR not be sold for almost full price on the PS4 with nothing but a texture boost?
I'm really confused why this is where we are drawing the line: a game that gave us everything we wanted, and more - and now asking for 20 bucks for an expansion.
Again, ITS AN EXPANSION. Not just a NG patch
How about giving it for fucking free? There's this thing called 'supporting your damn product' that some of us have come to expect. Having to pay for a patch to a brand new game is just plain shit support and let alone when it includes genuine fixes like lock-on that should have existed in the first place.How about give us the ps5 upgrade for $10?
This should all be a free upgrade. It looks like your regular patch work you see on other games.-Two graphic modes: frame-rate and resolution.
-Checkerboard rendering in both modes with 60fps.
-Framerate mode in 1800p CB.
-Resolution mode in 2160p CB.
-Possibility of dynamic resolution even if in the tests it seems to be a fixed resolution.
-60fps locked on both modes.
-Display distance is the same as before.
-Improvement of some textures.
-Loadings much faster (now instantaneous) compared to the version running on PS4 BC.
-The cinematics that were in pre-rendering on PS4 now run in real time on PS5 at 30fps instead of 60fps.
-The game exploits well the 3D audio + Dualsense features.
-DF regret that this kind of upgrade is paid when it's free at other studios.
That's part of the problem as you can't buy the upgrade without the expansion.
As far as being too young, get that ish out of here. PS5 has been all over the place with upgrades:
Of what I own:
-Final Fantasy VII (free)
-Nioh ($49.99)
-Nioh 2 (free)
-THPS 1+2 HD Deluxe (free)
-Saints Row The Third (free)
-Final Fantasy XIV (free)
-No Man's SKy (free)
-Subnautica (free)
-Yakuza: Like a Dragon (free)
-Judgment ($39.99)
-Spider-Man (Forced bundle in Miles Morales $69.99)
Up Coming:
-Tsushima (Forced Bundle to DC $29.99)
-Cyberpunk 2077 (free)
-Witcher 3 (free)
-Death Stranding ($9.99)
So you've got free upgrades, minimal upgrades, mid tier priced upgrades, damned near full priced upgrades and forced bundle upgrades. Sony Published games in that list (bolded) have no consistency to how they are being offered.
Of course, I would love that. Who wouldn't? But are we arguing over price point or over the fact that it exists?How about give us the ps5 upgrade for $10?
This should all be a free upgrade. It looks like your regular patch work you see on other games.
They can charge for the Iki DLC etc, and leave this free.
Again, my point was that I recall us having to pay money on ALL games that were ported to the PS4/X1X era of gaming.
I have never remembered a single game that was ported to PS4/X1X that wasnt paid.
Ultimately, what we have here is a reasonable array of revisions, but it does feel that Sony is charging for the kind of upgrades that other developers and publishers are giving away for free and in actual fact, the biggest upgrade of all - 60fps - was already given away with the original release.