Doesn't matter. Again, compare to the 6800XT and your questions are answered.Again it's 4k Vs 1440p. It's too wider to say it's because Nvidia branded A game can be optimized better on a card, sure, but isn't it regular such huge gap in specs required just because it's more optimised in the other one
It's not a trend, it's an exception. Most big games are overall performing better on PS5 : COD, AC Valhalla, NBA 2K1, Dirt 5 and Cyberpunk.
What means normal? You find normal a game can reach an average of 60 FPS in 4k in ultra setting in a 2070 card needs to runs 1800p with some graphic setting at medium on ps5? Why is it normal? How many times is happened?That's normal, some game engine will better work with AMD cards than nvidia's ones, and sometimes the situation is the opposite. These two games are showing exactly that.
All this means is we need a PS5Pro and a XSXXX asap.PS5 drops huge frames on COD as shown in the DF v PC video, in the forties. Valhalla now drops to low 50s on PS5. Dirt 5 the PS5 drops 30+ frames in 120hz mode when things get busy.
Sure doesn't matter. When ps5 performs like a 2080 S in a game it's because is bad optimized on Nvidia. But when ps5 underperform compared a 2070, it's normal. I don't know what to tell anymore. It's tiringDoesn't matter. Again, compare to the 6800XT and your questions are answered.
Hitman always ran better on Nvidia hardware. I remember it being the case in Hitman Blood Money (a game from 2006). It's all about the engine.What means normal? You find normal a game can reach an average of 60 FPS in 4k in ultra setting in a 2070 card needs to runs 1800p with some graphic setting at medium on ps5? Why is it normal? How many times is happened?
-That's because it's a bug. Restarting checkpoint eliminates the bug completely. There's a bug on XSX where COD hardlocks to 30fps fyi according to NX gamer analysis.PS5 drops huge frames on COD as shown in the DF v PC video, in the forties. Valhalla now drops to low 50s on PS5. Dirt 5 the PS5 drops 30+ frames in 120hz mode when things get busy. Cyberpunk runs at higher resolution and higher settings on Xbox.
Only one camera angle of NBA is actually better.
Hitman 3 is the first game where a platform shows a total fixed resolution and settings advantage over a whole game.
You're so close to getting it. It's almost like you shouldn't compare apples to oranges.Sure doesn't matter. When ps5 performs like a 2080 S in a game it's because is bad optimized on Nvidia. But when ps5 underperform compared a 2070, it's because Nvidia is better optimized. ps5 hardware is always a variable.
PS5 drops huge frames on COD as shown in the DF v PC video, in the forties. Valhalla now drops to low 50s on PS5. Dirt 5 the PS5 drops 30+ frames in 120hz mode when things get busy. Cyberpunk runs at higher resolution and higher settings on Xbox.
Only one camera angle of NBA is actually better.
Hitman 3 is the first game where a platform shows a total fixed resolution and settings advantage over a whole game.
I don't discuss Hitman engine runs better on Nvidia. But I don't find "normal" such perfomance gulf on ps5, it's the first time which happens so it should make think more about it. Especially looking to the average difference in multiplat between the two platform. DF should as minimum investigate better about it indeed to rise the flag of the victory every time series X get a "win" to flame the console warHitman always ran better on Nvidia hardware. I remember it being the case in Hitman Blood Money (a game from 2006). It's all about the engine.
PS5 drops huge frames on COD as shown in the DF v PC videoPS5 drops huge frames on COD as shown in the DF v PC video, in the forties. Valhalla now drops to low 50s on PS5. Dirt 5 the PS5 drops 30+ frames in 120hz mode when things get busy. Cyberpunk runs at higher resolution and higher settings on Xbox.
Only one camera angle of NBA is actually better.
Hitman 3 is the first game where a platform shows a total fixed resolution and settings advantage over a whole game.
I don't discuss Hitman engine runs better on Nvidia. But I don't find "normal" such perfomance handicap on ps5. Especially looking to the average difference in multiplat between the two platform. DF should as minimum investigate better about it indeed to rise the flag of the victory every time series X get a "win".
You don't have a clue of what you are talking about. Stop to talk for PR quotethe "average difference" was because Xbox waited AMD finishing it´s RDNA2 GPU; that situation caused xbox dev kit tools to come later.
People forget that Xbox Series X is stronger than ps5, and that will be the normal.
The question is will he do this game and publish it if Xbox has the advantage?I can give you the results that nxgamer will find right now.
"PS5 is a superb machine, sony is the most awesomer thing ever. And what ive found doing these complex calculations is that PS5 actually plays Hitman the best. The lower resolution on PS5 is actually better than xbox, it somehow, using the magic of PS5 gives more detail than xbox's native one. The shadows, again, they're more magical on PS5, even though they run at a lower quality. And that framerate, huh ? Check that out. All in all, PS5 is by far the superior version. You should listen to me and my analysis, even though i have no idea what im talking about, im not in the field, i dont have knowledge about gamemaking and i dont have the information needed to make the claims i make, you should still listen to me sucking sony, pardon, doint tech analysis"
This about sums it up
you have an appointment with realityYou don't have a clue of what you are talking about. Stop to talk for PR quote
Sure Phil.you have an appointment with reality
Sure doesn't matter. When ps5 performs like a 2080 S in a game it's because is bad optimized on Nvidia. But when ps5 underperform compared a 2070, it's normal. I don't know what to tell anymore. It's tiring
You missed my point. It's the first game which such disadvantage on ps5 compared.even.the series X. Is it series X an Nvidia card? How can be "normal"?No, simply when PS5 runs like 2080s in a game, that's simply it is better optimize for AMD GPU architecture, and when it is more 2070, simply that the game better use Nvidia GPU architecture, that's all and normal. Just see the 5700 XT with ACV and same with Hitman 3, you will find exactly the same thing...
These type of threads are what bring traffic to your site. Why would anyone want to ban them?these type of threads should be banned, it brings out the worst in people. It reminds me of Trump and his followers.
You missed my point. It's the first game which such disadvantage on ps5 compared.even.the series X. Is it series X an Nvidia card? How can be "normal"?
You mean the guy conjuring up a near 50 per cent advantage for the PS5 from this DF video is disingenuous?these type of threads should be banned, it brings out the worst in people. It reminds me of Trump and his followers.
There is no Switch version.Maybe the switch version can drop the res down 540p and be crowned the king of performance![]()
Indeed, the performance is so impressive that the Series S can't hold a locked 60fps at low settings at 1080p.Hi guys, I have just finished to watch the video from DF. What impressive performances from SX and SS. I remember when there were doubts about SS holding back SX, while it is keeping all promises MS did.
Anyway, SX is starting to show muscles. That 4k vs 'only' 1800p is something hard to swallow I guess (at least for some people who do not like high quality shadows either).
What a premium console Microsoft delivered.
Because it runs at native 4K in that custcenes because of a random DRS bug, while it uses a lower res on XSX. It was confirmed by Dictator.PS5 drops huge frames on COD as shown in the DF v PC video, in the forties. Valhalla now drops to low 50s on PS5. Dirt 5 the PS5 drops 30+ frames in 120hz mode when things get busy. Cyberpunk runs at higher resolution and higher settings on Xbox.
Only one camera angle of NBA is actually better.
Hitman 3 is the first game where a platform shows a total fixed resolution and settings advantage over a whole game.
Breath man, just breath and relax.Indeed, the performance is so impressive that the Series S can't hold a locked 60fps at low settings at 1080p.
Also it's big brother dropping to low 40's on occasions.
That's some true engineering right there. Well done Microsoft.
PS5 drops huge frames on COD as shown in the DF v PC video![]()
rx 6800xt 72cu RDNA 2 = 129% PS5 36 CU
Based on tests with a 2080 Ti, it looks like a 2080 Super or RTX 3060 Ti would be required to match or exceed PlayStation 5's output
All versions of Assassin's Creed Valhalla support dynamic resolution scaling, adjusting the amount of pixels drawn on a per-frame basis in order to hit the target frame-rate. At launch, the 'window' of potential resolutions for both consoles scaled from 1440p at the lowest to circa 1728p at the highest - 67 per cent to 80 per cent of full 4K resolution on both axes. This remains the case for the PlayStation 5 version of the game, but lower bounds for Series X has reduced to 1188p - 55 per cent of full 4K.![]()
Assassin's Creed Valhalla - what PC hardware is needed to match PS5 visuals?
And which settings get the best from your rig?www.eurogamer.net
![]()
Assassin's Creed Valhalla patch 1.0.4: Xbox Series X and PlayStation 5 re-tested
Plus: 4K quality modes and Series S 60fps testedwww.eurogamer.net
Indeed, the performance is so impressive that the Series S can't hold a locked 60fps at low settings at 1080p.
Also it's big brother dropping to low 40's on occasions.
That's some true engineering right there. Well done Microsoft.
Because it runs at native 4K in that custcenes because of a random DRS bug, while it uses a lower res on XSX. It was confirmed by Dictator.
But in gameplay in the same scenes and with the same res PS5 always performs a bit better than XSX, while actually having better effects (more alpha effects, better shadows).
Rent free.Indeed, the performance is so impressive that the Series S can't hold a locked 60fps at low settings at 1080p.
Also it's big brother dropping to low 40's on occasions.
That's some true engineering right there. Well done Microsoft.
Indeed, the performance is so impressive that the Series S can't hold a locked 60fps at low settings at 1080p.
Also it's big brother dropping to low 40's on occasions.
That's some true engineering right there. Well done Microsoft.
No need. PS5 wins this one as well. Like I already explained, frame rate is king this generation.What's that say about the PS5 when it has 44% resolution boost + better shadows on XSX? Go bump the threads where PS5 won to make yourself feel better, you obviously can't deal with this news lol
Is this a new version of Godwin's law? Xbox beats Playstation so everyone's a Trump supporter!?these type of threads should be banned, it brings out the worst in people. It reminds me of Trump and his followers.
PS5 drops huge frames on COD as shown in the DF v PC video, in the forties. Valhalla now drops to low 50s on PS5. Dirt 5 the PS5 drops 30+ frames in 120hz mode when things get busy. Cyberpunk runs at higher resolution and higher settings on Xbox.
Only one camera angle of NBA is actually better.
Hitman 3 is the first game where a platform shows a total fixed resolution and settings advantage over a whole game.
No need. PS5 wins this one as well. Like I already explained, frame rate is king this generation.
If I wanted to play games that stutter, I would have carried on playing on last gen.
Look at RX 5700... same 36CUs but way lower clocks (8TFs).As said, it's simply possible that Hitman 3 game engine fit worst with PS5 architure/specs than Nvidia one (or XsX one), that's all.
The question is will he do this game and publish it if Xbox has the advantage?
It only happens some times when the DRS auto disable and PS5 runs at native 4k.PS5 drops huge frames on COD as shown in the DF v PC video, in the forties.
I know it's crazy. On many different specced PC's that level drops more frames at different points then in those flowers. Really makes it seem like some kind of bug rather then actual GPU stress. The opening of the level at the top of the mountain looking over the mansion has the biggest frame drop on PC but it's 60 on xsx. This again really makes it seem like a bug.Guys are derailing this thread bringing up cod and Valhalla. If they need to bump threads where ps5 performed better, let them. Anything for them to cope.
On the other hand its nice to see we're back to df conspiracy theories and and "less is more" (44% less to be exact) arguments.
Crazy how one area in one level having a frame drop could be turned into the whole game having frame drops lol.
is this a joke post ? my joke-o-meter is broken?Alex baguette and John finally had a reason to get the good champagne out.
Honestly it's sad that a major games analysis website is run by shills.
I wonder if DF managed to get this article out without creaming their pants?
Oh what's the matter? Feeling bitter about the fact that PS5 has been winning right left and centre? Regardless, I bet he has accomplished more in his life than you ever will! You tosserim sure he'll do it if he can think of some angle where sony comes on top. Otherwise, he'll be too "busy". Not that his amateurish uninformerd videos ever helped anyone other than blowing hot air up sony's ass
PS5 is 1800p with medium shadows and also using Xbox one X and Pro graphics settings according to DF article. Textures set to ultra however.I'm late on this one. So PS5 better performance and XSX higher Resolution, right ?