Hogwarts and TLOU show far better consistency in frames with 32gb. Check out some YouTube videos comparing them. 1% and 0.1% lows are up quite a bit.
There’s no point comparing games made to run on last-gen hardware.
So you just decided to ignore my post clearly explaining why this is false and decided to double down? 9 TF for the 2070S is assuming the rated clock of 1770MHz which never happens because NVIDIA writes the lowest possible ones. A normal one routinely runs at 1900MHz+, making it close to 10 TF.
MineCraft was Java...
if you think that minecraft could run on a java cell phone just because it shares the same engine, you're wacky bro
GHG, there's no amount of convincing me that this is brute force required
Time-stamped to the issue.
1080p LOW textures who are not even close to original PS3 game and runs worse than the emulated Last of Us PS3 version on PC, takes 6.2 GB.
Ultra settings @ 4k, not 1080p, for plaque tale requiem, uses that!
Do i even need to bring up screenshots of plague tale requiem at ultra settings to show how good it looks comparatively? I don't think i need to.
What about Returnal then?.
Returnal uses last gen engine Unreal Engine 4.
I just wouldn't really call that a PC game ported to consoles. It's like RuneScape, that shit's a browser game.
It was still built for PS5 only, and the PC version scales way beyond the PS5 version, like the vast majority of game will this gen.
they also get fixed which is also part and parcel of PC gaming. Compare Arkham Knight at launch to how it is now, Horizon Zero Dawn to how it is now.... you see the difference? It's all a software issue. If ND were good at this PC port thing you wouldn't need to bruteforce jack shit. RE4 Remake shits on TLOU P1 from a great height visually and the game runs beautifully on my system.
It kind of does when the GPUs pretty much play everything i throw at it with 0 issues besides maybe missing DLSS. You can keep gaslighting people into thinking that these AMD crashes and driver issues are so common but the simple fact is that they aren't- 1, 2, 5 or even 10 reddit posts doesn't account for millions of users (myself included) Also.... I got those emulation PS3 issues fixed after searching on Google since you refused to help. Blaming AMD for you not helping a fellow PC gamer out is kinda cringe mate
The point that I was making in that thread is that either way you'd need to spend a pretty penny to emulate PS3 games (every component in my PC totals to 900 bucks) which may not be worth it for playing games from 17-10 years ago- PS3s can be found on the cheap these days and if all you want to do is play PS3 then it makes more sense to drop 150 on a used one from ebay than spending exponentially more than that to emulate them. Not to mention the point about not all PS3 games working correctly still stands. Even on an Nvidia card games like Infamous don't play 100% accurately whereas you'll never see issues like that on PS3.
Specs matter, but feel free to die on this hill.
A 1060 can run it, even in its broken state, just not at good settings -
On one hand devs should optimize for what most of the market has, but on the other rx480 and 1070 have released ages ago and its time to stop defending nvidia for putting the same (8gb) amount of VRAM on cards that cost so much more and are much more capable like the 3070ti or the rumoured upcoming 4060. When an RTX3060 has more VRAM than an RTX 3080 theres a problem.
Doesn't Returnal run at 1080p and like shit on PS5? Does anyone have comparable hardware and the game to test it?
they also get fixed which is also part and parcel of PC gaming. Compare Arkham Knight at launch to how it is now, Horizon Zero Dawn to how it is now.... you see the difference? It's all a software issue. If ND were good at this PC port thing you wouldn't need to bruteforce jack shit. RE4 Remake shits on TLOU P1 from a great height visually and the game runs beautifully on my system.
When you have what is essentially a next gen only game that LOOKS WORSE THAN TLOU2 a PS4 game there's no reason why even a 1060 isnt able to run it.
It kind of does when the GPUs pretty much play everything i throw at it with 0 issues besides maybe missing DLSS. You can keep gaslighting people into thinking that these AMD crashes and driver issues are so common but the simple fact is that they aren't- 1, 2, 5 or even 10 reddit posts doesn't account for millions of users (myself included) Also.... I got those emulation PS3 issues fixed after searching on Google since you refused to help. Blaming AMD for you not helping a fellow PC gamer out is kinda cringe mate
The point that I was making in that thread is that either way you'd need to spend a pretty penny to emulate PS3 games (every component in my PC totals to 900 bucks) which may not be worth it for playing games from 17-10 years ago- PS3s can be found on the cheap these days and if all you want to do is play PS3 then it makes more sense to drop 150 on a used one from ebay than spending exponentially more than that to emulate them. Not to mention the point about not all PS3 games working correctly still stands. Even on an Nvidia card games like Infamous don't play 100% accurately whereas you'll never see issues like that on PS3.
It is an attractive proposition for people on a budget who don't care about/hate PC gaming. Missing the point entirely and bringing it back up to blame my GPU vendor of choice is one of the reasons why memes like this exist.
Yep, and i can run returnal at 1440p/60 on my 1080ti. Granted i have a massive overclock on it putting it in the 14tf range, but still.
It's lacking the hardware decompressor though. The Kraken decompression alone consumes ~1.5 logical cores while it's working which is quite a lot for a 6 core CPU. And it's far from being idle in this game.
that is reasonable and is what low-medium settings are for. half decade old cards like the 1060.
I'm convinced the textures are bugged and will get fixed. There is no way the quality of those textures on medium, and especially low should be using the amount of vram they are.
Garbage ports beget garbage videos.
Yeah thats what i mean. Its like the vram is using the correct amount, but the textures are not loading correctly.
Not taking anyone side here, as the war with consoles vs PCs bores me to death and it doesn't make much sense, if I want to play a game badly I buy a PS or whatever, it's not like I have to do a human sacrifice to be allowed to buy a console, don't know what the big deal is, Jesus, the majority are behaving like they own Sony or any of the manufacturers for the PC components.
Nice selective screenshot you got there.
Ultra on PC looks worse than the PS5 version performance mode. much less quality mode. good lord lmao.
Its stuff like thisthat just turns me off of PC gaming. I see no point investing in all that extra hardware when developers aren't making games tailored towards it. Not a dev out there making games to take advantage of the beastly hardware. We are playing console games at a higher res/framerate.
Holy shit, by the looks of it this port will be among the legends.
tf we did to deserve this?
Agreed, trust me, I have no interest in defending these big companies, they only care about how much money they can make from consumers. I just try to say that stop defending ND by saying such cards is not good enough, that is not the point, they released a broken product they deserve all the shit coming to them.
enough for running the game as shown system requirements.
Everything you just said is irrelevant. Tlou remake was developed on PS5. It’s not the same thing. It’s about the memory management systems on their engine which is made to exploit ps5 features, that is developed for 1 spec. That’s it. It really does doesn’t surprise me that the game runs they way it does on PC.
Well, they clearly need to work on those systems then.
