• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Digital Foundry :- Does resolution really matter?

Status
Not open for further replies.
dark10x said:
I'll be honest, your accusations do actually hurt a lot. Knowing how many hours it takes to put this stuff together combined with the fact that I've been learning all this video work along the way - the fact that you brush it off as if it were rigged in some way? The Dark Souls video? You have no idea how that was made - I don't even HAVE the capability to do that yet.

You know what? You win. I'm done. I'm trying my best and you're shitting all over it. It's genuinely making me depressed at the moment. You're ready to jump down someone's throat because you think they are biased in favor of a platform you hate when, in reality, they happen to be a much larger fan of the thing you love.
Click to expand...

Don't be depressed. Most people familiar with your work at DF know you're incredibly thorough and while you do have a console preference just like everyone else (PS4 it seems to me from your posts here), you don't let that preference get in the way of your writing.
 
Is this guy butt hurt that a Sony console has better multiplats this gen than his favorite XB platform? Why these kind of articles this gen? Last gen PS3 was shamed at every opportunity for lower resolution and performance and rightfully so if it was not up to the other version. But now res does not matter. This guy should not be taken seriously for his bias towards one platform. There are actual fanboys in the industry that some people don't like to admit.
 
koshunter said:
Tsk tsk tsk, people always forget the best secret exclusive feature that the PS4 OS has that is only possible using the power of the PS4™.

Proper gamma display.
Click to expand...
But what if all your friends are Brazilian and Kiwi and you make lots of sandwiches anyway.
 
Crayon said:
So far, dark10 has had to answer for RL's actions. Its been going on for months. I dont blame him for feeling worn down.
Click to expand...

He is not responsible for RL's actions and shouldnt feel so. IMO he is the exact opposite of him.
 
nynt9 said:
lol, almost like an Aaron Greenberg quote. Why isn't the PC version locked to 900p then?
Click to expand...

Pre-frigging-cisely.

PR Bullshit because they knew nobody was expecting the new consoles to be producing sub-native 1080p and it would be seen as a negative.
It's amusing to see the legion of the disingenuous treating the comments as if they were anything other than PR damage limitation.

If Ryse were on PS4 it would have been bumped up to 1080p as that would be one of the quickest and simplest image improvements they could have made which wouldn't have involved the rebalancing of assets or new asset creation. Everybody knows it, whether they want to admit it or not.
 
Synth said:
As for developers not locking the Xbox One to 900p out of preference, I disagree with that. Sure, if not a preference of 900p over 1080p, but it is a preference of more complex graphics at 900p over more simplistic graphics at 1080p. 1080p isn't some special resolution that has only become achievable with the release of these two consoles. Much like how the OG Xbox had a 720p version of Soul Calibur 2, and the PS3 has a (mostly) 1080p Wipeout Fusion (or Ridge Racer 7), the resolution itself is fully achievable if you choose to build your game to target it. If it was purely a case of the Xbox One being weaker than the PS4, then it should only really be affecting multiplatform titles.
Click to expand...

So are you telling me that all Xbox one games that are running at a sub-1080p resolution are due to the developer preference rather than a hardware limitation? It is curious that those same developers choose 1080p for the PS4.
 
<-Baron-Spamedi-< said:
Pre-frigging-cisely.

PR Bullshit because they knew nobody was expecting the new consoles to be producing sub-native 1080p and it would be seen as a negative.
It's amusing to see the legion of the disingenuous treating the comments as if they were anything other than PR damage limitation.

If Ryse were on PS4 it would have been bumped up to 1080p as that would be one of the quickest and simplest image improvements they could have made which wouldn't have involved the rebalancing of assets or new asset creation. Everybody knows it, whether they want to admit it or not.
Click to expand...

People legit thought consoles wouldn't do sub 1080p? They both are. It was sub 720 last gen for some games. I don't see how any one could think that 1080p was a lock for the entire generation. I said I wasn't going to post anymore in here but I just want to say who ever made darkx10 write that post is a horrible person. The constant bashing is getting ridiculous. Sp what if someone has a bias. It's obvious a lot of people here do. We are all biased in some ways. You can't just completely strip that from yourself, it's human nature
 
godelsmetric said:
i mean bullying darkx10 with conspiracy theories to the point where he says he's done
Click to expand...

I know I was done with him when in a previous thread he nearly flat out admitted bias, by admitting that putting in critics of gameplay in tech reviews was just up to his "feelings" about a game and that he didn't feel it had to be consistent.

As per your appreciation of "Sony fanboys" being "crazy", given your history, that's rather rich in my humble opinion.

Eurogamer's tech reviews, and DF in particular, have been shoddy for years now. I am not shocked by the latest Leadbetter article at all, it is merely confirmation as far as I am concerned, only made more obvious by following right in the footsteps of a poll that showed that many PS4 owners felt that resolution was indeed important.
 
godelsmetric said:
i mean bullying darkx10 with conspiracy theories to the point where he says he's done
Click to expand...

Why do they have to be Sony fanboys to see when some BS is going on?


If a website is known for doing resolution comparisons then try to tell you that resolutions are not important their motive should be questioned.
 
Elandyll said:
I know I was done with him when in a previous thread he nearly flat out admitted bias, by admitting that putting in critics of gameplay in tech reviews was just up to his "feelings" about a game and that he didn't feel it had to be consistent.
Click to expand...
You make this shit sound like Zeitgeist when talking about some words in an article written by a human being, easily disregarded by those of us whose identity isn't defined by the shitbox they play
I understand being dissatisfied by a website not meeting your standards but I've always thought those mild gameplay critiques was one point of contention entirely fueled by console wars sentiments
 
onQ123 said:
Why do they have to be Sony fanboys to see when some BS is going on?


If a website in known for doing resolution comparisons then try to tell you that resolutions are not important their motive should be questioned.
Click to expand...


They do tech analysis not just resolution comparisons.

That's like saying top gear is Bullshit because they said this car is slower than this car but it's more fun to drive. Maybe a more fun driving experience is better than just the top speed the car can hit. There's so many factors to an image than just resolution but it's all people seem to go on about here. It is kind of annoying
 
So from talking about gameplay in technical comparisons to starting to question resolution as a factor at all, I guess it's safe to say that Digital Foundry has gone to the dark side and is slowly rebranding to another "me too" games column.

Of course resolution matters, especially to the core audience of their comparisons. The regular joe who plays games does not concern me, nor should he dictate the standards from which a technical column conducts their reviews. These comparisons used to be made for people who CARE about the details in the first place.
 
JAYSIMPLE said:
They do tech analysis not just resolution comparisons.

That's like saying top gear is Bullshit because they said this car is slower than this car but it's more fun to drive. Maybe a more fun driving experience is better than just the top speed the car can hit. There's so many factors to an image than just resolution but it's all people seem to go on about here. It is kind of annoying
Click to expand...

Top reason consumers choose PS4 is resolution, not fun!
(And XBO brand: Microsoft as the name of a company)
 
Quotient said:
So are you telling me that all Xbox one games that are running at a sub-1080p resolution are due to the developer preference rather than a hardware limitation? It is curious that those same developers choose 1080p for the PS4.
Click to expand...

If we're referring to exclusive games here, and not games that simply had a PS4 version as the lead... then yea, pretty much. Anything that's causing the game to be dropped to 900p in an exclusive has an alternative. If the developer doesn't want to pursue that alternative then they're making a choice to drop the resolution rather than make the changes required for the game to run at 1080p. The reason this happens less on the PS4 (although it still does sometimes happen) is mostly the same reason why we aren't seeing many 720p games on the Xbox One compared to say the Wii U... less things require the tradeoff. But the Xbox One could have every exclusive at 1080p if that's what was most important to each dev, just like the Wii U also could. There's other stuff they'd prefer to put in their games instead though.
 
TrutaS said:
So from talking about gameplay in technical comparisons
Click to expand...

can someone prove to me that this is actually a new thing and not just the narrative? because i'm browsing their website and yeah there's plenty of offhanded references to gameplay in face-offs and analysis dating pretty far back...
 
TrutaS said:
So from talking about gameplay in technical comparisons to starting to question resolution as a factor at all, I guess it's safe to say that Digital Foundry has gone to the dark side and is slowly rebranding to another "me too" games column.

Of course resolution matters, especially to the core audience of their comparisons. The regular joe who plays games does not concern me, nor should he dictate the standards from which a technical column conducts their reviews. These comparisons used to be made for people who CARE about the details in the first place.
Click to expand...

I don't think this article is from Digital Foundry, but rather Eurogamer general.
 
JAYSIMPLE said:
They do tech analysis not just resolution comparisons.

That's like saying top gear is Bullshit because they said this car is slower than this car but it's more fun to drive. Maybe a more fun driving experience is better than just the top speed the car can hit. There's so many factors to an image than just resolution but it's all people seem to go on about here. It is kind of annoying
Click to expand...

But how does that apply here? This site does comparisons of multiplatform games. If the only difference ends up being resolution 9/10 times then it is rather disingenuous to say that it doesn't matter. It is clearly a differentiator. Often the only differentiator, so why wouldn't it matter. Developers have made the choice to stick with the same graphical effects between multiplatform releases with the only difference being resolution. What else do you want people to go on about here. Some other magical mcguffin that doesn't exist? Would that be less annoying?
 
Whoever says resolution doesn't matter in gaming is either a liar or somebody who sticks to text based adventure games, and even for some of those resolution matters (have fun reading paragraphs at a really low resolution). With that said, as resolution increases there are other things to consider, and a balance to achieve as one number impacts another. FPS, for instance, as others have said. Just like resolution though there's a point where our eyes and brain just 'bottleneck' when it comes to FPS.
 
JAYSIMPLE said:
They do tech analysis not just resolution comparisons.

That's like saying top gear is Bullshit because they said this car is slower than this car but it's more fun to drive. Maybe a more fun driving experience is better than just the top speed the car can hit. There's so many factors to an image than just resolution but it's all people seem to go on about here. It is kind of annoying
Click to expand...

If Top Gear made a show asking does speed really matter I would wonder what the hell is going on.
 
Drifters said:
I wish leadbetter would tell us how to set our TVs to 900p to get the best picture.
Click to expand...

nASzXGz.gif
 
onQ123 said:
If Top Gear made a show asking does speed really matter I would wonder what the hell is going on.
Click to expand...

Well top gear isn't only about speed. They also take in to account price, precision around corners, comfort levels, noise levels etc. I have not read this article but i'm guessing that that's what this dude is trying to say. Graphics aren't the be-all-end-all.
 
Synth said:
If we're referring to exclusive games here, and not games that simply had a PS4 version as the lead... then yea, pretty much. Anything that's causing the game to be dropped to 900p in an exclusive has an alternative. If the developer doesn't want to pursue that alternative then they're making a choice to drop the resolution rather than make the changes required for the game to run at 1080p. The reason this happens less on the PS4 (although it still does sometimes happen) is mostly the same reason why we aren't seeing many 720p games on the Xbox One compared to say the Wii U... less things require the tradeoff. But the Xbox One could have every exclusive at 1080p if that's what was most important to each dev, just like the Wii U also could. There's other stuff they'd prefer to put in their games instead though.
Click to expand...

Yet all PS4 exclusives by Sony 1st/2nd party developers are 1080p. It is odd that only Microsoft's devs are making this choice.
 
GnawtyDog said:
Plenty of Xbox fans, Nintendo fans, PC fans, and PS fans in this thread. Singling out a specific fanbase for what?
Click to expand...

He didn't single out a fan base. He singled out fanboys. There is a difference. I am a PS4 fan. I font get upset when XBOX is praised because I'm also an XBOX fan.
 
What I got from this thread is that the ps is a stronger weak console than the Xbone. Worlds shortest midget syndrome.
 
Snorlocs said:
They are the most vocal in my opinion.
Click to expand...

Well that's basic math in this type of article, and in this gen. Still plenty of PC fans, Xbox fans, and Nintendo fans who have voiced their opinion here. To make a blanket statement and call a fanbase "crazy" is a stretch. No matter who gets upset (in this case darkx - who has a right to his opinion, and quitting this thread is one.)

...Scatter... said:
He didn't single out a fan base. He singled out fanboys. There is a difference. I am a PS4 fan. I font get upset when XBOX is praised because I'm also an XBOX fan.
Click to expand...

Well he should name them if he's so bold in that assertion. Both sides of the debate are putting their opinions out and debating them heavily. Just the way GAF is..........................AND If people are really going to play the victim game, lets not act like calling folks conspiracy theorist is an inoffensive remark that's been directed at some, or at large - same as fanboys. Pot meet kettle.
 
GnawtyDog said:
Well that's basic math in this type of article, and in this gen. Still plenty of PC fans, Xbox fans, and Nintendo fans who have voiced their opinion here. To make a blanket statement and call a fanbase "crazy" is a stretch. No matter who gets upset (in this case darkx - who has a right to his opinion, and quitting this thread is one.)



Well he should name them if he's so bold in that assertion. Both sides of the debate are putting their opinions out and debating them heavily. Just the way GAF is.
Click to expand...


I understand the desire for discussion, but can't we keep it on topic instead of bashing people and their work. Do you think Dark10x is a shill? He's a member of GAF.
 
...Scatter... said:
I understand the desire for discussion, but can't we keep it on topic instead of bashing people and their work. Do you think DarkX is a shill? He's a member of GAF.
Click to expand...

Bashing? Scrutinizing. I don't have an opinion on DarkX - not much to work with other than been an average gaffer with some connection to DF. As for shills and gaffers? They exist on GAF, in the past (banned) and probably in the present those that manage to stay unbanned by being sensible in their bias vs. their posts. Like a great number of gaffers. Shill is a very vague word tbh.
 
Teletraan1 said:
But how does that apply here? This site does comparisons of multiplatform games. If the only difference ends up being resolution 9/10 times then it is rather disingenuous to say that it doesn't matter. It is clearly a differentiator. Often the only differentiator, so why wouldn't it matter. Developers have made the choice to stick with the same graphical effects between multiplatform releases with the only difference being resolution. What else do you want people to go on about here. Some other magical mcguffin that doesn't exist? Would that be less annoying?
Click to expand...

The ps4 seems to be missing af from a handful of games and that legitimately turns textures a couple of metres from your player into a blurry mess but a lot of people downplay that effect. Ps4 version of ufc has 4xAA doesn't it? Over the 2xAA of the xbone? That's important too
 
Quotient said:
Yet all PS4 exclusives by Sony 1st/2nd party developers are 1080p. It is odd that only Microsoft's devs are making this choice.
Click to expand...

Holy shit... did I not already cover this in the post you just quoted?...

Less things will require the tradeoff on more powerful hardware. That doesn't change the fact that it is a choice and not a forced necessity. I can't believe this shit needs explaining (repeatedly).
 
JAYSIMPLE said:
The ps4 seems to be missing af from a handful of games and that legitimately turns textures a couple of metres from your player into a blurry mess but a lot of people downplay that effect. Ps4 version of ufc has 4xAA doesn't it? Over the 2xAA of the xbone? That's important too
Click to expand...
Why is does the ps4 lack af? Is it a Gpu, or cpu problem?
 
GnawtyDog said:
Bashing? Scrutinizing.
Click to expand...

Either way, yes resolution matters. The real discussion is to what extent? I'd love to see a study where you decrease res on a game from 1080 to 900 to 720 to 540 and you survey users on enjoyment. Mind you they experience the highest res first and work downwards. Love to see that graph. Personally I want 1080p everything, but it doesn't seem like that's in the cards.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

(Digital Foundry) Bloodborne PS5: Big Resolution Boosts, 120Hz, VRR - Today's Mod, Tomorrow's New Feature?
38
432
rm082e replied
Games Where Choices Really Do Matter?
31
777
Polaris replied
Pathtracing on Playstation 5 (Linux) - Digital Foundry
2
55
767
winjer replied
  • Locked
Is Digital foundry going blind?
24
817
Hadoukens replied
Digital Foundry - State of Play June 2026 Reaction
Analysis 
38
634
alabtrosMyster replied
Top Bottom