Yams
Member
Any gaming laptop that can handle 4K on ultra settings ? Maybe an asus ROG or an Alenware?
Maybe an Alienware Area 51m, but I'm not sure why you'd get one unless you had a lot of cash to burn.
Any gaming laptop that can handle 4K on ultra settings ? Maybe an asus ROG or an Alenware?
SorrySorry, not trying to cancel this simulation as it has quite a following.
I watched a number of YouTube videos on this and those guys are hardcore flight sim.
Don't get upset.
Remember, this is not a next-gen game because it is always online and next-gen doesn't start for another 3-4 years because ND hasn't released their game.
![]()
it is a game about flying planes tho. you aren't going to be on the ground for very long!as good as MSFS2020 looks in the sky, of course don't expect it to have the exact same high visual fidelity at ground level
Yes but FS2020 will likely have a better story than the next ND game![]()
See you after Naughty Dog's PS5 game reveal. That's where next-gen starts.
Here are just a few examples of the attention to detail in ND's games. The tech.
But but but I thought PCs ran all games at 4k/60fps with ease.
If not even the most expensive gpu can do It, so 4k/60fps is a distant dream for 95% of PC players.
PCs are not ready for native 4k. Devs should make It at lower res.
But but but I thought PCs ran all games at 4k/60fps with ease.
If not even the most expensive gpu can do It, so 4k/60fps is a distant dream for 95% of PC players.
PCs are not ready for native 4k. Devs should make It at lower res.
- Map streamed by the Azure cloud service is several petabytes worth of data
- Terrain generation, skies and clouds of unprecedented quality
- Very heavy on hardware. 2080 Ti/4K/Ultra settings nets around 30-40fps
- Scales very well with lower settings
- CPU-bound at around 70-80fps on Ultra
- Currently, AMD GPU's performs much worse
- 10+ hours of play-time used around 7GB of data
I just hope it's going to be as good as Flight Sim X in terms of online interactivity. That shit can be really funny depending on the people you play with.
This should've been at the July showcase tbh. C'mon, Microsoft
Eh, not really. Just because it tanks 2080 Ti to 30fps and streams Bing map images into the game, doesn't mean it's "light-years ahead".Oh but muh Naughty Dog. See the bolded? This whole thread is doing just that The tech in FS2020 is light years ahead of any ND soap opera.
Basically the next step, just a shame its a flight sim, if I coukd fly a helicopter with bf controls id play it
It got a VR mode?
Lol no problem, just shows what you think a game is.....to each their own. I think its just a boring simulator that will eat up your data and make no impact on the gaming world. I need great gameplay....but that my opinion....enjoy the simulator bro....the clouds look fantastic.
This not gonna to Xbox one. Quote me on thisBut I thought Xbox One was holding back next gen visuals?
Multiple reports say 343 is worst managed studio inside MS. All other MS studios collaborate with each other but no one collaborates with 343. They got very arrogant and abusive heads with no one creative vision. Its a travesty that our beloved Halo franchise is with them.Why wasn't the same passion and care taken with Halo Infinite visuals? Every other MS team and project seem to know what they're doing except Bonnie Ross and her Island of Misfit Diversity Hires.
It is coming to Xbox.
When I don't like and don't see any point in comparing Flight Simulator to The Last of Us, downplaying the tech on display here is just silly.Eh, not really. Just because it tanks 2080 Ti to 30fps and streams Bing map images into the game, doesn't mean it's "light-years ahead".
Me too! They did show in the video how the control schemes are scaleable - so you can make it as easy or complex (realistic?) as you wish. I think it's trying to be as acccessible as possible, which I think is great.I love the BF controls. I miss playing helicopters being in Battlefield.
I reckon you can easily run high settings with that spec. There are various different data settings so you can tune that to your connection restrictions. In the current build you have to be online all the time but I believe there is going to be an offline mode in the full release where you can download a specific area of the world, there is a low bandwidth mode where you can just stream in the bing maps and nothing else and (amongst others) there is the full mode where it will stream in the Bing maps and then stream in 3D assets to overlay on top. The data usage options look to be really tuneable.Me too! They did show in the video how the control schemes are scaleable - so you can make it as easy or complex (realistic?) as you wish. I think it's trying to be as acccessible as possible, which I think is great.
I'm intrigued as to how well I'll be able to run it, I have a 'mixed up' PC. A 9900k at 5.1GHz, 32GB of 3200 RAM - but an aging 1070 FTW and a sluggish 30Mbps internet connection and a 1440p monitor, I hope for mostly High settings, but not confident...
When you get closer to the terrain its nowhere near as impressiveShowing up close looks amazing as the game streams in even grass blades for the terrain. Not sure what you are getting at.
Landmarks though have higher fidelity models.When you get closer to the terrain its nowhere near as impressive
![]()
Scope? Haven't Flight simulator always have had the entire world to explore? Also in terms of detail, the cities and everything are really simple geometry models. They just give the illusion of detail from far away. The tech is very impressive and accurate layout for the whole world is definitely next level tech, but in terms of pure graphics this isn't on the level of the epic demo imo. There is nothing next gen here except for the AI algorithm that converts 2d map images to 3d models as far as I have seen.Landmarks though have higher fidelity models.
Of course you can't expect to have that kind of fidelity on any random building.
Still, it's the biggest jump in scope and detail we've ever seen. Anyone failing to understand that is just stupid or trolling.
Scope? Haven't Flight simulator always have had the entire world to explore? Also in terms of detail, the cities and everything are really simple geometry models. They just give the illusion of detail from far away. The tech is very impressive and accurate layout for the whole world is definitely next level tech, but in terms of pure graphics this isn't on the level of the epic demo imo. There is nothing next gen here except for the AI algorithm that converts 2d map images to 3d models as far as I have seen.
lmao. This game will get canceled for the Xbox One. Bookmark this.
When you get closer to the terrain its nowhere near as impressive
![]()
Here are just a few examples of the attention to detail in ND's games. The tech.
Here are just a few examples of the attention to detail in ND's games. The tech.
So my PC is already nextgen? Didn't see that coming.Remember, this is not a next-gen game because it is always online and next-gen doesn't start for another 3-4 years because ND hasn't released their game.
![]()