Unfortunately 3rd party devs will not do that and first party games are not ready yet. So, you have to wait and then decide your purchaseGraphically unimpressive. The Series X is in dire need of a visual stunner, because the more visually unimpressive games they show the more the 12TF marketing loses it's luster.
This is FUD and incorrect.
![]()
Dirt 5 Xbox Series X Hands-On Preview - Feel The Power
Dirt 5 Xbox Series X Hands-On Preview - Feel The Powerpress-start.com.au
Quality - full 4k and uncapped frame rate
Performance - Dynamic 4k at locked 60 fps
120 FPS - 1440p lower lod and visuals at 120 fps
Press Start was getting ~60fps in both Quality and Performance.
arstechnica.com
Dirt 5 on XSX :
- 4k mode : 30~60fps (40fps on average).
- Dynamic mode : 1440p~2160p with pop-in. Framerate close to 60fps but not locked.
- 120fps mode : LOD (level of detail) degraded, much less polygons + somes bugs (elements that disappear) at 1080p but sometimes possibly lower.
This is a joke right?
This game looks worse than Forza Horizon 4 and it isn't even open world.
So you didn't watch the video then lolscreen tearing
![]()
No, this is reality
Imagine making 12TF hardware, and have nothing to prove that your console is better than 10 TF one.
unfortunately not.
detailed article here : https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2020...s-x-the-120fps-difference-saves-a-rusty-ride/
Damn that sounds rough. Hopefully its not final code they are testing.unfortunately not.
detailed article here : https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2020...s-x-the-120fps-difference-saves-a-rusty-ride/
Thats why i Was xbox guy during 360 era.Easy to imagine. It took Sony between 2-3 years to present PS3 games that were visually as impressive as Xbox 360 flagships.
So you didn't watch the video then lol
kratos avatar though so that's shocking.
Ok? I literally showed you a review that contradicts your usual FUD (I'm sure if the PS5 preview came out first, you'd also be posting about it too) but here let me paste the relevant parts;
Quality Mode (4k/uncapped)
Playing in 4K, I started things off in Image
Quality mode which seemed to be pushing 4K at an uncapped frame rate. As far as I can tell, the game was hitting 60FPS most of the time, only dropping below when there were more than a handful of cars on-screen or when something major was happening off-track.
Performance Mode (Dynamic 4k/60fps)
Frame Rate mode was an extremely consistent 60FPS without sacrificing visuals
i watched ign video and there is screen tearing
if you don't want to see the truth, stay in your bubble
Maybe it proves something else; like 10 to 12 TF is simply not the full story.Imagine making 12TF hardware, and have nothing to prove that your console is better than 10 TF one.
Why would I care, it's not a game I'll be getting. You're the one peddling it's performance as some kind of console war weapon and ignoring evidence to the contrary.
Here's a bonus for you;
Now, this isn't really surprising as obviously, something had to give in order to hit 120FPS, but with the game being a buttery smooth 4K/60 in other modes, I think most people will end up opting for Visual mode.
But muh narrative
PS5 players will be good, so many good looking exclusives already on launch.Ouch. If its like that on the XSX, it will only be worse on the PS5!
Ouch. If its like that on the XSX, it will only be worse on the PS5!
PS5 players will be good, so many good looking exclusives already on launch.
Source on SX being harder to develop for?? PS5 being easier =/= SX being hard.So you think it's normal not to have any footage from a console releasing in a month? There's absolutely no cause for concern? Yes games will run on it at launch no doubt. But this coupled with the rumours that developers are finding it harder to develop on than a PS5 isn't great news.
Would it really matter if PS5 comes out on top? You should be buying the console that has your favourite games. Wars are stupid, just play games.
Source on SX being harder to develop for?? PS5 being easier =/= SX being hard.
Quick google search will bring up what you're looking for.Source on SX being harder to develop for?? PS5 being easier =/= SX being hard.
Maybe if you actually paid attention to the video you'd realize its due to their capture equipment which caused tearing on 120fps footage.i watched ign video and there is screen tearing
I sadly have to agree on this. I really wanna see a "WOW look at this" game.Graphically unimpressive. The Series X is in dire need of a visual stunner, because the more visually unimpressive games they show the more the 12TF marketing loses it's luster.
And yet you didn't quote or chastise any of the well known Sony fans that piled into this thread immediately for their say! Gotcha, buddy.
Simply stating facts. This will in all likely run worse on a GPU with less power, because that's the way these things work.
I don't think this is final code from what is being said.
Ok? I literally showed you a review that contradicts your usual FUD (I'm sure if the PS5 preview came out first, you'd also be posting about it too) but here let me paste the relevant parts;
Quality Mode (4k/uncapped)
Playing in 4K, I started things off in Image
Quality mode which seemed to be pushing 4K at an uncapped frame rate. As far as I can tell, the game was hitting 60FPS most of the time, only dropping below when there were more than a handful of cars on-screen or when something major was happening off-track.
Performance Mode (Dynamic 4k/60fps)
Frame Rate mode was an extremely consistent 60FPS without sacrificing visuals
arstechnica.com
In "resolution" mode, the game runs in an apparently uncapped frame rate; this bounces between 30fps and 60fps, which averages out to roughly 40fps. This mode's dynamic resolution maxes out near 2160p and falls as low as an apparent 1440p. (Compared to Xbox One's heavily aliased DiRT 4, the jump in resolution this time around is very appreciated.)
Drop to DiRT 5's middle "frame rate" setting, and you'll see a mild hit to texture pop-in on the ground ahead of you, along with a noticeable hit to shadow pop-in in the near distance. Settings are otherwise mostly left intact, other than a dynamic resolution that scales down lower, while the frame rate gets close to, but doesn't lock to, 60fps.
You're the one making the claim, mate, not my job to get your receipts for you.Quick google search will bring up what you're looking for.
Maybe the Series S is true bottleneck here![]()
I didn't ask you to quote my message. Thanks.You're the one making the claim, mate, not my job to get your receipts for you.
They aren't being derogatory to the XSX, just the game itself.
Yep the same people saying it doesn't look that bad would bedestroying the game for its visual and not being capable of holding a steady 60 fps.If the game was showcased as a Ps5 tittle the narrative would be way different, 4k 60 baby!
People saying it looks like trash are aware that this is cross gen tittle? Also is people expecting it to run or look better on ps5? Looking at the comments looks like it.....