:lol :lol :lol :lol :lolbluheim said:When I said Nintendo had fallen as far as LucasArts...
This is looking awful, look like a PS2 game. Once upon a time, Nintendo was doing great looking games. Aaah, good ol' days.
farnham said::lol :lol :lol :lol :lol
This game is developed by Monolith not Nintendo
duckroll said:I'm still not very convinced by this, but it's a good sign that they're showing more media for it now. It looks like a run of the mill survival action game from the early PS1 era where everyone was chasing in on RE clones honestly. The game seems to be split between adventure parts and action parts. In the adventure parts you find people to rescue them, explore the area, and avoid disaster spots, etc. In the action parts it's pretty much a gun shooting game, and it looks like it's on rails and in first person. The only times the character model appears in the gun shooting parts is when he's hiding behind a pillar and/or reloading.
Here are some interesting stuff I see in the menu screens:
- You can set where the radio messages and the gun sound fx comes out from. The screen shows the Radio messages output set to the Wiimote, and the Gun sound fx output set to the Wiimote as well.
- There are items in the game, and you have an inventory. They look like the normal restorative items for health and whatnot.
- The game is stage based and you get a ranking for how well you did at the end of each stage.
- You earn BP from combat and SP from rescueing people (and probably completing various QTE events successfully). BP is used to buy new weapons and upgrade the weapons, while SP is used to improve the character stats.
- You start with 3 basic weapons available - Rifle 1, Handgun 1 and Assault Rifle 1. Each of these are the start of a weapons tree, kinda like a skill tree in RPGs (lol Monolithsoft). You buy more weapons with BP via this tree.
- For weapons you already have, there are 5 areas you can upgrade them in - Power, ammo capacity, reload speed, etc. Upgrading will also cost BP.
- There are no screens for character stats upgrades, so I dunno what you can spend SP on.
Yeah, that once upon a time is mere months ago. Galaxy and Brawl look awesome, specially Galaxy, which in my book is one of the best looking games this generation.bluheim said:When I said Nintendo had fallen as far as LucasArts...
This is looking awful, look like a PS2 game. Once upon a time, Nintendo was doing great looking games. Aaah, good ol' days.
farnham said:This game is developed by Monolith not Nintendo
farnham said::lol :lol :lol :lol :lol
This game is developed by Monolith not Nintendo
You should consider cleaning that sand out of your vagina...bluheim said:It is published by Nintendo = it is a Nintendo game.
Or maybe, you consider that Resistance or Ratchet and Clank are non-Sony games ?
bluheim said:When I said Nintendo had fallen as far as LucasArts...
bluheim said:It is published by Nintendo = it is a Nintendo game.
Or maybe, you consider that Resistance or Ratchet and Clank are non-Sony games ?
Amir0x said:This does not look so good graphically, I thought they'd have improved it a lot over the months but ouch.
Still, concept is compelling will probably buy
You poor lil soul. . . to think that, one would have to have been struck pretty hard on the head.bluheim said:When I said Nintendo had fallen as far as LucasArts...
Of course an open world wasn't possible. After all GTA4 is the first GTA with an open world...Haruspex said:I'm a little saddened that Disaster seems to be stage-based with arcade gameplay, I guess the technical constraints meant an open world was not possible, or they were having difficulty integrating set-pieces into an open world.
I'll wait until I see gameplay footage before judging further, I hope this new media has only just emerged due to Nintendo's new strategy of saying little or nothing until 2 months before release, rather than because they are not confident in the quality of the title. Still looking forward to it for now, the main character's beard gives me hope.
duckroll said:When I said Sony had fallen as far as LucasArts...
Lair is looking awful, look like a PS2 game. Once upon a time, Sony was doing great looking games. Aaah, good ol' days.
fresquito said:Of course an open world wasn't possible. After all GTA4 is the first GTA with an open world...
Haruspex said:I'm a little saddened that Disaster seems to be stage-based with arcade gameplay, I guess the technical constraints meant an open world was not possible, or they were having difficulty integrating set-pieces into an open world.
Mr.Potato Head said:This is exactly why its hard for me to play my wii, then game on my pc, 360 and ps3 then go back to wii then go back to pc 360, ps3 lol.. its like i want to play my wii but the visuals just crush my heart all too often..some wii games DO LOOK GOOD for some odd reason but then we get games like this that look terrible with low rez textures,etc..
Cosmonaut X said:...or perhaps that wasn't the intention of the developers at any stage? Wasn't the whole "wow, GTA with DISASTERS!" just got up by fans and bloggers based on the (very) limited info available?
Cosmonaut X said:...or perhaps that wasn't the intention of the developers at any stage? Wasn't the whole "wow, GTA with DISASTERS!" just got up by fans and bloggers based on the (very) limited info available?
Akai said:Do you just chunk all your old consoles in the trash can with every new generation?
DefectiveReject said:I personally CANNOT wait for Nintendo to go HD.
Mario Galaxy and more are visual delights in SD. Imagine that world in HD. this game alng with others makes me wish HD was now with Nintendo purely to see what the real vision of this game was!
You know this for sure?Shiggy said:Those screenshots came from the build that was to be released in July. We all know, the game was delayed due to quality issues or to optimize the quality(official reason at least).
Jocchan said:
SovanJedi said:I er, don't get how people think this looks awful. Maybe I need to check my eyes or something, because this looks quite fine to me. A bit better than before at least.
bluheim said:OK, maybe my eyes are deceiving me but this looks awful to me :
Black-Wind said:You know this for sure?
Well, when will there be "final build" screens"? :lol
I never expected much from the graphics, only the interesting gameplay concept so I don't really care.
bluheim said:But they are OLD consoles. They are looking bad because they are OLD consoles. We have fond memories with this OLD consoles, that's why we keep them, and that's what keep us playing them even if the games look terrible.
Akai said:That's the stupidest reason I've ever heard...You should be playing games because they are fun to play, not because of worthless nostalgia...
wait how did u get that from the screens?Fantastical said:Looks like it is all on-rails, which is what I thought when it was first shown.