There is a reason why it's not good to be that guy. It's a discussion board and there is only so much you can say about the subject. If you've had your fill, keep stepping. Every subject on this board has been talked about.
Well, except circumcision. That's one topic that's never come up around here.
What I don't get is the controversy. Last I heard the big one was done of the family involved publically voicing that they thought that the American people should follow what they deem God's view of marriage and family, that's it, voicing an opinion. They never denied queers service or fought against trans bathroom rights any shit like that. Why do so many queer groups list them as the devil, considering that over the years, CFA has actually gone out of its way to fund fewer places that could be associated as conflicting to queers.
Like, I know everyone is different on it and that's perfectly fine and valid, but in terms of queer unfriendliness, I know places that could be considered a LOT worse. As for me, booth for 4 every few weeks, filled with myself and 3 queer friends.
I actually tip at Chick Fil A. Can we talk about that?
Can't stand the "friendliness" aspect. At least here, you get a number or color and they just bring it to you no fuss.
I don't eat there no. But I've been tempted!
And it's no hypocritical. I just choose to make this easy choice. I can't look up every company and where they buy their screws, but I know about CFA. And it's easy to not buy shit there.
I appreciate that I feel welcome at their restaurants as opposed to feeling like a nuisance at many other businesses, that's all. I don't necessarily want to have a conversation with the person working there, but a simple "hey, thanks for coming in" goes a long way to make me not feel like a jerk for walking in the door.
Although, this logic is kinda weird.Is there any company without questionable politics?
Not one with chicken this good, for darn sure.
What is the number 3 again?that #3 with lemonade is fire
What? Because they actually have principles they believe in? They could be making a lot more money by staying open on Sunday but choose not to so their staff don't have to work on the Lord's day or whatever. The reason their food is good, service is excellent, and business is succesful is intrinsic to their southern roots and values. I'm 100% pro-gay marriage but I think it's disgusting that they had to succumb to social pressures from a bunch of activists who are completely inconsiderate of other people's beliefs. One day this shit will be backfire on us
Spicy chicken.What is the number 3 again?
I eat the food, not the opinions of the corporation.
So, yes.
Wonderful satireMarriage is 100% a religious institution. In the bible it says it is wrong for gays to marry and it's as simple as that. I didn't make these rules. However, it's obviously immoral that gay couples do not benefit the same social benefits that married couples do, but that can be fixed that by implementing civil unions that provide those benefits. No need to destroy an institution because you want to be a part of something you don't believe in. It makes no sense to me
Wait, what's wrong with Jimmy Johns and Papa Johns?
they gave money to a group that pushed uganda to pass a law that enforces the death penalty for homosexual acts
this isn't just a company rep saying something off-color
Wait, what's wrong with Jimmy Johns and Papa Johns?
Not anymore they don't. They stopped donating after the protests.
Does he do it legally?Jimmy likes to go to Africa and shoot animals.
Does he do it legally?
*they stopped donating to those through the company foundation. The executives instead donate the money through other advocacy groups and privately, rather than to the company foundation for those interestsNot anymore they don't. They stopped donating after the protests.
Does he do it legally?
*they stopped donating to those through the company foundation. The executives instead donate the money through other advocacy groups and privately, rather than to the company foundation for those interests
So the issue wouldn't be that he hunts wild safari-type animals, but that he does so legally or illegally? Christ.
I asked a simple question, I didn't say what the issue would be; please don't put words in my mouth.So the issue wouldn't be that he hunts wild safari-type animals, but that he does so legally or illegally? Christ.
Isn't that what should happen, though? Executives should be allowed to donate elsewhere, but they shouldn't try to use the company foundation for it. They may not share the same interests.
I mean, that is how hunting works
I asked a simple question, I didn't say what the issue would be; please don't put words in my mouth.
I wasn't arguing against "how hunting works". I was arguing against deciding your moral stance on the basis of the legality of it.
I think hunting lions is deplorable, so I will not eat a Jimmy Johns (I don't know what he hunts). I think fighting against equal rights for gay couples is deplorable so I will not eat at CFA. I think hundreds of cases of norovirus and ecoli poisoning in many restaurants with weak response is deplorable so I will not eat at Chipotle,