I identify as a person whos hobby is to play games, I don't like being tagged as a "gamer".
I am as much a "gamer" as I am a "reader" or a "viewer". I don't see the point of discussing it at all.
So let's say you watch movies or listen to music, you wouldn't want to be associated with a term relating to that hobby since the amount of spew that is said on the Internet to either celebrities, musicians, film makers etc? Gaming is no different and it makes more sense not associating yourself with a minority rather than having a defeatist attitude and not wanting to be associated with gaming.
So many replies read like people are embarrassed by their hobby.
So many replies read like people are embarrassed by their hobby. What is this, 1985? People who enjoy food and food culture are not embarrassed to be called "foodies". I love games, games culture, etc. Of course I consider myself a gamer.
Most people are embarrassed by a very vocal group of people who like to claim the term "gamer" for themselves. I doubt that anyone here is embarrassed for playing video games.
I'd say, let them have their term. Everyone plays video games nowadays.
Sure, it's my main hobby. It's not like I'm going to introduce myself as Steve the Gamer but if someone asks I have no problem telling them I enjoy gaming.
The term 'gamer' is toxic and mostly used to define a specific, isolated demographic of individuals. I would not want to define myself that considering the same people who call themselves gamers (especially after GamerGate) has some disgusting shades about them.
It's stupid, and almost childish that people still cling to wanting to be called a 'gamer' when the evidence given about 'gamers' and their thought process is horrid.
Im not afraid to admit that actually. I buy mostly everything online that's gaming related. I haven't been to a brick/mortar that isn't best buy in ages. I don't wear gaming merch, and if I own any it stays in my entertainment room.
I'm still confused as to why people are taking the implications of definition of 'gamer' the wrong way...perhaps OP should have provided a definition to refer to because it seems a lot of people are being counter intuitive with their comments...whilst playing on GAF and playing games.
I agree with this man. I'm a 35 year old hubby, father and employee. I thoroughly enjoy getting up at 4am, an hour earlier than I should, to start my day with good coffee and some game time. Gaming is my hobby, not what defines me.
Yep.No. I'm someone who plays games once in a while.
I don't define the term that way. But whatevz. And if people DO want to judge me because I use that term to define my love for this hobby then that's a real easy filtering tool as to who I want to actually interact with. If you're that shallow to shun someone because of that then I probably don't want to interact with you anyways.
A few years ago I would have said yes. But then two things happened:
1) Video games became so ubiquitous that it's now almost as meaningless a signifier as calling yourself a "reader" or a "watcher".
2) Things like Gamergate rendered the remains of it's significance utterly abhorrent to me.
I love games, I've been playing games for 25 years, but if someone willingly presents themselves as a 'gamer' these days, I'm immediately wary.
I identify as a person whos hobby is to play games, I don't like being tagged as a "gamer".
If you play games you're a gamer.
Anyone thinking anything else is in denial. And age has nothing to do with anything, if you think you're not a gamer because you're an adult, well that is a childish thought.
I find it hard to not identify with your work, especially when you spend much of you spare time on it as well.