True story:
I knew a girl in highschool who had some kind of sexual fixation with Waluigi. She was eccentric, potentially borderline autistic... in our drawing course she would proudly carry around and show off her binder filled with erotic Waluigi drawings. I recall once she wore a homemade shirt to class that read, 'Because Waluigi owns you... and me." I suspect she was working through some emotional turmoil and for whatever reason needed to channel it into a character. Because her condition was obvious to most, no one in our class ever attempted to broach the subject.
Since then I've never been able to see that character in the same light.
Not before Bowser finally gets his own game, at long last. He's the last member of the "original" Mario cast who has yet to get his own title, after all.
l
He shouldn't exist.
By far the worst Nintendo character.
Toad hasn't had his own game.
Not to the point where it's worth arguing over, no. It's not like he's some deep character with qualities worth debating. You either like him or don't for superficial reasons because theres nothing to him, much like the other Mario characters. Hence all the tongue in cheek responses in this thread.
The only real knock I have against him is that his upside-down L is stupid, but that's just a logo on a hat, so whatever.
He may not have had his name in the title, but Toad was the de facto star of "Wario's Woods" (NES).
My idea
For example, create a game where you are Waluigi, you're in a castle with Daisy as your hostage and you're trying to stop Luigi from rescuing her. You can set traps, control baddies and generally slow Luigi down from rescuing her. Imagine using the UPad control goombas in batles, setting thwomps up, making a lava pit... but before Luigi plays through YOU have to to show that a level is beatable. You also only have a limited number of resources say and can send shy guys and others on missions (controlled by you) for more gold to buy more traps and create harder levels. Think of it like this: You start out with a hub, Daisy is tied, bound and gagged in one corner, in another is a shy guy, in another is a goomba (and a few others of course).
On the UPad is a map, you see Luigi's face and how far away he is. You can send shy guys to bother him or slow him down but you can ALSO send them to hunt for more gold to buy more enemies.
When you do this the map goes from the controller to TV. If you choose to harass Luigi you control shy guys and he's (for some reason) in a biplane, the goal is to shoot him down and he'll eject in a parachute with an L. If you fail he doesn't lose time and you lose gold. If you succeed he is slowed. Meanwhile, the Upad screen has the hub.
Second possibility, shy guys are going to steal gold. There is a village and you can enter homes, break things, and generally steal gold all while Fire Mario is shooting fire balls at you.
The Goombas are your troops, you can buy foot soldiers to essentially slow Luigi more, but also to place in the levels of your castle. The Castle itself is owned by you but there is also say a master of arms you have (I'm not sure who would be most suitable) who you go to for the level building mode. As I already said you must play any level you create for it to be playable. However long it takes YOU to get through is how long it takes Luigi.
I think you can kind of see where I'm going with that.
Honestly surprised that Waluigi never appeared in a Wario Ware game, despite so many of them existing.
But in the same vein, Waluigi was the main villain of Mario DDR, wasn't he?
People keep saying he's "developed a personality", but how? Have they ever had him do anything even remotely interesting beyond the crotch-chop?
Wario was borne out of a very specific frustration - namely, the handheld division resented the fact that the Mario games were successful but their own original concepts were struggling, and so this weird Mario parody bubbled up out of that (well, that and the Wrecking Crew thing). Waluigi doesn't even have any historical significance beyond "Wario needs a tennis partner". I'd rather they made a game about the chimp from Galaxy 2.
So I don't think Nintendo would want to elevate his character any more than necessary, if only out of fear that some dimwit writer will inadvertently add that he doesn't like shellfish.They're greedy and selfish. They'd con each other for a penny, despite being partners.
![]()
This is all we need.
Falco.
Then he'll get a game; Waluigi Uprising. Let's bring it on!Don't worry guys if Waluigi doesn't get a game, he will be a character in SSB4 as a character.
![]()
This is all we need.
So the people who are pro-Waluigi (shoot me for saying that) are also just kinda joshin' around?
Well consider me shrugged. Thread asks if he should get his own game, I say "Why not?".
Waluigi hate? Come on peeps, he's a cool guy. I'm all for more Mario characters as long as they keep up with them. I just miss my RPG crowd like Geno and Mallow. I don't think he should get his OWN game though when we have better characters that could have their own game (Bowser!)!.
I think I'll lose some sleep tonight.
![]()
This is all we need.
He's pretty much always been the wuss, or shy.Didn't that game make him into a massive wuss
Some places say he is, others leave it ambiguous, and some flat out say no. So who knows?Is Waluigi even Wario's brother.
Wario's Woods stars ToadToad hasn't had his own game.
That's not how you spell KrystalFalco.
I'd settle for Tingle, but it would be nice to have all 4 of those overalls wearing plumber guys.Don't worry guys if Waluigi doesn't get a game, he will be a character in SSB4 as a character.
Captain Syrup needs her own game.
Pirates>Plumbers who never do any plumbing
Waluigi sucks.