Twig said:
Then your attitude here makes even less sense than those who haven't.
Coming from someone who hasn't played the game? How does being more informed lessen my opinion?
Twig said:
There's absolutely no reason to include old enemies in this new game if they don't want to.
Oh, I see--so if the developer wants something a certain way, then they're objectively right and can't be disagreed with? By that measure, every game would be perfect. I have a right to want more from my games, and you have a right not to.
Twig said:
I'll agree on the animal buddies, because they were one of the few unique things about DKC, but there's no reason thus far to think that there won't be a similar mechanic in this game.
Sure there is, by virtue that nothing along those lines has been shown yet. This isn't concrete proof in any way, of course, but it does hint more strongly toward that than not.
Twig said:
Your incessant nostalgia-fueled desire to play the same game that came out years ago is what is "ruining" this for you. Nothing more, nothing less.
Pray tell where did I use the word "ruining," or anything even close to that? Please don't put words in my mouth--ones that are gross exaggerations, no less. In fact, I said quite the opposite when I stated that " I rather enjoyed the game. "Also, I like how a few posts is considered "incessant" :lol
Twig said:
I ain't assuming shit. Kremlings are symbolic of your entire argument, and my response extends to any other complaint you have. Except, as mentioned above, the animal buddies.
Your exact question suggests otherwise: "Because it doesn't have fucking Kremlings?"
That aside, I'm not sure why you're arguing with me on this. I feel like they could go a bit further than they did, you don't. We're not going to change each other's minds, so why bother trying?