Schrödinger's cat
Banned
So, if I tell people I'm "poised to win the lottery" then I can expect them to treat me like a millionaire immediately?
Sweet!
Sweet!
Would you count time played on PSVR? I'll let you count Kinect...I have a question to the hardcore Sony fans that love to infect every MS thread. Can any of you post hours/days played on a playstation 4 1st party game more than an xboxone 1st party game? I think that's a big advantage people overlook with xbox. Replayability. I've got 45 days played in Gears 4 and it's not even close to the 6000+ hours that tops my leaderboard. It seems the most played game online for hardcore Sony fans are xbox threads. Lol.
Any 1st party GAME. Not peripheral.Would you count time played on PSVR? I'll let you count Kinect...
I have a question to the hardcore Sony fans that love to infect every MS thread. Can any of you post hours/days played on a playstation 4 1st party game more than an xboxone 1st party game? I think that's a big advantage people overlook with xbox. Replayability. I've got 45 days played in Gears 4 and it's not even close to the 6000+ hours that tops my leaderboard. It seems the most played game online for hardcore Sony fans are xbox threads. Lol.
Attack the arguments, not the people making the arguments.I have a question to the hardcore Sony fans that love to infect every MS thread. Can any of you post hours/days played on a playstation 4 1st party game more than an xboxone 1st party game? I think that's a big advantage people overlook with xbox. Replayability. I've got 45 days played in Gears 4 and it's not even close to the 6000+ hours that tops my leaderboard. It seems the most played game online for hardcore Sony fans are xbox threads. Lol.
![]()
Plenty of 1st party games to play. Im just curious if anyone actually puts alot of time into these ps games this gen that seem to always dictate the arguments against xbox success.That happens when you have no other exclusive to play.
I am. I made my point clear. I made a joke as well, but look at my previous post for motive. I stated it in my original post as well. Replayability verses quantity.Attack the arguments, not the people making the arguments.
Plenty of 1st party games to play. Im just curious if anyone actually puts alot of time into these ps games this gen that seem to always dictate the arguments against xbox success.
I have a question to the hardcore Sony fans that love to infect every MS thread. Can any of you post hours/days played on a playstation 4 1st party game more than an xboxone 1st party game? I think that's a big advantage people overlook with xbox. Replayability. I've got 45 days played in Gears 4 and it's not even close to the 6000+ hours that tops my leaderboard. It seems the most played game online for hardcore Sony fans are xbox threads. Lol.
![]()
So many that it's worth 60$ for a ~10-15 hour one-off? I disagree. PS does have more 1st party games, but it's not an every month since launch plentiful and an extremely exaggerated claim, IMO. This is where replayability of games like Forza, Halo, Gears, SoT, ect come in. They are games that you get great value from long term play time. The same is just not true for Sony games, though they have a great line up of SP games, but are mostly one and done experiences.The good thing about PS exclusives is that there are so many that you don't need to spend a lot of your time on just one game while you wait for another to arrive.
That's why my discussion is centered around just that.Like it or not, this thread is about Xbox taking over Playstation next gen, which in fact Playstation related.
XBOX will never take Japan nor most of the EU.
It might keep pace with Sony in US, but thats still a dream. Unless of course Sony goes stupid and decides 599 PS5 or something.
MS will be out of the console space by mid next gen IMO. I see them going full gamepass/streaming and dropping their hardware.
I didn't feel like reading the whole thread considering how full of crap the first few posts were already (thank you sonyGAF), but this is the most ignorant shit I've read in a while. You sir, are the epitome of stupidity.
HAHAHAHA, I doubt it. Xbox is only strong in US and UK. The rest of the world is mainly Playstation and Nintendo.
So xbox fans shouldn't make their own points about the article and discussion? Only negative comments should be given? That's...an interesting take.The insecurity in this thread is amusing.
Xbox fans already have major publications shilling for their brand (which is what the OP is about). Who cares what a bunch of forum nerds say? You've already made it. Xbox doesn't need anyone to stand up for it.
So many that it's worth 60$ for a ~10-15 hour one-off? I disagree. PS does have more 1st party games, but it's not an every month since launch plentiful and an extremely exaggerated claim, IMO. This is where replayability of games like Forza, Halo, Gears, SoT, ect come in. They are games that you get great value from long term play time. The same is just not true for Sony games, though they have a great line up of SP games, but are mostly one and done experiences.
Microsoft has been in the gaming sphere for decades. But if you want to talk consoles, they have three generations and nearly 20 years under their belt. They aren't a "baby" by any stretch of the imagination.
To put it another way, they've been making home game consoles for as many (or more) years as Atari, SNK, NEC, and SEGA.
If the Xbox is "back", why the fuck are there still no exclusive games that are worth a shit?
Putting words into other people's mouths is an interesting take.So xbox fans shouldn't make their own points about the article and discussion? Only negative comments should be given? That's...an interesting take.
I disagree. I don't think Halo is the franchise that will save a console at this point. Same with Gears. I loved Halo 1-3 and ODST, but I grew tired of it. Im not saying I wouldn't be interested in a cool new Halo, but I don't think that title is going to suck new users in a significant way. If they think they can drop Master Chief into an open world and expect people to jump ship from playstation for it, I think they are mistaken. Just like I don't want Uncharted 5 at this point. I want big new tent-pole franchises.They need to make Halo great again in order to step up to Nintendo or Sony. I don't believe they know what Halo really is, or they wouldn't have done what they did.
Never said they couldn't. Just an observation. No need to get hostile. You said "xbox doesn't need anyone to stand up for it." So, what does that mean then?Putting words into other people's mouths is an interesting take.
Don't be a crybaby bitch when your favorite hunk of plastic receives criticism. Should the infectious "hardcore Sony fans" not make their own points about the article and discussion? You're violating your own point.
MLB is not a 1st party game. Those games have MP, sure, but are they really competing with the likes of Forza, Gears, and Halo MP? It's not really even close, IMO.Again, you're being dishonest.
MLB The Show, GT Sport, Uncharted 4, The Last of Us, Killzone Shadow Fall.
Last of Us Part II, Death Stranding are also expected to have multiplayer, along side another installment of MLB The Show.
It means Xbox doesn't need anyone to stand up for it. Journalists have already accepted that role, as is evidenced by the OP.Never said they couldn't. Just an observation. No need to get hostile. You said "xbox doesn't need anyone to stand up for it." So, what does that mean then?
MLB is not a 1st party game. Those games have MP, sure, but are they really competing with the likes of Forza, Gears, and Halo MP? It's not really even close, IMO.
That's strong hyperbole. Gaming journalists make plenty of PS articles discussing their success. Should posters not reply to those making negative comments in those threads either? Seems silly to me. Sounds like you are saying exactly what I interpreted above.It means Xbox doesn't need anyone to stand up for it. Journalists have already accepted that role, as is evidenced by the OP.
That's completely subjective and a strange argument. Fortnite is endlessly replayable and since it's free the value is unbeatable. It's still not something that interests me. I think the days of games needing a multiplayer component to sell are behind us. In the 360/PS3 era every game that came out had some weird tacked on MP component because thats what was popular at the time. Now, Im not so sure that's what most people are looking for.So many that it's worth 60$ for a ~10-15 hour one-off? I disagree. PS does have more 1st party games, but it's not an every month since launch plentiful and an extremely exaggerated claim, IMO. This is where replayability of games like Forza, Halo, Gears, SoT, ect come in. They are games that you get great value from long term play time. The same is just not true for Sony games, though they have a great line up of SP games, but are mostly one and done experiences.
That's not what I said, but if you have specific examples feel free to jump into those thread and tell hyperbolic posters to stop standing up for Sony's mistakes.That's strong hyperbole. Gaming journalists make plenty of PS articles discussing their success. Should posters not reply to those making negative comments in those threads either?
Power of the Cloud = clairvoyance.Seems silly to me. Sounds like you are saying exactly what I interpreted above.
if so, then my mistake. Could've sworn it was a 2k game.MLB The Show IS first party (developed by Sony Studio).
The Last of Us and Uncharted 4 are still active online, so is GT Sport. You can't find ways to discredit these games because they're not on your preferred platform. Fact is, they have multiplayer games which people like.
if so, then my mistake. Could've sworn it was a 2k game.
It's not that I am discrediting their MP just on the basis of platform, I asked if they provide as much replayability as MS top MP games. I don't believe they do and no one has provided anything to show against.
I agree that tacked on MP is not what most are looking for. Most of MS top IPs are centered around a great MP experience and are not just tacked on though. I would say PS takes the opposite approach. SP first with tacked on MP on most of their top IPs for this gen. This is where revenue comes in and absolutely matters. The more people play a game, the more revenue available past the usual $60 game cost. Halo, Gears, and Forza alone allow MS to make an incredible amount of revenue that keeps communities involved for the long term. Hell, Gears 4 is still having holiday events, new skins, and game modes 26 months past launch, as well as a healthy esport presence. I think this gets overlooked in the discussion with 1st player games.That's completely subjective and a strange argument. Fortnite is endlessly replayable and since it's free the value is unbeatable. It's still not something that interests me. I think the days of games needing a multiplayer component to sell are behind us. In the 360/PS3 era every game that came out had some weird tacked on MP component because thats what was popular at the time. Now, Im not so sure that's what most people are looking for.
And posted my numbers as well as references to top players on my friends list. I was not proven wrong as no one has posted a challenge to that statement. Replayability, longevity, and community engagement for added revenue is very important for developers long term success.That's not what you originally posted. You talk about Xbox having a huge advantage due to replayability and PS games being mostly a "one and done" experience.
This was in fact proven wrong.
And posted my numbers as well as references to top players on my friends list. I was not proven wrong as no one has posted a challenge to that statement. Replayability, longevity, and community engagement for added revenue is very important for developers long term success.
Man, those rays of light covering all the nudity will look amazing on the PS5! Best Puritan Rays ever!Sony 'we would like to announce that Bloodborne II will be coming exclusively to PS5'
Actually the Wii U lost last generation, Nintendo was last, Switch is a hybrid console as a result of that last. So...
Halo is Xbox's most important game. Without it, there is no Xbox, so all this "poised to dominate" talk without a competent version of the game that defines Xbox is nonsense.I disagree. I don't think Halo is the franchise that will save a console at this point. Same with Gears. I loved Halo 1-3 and ODST, but I grew tired of it. Im not saying I wouldn't be interested in a cool new Halo, but I don't think that title is going to suck new users in a significant way. If they think they can drop Master Chief into an open world and expect people to jump ship from playstation for it, I think they are mistaken. Just like I don't want Uncharted 5 at this point. I want big new tent-pole franchises.
I think the most interested I would be in a new Halo would be something similar to what Sony did with God of War.
I simply asked if anyone here could beat those numbers with a PS4 1st party game. More about curiosity, but I do believe there are alot more people playing xbox games than ps games in the long term, and spending money on these games. You can't deny that Sony has been a Sp game first with tacked on MP this generation. It works great for them. But let's not be facetious and deny that Sony does not compare to MS MP games that further extend their replayability. Uncharted/TLOU MP =/= Gears. Killzone MP =/= Halo. It's not even close. At the same time, MS SP offering =/= Sonys.No, you were. The problem is that PS4 doesn't track how long you played these games. As far as My Playstation life, well, it's not even working.
Your players are your references only and it not considered proof because each player is different. You're simply just adding irreverent factors to prove a point when you were discussing replayability. The games mentioned all have replay value and there's nothing you can say or do to minimize that.
It most likely won't be able to dominate Asia, let alone the entire generation
Putting words into other people's mouths is an interesting take.
Don't be a crybaby bitch when your favorite hunk of plastic receives criticism. .
I simply asked if anyone here could beat those numbers with a PS4 1st party game. More about curiosity, but I do believe there are alot more people playing xbox games than ps games in the long term, and spending money on these games. You can't deny that Sony has been a Sp game first with tacked on MP this generation. It works great for them. But let's not be facetious and deny that Sony does not compare to MS MP games that further extend their replayability. Uncharted/TLOU MP =/= Gears. Killzone MP =/= Halo. It's not even close. At the same time, MS SP offering =/= Sonys.
Sony would need to make twice as many fuck ups than they did in 2006 for Microsoft's next console to catch them, regardless of how powerful it is. But I just can't see it happening. Unless MS closes the gap via quality first party content.
My original statement was a jumping off point, but if you want to focus directly on the original challenge, show me someone in Uncharted, TLOU, or killzone on ps4 with high playing hours like that on MP.It's just more goalpost moving. First you wanted to see how many hours people spent on Sony's MP games, and now you want you want talk about revenue, further extending MP ect. Sony added content online to both Uncharted 4 and The Last of Us, which makes it irreverent. What matters is if it has replayability.
Uncharted series had multiplayer for awhile. Last of Us is far more competitive, harder than a lot of the casual shooters you see on the market today because it relies heavily on stealth. I know you're trying to downplay it, but it's not going to work. Last of Us is also considered a underrated multiplayer.