• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Engadget: Xbox is poised to dominate the next console generation

Status
Not open for further replies.
They might play differently but they're all similar experiences to me.

If you want to use Dreams and Detroit as examples of diversity, and think Sony is doing enough on that front, that's fine by me but I disagree. Those games are not moving the needle in any significant way for most people, myself included. I'd like to see Sony try their hand at a fantasy or sci-fi RPG, maybe an ARPG like an Untold Legends reboot, or maybe a new FPS that isn't Killzone. There's so much more they could do other than sticking to the samey formula for their games.
when you play racing games, if one arcade and other simulator, even these gives different experiences. somebody lives in "downplaying" apparently.
 
Last edited:
I was referring to how to support a fledged out MP experience, 343i included. What can Sony claim? GTS has been the only game supported past the launch window during this generation.

**edit
You keep changing your posts through edits that make it seem I'm ignoring your points. State your point sucsintly and I will rebute.


How about answering the question instead of dodging it like you're Mayweather?


Sure. I was speaking generally but for the games you mentioned, they're all samey third person, cinematic, action games that legit bore the pants off of me. Also look at their upcoming lineup that we know about - the Kojima game, zombie game and feudal Japan game. More samey third person, cinematic, action games. I'd really appreciate it if they'd branch out cover a wider variety of genres since their games haven't appealed to me in years.

An no. Dreams does not count. I'm talking stuff that appeals to the average joe. Because that's me.

Edit: How could I forget TLOU2? Another third person, cinematic, action game. That presentation they did at E3 was aggressively uninteresting.

If these games bore you, then why would you want Max Payne 3 enhanced on xbox?
 
Last edited:
There was a time when Netflix offered DVDs in the mail. Then, they offered a kinda mediocre streaming service to their same customers. A few years later, no DVDs and Netflix remains a powerhouse. There was also much pearl-clutching then about Netflix alienating its "current customers".

If Microsoft continues to de-emphasize hardware while pushing for streaming, cloud, play anywhere, play on anything, digital ownership, GaaS, etc., then they are moving in a direction where hardware isn't really necessary for their brand to thrive. Microsoft said it themselves: they see Amazon and Google as their main competition, not Sony. Does Google need a Google-branded box underneath your TV to use its services? Does Amazon?

This isn't proof that Microsoft will exit the hardware space, of course. However, I see them tailoring future hardware to best fit their streaming/digital plans:

- big hard drives with fast read/write speeds (an SSD coming standard would be impressive)
- top-grade network equipment, both wired and wireless, to ensure the fastest speeds possible
- large pool of undifferentiated RAM to buffer content

Actually didn't Netflix keep the DVD part of the business? I don't think they killed it.
 
If these games bore you, then why would you want Max Payne 3 enhanced on xbox?

Uh oh. You must be shook if you're digging through my post history looking for ammo. LOL

Anyway, Max Payne 3 is arguably one of the best third person shooters of all time obviously. The slow-mo and excessive violence make it stand out compared to other TPS.

Off topic but Rockstar did an excellent job supporting backwards compatibility this year. I'm very confident they will add Max Payne 3 next year, unless they have a remaster in the works a la LA Noire, which I would be 100% ok with for the record.
 
You're right. But they make customers pay more if they still want DVDs shipped to them. Streaming was a free add-on until it became their main business. DVD became the new add-on. :messenger_beaming:

If the video games industry went this way, I'd be okay with it. I'd pay an extra 10% upcharge. Just don't take away my ability to buy physical games.
 
Uh oh. You must be shook if you're digging through my post history looking for ammo. LOL

Anyway, Max Payne 3 is arguably one of the best third person shooters of all time obviously. The slow-mo and excessive violence make it stand out compared to other TPS.

Off topic but Rockstar did an excellent job supporting backwards compatibility this year. I'm very confident they will add Max Payne 3 next year, unless they have a remaster in the works a la LA Noire, which I would be 100% ok with for the record.

Those other games aren't on my console of choice so they suck but but but Max Payne 3 and RDR2 is good!!! LOL
 
What a load of horseshit.

I loved the 360 and it was my main system back then but today I just don't see MS competing with Sony. Halo and Gears were its two big franchises, both turned to absolute shit once Bungie and Epic left. I have no hope of those franchises becoming good again. MS's other franchises and exclusives are mostly irrelevant expect for racing where the Forza series is the best reality based racing franchise in gaming today.

This gen thankfully I went with the PS4 after MS's disastrous XBO reveal where they only talked about TV and a $500M deal with the NFL, not to mention all the DRM garbage and the forced Kinect that needed to be always connected. Sony convinced me that they were highly focused on games, Mark Cerny said he built the PS4 by talking directly with devs, asking them what features they needed to be able to create the best games possible. It's great when a console can have lots of other features on the side but the main reason I buy it is to game on it, so that's definitely the most important part. I had a feeling that the PS4 would be more powerful because of this and when they announced the price and that there would be no DRM, the choice was an easy choice to make and though it was tough leaving the 360 ecosystem behind where i had invested so much, I knew that with the change of architectures there would be no backward compatibility (yes MS did eventually come out with 360 BC but by then it was too late, I was fully invested in PS4).

This time around BC is almost a certainty for both next gen consoles and so I don't really see myself changing now, especially since Sony's first party games were so impressive this gen and there were so many of them. I believe that many PS4 owners think like me and plan to stick with Sony. Also PSVR shows tremendous potential and I think VR will become big in the years to come (mostly thanks to porn as with all things).
 
If the video games industry went this way, I'd be okay with it. I'd pay an extra 10% upcharge. Just don't take away my ability to buy physical games.


I like the digital thing and all but with these shitty policies of them being able to take your games away, I'd never want it to be the main way of gaming.

I have a huge digital library on the Ps4 and then more physical on xbox. Its quite cumbersome to be swapping discs on xbox cuz im so used to just opening the application and that's it.
 
Yup.

Since X has been winning every match up, pissing contests have now changed to sales. Since X launched, I have yet to see one thread where Sony fans bring up PS4 or Pro. It was such a big deal about 1080p vs 900p in 2013-2016, yet not so much anymore when X has the best visuals.

If Xbox was selling 10 million units, that would be a concern because many studios wouldn't bother. But even at 20 or 30 million, that's enough for all third party devs to make a game on any platform. And with that, an X version gets made and blows away all other consoles. X probably only has 3-4 million consoles out there and even then third party devs will make X updates.

So it goes to show high user bases aren't even important anymore since games can be easily ported and scaled on all consoles.

So until PS5 and X2 get launched and become the new pissing contestants, everyone knows X will rule.... and by the looks of it that will be for another 2 years if fall 2020 is the accurate date for next consoles.

I have seen this statement and sentiment quite a few times on the internet and the people saying it always fail to see the blatantly obvious. The PS4 doing 1080p, and XB1 not able to but a meager 900p or even 720p WAS a huge deal in terms of power discussion, because EVERYONE saved thier money from thier jobs last gen and all already bought expensive 1080p HDTVs.

Now that the 1X is pushing more pixels in a lot of games to a closer full 4K, you see most PlayStation fans don't care. Why is power no longer a debate or an issue? Well, simply put, most people don't want to spend $1000+ on a new TV set every console generation. Most people are still happy with their expensive 1080p top of the line HDTV they bought last gen, that the PS4 was able to take advantage of displaying in full 1080p where XB1 was not.

Remember when the PlayStation Pro was first revealed and a lot of fans were disappointed and upset? It was because people wanted a system that would boost performance and frames for thier current games and TV not add more pixels and force people to buy a new expensive TV yet again.

So when this new 1X is showing up in Digital Foundry videos boasting more pixels in a lot of games, so many PlayStation fans simply don't care because those pixels come at the cost of a new TV purchase. This is why power is no longer a debate topic, because for the 1X to win, people have to buy a new TV. The base PS4 won that debate with no additional purchase necessary.

So Xbox 1X is the most powerful console ever made, but NOT on your 1080p HDTV that was once top of the line and you worked hard to buy last generation. Nope, on a 1080p HDTV the 1X and the PS pro are still the same and are EQUAL. This is also why the 1X is not flying off store shelves, it requires the purchase of a new TV to actually be true. Had the 1X had a better CPU and been able to double performance on 1080p TVs locked at 60, it would have sold more.

A lot of people don't really care or need more than 1080p pixels, and instead would rather have more frames like 60 fps locked with no dips or even 120 fps. And a lot people just don't want to buy a new expensive TV with thier new console every generation.
 
So we went from "Sony's games are all too third person samey and they bore me" to Rockstar games are exceptional. THE EXCUSES NEVER ENDS!
 
PS4 dominates with all the MP focused games like COD, Fortnite, Blops, BF, all the Free 2 Play games.........They actually dominate with players online etc.....That's why MS wanted crossplay.......That's a fact....

Don't you usually need at least a couple of examples before you say "etc"?

As for exclusive games MP focused......or which have popular MP......PS4 has SFV, GTS which dominates anything MS has...And we have unique MP games like Uncharted 4, TLOU etc.......Sony even has it's own battle royale game in H1Z1. with millions of players as per several tweets......Gears and Halo were popular in MP in the 360 days, those days are gone.....They dont hold a candle to SFV or GTS this generation or even H1Z1....Even fate Grand Order with it's ASY-MP...

Soooo...PC? Per several tweets. Do you sweat from the brow when you turn on your Ps4? Just curious.

Look at third party MP focused games or those with a substantial MP game: like Siege, Monster Hunter, Fifa, Skyrim, GTA, Division, For Honor, Overwatch.....They all dominate on PS4, including Tekken 7 and Soul Calibur 6, DBZ, Injustice, Mortal, Guilty Gear etc....Killer Instinct is dead and people still play USF4 on PS4 regularly "an old last gen game".....The proof is there, you're just breaking small sticks in your ears and blindfolding yourself willingly....

I'm seriously asking this. You say the proof is there...but you can't bother to provide any of it?

Gran Turismo Sport dominates Forza? I'm convinced you're an Xbox fanboy trying to make Playstation fanboys look bad. I do enjoy reading your posts though. You have so much energy and it's hilarious to watch.
 
Last edited:
I don't think most Xbox fans would think they are going to dominate next gen and i think Microsoft would take 60/40 in Sony's favour. But it's certainly going to be more interesting what's going to be coming out on Xbox (not meaning it will be better than Ps5) Those who are Ps5 only people have nothing to worry about cause you'll probably get the same and those of us who''ll get both (me) will get the best of both world's. So there is no need for all this silly behavior now is there children :messenger_winking:
 
This is just feeble. Here are the facts:


Generation 8 = Wii U (11/12), Xbox One (11/13), PS4 (11/13), Switch (3/17)

Switch isn't an "8th gen console" just admit you have no idea what you're talking about. You clearly implied the Switch in your post and said "the successful last gen system" or similar and basically skipped over the Wii U, you fucked up own it.
 
Those two things are not mutually exclusive.

You're right, but lets be honest here. You can't claim Sony's 1st party games bore you to tears because they are 3rd person cinematic action games, yet say RDR2 and Max Payne 3 (of all games) are super awesome.
 
Xbox did change where they were at the start of the generation, and have done a lot to keep things from becoming worst case scenario. They are in a better spot.

However, some of the recent articles I'm seeing seem to be a little...Insane.
 
Do a 360 and walk away.

fd1.gif

The best part about that gif was it's origin was made by a fanboy to show a person who looks at the 360 would turn "around" and walk away from it, but it fell apart because a 360 would have you still facing the console.

Good times.
 
You're right, but lets be honest here. You can't claim Sony's 1st party games bore you to tears because they are 3rd person cinematic action games, yet say RDR2 and Max Payne 3 (of all games) are super awesome.

Well I didn't say the original comment Demigod was replying to, and I don't think Sony's first party is boring necessarily...though I will say they are of the same genre, which I could see why somebody would view as a repetitive thing, especially if these games are released in sequence. It's kinda like the whole idea that Dayz Gone and LOU2 shouldn't release in the same year, because they are too similar. That's just facts, no opinion needed.
 
Last edited:
The best part about that gif was it's origin was made by a fanboy to show a person who looks at the 360 would turn "around" and walk away from it, but it fell apart because a 360 would have you still facing the console.

Good times.

It is MJ, it is meant to 360 and "moon"walk away. Otherwise it would have been a 180, and that just kills the entire premise.
 
Well I didn't say the original comment Demigod was replying to, and I don't think Sony's first party is boring necessarily...though I will say they are of the same genre, which I could see why somebody would view as a repetitive thing, especially if these games are released in sequence. It's kinda like the whole idea that Dayz Gone and LOU2 shouldn't release in the same year, because they are too similar. That's just facts, no opinion needed.

Days Gone and TLOU2 releasing the same year is one of the DUMBEST things Sony has or will do this generation. If they are both good games, neither one will get the full praise that it would deserve because all people will do is compare the two. Just weird that Sony didn't spread them out more.

But I also feel like had Insomniac made Spiderman multi-console, nobody would think it's "samey" as God of War and Ghost of Tsushima
 
Ah here is the propaganda from the usual suspects.

Messaging. Control the conversation.

Like 2013 again.
 
Last edited:
In response to the thread, if next gen the Xbox will "dominate", and that being the word they used, I don't see how. For Xbox to "dominate", they would have to steal marketshare from PS5 to where people only bought and owned Xbox's and completely ignored the PS5. That would be domination and true to the word's meaning.

I don't think that is possible, and at best Xbox can hope for next gen, is console marketshare parity. So more people will buy both a PS5 and Xbox, unike this gen. If that happens Xbox will be success next gen.

But to suggest next gen people who bought a PS4 will suddenly abandon the PS5? This notion is simply and completely preposterous.
Sony simply needs to add full backwards compatibility of the PS4 to the PS5 with improved PS4 game performance, and show off God of War running at a locked 60 fps, Bloodborne running at 60 fps, Horizon Zero Dawn, Uncharted, all running at 60 fps, as well as PS4 remasters like God of War 3 and Shadow of the Colossus running at a whopping 120 fps and IT's OVER. OVER. Couple that with showing/announcing Horizon Zero Dawn 2, Bloodborne 2, God of War 2 and its a wrap, all 100 million PS4 owners will be back to buy PS5s. All of them. PS5 will also surpass 100 million.

Xbox can't dominate when every PS4 owner buys a PS5. They can only hope to win back the past 360 owners who bought a PS4 and never also bought an XB1.

Xbox offering handicap accessibility controllers, providing more powerful hardware so multiplats have more pixels on new tv purchases, and Game pass rental services, as well as new IPs that have great user reviews as well as great critic reviews, as awesome as these things all are, won't make PS4 fans abandon thier library, catalogs, ecosystems and beloved franchises. It's just not happening. At most, Xbox will also get bought and have marketshare parity. No domination is happening from Xbox.
 
Switch isn't an "8th gen console" just admit you have no idea what you're talking about. You clearly implied the Switch in your post and said "the successful last gen system" or similar and basically skipped over the Wii U, you fucked up own it.

I'm the only one who's provided facts, figures and reasoning for my position. How about YOU present a case for your argument, because all I'm hearing from you is "you have no idea what you're talking about", and no explanation as to how you arrived at that conclusion.

Please, and this goes out to anyone wanting to dispute me on this, justify what precisely generational demarcations are, and how they are used comparatively, because I think you'll find more support for my position than the alternative. I doubt for example, you'll find any financial analysts who put Switch in its own 9th gen category when tallying annual performance rankings because (gasp!) nobody knows exactly when that period is going to begin and as such its competing for marketshare with the other 8th gen systems!

If you can't be bothered to even try to debate, you can go piss up a rope. The only one needing to "own up" is you, because you clearly haven't thought this through, which is why no matter what you come back with, I'm still going to crush your argument.
 
Last edited:
I'm the only one who's provided facts, figures and reasoning for my position. How about YOU present a case for your argument, because all I'm hearing from you is "you have no idea what you're talking about", and no explanation as to how you arrived at that conclusion.

Please, and this goes out to anyone wanting to dispute me on this, justify what precisely generational demarcations are, and how they are used comparatively, because I think you'll find more support for my position than the alternative. I doubt for example, you'll find any financial analysts who put Switch in its own 9th gen category when tallying annual performance rankings because (gasp!) nobody knows exactly when that period is going to begin and as such its competing for marketshare with the other 8th gen systems!

If you can't be bothered to even try to debate, you can go piss up a rope. The only one needing to "own up" is you, because you clearly haven't thought this through, which is why no matter what you come back with, I'm still going to crush your argument.
If we're going to lump any consoles together, why not Wii/Wii-U and DS/3DS?

- The latter plays all the games of the former
- In the case of the Wii-U, it even uses the former's controllers
- They share the same form-factor and branding

Switch, on the other hand...

- Completely different name
- Completely different brand
- Completely different architecture
- Completely different form-factor
- No BC

You are arbitrarily lumping the Switch in with the platforms that came 5/6 years prior (Wii-U/3DS). This is why I asked if you also considered the Dreamcast a contemporary of the PS1 and N64, seeing how it lacked high-capacity discs and launched 2 years prior to the other 6th-gen platforms.

The DS is considered a different generation from the GBA yet it launched only three years later.

GBA + Gamecube = 6th gen
DS + Wii = 7th gen
3DS + Wii-U = 8th gen
Oh, but Switch is 8th gen too because reasons.
 
I think it's a good thing if Microsoft is Number one Next Generation because it will Force sony to not get complacent and continue to Fight for our money losing last generation lead to play station plus witch in turn lead to Microsoft answering with games with Gold free Games for all and we the consumer win this is a trend that will likely continue with backwards compatibility and a PlayStation now mirroring gamespass next to around.
 
I think it's a good thing if Microsoft is Number one Next Generation because it will Force sony to not get complacent and continue to Fight for our money losing last generation lead to play station plus witch in turn lead to Microsoft answering with games with Gold free Games for all and we the consumer win this is a trend that will likely continue with backwards compatibility and a PlayStation now mirroring gamespass next to around.
Why would it be good if Microsoft is arbitrarily #1, and why would that guarantee Sony is better?

Sony is the only console company in the history of the game industry to have two top consoles in a row. I'd include the SNES but it was a pretty significant decline in marketshare compared to the NES.

Are they arrogant and have they been arrogant in the past? Oh yes. Do they know how to put out a mass-market console? Clearly. They also put out the most successful non-Nintendo handheld by a margin of 10s of millions. Sony doesn't need Microsoft in order to put out a good platform.
 
I think it's a good thing if Microsoft is Number one Next Generation because it will Force sony to not get complacent and continue to Fight for our money losing last generation lead to play station plus witch in turn lead to Microsoft answering with games with Gold free Games for all and we the consumer win this is a trend that will likely continue with backwards compatibility and a PlayStation now mirroring gamespass next to around.

I disagree.

Sony did everything right with PS4 100% and I think they deserve to be rewarded for that effort with PS5 doing even better.

Xbox unfortunately messed up so bad that I think they set themselves two generations back, to where next gen they have to prove themselves all over again just to earn marketshare parity, and if they do it well enough, than maybe, maybe, next, next gen when the PS6 is up, they can maybe pass up the PS6 to be #1.

But PS4 was so good PS5 deserves to be #1 again.
 
Last edited:
I disagree.

Sony did everything right with PS4 100% and I think they deserve to be rewarded for that effort with PS5 doing even better.

Xbox unfortunately messed up so bad that I think they set themselves two generations back, to where next gen they have to prove themselves all over again just to earn marketshare parity, and if they do it well enough, than maybe, maybe, next, next gen when the PS6 is up, they can maybe pass up the PS6 to be #1.

But PS4 was so good PS5 deserves to be #1 again.
No one Deserves to be #1 just yet that line of thinking is what shot Xbox one in the head before it was even released
 
But to suggest next gen people who bought a PS4 will suddenly abandon the PS5?

It already happened before - people abandoned X360 despite having unarguably better controller, better online, cross-game voice chat, no game installs etc., simply for PS4's lower price. Because despite what all the kids here talk about exclusives, the whole majority of gamers don't give a flying f*** about those stupid console wars, they just want to play FIFA, CoD, Assassin, GTA, etc. for as low as possible, and the exclusives are just a nice addition to the system they already have. So whoever will offer the cheapest console will dominate again, no matter how this generation turned out.
 
Microsoft started this generation out with the assumption theyd roll sony in north America, had the benefit of the doubt from almost all third parties, had Marketing deals with:
-Call of Duty,
-Fifa,
-Battlefield 4,
- Fallout 4,
-The witcher 3
-Dark Souls 3
- The first look at next metal gear solid 5, which they lied and said it was exclusive
-and had Titanfall and Rise of the tomb raider as full blown exclusives.
-And first party exclusives like Halo 5, Quantam Break, Ryse, Killer Instinct, Spark, and Forza.

All of this was in the first 2 years of this generation. And they still shit the bed.

This time their dealing with a Sony that has a:
- 2:1 lead world wide
-doubled up on exclusives,
-Japense developers seeing 90:10 sales splits and
-western third parties seeing 60 to 70 splits,
-and unlike the ps3-ps4 transition, a much healthier sony financially than they were before.

As for cloud streaming, Sony bought onlive patents and Gaikia for streaming back in 2015. The idea sony isn't preparing for streaming is ridiculous.

Of course Microsft will do better next gen, they couldn't do worse. Time will though.
 
Shocking how many people view console wars as a zero sum game...in the real word and boardrooms...all that matters is are you making profit and is the juice worth the squeeze. That's all MS and SONY shareholders care about. If Sony sells a BILLION f'ng consoles next gen and MS sells 50 million, stockholders, CEO of MS and the board will look at MS return on investment and not some dick measuring contest.

Good luck to all forms of gaming...it's not a zero sum game.
 
P.S. Neither MS or Sony is gonna look at the other and be like shit...well...we made a bot load of money, good return on our financial investment BUT the other guy doubled or tripled us up in total sales so we need to get out.
 
Shocking how many people view console wars as a zero sum game...in the real word and boardrooms...all that matters is are you making profit and is the juice worth the squeeze. That's all MS and SONY shareholders care about. If Sony sells a BILLION f'ng consoles next gen and MS sells 50 million, stockholders, CEO of MS and the board will look at MS return on investment and not some dick measuring contest.

Good luck to all forms of gaming...it's not a zero sum game.

Thankfully you were not on a conference call with EA!
 
Last edited:
I disagree.

Sony did everything right with PS4 100% and I think they deserve to be rewarded for that effort with PS5 doing even better.

Xbox unfortunately messed up so bad that I think they set themselves two generations back, to where next gen they have to prove themselves all over again just to earn marketshare parity, and if they do it well enough, than maybe, maybe, next, next gen when the PS6 is up, they can maybe pass up the PS6 to be #1.

But PS4 was so good PS5 deserves to be #1 again.

Everything right is a stretch. Compared to Microsoft for sure, but Sony isn't somehow squeaky clean this gen just because microsoft committed suicide in 2013.
 
I have seen this statement and sentiment quite a few times on the internet and the people saying it always fail to see the blatantly obvious. The PS4 doing 1080p, and XB1 not able to but a meager 900p or even 720p WAS a huge deal in terms of power discussion, because EVERYONE saved thier money from thier jobs last gen and all already bought expensive 1080p HDTVs.

Now that the 1X is pushing more pixels in a lot of games to a closer full 4K, you see most PlayStation fans don't care. Why is power no longer a debate or an issue? Well, simply put, most people don't want to spend $1000+ on a new TV set every console generation. Most people are still happy with their expensive 1080p top of the line HDTV they bought last gen, that the PS4 was able to take advantage of displaying in full 1080p where XB1 was not.

Remember when the PlayStation Pro was first revealed and a lot of fans were disappointed and upset? It was because people wanted a system that would boost performance and frames for thier current games and TV not add more pixels and force people to buy a new expensive TV yet again.

So when this new 1X is showing up in Digital Foundry videos boasting more pixels in a lot of games, so many PlayStation fans simply don't care because those pixels come at the cost of a new TV purchase. This is why power is no longer a debate topic, because for the 1X to win, people have to buy a new TV. The base PS4 won that debate with no additional purchase necessary.

So Xbox 1X is the most powerful console ever made, but NOT on your 1080p HDTV that was once top of the line and you worked hard to buy last generation. Nope, on a 1080p HDTV the 1X and the PS pro are still the same and are EQUAL. This is also why the 1X is not flying off store shelves, it requires the purchase of a new TV to actually be true. Had the 1X had a better CPU and been able to double performance on 1080p TVs locked at 60, it would have sold more.

A lot of people don't really care or need more than 1080p pixels, and instead would rather have more frames like 60 fps locked with no dips or even 120 fps. And a lot people just don't want to buy a new expensive TV with thier new console every generation.

That's plain wrong.
 
I own all the consoles. I'll always own all the consoles. I love my Xbox One X. That said, this is juvenile. Results are going to be needed before we get ahead of ourselves. The justifications for this prediction are beyond weak. This is a wait-and-see situation, period.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom