mr_bishiuk said:eh? As far as I can see its Sony releasing the unfinished games, if Wipeout HD had been a fully fleshed out product, on store shelves and therefore backable on TV it could have made a difference for example. I also dont see anyone crying a river for Microsoft! Really you should read the thread before making accusations, in that point as a part of a wider discussion that was saying that it might be better for Sony to get games out simultaneously at key times nothing more. IF MS can do it why not Sony?
DCharlie said:travis bickle AND jrzez?
oh it is time to give up and we should just surrender right now!
Hellraizer said:Reminds me: People always bitched about the Xbox (360) being too shooter/fps orientated. How thing suddenly change![]()
You remember Burnout 3 and Burnout Revenge, not the last generation as a whole. Those games were anomalies. It was VERY uncommon for XBOX and PS2 multiplatform games to appear as close as those two games did.
The average difference between an XBOX multiplatform releases and the PS2/GC versions of the same game was HUGE. Much larger than any of the differences we see today. What has made comparisons so "popular" between the 360 and PS3 is simply the fact that the games are so damn close. The differences between them are not easy to pick out at first glance (in most cases) and require a new found level of scrutiny to determine. Multiplatform releases have never been as good as they are this generation.
Just think back to previous console cycles...
When talking SNES versus Megadrive, for instance, each machine had their own unique characteristics. The SNES could display 256 simultaneous colors while the Megadrive was limited to 64 colors. This alone made a huge difference in how the visuals appeared on screen. Then you have to consider the difference in sound quality. Of course, the Megadrive had a bit of an advantage with its faster CPU. Comparisons made today would have made no sense in the context of these machines as the differences between multiplatform releases could be spotted immediately.
The same exists when talking about PSX, Saturn, and N64 comparisons. The differences between multiplatform games were generally pretty significant to the point where, again, you could tell which was which from a simple glance. People praised RE2 on the N64 (which was impressive for its day), yet in reality, it would be considered a garbage port by todays standards. The capabilities of the machines were so drastically different that you could never offer the same experience across all three machines. The absolute WORST 360 to PS3 ports are still light years beyond even the best attempts during this generation. You would always end up sacrificing something significant due to the radically different hardware.
Last gen was as I said above. Each machine had a very different architecture. The PS2 simply wasn't capable of the techniques common in XBOX titles (shaders, for instance). Even games designed initially for the PS2 had a tendency to fare much better on the XBOX. In the rare instances where games were ported from the XBOX to the PS2 things were even worse. Splinter Cell anyone? How about Wreckless?! Ouch.
Things have never been better for multiplatform releases. Your sparks example suggests that you have forgotten just how far we've really come. Very few multiplatform games were as close as those released by Criterion and, even then, they were still limiting themselves by focusing on the PS2. It's just that the game LOOKED good enough that it didn't matter. Had they designed the game with the XBOX in mind I doubt a PS2 release could have compared.
The difference in textures, framerate, and image quality of modern multiplatform games wouldn't even REGISTER by previous generation standards.
Side note: Would people stop bringing up f*cking Killzone 2?! At the very least, those hyping it are driving more people that DISLIKE the game. It will likely be a decent game in the end, but all of this hype will drive people to slam the game at every turn. Just look at Uncharted. If you were to go by the forums, you'd swear that game was one of the worst games released this generation. There is this HUGE backlash against games that receive hype.
I've had one or two arguements with a few of the big 360 fans, don't put me into the same (x)boat as that nutcase.
I've had one or two arguements with a few of the big 360 fans, don't put me into the same (x)boat as that nutcase.
WrikaWrek said:Not only is that reason old and at large bs, you could've called MS already and ask for a replacement. Why didn't you?
Ha ha, OK, simple.DCharlie said:sorry too long
please compress
and tongues please remove!!!
You're really rooting for the 360.
The main point was simply that things have never been better for multiplatform releases. Differences between mulitplatform games were MUCH greater during all previous generations than they are now. Even the worst 360 to PS3 ports stand above the majority of multiplatform releases you would have seen at any other time in the past.
DCharlie said:is this a javascirpt, or is this the point you announce your distain?
Yes they are. I've never suggested otherwise.DCharlie said:but you have to admit - the x360 3rd party efforts ARE better.... right?![]()
DCharlie said:seriously, i've seen low baseball games that could limbo dance under your IQ. It's not my fault you are a complete fucking idiot.
DCharlie said:dude , it's fucking travis fucking bickle!
my mom has shat out more convincingly commited sfans than that!
You can always rrod the console yourself. Personally I wouldn't allow Microsoft to play me like that and just let the console die. Don't suck it up, or MS will never learn.Quixzlizx said:You can feel free to call me out when I start attacking people for trying to limit usage on dying hardware. :lol
Unless Microsoft changed their warranty policy again, the 3-year extension only applied to RROD errors, not disc drive errors. Feel free to correct me if I have outdated information.
P.S. You're really rooting for the 360.
GreekWolf said:When you factor in the difference in AA and normal mapping between the two, grandmaster had a good comparison
What the fuck? you're the person repeating ad naseum that due to 3rd parties having hardly-noticable improvements on the 360 over PS3 that theoretically the 360 can put out games that look like Uncharted and Killzone2. That's a true idiotic statement.
You're an embarrasment if you think commitment to a games company is a positive trait.
Yes they are. I've never suggested otherwise.
DCharlie said:and you are doing what exactly?
I noticed that too but I didn't mention it to save the peace in this thread etc..Quixzlizx said:You're really rooting for the 360.
why are you guys continue to argue with that douchebag...i mean DCharlie.
Just to put some fun back in this thread
dark10x said:Just to put some fun back in this thread, let's take a look at some previous gen multiplatform examples. Everyone can contribute as there are just so many possibilities...
Let's start with an XBOX to PS2 port (just to remind people of what it was like last gen)...
![]()
![]()
What else can I dig up? Hmmm...
What else can I dig up? Hmmm...
The difference is, the PS2 was the basis for most of the multiplatform games (such as those UbiSoft titles). In fact, the PS2 versions were generally released FIRST and I specifically remember being pissed off by that fact. With BG&E, I actually picked up the PS2 version first as I was so excited for the game but the framerate was so lousy that I found a way to return it for the excellent XBOX version. The differences between these ports were much greater than the stuff we commonly see today.There were some good exapmles of multiplatforms stuff last gen - Beyond Good & Evil, POP : Sands of Time for instance, those had much the same kind of differences as current gen.
Damn, it is REALLLLY hard to dig up decent media for last gen games. I mean, really, most of the shots posted are nasty composite captures with all of the color sucked out of them. Once you get into the generations prior to that it's virtually impossible to find ANY media.
Yeah, they are tough to find and most of them don't even contain worthwhile media. Very annoying.gollumsluvslave said:Indeed - I remember quite a few articles comparing GC, Xbox and PS2 games, but can't find any of them.
Yeah, they are tough to find and most of them don't even contain worthwhile media.
Those are some of the best examples of multiplatform releases last gen and the
XBOX versions were pretty much vastly superior in every case.
Monochrome vs Colour? Now there's a real difference!
as an unashamed C64 MEGAWHORE (who also owned a zx specy at the time) i find comparisons like this incredible.
i remember speccy friends trying to claim the speccy version of Way Of the exploding fist was better.... oops?
gollumsluvslave said:Not even close!
C64
![]()
Speccy
![]()
:lol :lol
Yup, only Amiga vs Atari ST comes close to C64 vs Speccy IMO in terms of bitter rivalry!
And the differences in that case were again way more apparent than now. Amiga generally looking better which pains me as I was an ST owner! :lol )
I know that this will annoy some people, but:-
PS3 and 360 are to all practical intents and purposes very capable machines that can do various things better than the other, but the net result is a wash.
zoukka said:World peace happened you say?
Err, what?DCharlie said:<oldsilenthillguysorsomething.gif>
:/
The thread had finally died down, was this necessary?dak1dsk1 said:Man... I pity the kids that get ps3s under the x-mas tree this year... ps3 is the new sega saturn... expensive and subpar.
DCharlie said:seriously, i've seen low baseball games that could limbo dance under your IQ. It's not my fault you are a complete fucking idiot.
Quixzlizx said:You're really rooting for the 360.
Dunlop said:The thread had finally died down, was this necessary?
+ Saturn VF2 was the greatest game of it's time
DCharlie said:travis bickle AND jrzez?
oh it is time to give up and we should just surrender right now!
lowrider007 said:+ Saturn Sega Rally, A M A Z I N G at the time, it was like having the arcade machine in your house.
soco said:man this thread feels like a group of monkeys escaped from the zoo, raided a mall, and began throwing feces at all the passersby.
it's awesome.
It was a good game, but it was nothing like having an arcade machine in your house.lowrider007 said:+ Saturn Sega Rally, A M A Z I N G at the time, it was like having the arcade machine in your house.
dark10x said:Side note: Would people stop bringing up f*cking Killzone 2?! At the very least, those hyping it are driving more people that DISLIKE the game. It will likely be a decent game in the end, but all of this hype will drive people to slam the game at every turn. Just look at Uncharted. If you were to go by the forums, you'd swear that game was one of the worst games released this generation. There is this HUGE backlash against games that receive hype.
Better have that list up & ready.
What the fuck? you're the person repeating ad naseum that due to 3rd parties having hardly-noticable improvements on the 360 over PS3 that theoretically the 360 can put out games that look like Uncharted and Killzone2. That's a true idiotic statement.
travis bickle AND jrzez?
oh it is time to give up and we should just surrender right now!
Reminds me of an old EGM article, when Sega first unveiled their Virtua Fighter 2 cabinet at the winter CES.dark10x said:It was a good game, but it was nothing like having an arcade machine in your house.It made you realize just how much more powerful the Sega Model 2 hardware really was.
I love it. The ultimate fanboy argument...J-Rzez said:And then expressed with FACT that KZ2 is superior visually to the MP titles claiming show off 360 superiority, and you present me with wild theories that because of these MP titles being better on 360 that KZ2 would be better on 360 lol.